SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content
Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content
Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.
Declaring that "cash comes from our legacy business," the CEO of Royal Dutch Shell has asserted that continuing the company's oil operations is necessary to help it transition away from non-oil energy operations.
Ben van Beurden made the remarks in an interview with the BBC published online Thursday.
"If we have to build a hydrogen plant from a wind farm that we build in the North Sea for a billion dollars, that is not going to be funded by a hydrogen business--it will be funded by the oil and gas business," van Beurden told the outlet.
The executive also pushed back against climate activists' demands, as well as scientific studies and international warnings, against pursuing new oil fields--like the proposed extraction in the Cambo oilfield off the coast of Scotland.
"Why would you say: Let's not get our oil and gas demands from our own resources but let's import from somewhere else, probably with a larger carbon footprint," he said, adding that such a move "also will not help the carbon footprint of the world."
Van Beurden made similar comments at an energy conference last month.
"Upstream, integrated gas, and the mature businesses like marketing and chemicals, they have to provide the cash for the future," he said at the online Energy Intelligence Forum.
"Investing in these businesses is going to be needed to keep them the strong cash engines that they currently are," he said, adding that "upstream needs to be a strong cash engine into, and probably through, the 2030s, and we need to invest to keep it there."
Related Content
Those remarks came just a week before he was confronted at the TED Countdown forum in Edinburgh, Scotland by a local climate activist over his company's links to human rights abuses in Nigeria, pursuit of new fossil fuel operations, and its appeal of a May court ruling that said Shell must decrease its carbon emissions 45% by 2030.
"I hope you know that as the climate crisis gets more and more deadly, you will be to blame," said activist Lauren MacDonald.
BBC noted in its reporting that Shell "plans to spend four times as much on oil and gas development as on renewables next year." The company announced plans earlier this year to hit net zero emissions by 2050, with a reliance "heavily on carbon offsets"--a scheme climate activists denounce as harmful greenwashing.