SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Extinction Rebellion "crime scene investigators" in white suits and masks put up "climate crime scene" tape at a rally outside the Brazilian Embassy on September 7, 2020 in London, United Kingdom. (Photo: Mike Kemp/In Pictures via Getty Images)
'Moral Red Line': Legal Definition Unveiled to Put Ecocide on Par With War Crimes
"It is a different way of looking at what atrocity looks like," said one proponent.
Jun 22, 2021
A panel of international lawyers on Tuesday published an official legal definition of the term "ecocide," which for decades has been condemned by conservationists and climate action campaigners but which until now has not been recognized as a crime.
With the Stop Ecocide campaign's new legal definition of ecocide, organizers and experts seek to eventually incorporate the prosecution of environmental destruction into the International Criminal Court's (ICC) mandate, making it possible for nations on the front lines of the climate crisis--which are the least responsible for the carbon emissions and industrial pollution that is heating the planet--to hold big polluters accountable.
"This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace." --Jojo Mehta, Stop Ecocide
"The time is right to harness the power of international criminal law to protect our global environment," said Philippe Sands, a professor at University College London and co-chair of the expert drafting panel convened by Stop Ecocide. "Seventy-five years ago, 'crimes against humanity' and 'genocide' were spoken for the first time, in Nuremberg's Courtroom 600, and my hope is that this group will be able to draw on experience since that day to forge a definition that is practical, effective, and sustainable, and that might attract support to allow an amendment to the ICC Statute to be made."
The panel said two thresholds must be reached to prosecute ecocide as a crime in the ICC: perpetrators must have knowledge of substantial likelihood of severe widespread or long-term damage, and actions must be "unlawful or wanton."
Representatives of the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu were the first to call for ecocide to be internationally criminalized alongside war crimes, when European Union ambassador John Licht addressed the ICC's Assembly of States Parties in December 2019.
"We believe this radical idea merits serious discussion," said Licht at the time, triggering similar calls from leaders in the Maldives. Residents of the two low-lying island nations face some of the most serious and imminent risks of the climate crisis, with 80% of the Maldives' 1,190 islands standing only three feet above sea level and 97% reporting shoreline erosion.
Frontline nations like the Maldives and Vanuatu are also some of the communities bearing the least responsibility for the climate crisis, compared to major contributors like the United States, China, and Russia.
"We see no serious efforts on the part of large emitting countries to save humanity from the impending climate change catastrophe," said Maldivian diplomat Ahmed Saleem in 2019.
Jojo Mehta, co-founder of Stop Ecocide, toldCNBC Tuesday that less than two years after the calls from the two island nations, "This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace."
French President Emanuel Macron has called for ecocide to be prosecuted in the ICC and Belgian ambassadors brought up the issue in their official statement to the Court in 2020, while political parties in Sweden, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the U.K. have supported the calls.
"If we had ecocide [recognized by the ICC], what it might mean is that you could prosecute crimes against the environment potentially without there needing to be a connection to some widespread human atrocity," Rachel Killean, a law professor at Queen's University Belfast, toldCNBC. "It is a different way of looking at what atrocity looks like."
Mehta noted that the world's biggest contributors to ecocide could be referred to the ICC by the United Nations Security Council, should the Court include it in its mandate, since countries including the U.S. and Russia are not signatories of the ICC's Rome Statute.
Despite the uphill battle to hold powerful nations to account, proponents of the movement argue the fight to include ecocide in the ICC's mandate is worthwhile in order to help create a "moral red line" regarding the destruction of the Earth.
"At the moment, if you are campaigning for human rights and social justice, at least you know that mass murder and torture are beyond the pale," Mehta told CNBC. "They are criminal and they are condemned. But, if you are in the environmental arena, you don't have that. You're standing on a void. There's a missing foundational piece that says this much damage is simply not allowed."
Should the ICC recognize ecocide, the campaign says, it could lead to access to reparations for countries like Vanuatu and the Maldives as well as other frontline communities and greater public understanding of the planetary emergency.
"None of the international laws protects the natural world as an end in itself," said Sands as the expert drafting panel released the definition. "This draft law is not only anthropocentric, it is eco-centric. I'm not starry-eyed about law; the mere adoption of a text does not stop horrors. But it can change consciousness."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A panel of international lawyers on Tuesday published an official legal definition of the term "ecocide," which for decades has been condemned by conservationists and climate action campaigners but which until now has not been recognized as a crime.
With the Stop Ecocide campaign's new legal definition of ecocide, organizers and experts seek to eventually incorporate the prosecution of environmental destruction into the International Criminal Court's (ICC) mandate, making it possible for nations on the front lines of the climate crisis--which are the least responsible for the carbon emissions and industrial pollution that is heating the planet--to hold big polluters accountable.
"This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace." --Jojo Mehta, Stop Ecocide
"The time is right to harness the power of international criminal law to protect our global environment," said Philippe Sands, a professor at University College London and co-chair of the expert drafting panel convened by Stop Ecocide. "Seventy-five years ago, 'crimes against humanity' and 'genocide' were spoken for the first time, in Nuremberg's Courtroom 600, and my hope is that this group will be able to draw on experience since that day to forge a definition that is practical, effective, and sustainable, and that might attract support to allow an amendment to the ICC Statute to be made."
The panel said two thresholds must be reached to prosecute ecocide as a crime in the ICC: perpetrators must have knowledge of substantial likelihood of severe widespread or long-term damage, and actions must be "unlawful or wanton."
Representatives of the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu were the first to call for ecocide to be internationally criminalized alongside war crimes, when European Union ambassador John Licht addressed the ICC's Assembly of States Parties in December 2019.
"We believe this radical idea merits serious discussion," said Licht at the time, triggering similar calls from leaders in the Maldives. Residents of the two low-lying island nations face some of the most serious and imminent risks of the climate crisis, with 80% of the Maldives' 1,190 islands standing only three feet above sea level and 97% reporting shoreline erosion.
Frontline nations like the Maldives and Vanuatu are also some of the communities bearing the least responsibility for the climate crisis, compared to major contributors like the United States, China, and Russia.
"We see no serious efforts on the part of large emitting countries to save humanity from the impending climate change catastrophe," said Maldivian diplomat Ahmed Saleem in 2019.
Jojo Mehta, co-founder of Stop Ecocide, toldCNBC Tuesday that less than two years after the calls from the two island nations, "This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace."
French President Emanuel Macron has called for ecocide to be prosecuted in the ICC and Belgian ambassadors brought up the issue in their official statement to the Court in 2020, while political parties in Sweden, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the U.K. have supported the calls.
"If we had ecocide [recognized by the ICC], what it might mean is that you could prosecute crimes against the environment potentially without there needing to be a connection to some widespread human atrocity," Rachel Killean, a law professor at Queen's University Belfast, toldCNBC. "It is a different way of looking at what atrocity looks like."
Mehta noted that the world's biggest contributors to ecocide could be referred to the ICC by the United Nations Security Council, should the Court include it in its mandate, since countries including the U.S. and Russia are not signatories of the ICC's Rome Statute.
Despite the uphill battle to hold powerful nations to account, proponents of the movement argue the fight to include ecocide in the ICC's mandate is worthwhile in order to help create a "moral red line" regarding the destruction of the Earth.
"At the moment, if you are campaigning for human rights and social justice, at least you know that mass murder and torture are beyond the pale," Mehta told CNBC. "They are criminal and they are condemned. But, if you are in the environmental arena, you don't have that. You're standing on a void. There's a missing foundational piece that says this much damage is simply not allowed."
Should the ICC recognize ecocide, the campaign says, it could lead to access to reparations for countries like Vanuatu and the Maldives as well as other frontline communities and greater public understanding of the planetary emergency.
"None of the international laws protects the natural world as an end in itself," said Sands as the expert drafting panel released the definition. "This draft law is not only anthropocentric, it is eco-centric. I'm not starry-eyed about law; the mere adoption of a text does not stop horrors. But it can change consciousness."
A panel of international lawyers on Tuesday published an official legal definition of the term "ecocide," which for decades has been condemned by conservationists and climate action campaigners but which until now has not been recognized as a crime.
With the Stop Ecocide campaign's new legal definition of ecocide, organizers and experts seek to eventually incorporate the prosecution of environmental destruction into the International Criminal Court's (ICC) mandate, making it possible for nations on the front lines of the climate crisis--which are the least responsible for the carbon emissions and industrial pollution that is heating the planet--to hold big polluters accountable.
"This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace." --Jojo Mehta, Stop Ecocide
"The time is right to harness the power of international criminal law to protect our global environment," said Philippe Sands, a professor at University College London and co-chair of the expert drafting panel convened by Stop Ecocide. "Seventy-five years ago, 'crimes against humanity' and 'genocide' were spoken for the first time, in Nuremberg's Courtroom 600, and my hope is that this group will be able to draw on experience since that day to forge a definition that is practical, effective, and sustainable, and that might attract support to allow an amendment to the ICC Statute to be made."
The panel said two thresholds must be reached to prosecute ecocide as a crime in the ICC: perpetrators must have knowledge of substantial likelihood of severe widespread or long-term damage, and actions must be "unlawful or wanton."
Representatives of the South Pacific island nation of Vanuatu were the first to call for ecocide to be internationally criminalized alongside war crimes, when European Union ambassador John Licht addressed the ICC's Assembly of States Parties in December 2019.
"We believe this radical idea merits serious discussion," said Licht at the time, triggering similar calls from leaders in the Maldives. Residents of the two low-lying island nations face some of the most serious and imminent risks of the climate crisis, with 80% of the Maldives' 1,190 islands standing only three feet above sea level and 97% reporting shoreline erosion.
Frontline nations like the Maldives and Vanuatu are also some of the communities bearing the least responsibility for the climate crisis, compared to major contributors like the United States, China, and Russia.
"We see no serious efforts on the part of large emitting countries to save humanity from the impending climate change catastrophe," said Maldivian diplomat Ahmed Saleem in 2019.
Jojo Mehta, co-founder of Stop Ecocide, toldCNBC Tuesday that less than two years after the calls from the two island nations, "This conversation is no longer falling on deaf ears and, indeed, it is actually gathering momentum at quite a pace."
French President Emanuel Macron has called for ecocide to be prosecuted in the ICC and Belgian ambassadors brought up the issue in their official statement to the Court in 2020, while political parties in Sweden, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and the U.K. have supported the calls.
"If we had ecocide [recognized by the ICC], what it might mean is that you could prosecute crimes against the environment potentially without there needing to be a connection to some widespread human atrocity," Rachel Killean, a law professor at Queen's University Belfast, toldCNBC. "It is a different way of looking at what atrocity looks like."
Mehta noted that the world's biggest contributors to ecocide could be referred to the ICC by the United Nations Security Council, should the Court include it in its mandate, since countries including the U.S. and Russia are not signatories of the ICC's Rome Statute.
Despite the uphill battle to hold powerful nations to account, proponents of the movement argue the fight to include ecocide in the ICC's mandate is worthwhile in order to help create a "moral red line" regarding the destruction of the Earth.
"At the moment, if you are campaigning for human rights and social justice, at least you know that mass murder and torture are beyond the pale," Mehta told CNBC. "They are criminal and they are condemned. But, if you are in the environmental arena, you don't have that. You're standing on a void. There's a missing foundational piece that says this much damage is simply not allowed."
Should the ICC recognize ecocide, the campaign says, it could lead to access to reparations for countries like Vanuatu and the Maldives as well as other frontline communities and greater public understanding of the planetary emergency.
"None of the international laws protects the natural world as an end in itself," said Sands as the expert drafting panel released the definition. "This draft law is not only anthropocentric, it is eco-centric. I'm not starry-eyed about law; the mere adoption of a text does not stop horrors. But it can change consciousness."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.