SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Fossil fuel corporations have plans to expand dirty energy extraction in Africa--proposing more than a trillion dollars worth of new oil, gas, and coal projects over the next three decades--even though such an undertaking would exacerbate climate chaos and create "stranded assets that leave behind unfunded clean-up, shortfalls of government revenue, and overnight job losses."
That's according to a new report published Thursday by Oil Change International in partnership with Oilwatch Africa, Africa Coal Network, 350Africa.org, Health of Mother Earth Foundation, WoMin African Alliance, and Center for International Environmental Law.
"Fossil fuel industry plans to sink USD $230 billion into the development of new extraction projects in Africa in the next decade--and USD $1.4 trillion by 2050--are not compatible with a safe climate future," note the authors, who advocate instead for a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
\u201cNEW @ PriceofOil, @OilwatchAfrica1, @AfricaCoalNet report details massive industry plans for new #FossilFuels extraction in Africa.\n71% of this is at extra risk of becoming stranded \u2014 it's time to build a #JustTransition instead! \n\nREAD: https://t.co/elePGcXGTG\u201d— Center for International Environmental Law (@Center for International Environmental Law) 1634186285
"It is a myth that fossil fuels equal development," Nnimmo Bassey, director of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation and a Right Livelihood laureate, said in a statement. "Both the physical resources and the profits from these projects have overwhelmingly flowed out of Africa rather than addressing energy poverty on the continent."
"Meanwhile," he added, "pollution is the daily reality of our peoples and criminally harms nearby waterways, bodies, soils, and the air."
The fossil fuel industry's plans would reinforce longstanding patterns of exploitation and inequality, according to Oil Change International, which pointed out that "two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa [from 2020 to 2050] will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues."
\u201cIf plans go forward, two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa 2020-2050 will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues. @TotalEnergies, @eni, @ExxonMobil, & @BP_plc are projected to own the most new production \ud83e\udd2c\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
The new report comes one day after the International Energy Agency (IEA) reiterated its message that limiting global warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century requires keeping fossil fuels in the ground, meaning that no new oil, gas, and coal extraction should be approved--in Africa or anywhere in the world.
"If the fossil fuel industry extracts the oil, gas, and coal projected for production in Africa in the next three decades," the report states, "this will emit 62 billion tons of CO2. This is equivalent to 13% of the remaining carbon budget associated with a 50% chance of staying within a 1.5degC level of warming."
In addition to urging policymakers to swiftly phase out fossil fuel production and massively ramp up investments in clean energy to avert the worst of the climate emergency--which is already fueling deadly extreme weather across the globe and is projected to become even more "catastrophic" in the absence of rapid and far-reaching efforts to slash greenhouse gas emissions--the IEA has also warned that there is a growing risk of dirty energy projects becoming stranded assets in the coming years.
According to the new report, 71% of proposed fossil fuel production in Africa over the next three decades would either rely on more expensive methods, be located in "new entrant" countries with little or no existing oil, gas, and coal extraction, or both--putting those projects at a heightened risk of being abandoned and causing "overnight" unemployment, fiscal austerity, and unaddressed environmental harms.
Moreover, the opportunity costs of further exploration and investment in new oil, gas, and coal projects are enormous, as the fossil fuel industry's expansion across Africa would foreclose possibilities to build more egalitarian economies powered by clean energy.
"The risks of allowing the fossil fuel industry to continue with business as usual must also be compared with the alternative development opportunities on the table," the report states. "If countries do not start to develop the infrastructure and technologies that will enable them to implement clean energy sources, they could also be locked out of the coming low-carbon economy. Many countries in Africa have a comparative advantage for renewable energy."
Africa is home to nearly 40% of the world's renewable energy potential, notes the report, and over a third of the continent's "future fossil fuel emissions are not locked in."
"From 2020 to 2050, 46% of gas production, 36% of oil production, and 23% of coal production are projected to come from new projects that are neither in production nor under development currently," the researchers write. "This means there are little or no costs to cancel them."
As a result, the report points out, "African countries are poised to leapfrog directly to more advanced and affordable renewable energy technologies--which also lend themselves to democratic ownership models."
\u201cThese plans to build new oil, gas, and coal projects in Africa are also crowding out the local, equitable, and renewable energy future that could be built instead! \ud83c\udf1e\ud83d\udd27\ud83d\udce3\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
"Phasing out fossil fuel production does not mean halting the use and production of fossil fuels in Africa overnight," the authors emphasize. "Rather, it means starting widespread planning now to ensure there is time and resources for clean-up and for a just transition for the workers and communities that depend upon production."
"The costs of this phase-out," they add, "should not and cannot be borne equally: Wealthy countries in the Global North most responsible for historic and current emissions must move first and fastest to phase out their fossil fuel production and pay their fair share for the global energy transition."
\u201cIt can\u2019t be shouted loud enough that rich countries need to do their fair share to phase out fossil fuels and stop blocking just transitions globally. (hear that @G7, @COP26, @g20org?). Here's what our report says they must do to get out of the way: https://t.co/S2M0wZCwyk\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
Oil Change International stressed that "the escalating risks of fossil fuel extraction for economies, the climate, and frontline communities mean there is now little to gain and everything to lose from building new fossil fuel projects."
The authors of the report make the following recommendations:
In a blog post written at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, Bassey argued that "the petroleum civilization will have an end. And that end is near."
"It is for humans to decide," he added, "if we want an orderly transition or a haphazard and cataclysmic one."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Fossil fuel corporations have plans to expand dirty energy extraction in Africa--proposing more than a trillion dollars worth of new oil, gas, and coal projects over the next three decades--even though such an undertaking would exacerbate climate chaos and create "stranded assets that leave behind unfunded clean-up, shortfalls of government revenue, and overnight job losses."
That's according to a new report published Thursday by Oil Change International in partnership with Oilwatch Africa, Africa Coal Network, 350Africa.org, Health of Mother Earth Foundation, WoMin African Alliance, and Center for International Environmental Law.
"Fossil fuel industry plans to sink USD $230 billion into the development of new extraction projects in Africa in the next decade--and USD $1.4 trillion by 2050--are not compatible with a safe climate future," note the authors, who advocate instead for a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
\u201cNEW @ PriceofOil, @OilwatchAfrica1, @AfricaCoalNet report details massive industry plans for new #FossilFuels extraction in Africa.\n71% of this is at extra risk of becoming stranded \u2014 it's time to build a #JustTransition instead! \n\nREAD: https://t.co/elePGcXGTG\u201d— Center for International Environmental Law (@Center for International Environmental Law) 1634186285
"It is a myth that fossil fuels equal development," Nnimmo Bassey, director of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation and a Right Livelihood laureate, said in a statement. "Both the physical resources and the profits from these projects have overwhelmingly flowed out of Africa rather than addressing energy poverty on the continent."
"Meanwhile," he added, "pollution is the daily reality of our peoples and criminally harms nearby waterways, bodies, soils, and the air."
The fossil fuel industry's plans would reinforce longstanding patterns of exploitation and inequality, according to Oil Change International, which pointed out that "two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa [from 2020 to 2050] will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues."
\u201cIf plans go forward, two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa 2020-2050 will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues. @TotalEnergies, @eni, @ExxonMobil, & @BP_plc are projected to own the most new production \ud83e\udd2c\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
The new report comes one day after the International Energy Agency (IEA) reiterated its message that limiting global warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century requires keeping fossil fuels in the ground, meaning that no new oil, gas, and coal extraction should be approved--in Africa or anywhere in the world.
"If the fossil fuel industry extracts the oil, gas, and coal projected for production in Africa in the next three decades," the report states, "this will emit 62 billion tons of CO2. This is equivalent to 13% of the remaining carbon budget associated with a 50% chance of staying within a 1.5degC level of warming."
In addition to urging policymakers to swiftly phase out fossil fuel production and massively ramp up investments in clean energy to avert the worst of the climate emergency--which is already fueling deadly extreme weather across the globe and is projected to become even more "catastrophic" in the absence of rapid and far-reaching efforts to slash greenhouse gas emissions--the IEA has also warned that there is a growing risk of dirty energy projects becoming stranded assets in the coming years.
According to the new report, 71% of proposed fossil fuel production in Africa over the next three decades would either rely on more expensive methods, be located in "new entrant" countries with little or no existing oil, gas, and coal extraction, or both--putting those projects at a heightened risk of being abandoned and causing "overnight" unemployment, fiscal austerity, and unaddressed environmental harms.
Moreover, the opportunity costs of further exploration and investment in new oil, gas, and coal projects are enormous, as the fossil fuel industry's expansion across Africa would foreclose possibilities to build more egalitarian economies powered by clean energy.
"The risks of allowing the fossil fuel industry to continue with business as usual must also be compared with the alternative development opportunities on the table," the report states. "If countries do not start to develop the infrastructure and technologies that will enable them to implement clean energy sources, they could also be locked out of the coming low-carbon economy. Many countries in Africa have a comparative advantage for renewable energy."
Africa is home to nearly 40% of the world's renewable energy potential, notes the report, and over a third of the continent's "future fossil fuel emissions are not locked in."
"From 2020 to 2050, 46% of gas production, 36% of oil production, and 23% of coal production are projected to come from new projects that are neither in production nor under development currently," the researchers write. "This means there are little or no costs to cancel them."
As a result, the report points out, "African countries are poised to leapfrog directly to more advanced and affordable renewable energy technologies--which also lend themselves to democratic ownership models."
\u201cThese plans to build new oil, gas, and coal projects in Africa are also crowding out the local, equitable, and renewable energy future that could be built instead! \ud83c\udf1e\ud83d\udd27\ud83d\udce3\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
"Phasing out fossil fuel production does not mean halting the use and production of fossil fuels in Africa overnight," the authors emphasize. "Rather, it means starting widespread planning now to ensure there is time and resources for clean-up and for a just transition for the workers and communities that depend upon production."
"The costs of this phase-out," they add, "should not and cannot be borne equally: Wealthy countries in the Global North most responsible for historic and current emissions must move first and fastest to phase out their fossil fuel production and pay their fair share for the global energy transition."
\u201cIt can\u2019t be shouted loud enough that rich countries need to do their fair share to phase out fossil fuels and stop blocking just transitions globally. (hear that @G7, @COP26, @g20org?). Here's what our report says they must do to get out of the way: https://t.co/S2M0wZCwyk\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
Oil Change International stressed that "the escalating risks of fossil fuel extraction for economies, the climate, and frontline communities mean there is now little to gain and everything to lose from building new fossil fuel projects."
The authors of the report make the following recommendations:
In a blog post written at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, Bassey argued that "the petroleum civilization will have an end. And that end is near."
"It is for humans to decide," he added, "if we want an orderly transition or a haphazard and cataclysmic one."
Fossil fuel corporations have plans to expand dirty energy extraction in Africa--proposing more than a trillion dollars worth of new oil, gas, and coal projects over the next three decades--even though such an undertaking would exacerbate climate chaos and create "stranded assets that leave behind unfunded clean-up, shortfalls of government revenue, and overnight job losses."
That's according to a new report published Thursday by Oil Change International in partnership with Oilwatch Africa, Africa Coal Network, 350Africa.org, Health of Mother Earth Foundation, WoMin African Alliance, and Center for International Environmental Law.
"Fossil fuel industry plans to sink USD $230 billion into the development of new extraction projects in Africa in the next decade--and USD $1.4 trillion by 2050--are not compatible with a safe climate future," note the authors, who advocate instead for a just transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
\u201cNEW @ PriceofOil, @OilwatchAfrica1, @AfricaCoalNet report details massive industry plans for new #FossilFuels extraction in Africa.\n71% of this is at extra risk of becoming stranded \u2014 it's time to build a #JustTransition instead! \n\nREAD: https://t.co/elePGcXGTG\u201d— Center for International Environmental Law (@Center for International Environmental Law) 1634186285
"It is a myth that fossil fuels equal development," Nnimmo Bassey, director of the Health of Mother Earth Foundation and a Right Livelihood laureate, said in a statement. "Both the physical resources and the profits from these projects have overwhelmingly flowed out of Africa rather than addressing energy poverty on the continent."
"Meanwhile," he added, "pollution is the daily reality of our peoples and criminally harms nearby waterways, bodies, soils, and the air."
The fossil fuel industry's plans would reinforce longstanding patterns of exploitation and inequality, according to Oil Change International, which pointed out that "two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa [from 2020 to 2050] will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues."
\u201cIf plans go forward, two-thirds of projected oil and gas expansion in Africa 2020-2050 will be owned by overseas corporations, who are structuring contracts to guard remaining revenues. @TotalEnergies, @eni, @ExxonMobil, & @BP_plc are projected to own the most new production \ud83e\udd2c\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
The new report comes one day after the International Energy Agency (IEA) reiterated its message that limiting global warming to 1.5degC by the end of the century requires keeping fossil fuels in the ground, meaning that no new oil, gas, and coal extraction should be approved--in Africa or anywhere in the world.
"If the fossil fuel industry extracts the oil, gas, and coal projected for production in Africa in the next three decades," the report states, "this will emit 62 billion tons of CO2. This is equivalent to 13% of the remaining carbon budget associated with a 50% chance of staying within a 1.5degC level of warming."
In addition to urging policymakers to swiftly phase out fossil fuel production and massively ramp up investments in clean energy to avert the worst of the climate emergency--which is already fueling deadly extreme weather across the globe and is projected to become even more "catastrophic" in the absence of rapid and far-reaching efforts to slash greenhouse gas emissions--the IEA has also warned that there is a growing risk of dirty energy projects becoming stranded assets in the coming years.
According to the new report, 71% of proposed fossil fuel production in Africa over the next three decades would either rely on more expensive methods, be located in "new entrant" countries with little or no existing oil, gas, and coal extraction, or both--putting those projects at a heightened risk of being abandoned and causing "overnight" unemployment, fiscal austerity, and unaddressed environmental harms.
Moreover, the opportunity costs of further exploration and investment in new oil, gas, and coal projects are enormous, as the fossil fuel industry's expansion across Africa would foreclose possibilities to build more egalitarian economies powered by clean energy.
"The risks of allowing the fossil fuel industry to continue with business as usual must also be compared with the alternative development opportunities on the table," the report states. "If countries do not start to develop the infrastructure and technologies that will enable them to implement clean energy sources, they could also be locked out of the coming low-carbon economy. Many countries in Africa have a comparative advantage for renewable energy."
Africa is home to nearly 40% of the world's renewable energy potential, notes the report, and over a third of the continent's "future fossil fuel emissions are not locked in."
"From 2020 to 2050, 46% of gas production, 36% of oil production, and 23% of coal production are projected to come from new projects that are neither in production nor under development currently," the researchers write. "This means there are little or no costs to cancel them."
As a result, the report points out, "African countries are poised to leapfrog directly to more advanced and affordable renewable energy technologies--which also lend themselves to democratic ownership models."
\u201cThese plans to build new oil, gas, and coal projects in Africa are also crowding out the local, equitable, and renewable energy future that could be built instead! \ud83c\udf1e\ud83d\udd27\ud83d\udce3\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
"Phasing out fossil fuel production does not mean halting the use and production of fossil fuels in Africa overnight," the authors emphasize. "Rather, it means starting widespread planning now to ensure there is time and resources for clean-up and for a just transition for the workers and communities that depend upon production."
"The costs of this phase-out," they add, "should not and cannot be borne equally: Wealthy countries in the Global North most responsible for historic and current emissions must move first and fastest to phase out their fossil fuel production and pay their fair share for the global energy transition."
\u201cIt can\u2019t be shouted loud enough that rich countries need to do their fair share to phase out fossil fuels and stop blocking just transitions globally. (hear that @G7, @COP26, @g20org?). Here's what our report says they must do to get out of the way: https://t.co/S2M0wZCwyk\u201d— Oil Change International (@Oil Change International) 1634190572
Oil Change International stressed that "the escalating risks of fossil fuel extraction for economies, the climate, and frontline communities mean there is now little to gain and everything to lose from building new fossil fuel projects."
The authors of the report make the following recommendations:
In a blog post written at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic, Bassey argued that "the petroleum civilization will have an end. And that end is near."
"It is for humans to decide," he added, "if we want an orderly transition or a haphazard and cataclysmic one."