SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Michael van der Veen, former President Donald Trump's defense lawyer, departs the Senate floor on the fourth day of the impeachment trial on February 12, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Jabin Botsford--Pool/Getty Images)
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."
When asked during the Q&A portion of Friday's impeachment proceedings whether he agrees with Democratic prosecutors that Donald Trump was perpetrating a falsehood when he repeatedly claimed the 2020 election was stolen from him, the former president's defense attorney Michael van der Veen demanded to know who submitted the question.
"I did," Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said from the Senate gallery, prompting a tense back-and-forth between the Vermont senator and van der Veen which forced Sen. Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.), the presiding officer, to intervene.
Trump's attorney proceeded to dodge Sanders' question by claiming his judgement on the election results is "irrelevant" to the trial--to which Sanders responded, "No it's not."
Watch the exchange:
Following Friday's session, the fourth day of the former president's impeachment trial, Sanders denounced the Trump lawyer's "pathetic" refusal to admit the former president's election loss--denial that was at the heart of the mob attack on the U.S. Capitol Building last month.
"This is what the Big Lie is all about," Sanders tweeted Friday night. "Three months after the election, and 61 court decisions later, Trump and his attorneys still refuse to acknowledge that he lost the election."
As Slate's Jeremy Stahl wrote late Friday, "Trump's big lie--a claim that he had won the election in a landslide, and the Republic was going to be stolen from his followers unless they acted--is directly relevant to whether or not he incited the attack on the Capitol."
"Trump's attorneys insisted on focusing on the question of whether the text of his remarks the day of the attack--to the mob he had recruited and invited--can be proven to have incited them," Stahl added. "They refused to answer for the months of lies and exhortations to supporters to 'stop the steal' that culminated in the violent invasion of the Capitol. Trump refused to show up to testify in his own defense of those months of repeating the big lie. And Republican senators remain on course to ensure that Trump is exonerated for the violence he caused."