An activist speaks outside the Supreme Court in protest against the new Texas abortion law on September 2, 2021 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Drew Angerer/Getty Images)
Sep 03, 2021
Republican lawmakers and governors in several states are planning or considering forced-birth legislation mirroring Senate Bill 8 in Texas, which the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to go into effect this week--stunning and angering abortion providers and rights advocates across the country.
In a number of states where extreme anti-choice bills have been blocked by courts in recent years, far-right legislators are seeing the court's decision as tacit approval of future laws that, like S.B. 8, would authorize private citizens to sue anyone who aids someone in obtaining abortion care after six weeks of pregnancy, enabling plaintiffs to win at least $10,000 in court and getting around Roe vs. Wade by keeping the state government itself from enforcing the bans.
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation."
--Kristin Ford, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation," Kristin Ford, acting vice president of communications and research at NARAL Pro-Choice America, told HuffPost on Wednesday. "There's also the very real threat that this has a domino effect in other states that are hellbent on ending legal abortion."
Florida State Sen. Wilton Simpson, the Republican president of the chamber, said Thursday that the Supreme Court's refusal to block S.B. 8 was "encouraging."
"I think it's worthwhile to take a look at the Texas law and see if there is more we can do here in Florida," Simpson said, while GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis said the Texas Republicans' approach to banning abortion care was "interesting" and something he would look at "more significantly."
With the Supreme Court effectively rendering Roe vs. Wade terminated in Texas for most people seeking an abortion while lower courts consider the law, the pro-choice research group Guttmacher Institute said S.B. 8 was "the tip of the iceberg."
\u201cTexas is the tip of the iceberg. As @ElizNash told @chloe_aatkins, "There are about 20 states that have already enacted comprehensive or early abortion bans." The bans are currently blocked, but other states may use Texas as a road map to undermine access. https://t.co/aqs4ze7Rjo\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1630542541
Abortion providers in states including Tennessee and Mississippi expressed fear on Thursday that their Republican governors would push for similar laws; in both states, forced-birth legislation has been blocked by courts in recent years, and the Supreme Court is expected to rule later this year on Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban--a decision which could overturn the precedent set by Roe.
Jennifer Pepper, executive director of the women's healthcare center Choices in Memphis, told the Washington Post she was "quite terrified" that Gov. Bill Lee and state GOP legislators will try to model a new bill on S.B. 8.
Mississippi state Sen. Chris McDaniel told the Associated Press that he would "absolutely" be filing legislation modeled on the Texas law.
"It's not a matter of whether that could be the end of Roe; it would be the end of Roe," Laurie Bertram Roberts, co-founder of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, told the Post. "What's going on in Texas and Mississippi is that they are showing their hands. It's a clear tell as to where the end game is."
The AP reported that legislators in Arkansas, Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota are considering new laws deputizing private citizens to enforce abortion bans, and reproductive rights groups told Politico that they expect similar bills to be proposed in Arizona, South Carolina, and Ohio.
The laws could have the effect of intimidating providers out of offering abortion care and patients out of seeking care, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.
"It creates a situation in which, even if the defendants were to win every single case, the burden of having to defend themselves, of getting attorneys, of having to go to around to rural courts across Texas' 258 counties--that alone threatens to stop the provision of abortion across the state," Marc Hearron, senior counsel with the organization, told Politico.
\u201cNow that the Supreme Court has blessed Texas\u2019s amateur bounty hunter scheme, there is nothing to stop every GOP legislature from passing an identically-structured law to squeeze abortion providers out of their states. It\u2019s an open invitation, from 5 right-wingers to all of them.\u201d— Jay Willis (@Jay Willis) 1630592834
"The sooner anti-choice lawmakers act on this signal, the harder it will be for providers to survive the litigation wars to come," tweeted journalist Jay Willis.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Republican lawmakers and governors in several states are planning or considering forced-birth legislation mirroring Senate Bill 8 in Texas, which the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to go into effect this week--stunning and angering abortion providers and rights advocates across the country.
In a number of states where extreme anti-choice bills have been blocked by courts in recent years, far-right legislators are seeing the court's decision as tacit approval of future laws that, like S.B. 8, would authorize private citizens to sue anyone who aids someone in obtaining abortion care after six weeks of pregnancy, enabling plaintiffs to win at least $10,000 in court and getting around Roe vs. Wade by keeping the state government itself from enforcing the bans.
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation."
--Kristin Ford, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation," Kristin Ford, acting vice president of communications and research at NARAL Pro-Choice America, told HuffPost on Wednesday. "There's also the very real threat that this has a domino effect in other states that are hellbent on ending legal abortion."
Florida State Sen. Wilton Simpson, the Republican president of the chamber, said Thursday that the Supreme Court's refusal to block S.B. 8 was "encouraging."
"I think it's worthwhile to take a look at the Texas law and see if there is more we can do here in Florida," Simpson said, while GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis said the Texas Republicans' approach to banning abortion care was "interesting" and something he would look at "more significantly."
With the Supreme Court effectively rendering Roe vs. Wade terminated in Texas for most people seeking an abortion while lower courts consider the law, the pro-choice research group Guttmacher Institute said S.B. 8 was "the tip of the iceberg."
\u201cTexas is the tip of the iceberg. As @ElizNash told @chloe_aatkins, "There are about 20 states that have already enacted comprehensive or early abortion bans." The bans are currently blocked, but other states may use Texas as a road map to undermine access. https://t.co/aqs4ze7Rjo\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1630542541
Abortion providers in states including Tennessee and Mississippi expressed fear on Thursday that their Republican governors would push for similar laws; in both states, forced-birth legislation has been blocked by courts in recent years, and the Supreme Court is expected to rule later this year on Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban--a decision which could overturn the precedent set by Roe.
Jennifer Pepper, executive director of the women's healthcare center Choices in Memphis, told the Washington Post she was "quite terrified" that Gov. Bill Lee and state GOP legislators will try to model a new bill on S.B. 8.
Mississippi state Sen. Chris McDaniel told the Associated Press that he would "absolutely" be filing legislation modeled on the Texas law.
"It's not a matter of whether that could be the end of Roe; it would be the end of Roe," Laurie Bertram Roberts, co-founder of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, told the Post. "What's going on in Texas and Mississippi is that they are showing their hands. It's a clear tell as to where the end game is."
The AP reported that legislators in Arkansas, Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota are considering new laws deputizing private citizens to enforce abortion bans, and reproductive rights groups told Politico that they expect similar bills to be proposed in Arizona, South Carolina, and Ohio.
The laws could have the effect of intimidating providers out of offering abortion care and patients out of seeking care, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.
"It creates a situation in which, even if the defendants were to win every single case, the burden of having to defend themselves, of getting attorneys, of having to go to around to rural courts across Texas' 258 counties--that alone threatens to stop the provision of abortion across the state," Marc Hearron, senior counsel with the organization, told Politico.
\u201cNow that the Supreme Court has blessed Texas\u2019s amateur bounty hunter scheme, there is nothing to stop every GOP legislature from passing an identically-structured law to squeeze abortion providers out of their states. It\u2019s an open invitation, from 5 right-wingers to all of them.\u201d— Jay Willis (@Jay Willis) 1630592834
"The sooner anti-choice lawmakers act on this signal, the harder it will be for providers to survive the litigation wars to come," tweeted journalist Jay Willis.
From Your Site Articles
- Texas Abortion Rights Advocates Vow to Fight 'Unconstitutional' Local Travel Bans ›
- 'This Is Sick': Cable Companies Refuse to Air Ad Criticizing Corporate Donors to Florida's Abortion Opponents ›
- After Texas Abortion Ruling, 'Make No Mistake—This Is the America the GOP Wants' ›
- Opinion | GOP's Anti-Abortion Big Brother Not Just Watching You. They're Stalking You | Common Dreams ›
Republican lawmakers and governors in several states are planning or considering forced-birth legislation mirroring Senate Bill 8 in Texas, which the U.S. Supreme Court allowed to go into effect this week--stunning and angering abortion providers and rights advocates across the country.
In a number of states where extreme anti-choice bills have been blocked by courts in recent years, far-right legislators are seeing the court's decision as tacit approval of future laws that, like S.B. 8, would authorize private citizens to sue anyone who aids someone in obtaining abortion care after six weeks of pregnancy, enabling plaintiffs to win at least $10,000 in court and getting around Roe vs. Wade by keeping the state government itself from enforcing the bans.
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation."
--Kristin Ford, NARAL Pro-Choice America
"This is not a 'What happens in Texas stays in Texas' situation," Kristin Ford, acting vice president of communications and research at NARAL Pro-Choice America, told HuffPost on Wednesday. "There's also the very real threat that this has a domino effect in other states that are hellbent on ending legal abortion."
Florida State Sen. Wilton Simpson, the Republican president of the chamber, said Thursday that the Supreme Court's refusal to block S.B. 8 was "encouraging."
"I think it's worthwhile to take a look at the Texas law and see if there is more we can do here in Florida," Simpson said, while GOP Gov. Ron DeSantis said the Texas Republicans' approach to banning abortion care was "interesting" and something he would look at "more significantly."
With the Supreme Court effectively rendering Roe vs. Wade terminated in Texas for most people seeking an abortion while lower courts consider the law, the pro-choice research group Guttmacher Institute said S.B. 8 was "the tip of the iceberg."
\u201cTexas is the tip of the iceberg. As @ElizNash told @chloe_aatkins, "There are about 20 states that have already enacted comprehensive or early abortion bans." The bans are currently blocked, but other states may use Texas as a road map to undermine access. https://t.co/aqs4ze7Rjo\u201d— Guttmacher Institute (@Guttmacher Institute) 1630542541
Abortion providers in states including Tennessee and Mississippi expressed fear on Thursday that their Republican governors would push for similar laws; in both states, forced-birth legislation has been blocked by courts in recent years, and the Supreme Court is expected to rule later this year on Mississippi's 15-week abortion ban--a decision which could overturn the precedent set by Roe.
Jennifer Pepper, executive director of the women's healthcare center Choices in Memphis, told the Washington Post she was "quite terrified" that Gov. Bill Lee and state GOP legislators will try to model a new bill on S.B. 8.
Mississippi state Sen. Chris McDaniel told the Associated Press that he would "absolutely" be filing legislation modeled on the Texas law.
"It's not a matter of whether that could be the end of Roe; it would be the end of Roe," Laurie Bertram Roberts, co-founder of the Mississippi Reproductive Freedom Fund, told the Post. "What's going on in Texas and Mississippi is that they are showing their hands. It's a clear tell as to where the end game is."
The AP reported that legislators in Arkansas, Indiana, North Dakota, and South Dakota are considering new laws deputizing private citizens to enforce abortion bans, and reproductive rights groups told Politico that they expect similar bills to be proposed in Arizona, South Carolina, and Ohio.
The laws could have the effect of intimidating providers out of offering abortion care and patients out of seeking care, according to the Center for Reproductive Rights.
"It creates a situation in which, even if the defendants were to win every single case, the burden of having to defend themselves, of getting attorneys, of having to go to around to rural courts across Texas' 258 counties--that alone threatens to stop the provision of abortion across the state," Marc Hearron, senior counsel with the organization, told Politico.
\u201cNow that the Supreme Court has blessed Texas\u2019s amateur bounty hunter scheme, there is nothing to stop every GOP legislature from passing an identically-structured law to squeeze abortion providers out of their states. It\u2019s an open invitation, from 5 right-wingers to all of them.\u201d— Jay Willis (@Jay Willis) 1630592834
"The sooner anti-choice lawmakers act on this signal, the harder it will be for providers to survive the litigation wars to come," tweeted journalist Jay Willis.
From Your Site Articles
- Texas Abortion Rights Advocates Vow to Fight 'Unconstitutional' Local Travel Bans ›
- 'This Is Sick': Cable Companies Refuse to Air Ad Criticizing Corporate Donors to Florida's Abortion Opponents ›
- After Texas Abortion Ruling, 'Make No Mistake—This Is the America the GOP Wants' ›
- Opinion | GOP's Anti-Abortion Big Brother Not Just Watching You. They're Stalking You | Common Dreams ›
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.