Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee to the Supreme Court, has been meeting with senators ahead of her confirmation hearings later this month. (Photo: Caroline Brehman/Getty Images)
Oct 01, 2020
Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee to fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, publicly supported a Christian fundamentalist organization espousing extreme anti-abortion views, The Guardianrevealed Thursday.
In 2006, when Barrett was a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, she joined hundreds of Indiana and Michigan conservatives in signing a full-page newspaper ad sponsored by St. Joseph County Right to Life and published in the South Bend Tribune expressing strong opposition to the fundamental reproductive rights affirmed by the Supreme Court more than 47 years ago.
\u201cBut sure, we don\u2019t know where she stands on Roe... https://t.co/fn04XR8qdJ\u201d— Katie Hill (@Katie Hill) 1601567222
"We, the following citizens of Michiana, oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death," the letter states. "Please continue to pray to end abortion."
On a separate page in the same paper, the anti-choice group wrote that "it's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore laws that protect the lives of unborn children."
\u201cHistorically, judicial nominees go out of their way to avoid taking a position on issues that may come in front of them, but in 2006, SCOTUS nominee Barrett made her opposition to Roe v. Wade clear.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1601569760
\u201cMake no mistake: Trump and McConnell\u2019s illegitimate Supreme Court nominee believes Roe v. Wade is \u201cbarbaric.\u201d We cannot let extremists take us back to the time of back-alley abortions and complete their decades-long assault on reproductive rights.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1601572100
Although polls show that most Americans want to keep abortion legal--with restrictions--conservative Christians, who believe life begins in the womb, overwhelmingly oppose the right to choose.
However, the beliefs espoused by St. Joseph County Right to Life are considered extreme even by the standards of the so-called pro-life movement. The group believes that life begins at fertilization, not at the point of embryonic implantation or fetal viability. This means that the group inherently opposes in vitro fertilization.
"Whether embryos are implanted in the woman and then selectively reduced or it's done in a petri dish and then discarded, you're still ending a new human life at that point and we do oppose that," Jackie Appleman, the group's executive director, told The Guardian.
Furthermore, Appleman said that "we support the criminalization of the doctors who perform abortions," although, "at this point we are not supportive of criminalizing the women."
"We would be supportive of criminalizing the discarding of frozen embryos or selective reduction through the IVF process," she added.
The letter Barrett signed does not mention criminalizing IVF or abortion doctors, and Ramesh Ponnuru noted in the right-wing National Review that she only signed the statement opposing on-demand abortion, not the page calling Roe v. Wade "barbaric."
Still, abortion advocates continue to express concern about what the addition of Barrett to an already conservative court will mean for reproductive rights.
"Trump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word," tweeted NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue. "This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake."
\u201cTrump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word. This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake: repro rights, voting rights, worker's rights, racial justice, LGBTQ rights. Let's fight like it is. #LetThePeopleDecide\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1601564828
Barrett has also come under fire for her other views on women, most notably for her membership in People of Praise, a conservative Catholic group which some former members have said expects females--who are excluded from some leadership roles--to be "absolutely obedient" to their husbands and other men.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee to fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, publicly supported a Christian fundamentalist organization espousing extreme anti-abortion views, The Guardianrevealed Thursday.
In 2006, when Barrett was a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, she joined hundreds of Indiana and Michigan conservatives in signing a full-page newspaper ad sponsored by St. Joseph County Right to Life and published in the South Bend Tribune expressing strong opposition to the fundamental reproductive rights affirmed by the Supreme Court more than 47 years ago.
\u201cBut sure, we don\u2019t know where she stands on Roe... https://t.co/fn04XR8qdJ\u201d— Katie Hill (@Katie Hill) 1601567222
"We, the following citizens of Michiana, oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death," the letter states. "Please continue to pray to end abortion."
On a separate page in the same paper, the anti-choice group wrote that "it's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore laws that protect the lives of unborn children."
\u201cHistorically, judicial nominees go out of their way to avoid taking a position on issues that may come in front of them, but in 2006, SCOTUS nominee Barrett made her opposition to Roe v. Wade clear.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1601569760
\u201cMake no mistake: Trump and McConnell\u2019s illegitimate Supreme Court nominee believes Roe v. Wade is \u201cbarbaric.\u201d We cannot let extremists take us back to the time of back-alley abortions and complete their decades-long assault on reproductive rights.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1601572100
Although polls show that most Americans want to keep abortion legal--with restrictions--conservative Christians, who believe life begins in the womb, overwhelmingly oppose the right to choose.
However, the beliefs espoused by St. Joseph County Right to Life are considered extreme even by the standards of the so-called pro-life movement. The group believes that life begins at fertilization, not at the point of embryonic implantation or fetal viability. This means that the group inherently opposes in vitro fertilization.
"Whether embryos are implanted in the woman and then selectively reduced or it's done in a petri dish and then discarded, you're still ending a new human life at that point and we do oppose that," Jackie Appleman, the group's executive director, told The Guardian.
Furthermore, Appleman said that "we support the criminalization of the doctors who perform abortions," although, "at this point we are not supportive of criminalizing the women."
"We would be supportive of criminalizing the discarding of frozen embryos or selective reduction through the IVF process," she added.
The letter Barrett signed does not mention criminalizing IVF or abortion doctors, and Ramesh Ponnuru noted in the right-wing National Review that she only signed the statement opposing on-demand abortion, not the page calling Roe v. Wade "barbaric."
Still, abortion advocates continue to express concern about what the addition of Barrett to an already conservative court will mean for reproductive rights.
"Trump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word," tweeted NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue. "This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake."
\u201cTrump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word. This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake: repro rights, voting rights, worker's rights, racial justice, LGBTQ rights. Let's fight like it is. #LetThePeopleDecide\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1601564828
Barrett has also come under fire for her other views on women, most notably for her membership in People of Praise, a conservative Catholic group which some former members have said expects females--who are excluded from some leadership roles--to be "absolutely obedient" to their husbands and other men.
Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump's nominee to fill the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's seat on the U.S. Supreme Court, publicly supported a Christian fundamentalist organization espousing extreme anti-abortion views, The Guardianrevealed Thursday.
In 2006, when Barrett was a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, she joined hundreds of Indiana and Michigan conservatives in signing a full-page newspaper ad sponsored by St. Joseph County Right to Life and published in the South Bend Tribune expressing strong opposition to the fundamental reproductive rights affirmed by the Supreme Court more than 47 years ago.
\u201cBut sure, we don\u2019t know where she stands on Roe... https://t.co/fn04XR8qdJ\u201d— Katie Hill (@Katie Hill) 1601567222
"We, the following citizens of Michiana, oppose abortion on demand and defend the right to life from fertilization to natural death," the letter states. "Please continue to pray to end abortion."
On a separate page in the same paper, the anti-choice group wrote that "it's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore laws that protect the lives of unborn children."
\u201cHistorically, judicial nominees go out of their way to avoid taking a position on issues that may come in front of them, but in 2006, SCOTUS nominee Barrett made her opposition to Roe v. Wade clear.\u201d— Joyce Alene (@Joyce Alene) 1601569760
\u201cMake no mistake: Trump and McConnell\u2019s illegitimate Supreme Court nominee believes Roe v. Wade is \u201cbarbaric.\u201d We cannot let extremists take us back to the time of back-alley abortions and complete their decades-long assault on reproductive rights.\u201d— Elizabeth Warren (@Elizabeth Warren) 1601572100
Although polls show that most Americans want to keep abortion legal--with restrictions--conservative Christians, who believe life begins in the womb, overwhelmingly oppose the right to choose.
However, the beliefs espoused by St. Joseph County Right to Life are considered extreme even by the standards of the so-called pro-life movement. The group believes that life begins at fertilization, not at the point of embryonic implantation or fetal viability. This means that the group inherently opposes in vitro fertilization.
"Whether embryos are implanted in the woman and then selectively reduced or it's done in a petri dish and then discarded, you're still ending a new human life at that point and we do oppose that," Jackie Appleman, the group's executive director, told The Guardian.
Furthermore, Appleman said that "we support the criminalization of the doctors who perform abortions," although, "at this point we are not supportive of criminalizing the women."
"We would be supportive of criminalizing the discarding of frozen embryos or selective reduction through the IVF process," she added.
The letter Barrett signed does not mention criminalizing IVF or abortion doctors, and Ramesh Ponnuru noted in the right-wing National Review that she only signed the statement opposing on-demand abortion, not the page calling Roe v. Wade "barbaric."
Still, abortion advocates continue to express concern about what the addition of Barrett to an already conservative court will mean for reproductive rights.
"Trump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word," tweeted NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue. "This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake."
\u201cTrump said he's only nominating justices who'll end Roe and criminalize abortion. We take him at his word. This nominee fits the bill. Everything is at stake: repro rights, voting rights, worker's rights, racial justice, LGBTQ rights. Let's fight like it is. #LetThePeopleDecide\u201d— Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon (@Ilyse Hogue is @ilyseh on mastodon) 1601564828
Barrett has also come under fire for her other views on women, most notably for her membership in People of Praise, a conservative Catholic group which some former members have said expects females--who are excluded from some leadership roles--to be "absolutely obedient" to their husbands and other men.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.