To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
U.S. Sen. Ed Markey (2nd L), Democrat of Massachusetts, speaks alongside fellow members of Congress and Supreme Court advocates as they introduce a bill in Congress to expand the number of seats on the court from nine to 13, in Washington, D.C., April 15, 2021. (Photo: Saul Loeb/AFP via Getty Images)
Capping off a month that has already featured more than 40 mass shootings across the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a National Rifle Association-backed challenge to a New York state gun control law--triggering new calls for Democrats to urgently "expand the court."
Slate staff writer Mark Joseph Stern, who covers courts and the law, pointed out in a series of tweets Monday that "this case is likely to pave the way to the Supreme Court declaring a constitutional right to concealed public carry, overriding many state and local restrictions on the ability to bear concealed arms in public."
"Congress and the White House can prioritize court expansion, adding liberal justices to prevent the current six-three majority from eradicating gun safety laws. Or they can watch as the majority exacerbates the nation's epidemic of gun violence by imposing a vision of the Second Amendment that data has indicated leads to more handgun-related homicides," Stern added in an article Monday. "The choice has never been so clear. And the stakes can be measured in human lives."
\u201cExpanding the Supreme Court is now the ONLY way to ensure that common sense gun laws are not struck down by the Brett Kavanaugh majority.\n\n#ExpandTheCourt \u2696\ufe0f\u201d— Brett Edkins (@Brett Edkins) 1619449124
The potentially landmark case, according toSCOTUSblog, "will be argued in the fall, with a decision expected sometime next year."
The justices' decision to take up the case comes just weeks after President Joe Biden announced six initial actions to begin tackling the nation's "gun violence public health epidemic" and signed an executive order to establish a 36-member commission that will analyze arguments for and against reforming the high court.
Shortly after Biden's move to create a commission--which controversially includes George Mason University Law School professor and Federalist Society contributor Adam White--Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) joined with Reps. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) to introduce a bill to expand the court by four seats, bringing the total to 13. If passed, the Judiciary Act of 2021 would allow Biden to restore a left-leaning majority, depending on his appointments.
After the court's announcement about the gun case, progressives reiterated support for expanding the nation's top court.
\u201cOof. Supreme Court reform may look a lot more necessary to Democrats after this decision.\nhttps://t.co/bl8jyhLLOB\u201d— Brian Fallon (@Brian Fallon) 1619444441
\u201cEvery single legislative and legal atrocity we\u2019re facing could be fixed if Democrats grew a spine and killed the filibuster, enacting voting rights legislation, and expanded the Supreme Court. \n\nHistory will otherwise remember them as enormous cowards who did not meet the moment.\u201d— Jordan Zakarin (@Jordan Zakarin) 1619445032
Referencing recent shootings and demands for stricter gun laws at the federal level, Elie Mystal, The Nation's justice correspondent, wrote in late March that "regardless of the outcome in Congress, the conservative-controlled Supreme Court will not allow us to have commonsense gun regulation, let alone any ambitious, progressive legislation to get guns off the streets, like they do in other countries that don't have mass shootings every other day."
Mystal continued:
Democrats (and Americans who don't want to be shot to death) lost the gun battle when [then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky] stole a seat on the court in 2016. They lost the war when [U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, may her memory be a blessing, didn't live until January 20, 2021. There is no new gun regulation or reform that can survive six bloodthirsty conservatives on the Supreme Court, just like there is no way to "win" a game of Russian roulette when there are six bullets in the revolver.
In fact, far from upholding whatever newly passed law that's ineffectual enough to survive a filibuster (you know, the same filibuster Democrats refuse to kill), the Supreme Court is poised to go in the other direction and dismantle what gun regulations we already have.
Sharing the piece in a pair of tweets Monday, Mystal wrote that "Democrats COULD put 10 more justices on the court to STOP THIS MADNESS... but nooo, Democrats want to pass gun reform *legislation* as if there a chance in hell this Supreme Court would uphold anything coming out of the Biden administration."
Noting the impact of Biden's predecessor appointing three justices in his single term, Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon issued a warning to policymakers on Monday: "Expand the court or let [former President] Donald Trump's justices make our mass shooting epidemic even worse."
This case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett, will address whether the state's denial of two men's applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. New York state law requires anyone who wants a license to carry a handgun outside their home to show a "proper cause."
"California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have similar laws," reported the New York Times, citing gun rights groups. "Federal appeals courts have generally rejected challenges to such restrictions," including the 2nd Circuit in this case, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Capping off a month that has already featured more than 40 mass shootings across the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a National Rifle Association-backed challenge to a New York state gun control law--triggering new calls for Democrats to urgently "expand the court."
Slate staff writer Mark Joseph Stern, who covers courts and the law, pointed out in a series of tweets Monday that "this case is likely to pave the way to the Supreme Court declaring a constitutional right to concealed public carry, overriding many state and local restrictions on the ability to bear concealed arms in public."
"Congress and the White House can prioritize court expansion, adding liberal justices to prevent the current six-three majority from eradicating gun safety laws. Or they can watch as the majority exacerbates the nation's epidemic of gun violence by imposing a vision of the Second Amendment that data has indicated leads to more handgun-related homicides," Stern added in an article Monday. "The choice has never been so clear. And the stakes can be measured in human lives."
\u201cExpanding the Supreme Court is now the ONLY way to ensure that common sense gun laws are not struck down by the Brett Kavanaugh majority.\n\n#ExpandTheCourt \u2696\ufe0f\u201d— Brett Edkins (@Brett Edkins) 1619449124
The potentially landmark case, according toSCOTUSblog, "will be argued in the fall, with a decision expected sometime next year."
The justices' decision to take up the case comes just weeks after President Joe Biden announced six initial actions to begin tackling the nation's "gun violence public health epidemic" and signed an executive order to establish a 36-member commission that will analyze arguments for and against reforming the high court.
Shortly after Biden's move to create a commission--which controversially includes George Mason University Law School professor and Federalist Society contributor Adam White--Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) joined with Reps. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) to introduce a bill to expand the court by four seats, bringing the total to 13. If passed, the Judiciary Act of 2021 would allow Biden to restore a left-leaning majority, depending on his appointments.
After the court's announcement about the gun case, progressives reiterated support for expanding the nation's top court.
\u201cOof. Supreme Court reform may look a lot more necessary to Democrats after this decision.\nhttps://t.co/bl8jyhLLOB\u201d— Brian Fallon (@Brian Fallon) 1619444441
\u201cEvery single legislative and legal atrocity we\u2019re facing could be fixed if Democrats grew a spine and killed the filibuster, enacting voting rights legislation, and expanded the Supreme Court. \n\nHistory will otherwise remember them as enormous cowards who did not meet the moment.\u201d— Jordan Zakarin (@Jordan Zakarin) 1619445032
Referencing recent shootings and demands for stricter gun laws at the federal level, Elie Mystal, The Nation's justice correspondent, wrote in late March that "regardless of the outcome in Congress, the conservative-controlled Supreme Court will not allow us to have commonsense gun regulation, let alone any ambitious, progressive legislation to get guns off the streets, like they do in other countries that don't have mass shootings every other day."
Mystal continued:
Democrats (and Americans who don't want to be shot to death) lost the gun battle when [then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky] stole a seat on the court in 2016. They lost the war when [U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, may her memory be a blessing, didn't live until January 20, 2021. There is no new gun regulation or reform that can survive six bloodthirsty conservatives on the Supreme Court, just like there is no way to "win" a game of Russian roulette when there are six bullets in the revolver.
In fact, far from upholding whatever newly passed law that's ineffectual enough to survive a filibuster (you know, the same filibuster Democrats refuse to kill), the Supreme Court is poised to go in the other direction and dismantle what gun regulations we already have.
Sharing the piece in a pair of tweets Monday, Mystal wrote that "Democrats COULD put 10 more justices on the court to STOP THIS MADNESS... but nooo, Democrats want to pass gun reform *legislation* as if there a chance in hell this Supreme Court would uphold anything coming out of the Biden administration."
Noting the impact of Biden's predecessor appointing three justices in his single term, Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon issued a warning to policymakers on Monday: "Expand the court or let [former President] Donald Trump's justices make our mass shooting epidemic even worse."
This case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett, will address whether the state's denial of two men's applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. New York state law requires anyone who wants a license to carry a handgun outside their home to show a "proper cause."
"California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have similar laws," reported the New York Times, citing gun rights groups. "Federal appeals courts have generally rejected challenges to such restrictions," including the 2nd Circuit in this case, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.
Capping off a month that has already featured more than 40 mass shootings across the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear a National Rifle Association-backed challenge to a New York state gun control law--triggering new calls for Democrats to urgently "expand the court."
Slate staff writer Mark Joseph Stern, who covers courts and the law, pointed out in a series of tweets Monday that "this case is likely to pave the way to the Supreme Court declaring a constitutional right to concealed public carry, overriding many state and local restrictions on the ability to bear concealed arms in public."
"Congress and the White House can prioritize court expansion, adding liberal justices to prevent the current six-three majority from eradicating gun safety laws. Or they can watch as the majority exacerbates the nation's epidemic of gun violence by imposing a vision of the Second Amendment that data has indicated leads to more handgun-related homicides," Stern added in an article Monday. "The choice has never been so clear. And the stakes can be measured in human lives."
\u201cExpanding the Supreme Court is now the ONLY way to ensure that common sense gun laws are not struck down by the Brett Kavanaugh majority.\n\n#ExpandTheCourt \u2696\ufe0f\u201d— Brett Edkins (@Brett Edkins) 1619449124
The potentially landmark case, according toSCOTUSblog, "will be argued in the fall, with a decision expected sometime next year."
The justices' decision to take up the case comes just weeks after President Joe Biden announced six initial actions to begin tackling the nation's "gun violence public health epidemic" and signed an executive order to establish a 36-member commission that will analyze arguments for and against reforming the high court.
Shortly after Biden's move to create a commission--which controversially includes George Mason University Law School professor and Federalist Society contributor Adam White--Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) joined with Reps. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.), Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.), and Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) to introduce a bill to expand the court by four seats, bringing the total to 13. If passed, the Judiciary Act of 2021 would allow Biden to restore a left-leaning majority, depending on his appointments.
After the court's announcement about the gun case, progressives reiterated support for expanding the nation's top court.
\u201cOof. Supreme Court reform may look a lot more necessary to Democrats after this decision.\nhttps://t.co/bl8jyhLLOB\u201d— Brian Fallon (@Brian Fallon) 1619444441
\u201cEvery single legislative and legal atrocity we\u2019re facing could be fixed if Democrats grew a spine and killed the filibuster, enacting voting rights legislation, and expanded the Supreme Court. \n\nHistory will otherwise remember them as enormous cowards who did not meet the moment.\u201d— Jordan Zakarin (@Jordan Zakarin) 1619445032
Referencing recent shootings and demands for stricter gun laws at the federal level, Elie Mystal, The Nation's justice correspondent, wrote in late March that "regardless of the outcome in Congress, the conservative-controlled Supreme Court will not allow us to have commonsense gun regulation, let alone any ambitious, progressive legislation to get guns off the streets, like they do in other countries that don't have mass shootings every other day."
Mystal continued:
Democrats (and Americans who don't want to be shot to death) lost the gun battle when [then-Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, a Republican from Kentucky] stole a seat on the court in 2016. They lost the war when [U.S. Supreme Court Justice] Ruth Bader Ginsburg, may her memory be a blessing, didn't live until January 20, 2021. There is no new gun regulation or reform that can survive six bloodthirsty conservatives on the Supreme Court, just like there is no way to "win" a game of Russian roulette when there are six bullets in the revolver.
In fact, far from upholding whatever newly passed law that's ineffectual enough to survive a filibuster (you know, the same filibuster Democrats refuse to kill), the Supreme Court is poised to go in the other direction and dismantle what gun regulations we already have.
Sharing the piece in a pair of tweets Monday, Mystal wrote that "Democrats COULD put 10 more justices on the court to STOP THIS MADNESS... but nooo, Democrats want to pass gun reform *legislation* as if there a chance in hell this Supreme Court would uphold anything coming out of the Biden administration."
Noting the impact of Biden's predecessor appointing three justices in his single term, Demand Justice executive director Brian Fallon issued a warning to policymakers on Monday: "Expand the court or let [former President] Donald Trump's justices make our mass shooting epidemic even worse."
This case, New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. Corlett, will address whether the state's denial of two men's applications for concealed-carry licenses for self-defense violated the Second Amendment. New York state law requires anyone who wants a license to carry a handgun outside their home to show a "proper cause."
"California, Delaware, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and Rhode Island have similar laws," reported the New York Times, citing gun rights groups. "Federal appeals courts have generally rejected challenges to such restrictions," including the 2nd Circuit in this case, prompting the appeal to the Supreme Court.