SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
People hold signs during a rally in support of the Supreme Court's ruling in favor of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, in San Diego, California on June 18, 2020. (Photo: Sandy Huffaker/AFP via Getty Images)
'Victory': Federal Judge Invalidates Latest Trump Effort to Kill DACA
"This is a victory for our courageous plaintiffs, DACA-eligible youth across the country, and all of our communities."
Nov 14, 2020
A federal judge said Saturday that Chad Wolf was not legally serving as acting homeland security chief when he issued a July memo limiting protections under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, so the memo is invalid.
"This is a victory for our courageous plaintiffs, DACA-eligible youth across the country, and all of our communities," Trudy S. Rebert, staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, said in a statement.
\u201cBREAKING: In our litigation, federal court finds that Trump administration\u2019s latest attempt to terminate #DACA was invalid because Chad Wolf was not lawfully appointed. \n\nMake no mistake: DACA recipients\u2019 #HomeisHere! @NILC @WiracYls\u201d— Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b (@Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b) 1605383670
The July 28, 2020 memorandum, which included a bar on accepting new applications for DACA--which protects undocumented people in the U.S. who arrived in the country as children--by first-time applicants, "was not an exercise of legal authority," Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York wrote.
From the Associated Press:
In Garaufis' ruling Saturday, the judge wrote that DHS didn't follow an order of succession established when then-Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned in April 2019. Kevin McAleenan, who succeeded Nielsen until he resigned in October 2019, also didn't have statutory authority to hold the position, Garaufis wrote.
Karen Tumlin, one of the lawyers in the case and director of the Justice Action Center, broke down the ruling's implications:
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does this mean for current #DACA recipients and those eligible to apply?\n--The memo making DACA renewals only 1 years instead of 2 years is invalid\n--The memo saying that new applicants cannot apply for DACA is invalid\n--Advance parole should be restored to 2012 terms\n2/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does the class certification mean?\n\nIt means that the court's order is NOT limited only to the named plaintiffs. Instead, the order applies to all people who are or will be eligible for DACA based on the terms of the program from 2012 (from the Obama Admin). \n\n3/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
"The ruling is another defeat for the Trump administration, which is now unlikely to be able to address DACA and the fate of Dreamers," CNNnoted. The outlet added:
The administration tried ending the program in 2017, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked their attempt in June. The memo invalidated on Saturday had sought to buy time while the administration decided its next steps.
Tumlin, in a statement, pointed to the unwavering determination of the Trump administration--which includes immigration hardliner Stephen Miller--to attack the Obama-era program.
"After the June Supreme Court victory, the Trump administration was bound to reset the DACA program to its original terms from 2012," said Tumlin. "Rather than doing that, the Trump administration gutted the program again--locking out young people who had been waiting years to apply and severely curtailing the program for existing DACA recipients," said Tumlin, adding that Congress must "pass permanent protections for these immigrant youth."
\u201cIncredible news from @NILC! #DACA recipients win again. We look forward to having the full program reinstated. We also hope for it to be expanded by the Biden administration. More details on what this means for undocumented youth coming soon. For now, join us in celebration. \ud83c\udf89\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1605413861
President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to protect so-called Dreamers, but immigrant rights groups still see much work ahead.
"As we look forward to a Biden administration, we know this victory is just the beginning," said Javier. H. Valdes, co-executive director of Make the Road New York, an organizational plaintiff in the case.
"Not only must the new administration immediately protect DACA and [Temporary Protected Status] holders and reverse all of Trump's nativist polices," he said, "but also provide swift relief and a path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented families across this country."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge said Saturday that Chad Wolf was not legally serving as acting homeland security chief when he issued a July memo limiting protections under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, so the memo is invalid.
"This is a victory for our courageous plaintiffs, DACA-eligible youth across the country, and all of our communities," Trudy S. Rebert, staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, said in a statement.
\u201cBREAKING: In our litigation, federal court finds that Trump administration\u2019s latest attempt to terminate #DACA was invalid because Chad Wolf was not lawfully appointed. \n\nMake no mistake: DACA recipients\u2019 #HomeisHere! @NILC @WiracYls\u201d— Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b (@Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b) 1605383670
The July 28, 2020 memorandum, which included a bar on accepting new applications for DACA--which protects undocumented people in the U.S. who arrived in the country as children--by first-time applicants, "was not an exercise of legal authority," Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York wrote.
From the Associated Press:
In Garaufis' ruling Saturday, the judge wrote that DHS didn't follow an order of succession established when then-Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned in April 2019. Kevin McAleenan, who succeeded Nielsen until he resigned in October 2019, also didn't have statutory authority to hold the position, Garaufis wrote.
Karen Tumlin, one of the lawyers in the case and director of the Justice Action Center, broke down the ruling's implications:
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does this mean for current #DACA recipients and those eligible to apply?\n--The memo making DACA renewals only 1 years instead of 2 years is invalid\n--The memo saying that new applicants cannot apply for DACA is invalid\n--Advance parole should be restored to 2012 terms\n2/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does the class certification mean?\n\nIt means that the court's order is NOT limited only to the named plaintiffs. Instead, the order applies to all people who are or will be eligible for DACA based on the terms of the program from 2012 (from the Obama Admin). \n\n3/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
"The ruling is another defeat for the Trump administration, which is now unlikely to be able to address DACA and the fate of Dreamers," CNNnoted. The outlet added:
The administration tried ending the program in 2017, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked their attempt in June. The memo invalidated on Saturday had sought to buy time while the administration decided its next steps.
Tumlin, in a statement, pointed to the unwavering determination of the Trump administration--which includes immigration hardliner Stephen Miller--to attack the Obama-era program.
"After the June Supreme Court victory, the Trump administration was bound to reset the DACA program to its original terms from 2012," said Tumlin. "Rather than doing that, the Trump administration gutted the program again--locking out young people who had been waiting years to apply and severely curtailing the program for existing DACA recipients," said Tumlin, adding that Congress must "pass permanent protections for these immigrant youth."
\u201cIncredible news from @NILC! #DACA recipients win again. We look forward to having the full program reinstated. We also hope for it to be expanded by the Biden administration. More details on what this means for undocumented youth coming soon. For now, join us in celebration. \ud83c\udf89\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1605413861
President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to protect so-called Dreamers, but immigrant rights groups still see much work ahead.
"As we look forward to a Biden administration, we know this victory is just the beginning," said Javier. H. Valdes, co-executive director of Make the Road New York, an organizational plaintiff in the case.
"Not only must the new administration immediately protect DACA and [Temporary Protected Status] holders and reverse all of Trump's nativist polices," he said, "but also provide swift relief and a path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented families across this country."
A federal judge said Saturday that Chad Wolf was not legally serving as acting homeland security chief when he issued a July memo limiting protections under the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, so the memo is invalid.
"This is a victory for our courageous plaintiffs, DACA-eligible youth across the country, and all of our communities," Trudy S. Rebert, staff attorney at the National Immigration Law Center, said in a statement.
\u201cBREAKING: In our litigation, federal court finds that Trump administration\u2019s latest attempt to terminate #DACA was invalid because Chad Wolf was not lawfully appointed. \n\nMake no mistake: DACA recipients\u2019 #HomeisHere! @NILC @WiracYls\u201d— Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b (@Make the Road NY \ud83e\udd8b) 1605383670
The July 28, 2020 memorandum, which included a bar on accepting new applications for DACA--which protects undocumented people in the U.S. who arrived in the country as children--by first-time applicants, "was not an exercise of legal authority," Judge Nicholas Garaufis of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York wrote.
From the Associated Press:
In Garaufis' ruling Saturday, the judge wrote that DHS didn't follow an order of succession established when then-Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen resigned in April 2019. Kevin McAleenan, who succeeded Nielsen until he resigned in October 2019, also didn't have statutory authority to hold the position, Garaufis wrote.
Karen Tumlin, one of the lawyers in the case and director of the Justice Action Center, broke down the ruling's implications:
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does this mean for current #DACA recipients and those eligible to apply?\n--The memo making DACA renewals only 1 years instead of 2 years is invalid\n--The memo saying that new applicants cannot apply for DACA is invalid\n--Advance parole should be restored to 2012 terms\n2/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
\u201c@DHS_Wolf What does the class certification mean?\n\nIt means that the court's order is NOT limited only to the named plaintiffs. Instead, the order applies to all people who are or will be eligible for DACA based on the terms of the program from 2012 (from the Obama Admin). \n\n3/\u201d— Karen Tumlin (@Karen Tumlin) 1605385483
"The ruling is another defeat for the Trump administration, which is now unlikely to be able to address DACA and the fate of Dreamers," CNNnoted. The outlet added:
The administration tried ending the program in 2017, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked their attempt in June. The memo invalidated on Saturday had sought to buy time while the administration decided its next steps.
Tumlin, in a statement, pointed to the unwavering determination of the Trump administration--which includes immigration hardliner Stephen Miller--to attack the Obama-era program.
"After the June Supreme Court victory, the Trump administration was bound to reset the DACA program to its original terms from 2012," said Tumlin. "Rather than doing that, the Trump administration gutted the program again--locking out young people who had been waiting years to apply and severely curtailing the program for existing DACA recipients," said Tumlin, adding that Congress must "pass permanent protections for these immigrant youth."
\u201cIncredible news from @NILC! #DACA recipients win again. We look forward to having the full program reinstated. We also hope for it to be expanded by the Biden administration. More details on what this means for undocumented youth coming soon. For now, join us in celebration. \ud83c\udf89\u201d— RAICES (@RAICES) 1605413861
President-elect Joe Biden has pledged to protect so-called Dreamers, but immigrant rights groups still see much work ahead.
"As we look forward to a Biden administration, we know this victory is just the beginning," said Javier. H. Valdes, co-executive director of Make the Road New York, an organizational plaintiff in the case.
"Not only must the new administration immediately protect DACA and [Temporary Protected Status] holders and reverse all of Trump's nativist polices," he said, "but also provide swift relief and a path to citizenship for the millions of undocumented families across this country."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.