SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, toldThe Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington toldThe Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independentreported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardianreported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, toldThe Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington toldThe Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independentreported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardianreported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."
The latest data released by the European Union's Copernicus Atmosphere Monitoring Service shows Arctic wildfires this year have emitted 35% more carbon dioxide than they did in all of 2019.
"What we have been seeing in the Arctic this summer is a significant number of wildfires in the Siberian Arctic that have been burning since about the second week of June with high intensity and producing large amounts of smoke pollution covering much of the region," Mark Parrington, senior scientist at Copernicus, toldThe Independent in early August.
\u201cEarly August #ArcticFires continuing at similar daily total intensity to 2019 in #CopernicusAtmosphere Monitoring Service GFAS data https://t.co/eb31VObkdM. Latest CO forecast https://t.co/mK95ak81qV shows high values over #Siberia & residual smoke over NE Canada & N Atlantic\u201d— Mark Parrington (@Mark Parrington) 1596708889
"In some respects [the data] has been similar to 2019 in terms of the dry and warm conditions in the Siberian Arctic," Parrington toldThe Guardian Monday. "This year, the difference was a large cluster of fires that burned through July for many days leading to higher estimated emissions."
Data shows 245 metric tons of CO2 have been released from Arctic wildfires this year, more than the annual CO2 output of Sweden, Norway, and Finland combined, The Independentreported.
\u201cArctic tipping point now fueling even more warming \n1. vanishing ice and open ocean absorb more co2 \n2. June and July, Arctic fires burning through rich carbon peat land released 204 megatons of c02, more carbon in 2 months than Scandinavia will all year https://t.co/dAaPn1RENL\u201d— GO GREEN (@GO GREEN) 1596627878
According to an analysis by Dr. Thomas Smith, assistant professor of environmental geography at the London School of Economics, approximately half of fires in the Arctic Circle were burning on "peat soils," which contain carbon that has accumulated over thousands of years, The Guardianreported.
\u201cGood discussion of what peat fires might mean in the Arctic:\nhttps://t.co/X9HXhpNR79 via @vice\u201d— Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f (@Dr Thomas Smith \ud83d\udd25\ud83c\udf0f) 1564422230
"Peat fires burn 'old' carbon," Smith told VICE in July, meaning that the carbon has taken thousands of years to accumulate. "So in a few weeks, a fire can burn through hundreds of years worth of carbon sequestration."