SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
\u201cGas is a fossil fuel and does not belong in clean electricity standard. \n\nUsing gas to fight climate change is like using gasoline to fight a fire. \n\nDo you agree, @FrankPallone?\n\n#nogas #gasisnotclean\u201d— Jamie DeMarco (@Jamie DeMarco) 1630503270
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
\u201cFACT: We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of frontline communities like ours in Wayne County, where we haven\u2019t complied with the Clean Air Act for years. Natural gas isn\u2019t clean, it isn\u2019t safe, and it doesn\u2019t belong in a CES. #NoGas\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1630448089
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
\u201cGas is a fossil fuel and does not belong in clean electricity standard. \n\nUsing gas to fight climate change is like using gasoline to fight a fire. \n\nDo you agree, @FrankPallone?\n\n#nogas #gasisnotclean\u201d— Jamie DeMarco (@Jamie DeMarco) 1630503270
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
\u201cFACT: We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of frontline communities like ours in Wayne County, where we haven\u2019t complied with the Clean Air Act for years. Natural gas isn\u2019t clean, it isn\u2019t safe, and it doesn\u2019t belong in a CES. #NoGas\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1630448089
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."
Stressing that every stage of gas production pollutes the Earth's air and water, a coalition of climate and social justice groups on Wednesday launched an initiative aimed at strengthening a proposed federal energy policy by ensuring that it excludes the fossil fuel.
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas."
--Lauren Maunus, Sunrise Movement
Sunrise Movement, Greenpeace USA, Oil Change U.S., and other partners launched the Gas Is Not Clean campaign, an effort to ensure that the federal Clean Energy Standard (CES)--a policy proposal requiring a mininum share of electricity to be generated from clean sources--does not include gas.
According to Sunrise Movement, the new campaign "will build pressure on politicians to commit to prioritizing truly clean, renewable energy... by making clear that gas is not clean, and that every stage of its production--extraction, processing, transport, and combustion--generates toxic air and water pollution."
The initiative's website will track which federal lawmakers support excluding a gas carve-out from the CES, while serving as a resource for lawmakers and their staffers. The campaign also says it will be "engaging members of Congress through digital amplification, Hill blasts, and local organizing efforts."
On August 24, the Democrat-controlled U.S. House of Representatives voted along party lines in favor of a $3.5 trillion budget reconciliation blueprint that includes federal tax incentives of around $150 billion to $200 billion for CES implementation. In the absence of a universal definition of what constitutes "clean" energy, the fossil fuel industry has been lobbying for the inclusion of gas in the CES.
\u201cGas is a fossil fuel and does not belong in clean electricity standard. \n\nUsing gas to fight climate change is like using gasoline to fight a fire. \n\nDo you agree, @FrankPallone?\n\n#nogas #gasisnotclean\u201d— Jamie DeMarco (@Jamie DeMarco) 1630503270
Republican and right-wing Democratic U.S. lawmakers have also pushed for what they call a "technology-neutral" approach to meeting the Biden administration's goal of generating 80% clean power by 2035. In June, Reps. David B. McKinley (R-W.Va.) and Kurt Schrader (D-Ore.) introduced an industry-backed bill that would extend partial credit to gas generation as part of a plan to reduce carbon emissions 80% by 2050.
Rep. Jamaal Bowman (D-N.Y.), on the other hand, says there is absolutely no room for gas in the CES.
"With climate disasters coming at us from every direction, the stakes of the reconciliation bill could not be higher," Bowman said in a statement. "This is our moment to turbocharge the transition to a green, just economy, and the Clean Energy Standard can play a key role--but it needs to be as ambitious as possible on renewables, and it needs to exclude gas."
"This is not complicated, and we can't allow the gas industry to confuse the issue," he added. "No fossil fuels, period."
Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) stands with his party's progressive wing in staunchly opposing gas inclusion in the CES, asserting in July that it is "an imperative, not just an option... to stop all of the expansion of coal, oil, and gas throughout our country and, frankly, throughout our world."
"You've gotta get to the 80%," Schumer told The New Republic, referring to the White House's 2035 clean power goal. "Gas doesn't help us get there... The number one goal is to get to the 80%, period."
\u201cFACT: We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of frontline communities like ours in Wayne County, where we haven\u2019t complied with the Clean Air Act for years. Natural gas isn\u2019t clean, it isn\u2019t safe, and it doesn\u2019t belong in a CES. #NoGas\u201d— Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (@Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib) 1630448089
Climate advocates are pushing for a Renewable Energy Standard (RES)--a policy adopted by at least 28 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico--that would ideally achieve a 100% renewable energy portfolio for the U.S. electrical grid by the end of the decade. Such a policy would include renewable energy technologies like solar and wind, while excluding gas, carbon capture and storage, biomass, nuclear, and other false climate "solutions."
"We need a Clean Energy Standard that centers the health of the planet, communities, and people," tweeted Greenpeace USA. "We cannot continue using harmful energy sources, like natural gas, that pollute our air, water, and human health."
Sunrise Movement advocacy director Lauren Maunus said in a statement announcing the new campaign that "we're making our politicians pick a side--are you with us or fossil fuel executives?"
"The science is clear: There is nothing clean about gas," Maunus continued. "It's a potent fossil fuel that pollutes the air we breathe, the water we drink, and is the reason Hurricane Ida intensified to the point of fatality and utter destruction. A CES that includes investments towards gas does not meet the scale of the climate crisis, and is a slap in the face to communities across the country who are facing climate disasters."
"We deserve a liveable future free of toxic pollution and catastrophic climate disasters," she added. "We will continue to pressure members of Congress until they exclude gas from the CES."