SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Attorney General William Barr drew stinging rebuke from legal experts and civil liberties advocates including the ACLU Wednesday after he told federal prosecutors to more aggressively charge some protesters with crimes--including sedition, under certain circumstances.
The Wall Street Journalreports Barr's directive came during a conference call last week in which the attorney general warned that protests--which have been overwhelmingly peaceful and focused on racial justice--could increase as Election Day approaches.
\u201cAttorney General William Barr told federal prosecutors to be aggressive in charging violent demonstrators, including potentially prosecuting them for plotting to overthrow the government, say people familiar with the talks https://t.co/hu4TzCOMqt\u201d— The Wall Street Journal (@The Wall Street Journal) 1600277050
Two people familiar with the call told the Journal that Barr urged prosecutors to seek federal charges wherever possible--including a rarely-used sedition law meant to punish people who conspire to overthrow the U.S. government.
However, legal experts noted that in order to successfully charge someone with sedition, prosecutors must prove that they were part of a conspiracy to overthrow the government or attack government officials, or that they posed an imminent threat to the nation.
\u201cSedition charges require proof of efforts to overthrow the United States Government. Talking in these terms based on what\u2019s happening is grotesquely irresponsible. It\u2019s way beyond monarchical. It\u2019s paranoid and dictatorial. Opus Dei, anyone?\n\nhttps://t.co/Gh23Dp2yU5\u201d— Laurence Tribe (@Laurence Tribe) 1600290099
"Treating protest as a form of sedition won't stand up in court, but that is clearly not the point here," Somil Trivedi, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project, said in an email to Common Dreams. "This is a tyrannical and un-American attempt to suppress demands for racial justice and an end to police violence. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration's authoritarian impulses."
\u201cTreating protest as a form of sedition won't hold up in court, but that is clearly not the point here. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration\u2019s authoritarian impulses.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1600288493
Some observers warned that aggressively prosecuting protesters could have a chilling effect on constitutionally-protected free speech, assembly, and expression.
\u201c1 Violent crime should be addressed appropriately, altho most often, it is a matter for state, not fed'll, prosecution. The risk here is Barr's directive will have a chilling effect on peaceful protest & free speech especially given the unusual suggestion to use the Sedition Act.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1600278829
Others wondered whether sedition charges would apply to violent right-wing protesters who support Trump.
\u201cAttorney General Bill Barr has reportedly been urging federal prosecutors to charge 'violent' protesters with aggressive sedition charges. \n\nDoes this apply to the armed Boogaloo Boys, too?? \ud83e\udd14\nhttps://t.co/HjX1MwAH5H\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1600291800
Both Barr and President Donald Trump have (often falsely) blamed left-wing and anarchist protesters, including members of the Black Lives Matter movement and people who loosely identify under the Antifa umbrella, for most of the violence during the ongoing protests that began earlier this year after police and white supremacist killings of Black and Latinx people including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery.
However, a study by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), which analyzed more than 7,750 Black Lives Matter demonstrations in all 50 states and Washington D.C. that occurred between May 26 and August 22, found that fully 93% of the protests were peaceful.
Nevertheless, the president has called the Black Lives Matter movement--the latest iteration of the centuries-old Black struggle for equality and justice--"a symbol of hate."
\u201c....horrible BLM chant, \u201cPigs In A Blanket, Fry \u2018Em Like Bacon\u201d. Maybe our GREAT Police, who have been neutralized and scorned by a mayor who hates & disrespects them, won\u2019t let this symbol of hate be affixed to New York\u2019s greatest street. Spend this money fighting crime instead!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1593611328
Trump has made "law and order"--replete with thinly-veiled racist appeals to white voters--a pillar of his re-election bid. He has habitually downplayed right-wing violence, even as his own Department of Homeland Security warned earlier this month that white supremacist pose the greatest domestic terrorist threat, and even as white supremacists keep attacking and killing people.
In 2017 the president infamously called neo-Nazis and other white nationalists who attended the Charlottesville, Virginia protest where anti-racist protester Heather Heyer was murdered "very fine people."
Despite the growing white supremacist threat, Trump revoked funding for the federal program tasked with countering violent extremism, while focusing his ire on the overwhelmingly peaceful Black Lives Matter movement. The president and some of his prominent supporters have repeatedly conflated the movement for Black lives with what the FBI for a while called "Black identity extremists."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Attorney General William Barr drew stinging rebuke from legal experts and civil liberties advocates including the ACLU Wednesday after he told federal prosecutors to more aggressively charge some protesters with crimes--including sedition, under certain circumstances.
The Wall Street Journalreports Barr's directive came during a conference call last week in which the attorney general warned that protests--which have been overwhelmingly peaceful and focused on racial justice--could increase as Election Day approaches.
\u201cAttorney General William Barr told federal prosecutors to be aggressive in charging violent demonstrators, including potentially prosecuting them for plotting to overthrow the government, say people familiar with the talks https://t.co/hu4TzCOMqt\u201d— The Wall Street Journal (@The Wall Street Journal) 1600277050
Two people familiar with the call told the Journal that Barr urged prosecutors to seek federal charges wherever possible--including a rarely-used sedition law meant to punish people who conspire to overthrow the U.S. government.
However, legal experts noted that in order to successfully charge someone with sedition, prosecutors must prove that they were part of a conspiracy to overthrow the government or attack government officials, or that they posed an imminent threat to the nation.
\u201cSedition charges require proof of efforts to overthrow the United States Government. Talking in these terms based on what\u2019s happening is grotesquely irresponsible. It\u2019s way beyond monarchical. It\u2019s paranoid and dictatorial. Opus Dei, anyone?\n\nhttps://t.co/Gh23Dp2yU5\u201d— Laurence Tribe (@Laurence Tribe) 1600290099
"Treating protest as a form of sedition won't stand up in court, but that is clearly not the point here," Somil Trivedi, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project, said in an email to Common Dreams. "This is a tyrannical and un-American attempt to suppress demands for racial justice and an end to police violence. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration's authoritarian impulses."
\u201cTreating protest as a form of sedition won't hold up in court, but that is clearly not the point here. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration\u2019s authoritarian impulses.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1600288493
Some observers warned that aggressively prosecuting protesters could have a chilling effect on constitutionally-protected free speech, assembly, and expression.
\u201c1 Violent crime should be addressed appropriately, altho most often, it is a matter for state, not fed'll, prosecution. The risk here is Barr's directive will have a chilling effect on peaceful protest & free speech especially given the unusual suggestion to use the Sedition Act.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1600278829
Others wondered whether sedition charges would apply to violent right-wing protesters who support Trump.
\u201cAttorney General Bill Barr has reportedly been urging federal prosecutors to charge 'violent' protesters with aggressive sedition charges. \n\nDoes this apply to the armed Boogaloo Boys, too?? \ud83e\udd14\nhttps://t.co/HjX1MwAH5H\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1600291800
Both Barr and President Donald Trump have (often falsely) blamed left-wing and anarchist protesters, including members of the Black Lives Matter movement and people who loosely identify under the Antifa umbrella, for most of the violence during the ongoing protests that began earlier this year after police and white supremacist killings of Black and Latinx people including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery.
However, a study by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), which analyzed more than 7,750 Black Lives Matter demonstrations in all 50 states and Washington D.C. that occurred between May 26 and August 22, found that fully 93% of the protests were peaceful.
Nevertheless, the president has called the Black Lives Matter movement--the latest iteration of the centuries-old Black struggle for equality and justice--"a symbol of hate."
\u201c....horrible BLM chant, \u201cPigs In A Blanket, Fry \u2018Em Like Bacon\u201d. Maybe our GREAT Police, who have been neutralized and scorned by a mayor who hates & disrespects them, won\u2019t let this symbol of hate be affixed to New York\u2019s greatest street. Spend this money fighting crime instead!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1593611328
Trump has made "law and order"--replete with thinly-veiled racist appeals to white voters--a pillar of his re-election bid. He has habitually downplayed right-wing violence, even as his own Department of Homeland Security warned earlier this month that white supremacist pose the greatest domestic terrorist threat, and even as white supremacists keep attacking and killing people.
In 2017 the president infamously called neo-Nazis and other white nationalists who attended the Charlottesville, Virginia protest where anti-racist protester Heather Heyer was murdered "very fine people."
Despite the growing white supremacist threat, Trump revoked funding for the federal program tasked with countering violent extremism, while focusing his ire on the overwhelmingly peaceful Black Lives Matter movement. The president and some of his prominent supporters have repeatedly conflated the movement for Black lives with what the FBI for a while called "Black identity extremists."
Attorney General William Barr drew stinging rebuke from legal experts and civil liberties advocates including the ACLU Wednesday after he told federal prosecutors to more aggressively charge some protesters with crimes--including sedition, under certain circumstances.
The Wall Street Journalreports Barr's directive came during a conference call last week in which the attorney general warned that protests--which have been overwhelmingly peaceful and focused on racial justice--could increase as Election Day approaches.
\u201cAttorney General William Barr told federal prosecutors to be aggressive in charging violent demonstrators, including potentially prosecuting them for plotting to overthrow the government, say people familiar with the talks https://t.co/hu4TzCOMqt\u201d— The Wall Street Journal (@The Wall Street Journal) 1600277050
Two people familiar with the call told the Journal that Barr urged prosecutors to seek federal charges wherever possible--including a rarely-used sedition law meant to punish people who conspire to overthrow the U.S. government.
However, legal experts noted that in order to successfully charge someone with sedition, prosecutors must prove that they were part of a conspiracy to overthrow the government or attack government officials, or that they posed an imminent threat to the nation.
\u201cSedition charges require proof of efforts to overthrow the United States Government. Talking in these terms based on what\u2019s happening is grotesquely irresponsible. It\u2019s way beyond monarchical. It\u2019s paranoid and dictatorial. Opus Dei, anyone?\n\nhttps://t.co/Gh23Dp2yU5\u201d— Laurence Tribe (@Laurence Tribe) 1600290099
"Treating protest as a form of sedition won't stand up in court, but that is clearly not the point here," Somil Trivedi, a senior staff attorney with the ACLU's Criminal Law Reform Project, said in an email to Common Dreams. "This is a tyrannical and un-American attempt to suppress demands for racial justice and an end to police violence. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration's authoritarian impulses."
\u201cTreating protest as a form of sedition won't hold up in court, but that is clearly not the point here. Independent and ethical prosecutors should reject this administration\u2019s authoritarian impulses.\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1600288493
Some observers warned that aggressively prosecuting protesters could have a chilling effect on constitutionally-protected free speech, assembly, and expression.
\u201c1 Violent crime should be addressed appropriately, altho most often, it is a matter for state, not fed'll, prosecution. The risk here is Barr's directive will have a chilling effect on peaceful protest & free speech especially given the unusual suggestion to use the Sedition Act.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1600278829
Others wondered whether sedition charges would apply to violent right-wing protesters who support Trump.
\u201cAttorney General Bill Barr has reportedly been urging federal prosecutors to charge 'violent' protesters with aggressive sedition charges. \n\nDoes this apply to the armed Boogaloo Boys, too?? \ud83e\udd14\nhttps://t.co/HjX1MwAH5H\u201d— CODEPINK (@CODEPINK) 1600291800
Both Barr and President Donald Trump have (often falsely) blamed left-wing and anarchist protesters, including members of the Black Lives Matter movement and people who loosely identify under the Antifa umbrella, for most of the violence during the ongoing protests that began earlier this year after police and white supremacist killings of Black and Latinx people including George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, and Ahmaud Arbery.
However, a study by the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project (ACLED), which analyzed more than 7,750 Black Lives Matter demonstrations in all 50 states and Washington D.C. that occurred between May 26 and August 22, found that fully 93% of the protests were peaceful.
Nevertheless, the president has called the Black Lives Matter movement--the latest iteration of the centuries-old Black struggle for equality and justice--"a symbol of hate."
\u201c....horrible BLM chant, \u201cPigs In A Blanket, Fry \u2018Em Like Bacon\u201d. Maybe our GREAT Police, who have been neutralized and scorned by a mayor who hates & disrespects them, won\u2019t let this symbol of hate be affixed to New York\u2019s greatest street. Spend this money fighting crime instead!\u201d— Donald J. Trump (@Donald J. Trump) 1593611328
Trump has made "law and order"--replete with thinly-veiled racist appeals to white voters--a pillar of his re-election bid. He has habitually downplayed right-wing violence, even as his own Department of Homeland Security warned earlier this month that white supremacist pose the greatest domestic terrorist threat, and even as white supremacists keep attacking and killing people.
In 2017 the president infamously called neo-Nazis and other white nationalists who attended the Charlottesville, Virginia protest where anti-racist protester Heather Heyer was murdered "very fine people."
Despite the growing white supremacist threat, Trump revoked funding for the federal program tasked with countering violent extremism, while focusing his ire on the overwhelmingly peaceful Black Lives Matter movement. The president and some of his prominent supporters have repeatedly conflated the movement for Black lives with what the FBI for a while called "Black identity extremists."