Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) talks with reporters as he leaves the Capitol after the first day of former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial February 9, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)
Feb 08, 2021
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday evening reaffirmed that former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial is constitutional, with just six Republicans joining Democrats on the vote, which came after hours of opening arguments from House impeachment managers and Trump's widely criticized attorneys.
This is the second time in as many weeks that the Senate has voted on the trial's constitutionality. In late January, Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), and Pat Toomey (Pa.) joined Democrats for a similar vote forced by Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.).
All but one Republican--Sen. Bill Cassidy (La.)--doubled down on that position Tuesday. Cassidy explained after the vote that "the issue at hand is, is it constitutional to impeach a president who has left office, and the House managers made a compelling, cogent case--and the president's team did not."
\u201c\u201cIf I\u2019m an impartial juror and one aide is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror I\u2019m going to vote for the side that did a good job.\u201d\u201d— Burgess Everett (@Burgess Everett) 1612909953
Tuesday's vote could indicate an unwillingness by most GOP senators to convict Trump, which would require two-thirds of the chamber.
The vote came after Trump's attorneys attempted to argue that, despite precedent, the trial isn't constitutional because Trump is no longer president. Like with the previous vote, which came days after Trump left office, Republicans--particularly Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.)--came under fire again Tuesday for delaying Trump's trial until after President Joe Biden's inauguration and Democrats took control of the Senate by the narrowest margin possible.
"This trial could have taken place while Trump was in office, if McConnell and Senate Republicans had not delayed it," said Stand Up America founder and president Sean Eldridge in a tweet Tuesday. "Their delays in no way exonerate Trump for inciting a violent and deadly insurrection. Convicting and disqualifying him is still critical to defending our democracy."
\u201cGOP:\n\n-a quick trial violates due process\n\n-McConnell delays trial until after Trump leaves office\n\n-now it's too late!\u201d— Ari Berman (@Ari Berman) 1612896067
While the House impeachment managers, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), were praised for a powerful 13-minute video that bolsters the charge--as laid out in the single article of impeachment--that Trump incited the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, Trump's attorneys were widely mocked and criticized.
As Andy Kroll summarized for Rolling Stone:
House Democrats on Tuesday afternoon laid out their case for why the Senate should proceed with an impeachment trial against a former president, citing the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the writings of legal scholars of all ideologies. Afterward, attorney Bruce Castor, a member of Trump's defense team, stepped up to microphone. What ensued was a meandering and at times incoherent legal argument from Castor, one that by turns flattered the senators in attendance ("senators are family men and women"), evoked Castor's youth in suburban Philadelphia ("here's little Bruce"), and offered the obligatory Ben Franklin quote.
While both Castor and David Schoen--who spoke second, after a last-minute shuffle--were slammed for their performances, Castor even drew critique from former Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz, who said on Newsmax: "There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying."
\u201cHow bad is Bruce Castor's presentation in defense of Trump so far? Newsmax cuts into it so Alan Dershowitz can trash it.\n\n"There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying!"\u201d— Justin Baragona (@Justin Baragona) 1612902791
A flood of similar criticism of both Castor and Schoen came from a diverse collection of experts, advocates, and other political commentators:
\u201cWe truly have no idea what Trump's lawyer, Bruce Castor, is talking about right now.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1612903060
\u201cLowering the emotion by telling the Senate majority that they want to destroy America.\u201d— David Weigel (@David Weigel) 1612904748
\u201cEveryone watching this should get a copy of @IjeomaOluo's book "Mediocre" so they can understand why Trump's lawyers are so ineffably - and proudly - stupid.\u201d— Dave Zirin (@Dave Zirin) 1612905594
\u201cThe only people in America celebrating this opening by Trump's lawyer are the script writers for SNL\u201d— Glenn Kessler (@Glenn Kessler) 1612903116
Castor, for his part, told reporters, "I thought we had a good day."
Join Us: Everything is on the Line
The future of all that we cherish is on the line and we have to fight like hell to protect democracy, human decency, and a liveable planet. The last line of defense is people who understand what’s at stake—activists, writers, thinkers, doers, and everyday people who see what is happening, know in their hearts that a better world is possible, and are willing to fight for it. You are one of the good people Common Dreams was built for. We provide independent news, progressive opinion, and crucial analysis on the day’s most important issues. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. But to keep publishing and remain strong in these dangerous times, we need your support. So we’re asking you today: Will you donate to our Fall Campaign and keep the progressive, nonprofit journalism of Common Dreams alive? |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
democracyimpeachmentjan 6 insurrectionpoliticspublic citizenrepublican partystand up americatrumpismus houseus senate
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday evening reaffirmed that former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial is constitutional, with just six Republicans joining Democrats on the vote, which came after hours of opening arguments from House impeachment managers and Trump's widely criticized attorneys.
This is the second time in as many weeks that the Senate has voted on the trial's constitutionality. In late January, Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), and Pat Toomey (Pa.) joined Democrats for a similar vote forced by Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.).
All but one Republican--Sen. Bill Cassidy (La.)--doubled down on that position Tuesday. Cassidy explained after the vote that "the issue at hand is, is it constitutional to impeach a president who has left office, and the House managers made a compelling, cogent case--and the president's team did not."
\u201c\u201cIf I\u2019m an impartial juror and one aide is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror I\u2019m going to vote for the side that did a good job.\u201d\u201d— Burgess Everett (@Burgess Everett) 1612909953
Tuesday's vote could indicate an unwillingness by most GOP senators to convict Trump, which would require two-thirds of the chamber.
The vote came after Trump's attorneys attempted to argue that, despite precedent, the trial isn't constitutional because Trump is no longer president. Like with the previous vote, which came days after Trump left office, Republicans--particularly Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.)--came under fire again Tuesday for delaying Trump's trial until after President Joe Biden's inauguration and Democrats took control of the Senate by the narrowest margin possible.
"This trial could have taken place while Trump was in office, if McConnell and Senate Republicans had not delayed it," said Stand Up America founder and president Sean Eldridge in a tweet Tuesday. "Their delays in no way exonerate Trump for inciting a violent and deadly insurrection. Convicting and disqualifying him is still critical to defending our democracy."
\u201cGOP:\n\n-a quick trial violates due process\n\n-McConnell delays trial until after Trump leaves office\n\n-now it's too late!\u201d— Ari Berman (@Ari Berman) 1612896067
While the House impeachment managers, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), were praised for a powerful 13-minute video that bolsters the charge--as laid out in the single article of impeachment--that Trump incited the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, Trump's attorneys were widely mocked and criticized.
As Andy Kroll summarized for Rolling Stone:
House Democrats on Tuesday afternoon laid out their case for why the Senate should proceed with an impeachment trial against a former president, citing the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the writings of legal scholars of all ideologies. Afterward, attorney Bruce Castor, a member of Trump's defense team, stepped up to microphone. What ensued was a meandering and at times incoherent legal argument from Castor, one that by turns flattered the senators in attendance ("senators are family men and women"), evoked Castor's youth in suburban Philadelphia ("here's little Bruce"), and offered the obligatory Ben Franklin quote.
While both Castor and David Schoen--who spoke second, after a last-minute shuffle--were slammed for their performances, Castor even drew critique from former Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz, who said on Newsmax: "There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying."
\u201cHow bad is Bruce Castor's presentation in defense of Trump so far? Newsmax cuts into it so Alan Dershowitz can trash it.\n\n"There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying!"\u201d— Justin Baragona (@Justin Baragona) 1612902791
A flood of similar criticism of both Castor and Schoen came from a diverse collection of experts, advocates, and other political commentators:
\u201cWe truly have no idea what Trump's lawyer, Bruce Castor, is talking about right now.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1612903060
\u201cLowering the emotion by telling the Senate majority that they want to destroy America.\u201d— David Weigel (@David Weigel) 1612904748
\u201cEveryone watching this should get a copy of @IjeomaOluo's book "Mediocre" so they can understand why Trump's lawyers are so ineffably - and proudly - stupid.\u201d— Dave Zirin (@Dave Zirin) 1612905594
\u201cThe only people in America celebrating this opening by Trump's lawyer are the script writers for SNL\u201d— Glenn Kessler (@Glenn Kessler) 1612903116
Castor, for his part, told reporters, "I thought we had a good day."
The U.S. Senate on Tuesday evening reaffirmed that former President Donald Trump's impeachment trial is constitutional, with just six Republicans joining Democrats on the vote, which came after hours of opening arguments from House impeachment managers and Trump's widely criticized attorneys.
This is the second time in as many weeks that the Senate has voted on the trial's constitutionality. In late January, Republican Sens. Susan Collins (Maine), Lisa Murkowski (Alaska), Mitt Romney (Utah), Ben Sasse (Neb.), and Pat Toomey (Pa.) joined Democrats for a similar vote forced by Sen. Rand Paul (Ky.).
All but one Republican--Sen. Bill Cassidy (La.)--doubled down on that position Tuesday. Cassidy explained after the vote that "the issue at hand is, is it constitutional to impeach a president who has left office, and the House managers made a compelling, cogent case--and the president's team did not."
\u201c\u201cIf I\u2019m an impartial juror and one aide is doing a great job and the other side is doing a terrible job on the issue at hand, as an impartial juror I\u2019m going to vote for the side that did a good job.\u201d\u201d— Burgess Everett (@Burgess Everett) 1612909953
Tuesday's vote could indicate an unwillingness by most GOP senators to convict Trump, which would require two-thirds of the chamber.
The vote came after Trump's attorneys attempted to argue that, despite precedent, the trial isn't constitutional because Trump is no longer president. Like with the previous vote, which came days after Trump left office, Republicans--particularly Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.)--came under fire again Tuesday for delaying Trump's trial until after President Joe Biden's inauguration and Democrats took control of the Senate by the narrowest margin possible.
"This trial could have taken place while Trump was in office, if McConnell and Senate Republicans had not delayed it," said Stand Up America founder and president Sean Eldridge in a tweet Tuesday. "Their delays in no way exonerate Trump for inciting a violent and deadly insurrection. Convicting and disqualifying him is still critical to defending our democracy."
\u201cGOP:\n\n-a quick trial violates due process\n\n-McConnell delays trial until after Trump leaves office\n\n-now it's too late!\u201d— Ari Berman (@Ari Berman) 1612896067
While the House impeachment managers, led by Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), were praised for a powerful 13-minute video that bolsters the charge--as laid out in the single article of impeachment--that Trump incited the deadly insurrection at the U.S. Capitol on January 6, Trump's attorneys were widely mocked and criticized.
As Andy Kroll summarized for Rolling Stone:
House Democrats on Tuesday afternoon laid out their case for why the Senate should proceed with an impeachment trial against a former president, citing the Constitution, the Federalist Papers, and the writings of legal scholars of all ideologies. Afterward, attorney Bruce Castor, a member of Trump's defense team, stepped up to microphone. What ensued was a meandering and at times incoherent legal argument from Castor, one that by turns flattered the senators in attendance ("senators are family men and women"), evoked Castor's youth in suburban Philadelphia ("here's little Bruce"), and offered the obligatory Ben Franklin quote.
While both Castor and David Schoen--who spoke second, after a last-minute shuffle--were slammed for their performances, Castor even drew critique from former Trump attorney Alan Dershowitz, who said on Newsmax: "There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying."
\u201cHow bad is Bruce Castor's presentation in defense of Trump so far? Newsmax cuts into it so Alan Dershowitz can trash it.\n\n"There is no argument. I have no idea what he's doing. I have no idea why he's saying what he's saying!"\u201d— Justin Baragona (@Justin Baragona) 1612902791
A flood of similar criticism of both Castor and Schoen came from a diverse collection of experts, advocates, and other political commentators:
\u201cWe truly have no idea what Trump's lawyer, Bruce Castor, is talking about right now.\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1612903060
\u201cLowering the emotion by telling the Senate majority that they want to destroy America.\u201d— David Weigel (@David Weigel) 1612904748
\u201cEveryone watching this should get a copy of @IjeomaOluo's book "Mediocre" so they can understand why Trump's lawyers are so ineffably - and proudly - stupid.\u201d— Dave Zirin (@Dave Zirin) 1612905594
\u201cThe only people in America celebrating this opening by Trump's lawyer are the script writers for SNL\u201d— Glenn Kessler (@Glenn Kessler) 1612903116
Castor, for his part, told reporters, "I thought we had a good day."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.