SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
As leaders of the G7 were criticized for failing to rise to the challenge of the Covid-19 pandemic during their summit in the United Kingdom this weekend, Oxfam International on Saturday warned that failure of the world's richest nations to fully embrace a lifting of intellectual property protections for life-saving vaccines could ultimately raise the cost of administering shots to the entire world by as much as $74 billion with most of that money going directly into the wallets of pharmaceutical companies and their wealthy shareholders.
"Big pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world. We need to suspend the patents NOW!"
Oxfam calculates that if patent protections were waived by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and vaccine production ramped up worldwide people in low- and middle-income nations could be adequately vaccinated for an estimated cost of $6.5 billion, but that if pharmaceutical companies are allowed to retain their for-profit stranglehold on production and distribution that cost would soar to $80 billion.
"Without a waiver, we would effectively be spending up to 10 times more that we need to in order to get enough doses--much of which will be money that will go directly into the pockets of the shareholders of these companies," a spokesperson for the global anti-poverty group toldThe Guardian.
\u201cThis is not about profit it is about saving lives. Lift barriers to #TRIPSwaiver NOW! \nSign the petition. Demand protection for everyone\nhttps://t.co/OJAxXQFocK\n#PeoplesVaccine\u201d— Oxfam International (@Oxfam International) 1623502814
The assessment come as anti-poverty and public healthy campaigners have issued harsh rebuke to an agreement announced by G7 leaders on Friday, warning a collective pledge to donate at least 1 billion vaccine doses to the developing world should be seen as little more than a giveaway to powerful corporate interests and nowhere near adequate to protect the world's most vulnerable from the ravages of Covid-19.
"Charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
"If the best G7 leaders can manage is to donate 1 billion vaccine doses then this summit will have been a failure," said Oxfam's health policy manager Anna Marriott in statement on Friday.
With an estimated 11 billion doses needed to end the pandemic, Marriott said the G7 plan--as nice as it might sound to some on paper--is not going to cut it.
"Dose sharing is part of the solution if done immediately," she said, "but charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
Nick Dearden, executive director of the U.K.-based Global Justice Now--which along with Oxfam is part of an international coalition backing the WTO waiver and calling for a "People's Vaccine" regiment--said the Carbis Bay Agreement, named for the body of water in Cornwall where the G7 has gathered, exemplifies the failures that have become a hallmark of the world's powerful during since Covid-19 hit last year.
\u201cBig pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world.\n\nWe need to suspend the patents NOW!\n\n#PeoplesVaccine\n\nhttps://t.co/aj3DQbGKXF\u201d— Global Justice Now (@Global Justice Now) 1623499215
"The lessons from this pandemic are clear; we can't just hand over publicly funded research to private companies and expect them to deliver vaccines fairly in the public interest," said Dearden in a communique from Cornwall on Saturday. "But here we have a plan carved out by the same companies who have driven an artificial shortage of Covid-19 vaccines. And the lower income nations who are most impacted have been frozen out the room too."
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries, should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."
Instead of solutions by the G7, said Dearden, "we have a back-room deal by the wealthiest that risks repeating all of the mistakes made so far in this pandemic."
The international campaign demanding a "People's Vaccine" that puts public health needs above the profit-seeking interests of pharmaceutical corporations has been adamant since its inception during the pandemic that five things must be done at a global scale in order to end the Covid-19 outbreak resolutely and equitably:
While some leaders at the G7--including U.S. President Joe Biden and more recently President Emmanuel Macron of France--have backed the WTO waiver, many in the G7 continue to stutter and object to such a move.
Oxfam's Marriott suggested further delay is not only unacceptable--but deadly.
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries," she said, "should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
As leaders of the G7 were criticized for failing to rise to the challenge of the Covid-19 pandemic during their summit in the United Kingdom this weekend, Oxfam International on Saturday warned that failure of the world's richest nations to fully embrace a lifting of intellectual property protections for life-saving vaccines could ultimately raise the cost of administering shots to the entire world by as much as $74 billion with most of that money going directly into the wallets of pharmaceutical companies and their wealthy shareholders.
"Big pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world. We need to suspend the patents NOW!"
Oxfam calculates that if patent protections were waived by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and vaccine production ramped up worldwide people in low- and middle-income nations could be adequately vaccinated for an estimated cost of $6.5 billion, but that if pharmaceutical companies are allowed to retain their for-profit stranglehold on production and distribution that cost would soar to $80 billion.
"Without a waiver, we would effectively be spending up to 10 times more that we need to in order to get enough doses--much of which will be money that will go directly into the pockets of the shareholders of these companies," a spokesperson for the global anti-poverty group toldThe Guardian.
\u201cThis is not about profit it is about saving lives. Lift barriers to #TRIPSwaiver NOW! \nSign the petition. Demand protection for everyone\nhttps://t.co/OJAxXQFocK\n#PeoplesVaccine\u201d— Oxfam International (@Oxfam International) 1623502814
The assessment come as anti-poverty and public healthy campaigners have issued harsh rebuke to an agreement announced by G7 leaders on Friday, warning a collective pledge to donate at least 1 billion vaccine doses to the developing world should be seen as little more than a giveaway to powerful corporate interests and nowhere near adequate to protect the world's most vulnerable from the ravages of Covid-19.
"Charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
"If the best G7 leaders can manage is to donate 1 billion vaccine doses then this summit will have been a failure," said Oxfam's health policy manager Anna Marriott in statement on Friday.
With an estimated 11 billion doses needed to end the pandemic, Marriott said the G7 plan--as nice as it might sound to some on paper--is not going to cut it.
"Dose sharing is part of the solution if done immediately," she said, "but charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
Nick Dearden, executive director of the U.K.-based Global Justice Now--which along with Oxfam is part of an international coalition backing the WTO waiver and calling for a "People's Vaccine" regiment--said the Carbis Bay Agreement, named for the body of water in Cornwall where the G7 has gathered, exemplifies the failures that have become a hallmark of the world's powerful during since Covid-19 hit last year.
\u201cBig pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world.\n\nWe need to suspend the patents NOW!\n\n#PeoplesVaccine\n\nhttps://t.co/aj3DQbGKXF\u201d— Global Justice Now (@Global Justice Now) 1623499215
"The lessons from this pandemic are clear; we can't just hand over publicly funded research to private companies and expect them to deliver vaccines fairly in the public interest," said Dearden in a communique from Cornwall on Saturday. "But here we have a plan carved out by the same companies who have driven an artificial shortage of Covid-19 vaccines. And the lower income nations who are most impacted have been frozen out the room too."
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries, should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."
Instead of solutions by the G7, said Dearden, "we have a back-room deal by the wealthiest that risks repeating all of the mistakes made so far in this pandemic."
The international campaign demanding a "People's Vaccine" that puts public health needs above the profit-seeking interests of pharmaceutical corporations has been adamant since its inception during the pandemic that five things must be done at a global scale in order to end the Covid-19 outbreak resolutely and equitably:
While some leaders at the G7--including U.S. President Joe Biden and more recently President Emmanuel Macron of France--have backed the WTO waiver, many in the G7 continue to stutter and object to such a move.
Oxfam's Marriott suggested further delay is not only unacceptable--but deadly.
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries," she said, "should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."
As leaders of the G7 were criticized for failing to rise to the challenge of the Covid-19 pandemic during their summit in the United Kingdom this weekend, Oxfam International on Saturday warned that failure of the world's richest nations to fully embrace a lifting of intellectual property protections for life-saving vaccines could ultimately raise the cost of administering shots to the entire world by as much as $74 billion with most of that money going directly into the wallets of pharmaceutical companies and their wealthy shareholders.
"Big pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world. We need to suspend the patents NOW!"
Oxfam calculates that if patent protections were waived by the World Trade Organization (WTO) and vaccine production ramped up worldwide people in low- and middle-income nations could be adequately vaccinated for an estimated cost of $6.5 billion, but that if pharmaceutical companies are allowed to retain their for-profit stranglehold on production and distribution that cost would soar to $80 billion.
"Without a waiver, we would effectively be spending up to 10 times more that we need to in order to get enough doses--much of which will be money that will go directly into the pockets of the shareholders of these companies," a spokesperson for the global anti-poverty group toldThe Guardian.
\u201cThis is not about profit it is about saving lives. Lift barriers to #TRIPSwaiver NOW! \nSign the petition. Demand protection for everyone\nhttps://t.co/OJAxXQFocK\n#PeoplesVaccine\u201d— Oxfam International (@Oxfam International) 1623502814
The assessment come as anti-poverty and public healthy campaigners have issued harsh rebuke to an agreement announced by G7 leaders on Friday, warning a collective pledge to donate at least 1 billion vaccine doses to the developing world should be seen as little more than a giveaway to powerful corporate interests and nowhere near adequate to protect the world's most vulnerable from the ravages of Covid-19.
"Charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
"If the best G7 leaders can manage is to donate 1 billion vaccine doses then this summit will have been a failure," said Oxfam's health policy manager Anna Marriott in statement on Friday.
With an estimated 11 billion doses needed to end the pandemic, Marriott said the G7 plan--as nice as it might sound to some on paper--is not going to cut it.
"Dose sharing is part of the solution if done immediately," she said, "but charity is not going to fix the colossal vaccine supply crisis. In order to ramp up production, the G7 should break the pharmaceutical monopolies and insist that the vaccine science and know-how is shared with qualified manufacturers around the world."
Nick Dearden, executive director of the U.K.-based Global Justice Now--which along with Oxfam is part of an international coalition backing the WTO waiver and calling for a "People's Vaccine" regiment--said the Carbis Bay Agreement, named for the body of water in Cornwall where the G7 has gathered, exemplifies the failures that have become a hallmark of the world's powerful during since Covid-19 hit last year.
\u201cBig pharma greed is adding over $70 BILLION to the cost of vaccinating the world.\n\nWe need to suspend the patents NOW!\n\n#PeoplesVaccine\n\nhttps://t.co/aj3DQbGKXF\u201d— Global Justice Now (@Global Justice Now) 1623499215
"The lessons from this pandemic are clear; we can't just hand over publicly funded research to private companies and expect them to deliver vaccines fairly in the public interest," said Dearden in a communique from Cornwall on Saturday. "But here we have a plan carved out by the same companies who have driven an artificial shortage of Covid-19 vaccines. And the lower income nations who are most impacted have been frozen out the room too."
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries, should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."
Instead of solutions by the G7, said Dearden, "we have a back-room deal by the wealthiest that risks repeating all of the mistakes made so far in this pandemic."
The international campaign demanding a "People's Vaccine" that puts public health needs above the profit-seeking interests of pharmaceutical corporations has been adamant since its inception during the pandemic that five things must be done at a global scale in order to end the Covid-19 outbreak resolutely and equitably:
While some leaders at the G7--including U.S. President Joe Biden and more recently President Emmanuel Macron of France--have backed the WTO waiver, many in the G7 continue to stutter and object to such a move.
Oxfam's Marriott suggested further delay is not only unacceptable--but deadly.
"The lives of millions of people in developing countries," she said, "should never be dependent on the good will of rich nations and profit hungry pharmaceutical corporations."