Cars approach a mail-in ballot drop off location on October 13, 2020 in Austin, Texas. (Photo: Sergio Flores/Getty Images)
Nov 01, 2020
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNNnoted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
\u201cTexas Republicans have asked a federal judge to throw out 100,000 ballots in Harris County cast through curbside voting. They drew Judge Andrew Hanen, one of the most notoriously partisan Republican judges in the entire federal judiciary. This is alarming. https://t.co/VODOZrCoUF\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1604168065
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNNnoted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
\u201cTexas Republicans have asked a federal judge to throw out 100,000 ballots in Harris County cast through curbside voting. They drew Judge Andrew Hanen, one of the most notoriously partisan Republican judges in the entire federal judiciary. This is alarming. https://t.co/VODOZrCoUF\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1604168065
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
Voting rights advocates are sounding the alarm and taking emergency legal action as a right-wing federal judge Monday morning is set to hear a lawsuit by Texas Republicans seeking to invalidate nearly 130,000 legally cast ballots in heavily Democratic Harris County, an alarming last-ditch ploy one observer described as an "attempted judicial coup in progress."
The hearing, scheduled for 10:30 am local time, will come less than 24 hours after the Texas Supreme Court rejected a nearly identical GOP effort to toss out ballots cast through Harris County's drive-thru voting system, which has been in place for months as a safer voting option amid the coronavirus pandemic.
"Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
--Andre Segura, ACLU of Texas
"Ten of Harris County's 120 early voting sites are drive-thru locations," CNNnoted over the weekend. "As of Friday, nearly 127,000 votes had been cast via drive-thru, marking nearly nine percent of the total votes cast in the country's third most populous county. While curbside voting in Harris County is limited to voters with a disability and located at all polling sites, the drive-thru voting locations are open to all voters."
The Republican lawsuit--filed by wealthy conservative activist Steven Hotze, state Rep. Steve Toth, and a pair of GOP candidates for office--alleges that drive-thru voting is unconstitutional because only the state legislature has the authority to make changes to election law. Slate court reporter Mark Joseph Stern wrote late Saturday that "there are so many flaws in Republicans' argument that it's hard to know where to begin."
"The GOP operatives probably don't have standing to challenge a voting procedure that merely makes it easier and safer to vote," Stern wrote. "But leave that aside and look at the merits. The U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled that the legislature does not have sole authority over elections."
"And yet there is good reason to worry that Republicans will prevail, at least initially," Stern warned. "[U.S. District Judge Andrew] Hanen, the federal judge overseeing the case, is a rabid partisan... Alarmingly, he scheduled a hearing in this case for Monday morning--without even giving Harris County a chance to file a response brief. It is possible that Hanen is rushing to throw a wrench into Texas' election, purporting to void a vast number of votes in a critical battleground state."
\u201cTexas Republicans have asked a federal judge to throw out 100,000 ballots in Harris County cast through curbside voting. They drew Judge Andrew Hanen, one of the most notoriously partisan Republican judges in the entire federal judiciary. This is alarming. https://t.co/VODOZrCoUF\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1604168065
On behalf of several voters who cast their ballots using the drive-thru voting process, the ACLU of Texas late Sunday filed a motion to intervene (pdf) in the Republican-led lawsuit, the third GOP effort to invalidate more than 120,000 ballots in the key battleground state.
According to FiveThirtyEight, President Donald Trump and Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden are neck-and-neck in Texas, which has seen record-shattering early voting in the days leading up to November 3.
"This lawsuit is another desperate and ludicrous attempt by extremists to block the will of the people and disrupt democracy," Andre Segura, legal director for the ACLU of Texas, said in a statement. "Throwing out these votes would be patently unlawful and unprecedented. Texans have shown up in record numbers to make their voices heard, and we will fight to ensure that these votes are counted."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.