SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A report released Tuesday by European campaigners highlights how the global industrial animal farming sector, backed by billions from major financial institutions, is fueling the intertwined climate and biodiversity crises--and what policymakers can do to better protect people and the planet.
"The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
--Meat Atlas 2021
Meat Atlas 2021 (pdf)--published by Friends of the Earth Europe, its German arm Bund fur Umwelt und Naturschutz, and the Berlin-based Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung--says the food sector is responsible for 21% to 37% of planet-heating emissions, over half of which comes from industrial animal farming.
Along with featuring "facts and figures about the animals we eat," the report explains that scientists have been "stressing for over a decade that a climate- and biodiversity-friendly diet contains less than half the amount of meat consumed in industrialized countries today."
"However, an ambitious and dedicated political shift in agriculture and food policy to tackle the climate crisis seems far away," the report continues. "The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
Leaders at the three groups behind the atlas argue in its introduction that "contrary to what politicians might claim, laws and regulations can steer our consumption decisions in favor of sustainability and health. There are numerous instruments for this: fiscal, informational, and legal."
"European and national food strategies should contain such instruments, as well as those which support sustainable livestock breeding and a transition of the industry towards more locally embedded models in order to create fair and sustainable food environments," the trio writes. "They should also reinforce environmental and social laws as well as animal welfare legislation in order to shift the focus of current industrial meat production to quality instead of quantity."
The atlas uses several data points to make the case that industrial farming is wreaking havoc on the planet--including findings from 2018 that "just five meat-and-milk giants, JBS, Tyson, Cargill, Dairy Farmers of America, and Fonterra, produce more combined emissions per year than major oil players like Exxon, Shell, or BP. Taken together, 20 livestock firms are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than Germany, Britain, or France."
\u201cThe world\u2019s five biggest meat and milk producers emit the same amount of greenhouse gases as Exxon.\n\nAnd the 20 biggest livestock companies emit more than either Germany, Britain or France. \n\nhttps://t.co/QREwpj19D5\u201d— Lee Harris (@Lee Harris) 1631021983
Although some animal farming industry giants are privately owned, the atlas acknowledges, "others are at least partially listed on the stock exchanges" and "financial firms are major investors, underwriters, and lenders to the sector."
More than 2,500 investment banks, private banks, and pension funds poured $478 billion into meat and dairy firms from 2015 to 2020, the report says, emphasizing that BlackRock, Capital Group, Vanguard, and the Norwegian government pension fund are among the top investors.
"While many financiers have made commitments to environmental policies and targets," the atlas explains, "the impacts of industrial-scale agriculture are yet to be regulated across financial and legal platforms."
Meat Atlas 2021 also explores various other aspects of the industry including consolidation, trade policies, pandemic risk, land conflicts, water use, pesticides, and microbial resistance. According to the report, key takeaways include:
"Industrial meat farming is fanning the flames of climate crisis and biodiversity collapse while threatening the health of farmers, workers, and consumers--the evidence is resounding," said Stanka Becheva, food and agriculture campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, in a statement Tuesday.
Though Becheva took aim at the European Union's policymakers in particular, her message about what changes are needed has broader applicability.
"The E.U. needs to curb this insatiable industry, but right now its leaders are just eating out of Big Agribusiness' hand," she said. "Europe must act to clamp down on deforestation and human rights violations in supply chains, facilitate the switch to more plant-based diets, and redirect billions of euros of subsidies and finance to small sustainable farmers."
Surveys suggest such moves would be popular, Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung president Barbara Unmussig pointed out Tuesday.
"As the polls in this Meat Atlas 2021 show, the younger generations in Germany--but also in other countries--share this critical assessment: They no longer accept the meat industry's business model," Unmussig said.
"More than 70% of German young adults are willing to pay more for meat if the production conditions change fundamentally," she explained. "But the most decisive result: a huge majority of over 80% see politics in the duty to finally set binding conditions for a climate-friendly agriculture, better animal husbandry and a climate-friendly diet."
\u201c\ud83c\udd95 #MeatAtlas reveals urgency of a transition for #FoodAndFarming\n\n\ud83c\udfedIndustrial animal farming responsible for up to 21% of climate-damaging emissions\n\ud83e\udd69Meat production to reach 366 M tonnes by 2029\n\ud83c\udf31Nature-friendly solutions are under threat\n\ud83d\udc49https://t.co/ab2S7jvsoi\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1631000886
Meat production "is expected to increase by another 40 million tonnes a year by 2029," which "would take the total output to around 366 million tonnes a year, unless policy changes intervene," according to the atlas. "Although 80% of the growth is likely to take place in the Global South, the biggest producers will remain China, Brazil, the USA, and the members of the European Union."
Noting that "the economic interests of the meat industry, which is worth billions, and the refusal of politicians to reform strategically and coherently are keeping us on a tortuous path overstretching the ecological limits of the planet," Unmussig warned that "the way things are, we will need to reduce meat production by half."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
A report released Tuesday by European campaigners highlights how the global industrial animal farming sector, backed by billions from major financial institutions, is fueling the intertwined climate and biodiversity crises--and what policymakers can do to better protect people and the planet.
"The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
--Meat Atlas 2021
Meat Atlas 2021 (pdf)--published by Friends of the Earth Europe, its German arm Bund fur Umwelt und Naturschutz, and the Berlin-based Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung--says the food sector is responsible for 21% to 37% of planet-heating emissions, over half of which comes from industrial animal farming.
Along with featuring "facts and figures about the animals we eat," the report explains that scientists have been "stressing for over a decade that a climate- and biodiversity-friendly diet contains less than half the amount of meat consumed in industrialized countries today."
"However, an ambitious and dedicated political shift in agriculture and food policy to tackle the climate crisis seems far away," the report continues. "The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
Leaders at the three groups behind the atlas argue in its introduction that "contrary to what politicians might claim, laws and regulations can steer our consumption decisions in favor of sustainability and health. There are numerous instruments for this: fiscal, informational, and legal."
"European and national food strategies should contain such instruments, as well as those which support sustainable livestock breeding and a transition of the industry towards more locally embedded models in order to create fair and sustainable food environments," the trio writes. "They should also reinforce environmental and social laws as well as animal welfare legislation in order to shift the focus of current industrial meat production to quality instead of quantity."
The atlas uses several data points to make the case that industrial farming is wreaking havoc on the planet--including findings from 2018 that "just five meat-and-milk giants, JBS, Tyson, Cargill, Dairy Farmers of America, and Fonterra, produce more combined emissions per year than major oil players like Exxon, Shell, or BP. Taken together, 20 livestock firms are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than Germany, Britain, or France."
\u201cThe world\u2019s five biggest meat and milk producers emit the same amount of greenhouse gases as Exxon.\n\nAnd the 20 biggest livestock companies emit more than either Germany, Britain or France. \n\nhttps://t.co/QREwpj19D5\u201d— Lee Harris (@Lee Harris) 1631021983
Although some animal farming industry giants are privately owned, the atlas acknowledges, "others are at least partially listed on the stock exchanges" and "financial firms are major investors, underwriters, and lenders to the sector."
More than 2,500 investment banks, private banks, and pension funds poured $478 billion into meat and dairy firms from 2015 to 2020, the report says, emphasizing that BlackRock, Capital Group, Vanguard, and the Norwegian government pension fund are among the top investors.
"While many financiers have made commitments to environmental policies and targets," the atlas explains, "the impacts of industrial-scale agriculture are yet to be regulated across financial and legal platforms."
Meat Atlas 2021 also explores various other aspects of the industry including consolidation, trade policies, pandemic risk, land conflicts, water use, pesticides, and microbial resistance. According to the report, key takeaways include:
"Industrial meat farming is fanning the flames of climate crisis and biodiversity collapse while threatening the health of farmers, workers, and consumers--the evidence is resounding," said Stanka Becheva, food and agriculture campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, in a statement Tuesday.
Though Becheva took aim at the European Union's policymakers in particular, her message about what changes are needed has broader applicability.
"The E.U. needs to curb this insatiable industry, but right now its leaders are just eating out of Big Agribusiness' hand," she said. "Europe must act to clamp down on deforestation and human rights violations in supply chains, facilitate the switch to more plant-based diets, and redirect billions of euros of subsidies and finance to small sustainable farmers."
Surveys suggest such moves would be popular, Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung president Barbara Unmussig pointed out Tuesday.
"As the polls in this Meat Atlas 2021 show, the younger generations in Germany--but also in other countries--share this critical assessment: They no longer accept the meat industry's business model," Unmussig said.
"More than 70% of German young adults are willing to pay more for meat if the production conditions change fundamentally," she explained. "But the most decisive result: a huge majority of over 80% see politics in the duty to finally set binding conditions for a climate-friendly agriculture, better animal husbandry and a climate-friendly diet."
\u201c\ud83c\udd95 #MeatAtlas reveals urgency of a transition for #FoodAndFarming\n\n\ud83c\udfedIndustrial animal farming responsible for up to 21% of climate-damaging emissions\n\ud83e\udd69Meat production to reach 366 M tonnes by 2029\n\ud83c\udf31Nature-friendly solutions are under threat\n\ud83d\udc49https://t.co/ab2S7jvsoi\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1631000886
Meat production "is expected to increase by another 40 million tonnes a year by 2029," which "would take the total output to around 366 million tonnes a year, unless policy changes intervene," according to the atlas. "Although 80% of the growth is likely to take place in the Global South, the biggest producers will remain China, Brazil, the USA, and the members of the European Union."
Noting that "the economic interests of the meat industry, which is worth billions, and the refusal of politicians to reform strategically and coherently are keeping us on a tortuous path overstretching the ecological limits of the planet," Unmussig warned that "the way things are, we will need to reduce meat production by half."
A report released Tuesday by European campaigners highlights how the global industrial animal farming sector, backed by billions from major financial institutions, is fueling the intertwined climate and biodiversity crises--and what policymakers can do to better protect people and the planet.
"The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
--Meat Atlas 2021
Meat Atlas 2021 (pdf)--published by Friends of the Earth Europe, its German arm Bund fur Umwelt und Naturschutz, and the Berlin-based Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung--says the food sector is responsible for 21% to 37% of planet-heating emissions, over half of which comes from industrial animal farming.
Along with featuring "facts and figures about the animals we eat," the report explains that scientists have been "stressing for over a decade that a climate- and biodiversity-friendly diet contains less than half the amount of meat consumed in industrialized countries today."
"However, an ambitious and dedicated political shift in agriculture and food policy to tackle the climate crisis seems far away," the report continues. "The food and farming sector in industrialized countries, which accounts for about one-third of global greenhouse gas emissions, is far from doing its fair share to reduce them."
Leaders at the three groups behind the atlas argue in its introduction that "contrary to what politicians might claim, laws and regulations can steer our consumption decisions in favor of sustainability and health. There are numerous instruments for this: fiscal, informational, and legal."
"European and national food strategies should contain such instruments, as well as those which support sustainable livestock breeding and a transition of the industry towards more locally embedded models in order to create fair and sustainable food environments," the trio writes. "They should also reinforce environmental and social laws as well as animal welfare legislation in order to shift the focus of current industrial meat production to quality instead of quantity."
The atlas uses several data points to make the case that industrial farming is wreaking havoc on the planet--including findings from 2018 that "just five meat-and-milk giants, JBS, Tyson, Cargill, Dairy Farmers of America, and Fonterra, produce more combined emissions per year than major oil players like Exxon, Shell, or BP. Taken together, 20 livestock firms are responsible for more greenhouse gas emissions than Germany, Britain, or France."
\u201cThe world\u2019s five biggest meat and milk producers emit the same amount of greenhouse gases as Exxon.\n\nAnd the 20 biggest livestock companies emit more than either Germany, Britain or France. \n\nhttps://t.co/QREwpj19D5\u201d— Lee Harris (@Lee Harris) 1631021983
Although some animal farming industry giants are privately owned, the atlas acknowledges, "others are at least partially listed on the stock exchanges" and "financial firms are major investors, underwriters, and lenders to the sector."
More than 2,500 investment banks, private banks, and pension funds poured $478 billion into meat and dairy firms from 2015 to 2020, the report says, emphasizing that BlackRock, Capital Group, Vanguard, and the Norwegian government pension fund are among the top investors.
"While many financiers have made commitments to environmental policies and targets," the atlas explains, "the impacts of industrial-scale agriculture are yet to be regulated across financial and legal platforms."
Meat Atlas 2021 also explores various other aspects of the industry including consolidation, trade policies, pandemic risk, land conflicts, water use, pesticides, and microbial resistance. According to the report, key takeaways include:
"Industrial meat farming is fanning the flames of climate crisis and biodiversity collapse while threatening the health of farmers, workers, and consumers--the evidence is resounding," said Stanka Becheva, food and agriculture campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe, in a statement Tuesday.
Though Becheva took aim at the European Union's policymakers in particular, her message about what changes are needed has broader applicability.
"The E.U. needs to curb this insatiable industry, but right now its leaders are just eating out of Big Agribusiness' hand," she said. "Europe must act to clamp down on deforestation and human rights violations in supply chains, facilitate the switch to more plant-based diets, and redirect billions of euros of subsidies and finance to small sustainable farmers."
Surveys suggest such moves would be popular, Heinrich-Boll-Stiftung president Barbara Unmussig pointed out Tuesday.
"As the polls in this Meat Atlas 2021 show, the younger generations in Germany--but also in other countries--share this critical assessment: They no longer accept the meat industry's business model," Unmussig said.
"More than 70% of German young adults are willing to pay more for meat if the production conditions change fundamentally," she explained. "But the most decisive result: a huge majority of over 80% see politics in the duty to finally set binding conditions for a climate-friendly agriculture, better animal husbandry and a climate-friendly diet."
\u201c\ud83c\udd95 #MeatAtlas reveals urgency of a transition for #FoodAndFarming\n\n\ud83c\udfedIndustrial animal farming responsible for up to 21% of climate-damaging emissions\n\ud83e\udd69Meat production to reach 366 M tonnes by 2029\n\ud83c\udf31Nature-friendly solutions are under threat\n\ud83d\udc49https://t.co/ab2S7jvsoi\u201d— Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d (@Friends of the Earth Europe\ud83c\udf0d) 1631000886
Meat production "is expected to increase by another 40 million tonnes a year by 2029," which "would take the total output to around 366 million tonnes a year, unless policy changes intervene," according to the atlas. "Although 80% of the growth is likely to take place in the Global South, the biggest producers will remain China, Brazil, the USA, and the members of the European Union."
Noting that "the economic interests of the meat industry, which is worth billions, and the refusal of politicians to reform strategically and coherently are keeping us on a tortuous path overstretching the ecological limits of the planet," Unmussig warned that "the way things are, we will need to reduce meat production by half."