SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER

Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

* indicates required
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Rejecting Bayer Appeal, Top EU Court Upholds Ban on Bee-Killing Pesticides

Protesters hold bees killed by pesticides prior to the annual shareholders meeting of German chemicals and pharmaceuticals conglomerate Bayer AG on April 26, 2019 in Bonn, Germany. (Photo: Maja Hitij via Getty Images)

Rejecting Bayer Appeal, Top EU Court Upholds Ban on Bee-Killing Pesticides

"The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people's health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals," said Greenpeace.

The European Union's top court ruled Thursday in favor of the European Commission's partial ban on three pesticides hazardous to bees, much to the chagrin of Bayer--the German pharmaceutical and biotech company that merged with agrochemical giant Monsanto in 2018.

Bayer attempted to overturn the ban and undermine the E.U.'s "precautionary principle" for the protection of environmental and human health, but the European Court of Justice dismissed the corporation's appeal and backed a lower court's 2018 decision to uphold restrictions on the use of some pesticides on certain crops. In 2013, the Commission banned the use of imidacloprid, clothianidin, and thiamethoxam--three bee-killing neonicotinoid pesticides--on maize, rapseed, and some cereals.

"The Court of Justice has reaffirmed that protecting nature and people's health takes precedence over the narrow economic interests of powerful multinationals and that the precautionary principle is a cornerstone of E.U. law," Greenpeace E.U. legal strategist Andrea Carta said in response to the top court's ratification of the ban.

"This means the E.U. has a responsibility and the power to ensure the safety of all pesticides, chemicals, GM crops, and other dangerous products and substances," said Carta.

While hailing the "landmark decision," Greenpeace E.U. warned that it "does not mean an end to threats to bees and other pollinators in the E.U."

"E.U. courts have again ruled that bees and other essential insects should be protected from dangerous pesticides, but governments continue to dish out exemptions and hold up attempts to put in place effective safety testing," said Carta. "This ruling shows they must adopt rigorous testing rules without further delay."

According toReuters, 206 emergency authorizations were granted for the use of the neonicotinoids in the E.U. between 2013 and 2019, and the ban did not prevent the use of the toxic substances on other crops, such as sugar beet. "E.U. auditors last year said this pesticide use, while legal, was thought to be responsible for honeybee losses," the news outlet reported.

In addition, Greenpeace E.U. pointed out, "Research also indicates that several other pesticides currently used in the E.U. are a threat to bees and other pollinating insects, including four more neonicotinoids not covered by the 2013 ban."

Reuters noted that the Commission, in an effort to protect bees, has proposed targets to reduce the E.U.'s use of pesticides by 50% and to cut fertilizer use by 20% by 2030.

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.