SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A man walks past a campaign banner reading in French "Contaminated drinking water, poisoned child, Multinational held responsible" displayed in the streets of Geneva on November 29, 2020. - Swiss voters rejected on November 29, 2020 a plan to impose the world's strictest corporate responsibility rules, which would have made multinationals headquartered in the country liable for abusive business practices worldwide. (Photo by FABRICE COFFRINI/AFP via Getty Images)
Swiss Fall Short in Sunday's Vote to Hold Multinational Corporations Accountable
Despite winning a majority of votes, Swiss election rules—much like the US Electoral College—kills the initiative.
Nov 28, 2020
Sunday's vote in Switzerland to make multinational companies headquartered in the country--like Nestle, minerals giant Glencore, agribusiness company Syngenta-- liable for human rights violations and environmental abuses abroad failed in a country-wide referendum on Sunday.
The initiative titled "Responsible Companies -- to protect people and the environment'' won a narrow majority of votes on Sunday, with 50.7% percent backing it, but failed because a majority of the country's states (or cantons), came out against it. Under the Swiss system, because the initiative proposed a constitutional amendment, it needed the backing of both a popular majority and a majority of cantons to pass.
Organizations like Amnesty International, Greenpeace and the Swiss watchdog group Public Eye backed the proposal. Andreas Missbach, director of Public Eye, said it was a shame that the tougher proposals did not pass, considering that a majority of Swiss voters were in favor. He added that the government-backed legislation was insufficient. "The counterproposal doesn't really bring us anything other than more glossy corporate sustainability reports," he said. "The problems are still here; they are not going away."
The initiative, promoted by a coalition of over 130 civil society organizations, had faced strong opposition from the business sector and the government, which claimed the rules would hurt Swiss companies.
The proposal
The initiative requires Swiss companies to examine whether they can comply with internationally recognized human rights and environmental standards when carrying out their business operations. They will not only have to consider their own activities, but also the activities of their subsidiaries, suppliers and business partners. If need be, they will have to take action and submit reports. In addition, Swiss companies will also be liable for damage caused by companies that they control. However, they will not be held liable if they can prove that they complied with their due diligence obligations. Parliament has approved an indirect counter-proposal to the initiative, which also introduces new reporting and due diligence obligations. Any failures to comply would lead to fines being imposed. The counter-proposal will come into effect if the initiative is rejected, unless the counter-proposal itself is rejected in a referendum.
The vote on Sunday had been the source of much debate in Switzerland, and was the most expensive campaign in the country's history, according to the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.
Separately on Sunday, an initiative on the financing of weapon manufacturers also failed. The proposal would have prevented Swiss institutions, including the central bank, from investing in companies generating more than 5 percent of their revenue from the production of war materials.
\u201cswiss corporations are among the most powerful in the world, and they get far too little international scrutiny. they poison the soil, water, and air of poor countries - thus literally killing people abroad - while acting as clean, responsible orgs at home.\u201d— Bes D. Marx (@Bes D. Marx) 1606669754
\u201cSuch important work done by our Swiss members @publiceye_ch & others to advance this initiative in the face of massive corporate pushback, spending and lobbying. Majority of the population in favor, unfortunately not enough cantons. Thanks for your hard work, the fight continues!\u201d— OECD Watch (@OECD Watch) 1606675101
\u201cAnother shameful day for Swiss voters who rejected 2 left-wing popular initiatives. One to make corporations headquartered locally pay for their social & envirmntal crimes abroad. The 2nd about ending the financing of military commerce.I list below few reasons for this defeat 1/7\u201d— Emilie Tricarico (@Emilie Tricarico) 1606669882
\u201cA great opportunity to squeeze corporate nuts but the Swiss blew it. When will the people learn that corporations are the main source of #ClimateChange, #environmental & 3rd world labour #exploitation? https://t.co/0Lv92V2hgA\u201d— Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43 (@Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43) 1606665717
\u201cThe Swiss Initiative to regulate transnational corporations abroad has been rejected by Cantons,even if the majority of people voted in favour. A shame. But shows also the fantastic work developped by CSOs to raise awareness to #StopTNCImpunity \u270a\ud83c\udffeGood step towards #BindingTreaty\u201d— M\u00f3nica Vargas C. (@M\u00f3nica Vargas C.) 1606664349
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sunday's vote in Switzerland to make multinational companies headquartered in the country--like Nestle, minerals giant Glencore, agribusiness company Syngenta-- liable for human rights violations and environmental abuses abroad failed in a country-wide referendum on Sunday.
The initiative titled "Responsible Companies -- to protect people and the environment'' won a narrow majority of votes on Sunday, with 50.7% percent backing it, but failed because a majority of the country's states (or cantons), came out against it. Under the Swiss system, because the initiative proposed a constitutional amendment, it needed the backing of both a popular majority and a majority of cantons to pass.
Organizations like Amnesty International, Greenpeace and the Swiss watchdog group Public Eye backed the proposal. Andreas Missbach, director of Public Eye, said it was a shame that the tougher proposals did not pass, considering that a majority of Swiss voters were in favor. He added that the government-backed legislation was insufficient. "The counterproposal doesn't really bring us anything other than more glossy corporate sustainability reports," he said. "The problems are still here; they are not going away."
The initiative, promoted by a coalition of over 130 civil society organizations, had faced strong opposition from the business sector and the government, which claimed the rules would hurt Swiss companies.
The proposal
The initiative requires Swiss companies to examine whether they can comply with internationally recognized human rights and environmental standards when carrying out their business operations. They will not only have to consider their own activities, but also the activities of their subsidiaries, suppliers and business partners. If need be, they will have to take action and submit reports. In addition, Swiss companies will also be liable for damage caused by companies that they control. However, they will not be held liable if they can prove that they complied with their due diligence obligations. Parliament has approved an indirect counter-proposal to the initiative, which also introduces new reporting and due diligence obligations. Any failures to comply would lead to fines being imposed. The counter-proposal will come into effect if the initiative is rejected, unless the counter-proposal itself is rejected in a referendum.
The vote on Sunday had been the source of much debate in Switzerland, and was the most expensive campaign in the country's history, according to the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.
Separately on Sunday, an initiative on the financing of weapon manufacturers also failed. The proposal would have prevented Swiss institutions, including the central bank, from investing in companies generating more than 5 percent of their revenue from the production of war materials.
\u201cswiss corporations are among the most powerful in the world, and they get far too little international scrutiny. they poison the soil, water, and air of poor countries - thus literally killing people abroad - while acting as clean, responsible orgs at home.\u201d— Bes D. Marx (@Bes D. Marx) 1606669754
\u201cSuch important work done by our Swiss members @publiceye_ch & others to advance this initiative in the face of massive corporate pushback, spending and lobbying. Majority of the population in favor, unfortunately not enough cantons. Thanks for your hard work, the fight continues!\u201d— OECD Watch (@OECD Watch) 1606675101
\u201cAnother shameful day for Swiss voters who rejected 2 left-wing popular initiatives. One to make corporations headquartered locally pay for their social & envirmntal crimes abroad. The 2nd about ending the financing of military commerce.I list below few reasons for this defeat 1/7\u201d— Emilie Tricarico (@Emilie Tricarico) 1606669882
\u201cA great opportunity to squeeze corporate nuts but the Swiss blew it. When will the people learn that corporations are the main source of #ClimateChange, #environmental & 3rd world labour #exploitation? https://t.co/0Lv92V2hgA\u201d— Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43 (@Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43) 1606665717
\u201cThe Swiss Initiative to regulate transnational corporations abroad has been rejected by Cantons,even if the majority of people voted in favour. A shame. But shows also the fantastic work developped by CSOs to raise awareness to #StopTNCImpunity \u270a\ud83c\udffeGood step towards #BindingTreaty\u201d— M\u00f3nica Vargas C. (@M\u00f3nica Vargas C.) 1606664349
Sunday's vote in Switzerland to make multinational companies headquartered in the country--like Nestle, minerals giant Glencore, agribusiness company Syngenta-- liable for human rights violations and environmental abuses abroad failed in a country-wide referendum on Sunday.
The initiative titled "Responsible Companies -- to protect people and the environment'' won a narrow majority of votes on Sunday, with 50.7% percent backing it, but failed because a majority of the country's states (or cantons), came out against it. Under the Swiss system, because the initiative proposed a constitutional amendment, it needed the backing of both a popular majority and a majority of cantons to pass.
Organizations like Amnesty International, Greenpeace and the Swiss watchdog group Public Eye backed the proposal. Andreas Missbach, director of Public Eye, said it was a shame that the tougher proposals did not pass, considering that a majority of Swiss voters were in favor. He added that the government-backed legislation was insufficient. "The counterproposal doesn't really bring us anything other than more glossy corporate sustainability reports," he said. "The problems are still here; they are not going away."
The initiative, promoted by a coalition of over 130 civil society organizations, had faced strong opposition from the business sector and the government, which claimed the rules would hurt Swiss companies.
The proposal
The initiative requires Swiss companies to examine whether they can comply with internationally recognized human rights and environmental standards when carrying out their business operations. They will not only have to consider their own activities, but also the activities of their subsidiaries, suppliers and business partners. If need be, they will have to take action and submit reports. In addition, Swiss companies will also be liable for damage caused by companies that they control. However, they will not be held liable if they can prove that they complied with their due diligence obligations. Parliament has approved an indirect counter-proposal to the initiative, which also introduces new reporting and due diligence obligations. Any failures to comply would lead to fines being imposed. The counter-proposal will come into effect if the initiative is rejected, unless the counter-proposal itself is rejected in a referendum.
The vote on Sunday had been the source of much debate in Switzerland, and was the most expensive campaign in the country's history, according to the Swiss newspaper Tages-Anzeiger.
Separately on Sunday, an initiative on the financing of weapon manufacturers also failed. The proposal would have prevented Swiss institutions, including the central bank, from investing in companies generating more than 5 percent of their revenue from the production of war materials.
\u201cswiss corporations are among the most powerful in the world, and they get far too little international scrutiny. they poison the soil, water, and air of poor countries - thus literally killing people abroad - while acting as clean, responsible orgs at home.\u201d— Bes D. Marx (@Bes D. Marx) 1606669754
\u201cSuch important work done by our Swiss members @publiceye_ch & others to advance this initiative in the face of massive corporate pushback, spending and lobbying. Majority of the population in favor, unfortunately not enough cantons. Thanks for your hard work, the fight continues!\u201d— OECD Watch (@OECD Watch) 1606675101
\u201cAnother shameful day for Swiss voters who rejected 2 left-wing popular initiatives. One to make corporations headquartered locally pay for their social & envirmntal crimes abroad. The 2nd about ending the financing of military commerce.I list below few reasons for this defeat 1/7\u201d— Emilie Tricarico (@Emilie Tricarico) 1606669882
\u201cA great opportunity to squeeze corporate nuts but the Swiss blew it. When will the people learn that corporations are the main source of #ClimateChange, #environmental & 3rd world labour #exploitation? https://t.co/0Lv92V2hgA\u201d— Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43 (@Paul No\u00ebl, Citizen of the pale blue dot, \ud83c\udf43\ud83d\udc9a\ud83c\udf43) 1606665717
\u201cThe Swiss Initiative to regulate transnational corporations abroad has been rejected by Cantons,even if the majority of people voted in favour. A shame. But shows also the fantastic work developped by CSOs to raise awareness to #StopTNCImpunity \u270a\ud83c\udffeGood step towards #BindingTreaty\u201d— M\u00f3nica Vargas C. (@M\u00f3nica Vargas C.) 1606664349
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.