SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A family seeking asylum prepares to be taken to a border patrol processing facility after crossing into the U.S. on June 16, 2021 in La Joya, Texas. (Photo: Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
'Vile': Biden DHS to Turn Away Migrant Families Under 'Expedited Removal' Policy
"This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."
Jul 27, 2021
Immigrant rights advocates are decrying what some called an "appalling" Monday night announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that the Biden administration will return to the use of an "expedited removal" process to send families seeking asylum back over the U.S.-Mexico border if they can't convince immigration agents that they need refuge in the United States.
"The expedited removal 'procedure' involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge... or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process."
--Camille Mackler, Immigrant ARC
Groups including Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the ACLU had hoped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would revoke Title 42, under which the federal government has had the authority to send to Mexico any undocumented immigrants who attempt to cross the southern U.S. border.
Instead, DHS on Monday said that some families, many of whom Mexican officials have refused to accept under Title 42, "will be placed in expedited removal proceedings" to provide "a lawful, more accelerated procedure to remove those family units who do not have a basis under U.S. law to be in the United States. "
"The announcement we had been hoping for was about an end to Title 42," Linda Rivas, executive director of Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in El Paso, Texas, told the New York Times. "This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."
Under the policy, immigrant families who are intercepted by immigration agents at the border will be screened promptly to determine if they have a "credible fear" of persecution or violence in their home country which led them to seek asylum.
If an agent determines there is no credible fear, families will be expelled from the country without an immigration judge hearing their case.
The policy has been used by both Democratic and Republican administrations in the past.
Before Monday's announcement, thousands of families who Mexico would not accept under Title 42 have been sent by U.S. Border Patrol agents to stay in shelters while they wait to appear in immigration court.
The departure from that system "is not due process," tweeted Camille Mackler, founder and executive director of Immigrant ARC, which provides legal services to immigrants and was formed after legal advocates descended on John F. Kennedy International Airport to provide support to immigrants when the Trump administration announced its travel ban in January 2017.
\u201cThe expedited removal \u201cprocedure\u201d involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge, consult with a legal advocate (much less an attorney), or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process.\u201d— Camille J. Mackler (@Camille J. Mackler) 1627351604
Robyn Barnard, senior advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, described "how due process is run roughshod by expedited removal."
\u201cThe whole point of expedited removal is to summarily deport ppl w/out seeing a judge to make their claim for asylum. DHS locks them up in prisons while they effect these summary deportations & it all happens in quick succession to make it cheaper for govt\u201d— Robyn Barnard (@Robyn Barnard) 1627346736
"There is no 'right' or 'wrong' way to seek asylum," Barnard tweeted. "It is a legal right to be able to do so however you get here. When you block the ports [under Title 42] and leave people in desperate and dangerous situations, what other options do they have?"
Heidi Altman, policy director at the National Immigrant Justice Center, called the DHS announcement "vile."
\u201cThis statement is vile: vaguely threatening to punish families for how they flee, using sterile terms like "family units" and "accelerated procedure" to talk about deporting parents and children to harm. @DHSgov: Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm. End it.\u201d— Heidi Altman (@Heidi Altman) 1627349213
"Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm," said Altman. "End it."
On January 20th, it begins...
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Immigrant rights advocates are decrying what some called an "appalling" Monday night announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that the Biden administration will return to the use of an "expedited removal" process to send families seeking asylum back over the U.S.-Mexico border if they can't convince immigration agents that they need refuge in the United States.
"The expedited removal 'procedure' involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge... or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process."
--Camille Mackler, Immigrant ARC
Groups including Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the ACLU had hoped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would revoke Title 42, under which the federal government has had the authority to send to Mexico any undocumented immigrants who attempt to cross the southern U.S. border.
Instead, DHS on Monday said that some families, many of whom Mexican officials have refused to accept under Title 42, "will be placed in expedited removal proceedings" to provide "a lawful, more accelerated procedure to remove those family units who do not have a basis under U.S. law to be in the United States. "
"The announcement we had been hoping for was about an end to Title 42," Linda Rivas, executive director of Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in El Paso, Texas, told the New York Times. "This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."
Under the policy, immigrant families who are intercepted by immigration agents at the border will be screened promptly to determine if they have a "credible fear" of persecution or violence in their home country which led them to seek asylum.
If an agent determines there is no credible fear, families will be expelled from the country without an immigration judge hearing their case.
The policy has been used by both Democratic and Republican administrations in the past.
Before Monday's announcement, thousands of families who Mexico would not accept under Title 42 have been sent by U.S. Border Patrol agents to stay in shelters while they wait to appear in immigration court.
The departure from that system "is not due process," tweeted Camille Mackler, founder and executive director of Immigrant ARC, which provides legal services to immigrants and was formed after legal advocates descended on John F. Kennedy International Airport to provide support to immigrants when the Trump administration announced its travel ban in January 2017.
\u201cThe expedited removal \u201cprocedure\u201d involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge, consult with a legal advocate (much less an attorney), or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process.\u201d— Camille J. Mackler (@Camille J. Mackler) 1627351604
Robyn Barnard, senior advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, described "how due process is run roughshod by expedited removal."
\u201cThe whole point of expedited removal is to summarily deport ppl w/out seeing a judge to make their claim for asylum. DHS locks them up in prisons while they effect these summary deportations & it all happens in quick succession to make it cheaper for govt\u201d— Robyn Barnard (@Robyn Barnard) 1627346736
"There is no 'right' or 'wrong' way to seek asylum," Barnard tweeted. "It is a legal right to be able to do so however you get here. When you block the ports [under Title 42] and leave people in desperate and dangerous situations, what other options do they have?"
Heidi Altman, policy director at the National Immigrant Justice Center, called the DHS announcement "vile."
\u201cThis statement is vile: vaguely threatening to punish families for how they flee, using sterile terms like "family units" and "accelerated procedure" to talk about deporting parents and children to harm. @DHSgov: Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm. End it.\u201d— Heidi Altman (@Heidi Altman) 1627349213
"Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm," said Altman. "End it."
Immigrant rights advocates are decrying what some called an "appalling" Monday night announcement by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security that the Biden administration will return to the use of an "expedited removal" process to send families seeking asylum back over the U.S.-Mexico border if they can't convince immigration agents that they need refuge in the United States.
"The expedited removal 'procedure' involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge... or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process."
--Camille Mackler, Immigrant ARC
Groups including Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center and the ACLU had hoped the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) would revoke Title 42, under which the federal government has had the authority to send to Mexico any undocumented immigrants who attempt to cross the southern U.S. border.
Instead, DHS on Monday said that some families, many of whom Mexican officials have refused to accept under Title 42, "will be placed in expedited removal proceedings" to provide "a lawful, more accelerated procedure to remove those family units who do not have a basis under U.S. law to be in the United States. "
"The announcement we had been hoping for was about an end to Title 42," Linda Rivas, executive director of Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center in El Paso, Texas, told the New York Times. "This administration continues to seek efficiency over safety and due process for migrant families."
Under the policy, immigrant families who are intercepted by immigration agents at the border will be screened promptly to determine if they have a "credible fear" of persecution or violence in their home country which led them to seek asylum.
If an agent determines there is no credible fear, families will be expelled from the country without an immigration judge hearing their case.
The policy has been used by both Democratic and Republican administrations in the past.
Before Monday's announcement, thousands of families who Mexico would not accept under Title 42 have been sent by U.S. Border Patrol agents to stay in shelters while they wait to appear in immigration court.
The departure from that system "is not due process," tweeted Camille Mackler, founder and executive director of Immigrant ARC, which provides legal services to immigrants and was formed after legal advocates descended on John F. Kennedy International Airport to provide support to immigrants when the Trump administration announced its travel ban in January 2017.
\u201cThe expedited removal \u201cprocedure\u201d involves sitting across a desk from a government agent signing a deportation order. There is no ability to see a judge, consult with a legal advocate (much less an attorney), or otherwise understand the process. This is not due process.\u201d— Camille J. Mackler (@Camille J. Mackler) 1627351604
Robyn Barnard, senior advocacy counsel at Human Rights First, described "how due process is run roughshod by expedited removal."
\u201cThe whole point of expedited removal is to summarily deport ppl w/out seeing a judge to make their claim for asylum. DHS locks them up in prisons while they effect these summary deportations & it all happens in quick succession to make it cheaper for govt\u201d— Robyn Barnard (@Robyn Barnard) 1627346736
"There is no 'right' or 'wrong' way to seek asylum," Barnard tweeted. "It is a legal right to be able to do so however you get here. When you block the ports [under Title 42] and leave people in desperate and dangerous situations, what other options do they have?"
Heidi Altman, policy director at the National Immigrant Justice Center, called the DHS announcement "vile."
\u201cThis statement is vile: vaguely threatening to punish families for how they flee, using sterile terms like "family units" and "accelerated procedure" to talk about deporting parents and children to harm. @DHSgov: Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm. End it.\u201d— Heidi Altman (@Heidi Altman) 1627349213
"Expedited removal sends asylum seekers back to harm," said Altman. "End it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.