SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In the wake of President Joe Biden's announcement Thursday of a new framework for a dramatically pared-down Build Back Better package, disappointed but resolute progressives vowed they "won't leave working families behind" and reasserted that the budget reconciliation and much narrower infrastructure bills must be passed in tandem.
"Progressives won't leave working families behind," insisted Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) "We've been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together--and that hasn't changed."
While Jayapal said that members of the Progressive Caucus "enthusiastically" endorsed the "many good things" in the framework announced by Biden, she expressed hope that Democrats in the Senate would still be able to save certain elements of the package, including prescription drug pricing.
\u201cProgressives won\u2019t leave working families behind.\n\nWe\u2019ve been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together \u2014 and that hasn\u2019t changed.\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1635438600
Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), the progressive whip, reportedly said there are not enough Democratic votes to pass the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill on Thursday, as requested by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), absent final legislative text and assurances on the larger bill.
"We have been clear since April: we will pass the bipartisan infrastructure once we vote a Build Back Better Act to help our communities," Omar asserted "That has not changed. No vote on infrastructure until we vote on reconciliation."
In his White House address, Biden declared that "after months of tough and thoughtful negotiations... we have a historic economic framework" that "will create millions of jobs, grow the economy, invest in our nation, and our people, turn the climate crisis into an opportunity and put us on a path not only to compete but to win the economic competition of the 21st century against China and every other major country in the world."
While the president acknowledged that "no one got everything they wanted, including me," progressive critics, given the amount of corporate lobbying aimed at the legislative effort, shot back at that assertion.
\u201cThis is not true: Big pharma, the fossil fuel industry, the superrich, the for-profit college industry, and health insurers all got exactly what they wanted in this bill.\u201d— Branko Marcetic (@Branko Marcetic) 1635437307
Following Biden's announcement, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was not prepared to support the watered-down proposal--whose price tag was slashed from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion in the hopes of gaining right-wing Democratic senators' support--without the expansion of Medicare included and the ability to lower drug prices.
Moreover, Sanders said he agreed with House progressives who said they would not vote one bill until both were finalized and guarantees were in place that both will pass the Senate.
"What you don't want to see is the infrastructure bill pass and then not have the kind of Build Back Better bill that we need," Sanders said. "That's why you need 50 members [of the Senate] on board before there should be a vote, in my view, in the House."
"Clearly to my mind it has some major gaps in it," Sanders said of the weakened proposal.
Among the key social programs championed by progressives that were gutted following aggressive corporate lobbying are free community college, paid family leave, allowing Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, Medicare expansion, and the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) designed to more rapidly transition the nation to renewable energy. Also chopped was a billionaire tax proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) but rejected by coal baron Manchin as "divisive" and reportedly opposed by multimillionaire House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
\u201cI back House Progressives. \n\nWe need to agree on bill text for Build Back Better to be sure we are all on the same page. Literally. This sounds like an inside issue, but it\u2019s about making sure Democrats deliver for Americans.\u201d— Senator Tina Smith (@Senator Tina Smith) 1635430814
"The American people are very, very clear that they're sick and tired of paying the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs," Sanders said. "There is to the best of my knowledge no language in there that takes on the pharmaceutical industry."
The cuts were the result of relentless obstruction by corporate-backed Democrats Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema, whose votes are required to pass the legislation via the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process.
However, it was unclear whether they would vote for the pared-down package.
It was also uncertain whether progressives would accept the weakened package--or the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill they delayed earlier this month over concerns that their $3.5 trillion proposal would be sacrificed.
"I am not going to sell out my district for a bill that was written by the fossil fuel industry and championed by two Democratic senators who bow down to Big Pharma and corporate polluters," Rep. Rashida Tlaib bluntly stated in anticipation of Biden's speech.
After leaving a Congressional Progressive Caucus meeting Thursday, Tlaib reportedly said to "put a 'hell no'" next to her name on the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
\u201cShould progressives move forward and vote on BIF?\n\n\u201cIt\u2019s the same answer it\u2019s always been. There\u2019s one big package here with multiple votes. It\u2019s important all the pieces go forward together,\u201d Warren said\u201d— Igor Bobic (@Igor Bobic) 1635434100
During his speech, Biden couched the compromise in terms of "competitiveness versus complacency."
"It's about leading the world or letting the world pass us by," he insisted.
However, progressives were quick to point out who would be "passed by" by the dramatically reduced reconciliation bill.
"The omission of paid family and medical leave from a package aiming to Build Back Better from a global pandemic and care crisis would be a devastating outcome for the millions of workers who are being asked to choose between their health, paychecks, and caregiving every day," the advocacy group Paid Leave for All said in a statement.
Zeroing in on the jettisoned Medicare provisions, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said in a statement that "failing to take this opportunity to end Big Pharma price-gouging will mean Americans will continue to go without medicines they need."
\u201cCutting Medicare drug price negotiation from Build Back Better would be an unmitigated disaster.\n\n1 in 4 Americans ration or skip meds because of high prices. That's horrific.\n\nPLEASE call your member of Congress and demand they don't cut drug price negotiation: (202) 224-3121\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1635437835
"One-in-four Americans report rationing or skipping prescriptions because of high prices," the statement added. "It will mean that many of those who do find a way to pay for needed medications will face economic insecurity."
Varshini Prakash, executive director of the youth-led climate justice group Sunrise Movement, said in a statement that "this framework is exactly that--just a framework. A deal is not a deal until progressives agree to it."
"It's promising to see a substantial investment in climate action," she continued, "but it's appalling and frankly cruel that drug pricing, paid leave, Medicare expansion on dental and vision, are all cut from the framework, and Biden seems willing to leave a pathway to citizenship for millions up to an un-elected parliamentarian."
\u201cThis new framework is just that: a framework. It\u2019s not a deal until progressives sign off. We\u2019ve already seen major cuts, from paid leave to Medicare expansion, and we can\u2019t afford any more. \n\n@SpeakerPelosi, you have to pass reconciliation before the BIF. We\u2019re not going back.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1635445686
"We stand with Sen. Sanders and House progressives on needing to see the legislative text, ensuring Sens. Manchin and Sinema vote for the reconciliation package, and passing reconciliation in the House before the House brings the [infrastructure bill] to a vote," added Prakash. "Progressives are the ones who have fought like hell for Biden's full agenda, and their votes cannot be taken for granted."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
In the wake of President Joe Biden's announcement Thursday of a new framework for a dramatically pared-down Build Back Better package, disappointed but resolute progressives vowed they "won't leave working families behind" and reasserted that the budget reconciliation and much narrower infrastructure bills must be passed in tandem.
"Progressives won't leave working families behind," insisted Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) "We've been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together--and that hasn't changed."
While Jayapal said that members of the Progressive Caucus "enthusiastically" endorsed the "many good things" in the framework announced by Biden, she expressed hope that Democrats in the Senate would still be able to save certain elements of the package, including prescription drug pricing.
\u201cProgressives won\u2019t leave working families behind.\n\nWe\u2019ve been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together \u2014 and that hasn\u2019t changed.\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1635438600
Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), the progressive whip, reportedly said there are not enough Democratic votes to pass the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill on Thursday, as requested by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), absent final legislative text and assurances on the larger bill.
"We have been clear since April: we will pass the bipartisan infrastructure once we vote a Build Back Better Act to help our communities," Omar asserted "That has not changed. No vote on infrastructure until we vote on reconciliation."
In his White House address, Biden declared that "after months of tough and thoughtful negotiations... we have a historic economic framework" that "will create millions of jobs, grow the economy, invest in our nation, and our people, turn the climate crisis into an opportunity and put us on a path not only to compete but to win the economic competition of the 21st century against China and every other major country in the world."
While the president acknowledged that "no one got everything they wanted, including me," progressive critics, given the amount of corporate lobbying aimed at the legislative effort, shot back at that assertion.
\u201cThis is not true: Big pharma, the fossil fuel industry, the superrich, the for-profit college industry, and health insurers all got exactly what they wanted in this bill.\u201d— Branko Marcetic (@Branko Marcetic) 1635437307
Following Biden's announcement, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was not prepared to support the watered-down proposal--whose price tag was slashed from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion in the hopes of gaining right-wing Democratic senators' support--without the expansion of Medicare included and the ability to lower drug prices.
Moreover, Sanders said he agreed with House progressives who said they would not vote one bill until both were finalized and guarantees were in place that both will pass the Senate.
"What you don't want to see is the infrastructure bill pass and then not have the kind of Build Back Better bill that we need," Sanders said. "That's why you need 50 members [of the Senate] on board before there should be a vote, in my view, in the House."
"Clearly to my mind it has some major gaps in it," Sanders said of the weakened proposal.
Among the key social programs championed by progressives that were gutted following aggressive corporate lobbying are free community college, paid family leave, allowing Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, Medicare expansion, and the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) designed to more rapidly transition the nation to renewable energy. Also chopped was a billionaire tax proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) but rejected by coal baron Manchin as "divisive" and reportedly opposed by multimillionaire House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
\u201cI back House Progressives. \n\nWe need to agree on bill text for Build Back Better to be sure we are all on the same page. Literally. This sounds like an inside issue, but it\u2019s about making sure Democrats deliver for Americans.\u201d— Senator Tina Smith (@Senator Tina Smith) 1635430814
"The American people are very, very clear that they're sick and tired of paying the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs," Sanders said. "There is to the best of my knowledge no language in there that takes on the pharmaceutical industry."
The cuts were the result of relentless obstruction by corporate-backed Democrats Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema, whose votes are required to pass the legislation via the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process.
However, it was unclear whether they would vote for the pared-down package.
It was also uncertain whether progressives would accept the weakened package--or the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill they delayed earlier this month over concerns that their $3.5 trillion proposal would be sacrificed.
"I am not going to sell out my district for a bill that was written by the fossil fuel industry and championed by two Democratic senators who bow down to Big Pharma and corporate polluters," Rep. Rashida Tlaib bluntly stated in anticipation of Biden's speech.
After leaving a Congressional Progressive Caucus meeting Thursday, Tlaib reportedly said to "put a 'hell no'" next to her name on the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
\u201cShould progressives move forward and vote on BIF?\n\n\u201cIt\u2019s the same answer it\u2019s always been. There\u2019s one big package here with multiple votes. It\u2019s important all the pieces go forward together,\u201d Warren said\u201d— Igor Bobic (@Igor Bobic) 1635434100
During his speech, Biden couched the compromise in terms of "competitiveness versus complacency."
"It's about leading the world or letting the world pass us by," he insisted.
However, progressives were quick to point out who would be "passed by" by the dramatically reduced reconciliation bill.
"The omission of paid family and medical leave from a package aiming to Build Back Better from a global pandemic and care crisis would be a devastating outcome for the millions of workers who are being asked to choose between their health, paychecks, and caregiving every day," the advocacy group Paid Leave for All said in a statement.
Zeroing in on the jettisoned Medicare provisions, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said in a statement that "failing to take this opportunity to end Big Pharma price-gouging will mean Americans will continue to go without medicines they need."
\u201cCutting Medicare drug price negotiation from Build Back Better would be an unmitigated disaster.\n\n1 in 4 Americans ration or skip meds because of high prices. That's horrific.\n\nPLEASE call your member of Congress and demand they don't cut drug price negotiation: (202) 224-3121\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1635437835
"One-in-four Americans report rationing or skipping prescriptions because of high prices," the statement added. "It will mean that many of those who do find a way to pay for needed medications will face economic insecurity."
Varshini Prakash, executive director of the youth-led climate justice group Sunrise Movement, said in a statement that "this framework is exactly that--just a framework. A deal is not a deal until progressives agree to it."
"It's promising to see a substantial investment in climate action," she continued, "but it's appalling and frankly cruel that drug pricing, paid leave, Medicare expansion on dental and vision, are all cut from the framework, and Biden seems willing to leave a pathway to citizenship for millions up to an un-elected parliamentarian."
\u201cThis new framework is just that: a framework. It\u2019s not a deal until progressives sign off. We\u2019ve already seen major cuts, from paid leave to Medicare expansion, and we can\u2019t afford any more. \n\n@SpeakerPelosi, you have to pass reconciliation before the BIF. We\u2019re not going back.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1635445686
"We stand with Sen. Sanders and House progressives on needing to see the legislative text, ensuring Sens. Manchin and Sinema vote for the reconciliation package, and passing reconciliation in the House before the House brings the [infrastructure bill] to a vote," added Prakash. "Progressives are the ones who have fought like hell for Biden's full agenda, and their votes cannot be taken for granted."
In the wake of President Joe Biden's announcement Thursday of a new framework for a dramatically pared-down Build Back Better package, disappointed but resolute progressives vowed they "won't leave working families behind" and reasserted that the budget reconciliation and much narrower infrastructure bills must be passed in tandem.
"Progressives won't leave working families behind," insisted Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) "We've been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together--and that hasn't changed."
While Jayapal said that members of the Progressive Caucus "enthusiastically" endorsed the "many good things" in the framework announced by Biden, she expressed hope that Democrats in the Senate would still be able to save certain elements of the package, including prescription drug pricing.
\u201cProgressives won\u2019t leave working families behind.\n\nWe\u2019ve been clear since the spring: the infrastructure bill and the Build Back Better Act pass together \u2014 and that hasn\u2019t changed.\u201d— Rep. Pramila Jayapal (@Rep. Pramila Jayapal) 1635438600
Meanwhile, Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.), the progressive whip, reportedly said there are not enough Democratic votes to pass the $1.2 trillion infrastructure bill on Thursday, as requested by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), absent final legislative text and assurances on the larger bill.
"We have been clear since April: we will pass the bipartisan infrastructure once we vote a Build Back Better Act to help our communities," Omar asserted "That has not changed. No vote on infrastructure until we vote on reconciliation."
In his White House address, Biden declared that "after months of tough and thoughtful negotiations... we have a historic economic framework" that "will create millions of jobs, grow the economy, invest in our nation, and our people, turn the climate crisis into an opportunity and put us on a path not only to compete but to win the economic competition of the 21st century against China and every other major country in the world."
While the president acknowledged that "no one got everything they wanted, including me," progressive critics, given the amount of corporate lobbying aimed at the legislative effort, shot back at that assertion.
\u201cThis is not true: Big pharma, the fossil fuel industry, the superrich, the for-profit college industry, and health insurers all got exactly what they wanted in this bill.\u201d— Branko Marcetic (@Branko Marcetic) 1635437307
Following Biden's announcement, Senate Budget Committee Chair Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) said he was not prepared to support the watered-down proposal--whose price tag was slashed from $3.5 trillion to $1.75 trillion in the hopes of gaining right-wing Democratic senators' support--without the expansion of Medicare included and the ability to lower drug prices.
Moreover, Sanders said he agreed with House progressives who said they would not vote one bill until both were finalized and guarantees were in place that both will pass the Senate.
"What you don't want to see is the infrastructure bill pass and then not have the kind of Build Back Better bill that we need," Sanders said. "That's why you need 50 members [of the Senate] on board before there should be a vote, in my view, in the House."
"Clearly to my mind it has some major gaps in it," Sanders said of the weakened proposal.
Among the key social programs championed by progressives that were gutted following aggressive corporate lobbying are free community college, paid family leave, allowing Medicare to negotiate lower prescription drug prices, Medicare expansion, and the Clean Electricity Performance Program (CEPP) designed to more rapidly transition the nation to renewable energy. Also chopped was a billionaire tax proposed by Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) but rejected by coal baron Manchin as "divisive" and reportedly opposed by multimillionaire House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.).
\u201cI back House Progressives. \n\nWe need to agree on bill text for Build Back Better to be sure we are all on the same page. Literally. This sounds like an inside issue, but it\u2019s about making sure Democrats deliver for Americans.\u201d— Senator Tina Smith (@Senator Tina Smith) 1635430814
"The American people are very, very clear that they're sick and tired of paying the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs," Sanders said. "There is to the best of my knowledge no language in there that takes on the pharmaceutical industry."
The cuts were the result of relentless obstruction by corporate-backed Democrats Sens. Joe Manchin of West Virginia and Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema, whose votes are required to pass the legislation via the filibuster-proof budget reconciliation process.
However, it was unclear whether they would vote for the pared-down package.
It was also uncertain whether progressives would accept the weakened package--or the $1.2 trillion bipartisan infrastructure bill they delayed earlier this month over concerns that their $3.5 trillion proposal would be sacrificed.
"I am not going to sell out my district for a bill that was written by the fossil fuel industry and championed by two Democratic senators who bow down to Big Pharma and corporate polluters," Rep. Rashida Tlaib bluntly stated in anticipation of Biden's speech.
After leaving a Congressional Progressive Caucus meeting Thursday, Tlaib reportedly said to "put a 'hell no'" next to her name on the bipartisan infrastructure bill.
\u201cShould progressives move forward and vote on BIF?\n\n\u201cIt\u2019s the same answer it\u2019s always been. There\u2019s one big package here with multiple votes. It\u2019s important all the pieces go forward together,\u201d Warren said\u201d— Igor Bobic (@Igor Bobic) 1635434100
During his speech, Biden couched the compromise in terms of "competitiveness versus complacency."
"It's about leading the world or letting the world pass us by," he insisted.
However, progressives were quick to point out who would be "passed by" by the dramatically reduced reconciliation bill.
"The omission of paid family and medical leave from a package aiming to Build Back Better from a global pandemic and care crisis would be a devastating outcome for the millions of workers who are being asked to choose between their health, paychecks, and caregiving every day," the advocacy group Paid Leave for All said in a statement.
Zeroing in on the jettisoned Medicare provisions, the consumer advocacy group Public Citizen said in a statement that "failing to take this opportunity to end Big Pharma price-gouging will mean Americans will continue to go without medicines they need."
\u201cCutting Medicare drug price negotiation from Build Back Better would be an unmitigated disaster.\n\n1 in 4 Americans ration or skip meds because of high prices. That's horrific.\n\nPLEASE call your member of Congress and demand they don't cut drug price negotiation: (202) 224-3121\u201d— Public Citizen (@Public Citizen) 1635437835
"One-in-four Americans report rationing or skipping prescriptions because of high prices," the statement added. "It will mean that many of those who do find a way to pay for needed medications will face economic insecurity."
Varshini Prakash, executive director of the youth-led climate justice group Sunrise Movement, said in a statement that "this framework is exactly that--just a framework. A deal is not a deal until progressives agree to it."
"It's promising to see a substantial investment in climate action," she continued, "but it's appalling and frankly cruel that drug pricing, paid leave, Medicare expansion on dental and vision, are all cut from the framework, and Biden seems willing to leave a pathway to citizenship for millions up to an un-elected parliamentarian."
\u201cThis new framework is just that: a framework. It\u2019s not a deal until progressives sign off. We\u2019ve already seen major cuts, from paid leave to Medicare expansion, and we can\u2019t afford any more. \n\n@SpeakerPelosi, you have to pass reconciliation before the BIF. We\u2019re not going back.\u201d— Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05 (@Sunrise Movement \ud83c\udf05) 1635445686
"We stand with Sen. Sanders and House progressives on needing to see the legislative text, ensuring Sens. Manchin and Sinema vote for the reconciliation package, and passing reconciliation in the House before the House brings the [infrastructure bill] to a vote," added Prakash. "Progressives are the ones who have fought like hell for Biden's full agenda, and their votes cannot be taken for granted."