SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Members of the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) hold a rally at the Richard J. Daley Center plaza on February 26, 2018 in Chicago. (Photo: Scott Olson/Getty Images)
While it is well-established that unions strengthen worker power on the job and reduce inequality, a new report out Wednesday shows that higher unionization rates are also associated with improved conditions outside of the workplace, including better access to healthcare, paid leave, and the ballot box.
"Unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions," said Asha Banerjee, economic analyst at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) and co-author of the report. "But the benefits of unions extend far beyond the workplace. The data suggest that unions also give workers a voice in shaping their communities and political representation."
To document the correlation between organized labor and various indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being, researchers at EPI compared Census Bureau data on minimum wages, median annual incomes, access to unemployment insurance, lack of health insurance, Medicaid expansion, paid sick and family leave laws, and voter suppression laws in states with "high" (13.5% to 24.7%), "medium" (8.3% to 13/3%), and "low" (3.2% to 7.7%) levels of union density.
All 50 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia were sorted into three equally sized categories based on their average level of union density--defined as the percentage of workers in a state who are members of a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement--from 2015 to 2019. The past two years were excluded "to avoid any potential distortions related to the... Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing recession."
Echoing an extensive body of research, EPI's analysis underscores the positive economic benefits that correspond with unionization.
"The 17 U.S. states with the highest union densities have state minimum wages that are on average 19% higher than the national average and 40% higher than those in low-union-density states," says the report.
"Unions," the authors emphasize, "have played a central role in organizing and mobilizing campaigns to increase state and local minimum wages." The Service Employees International Union, for instance, "has had a crucial role in the successful national Fight for $15 campaign," helping to win raises for millions of workers nationwide.
Researchers noted that "Black, Hispanic, and Asian American/Pacific Islander women--along with Black and brown workers as a whole, who have long been overrepresented in low-wage service sectors--have benefited disproportionately from these efforts."
EPI also found that "high-union-density states had an average median income about $6,000 higher than the national average," while "the low-union-density states had an average median income about $6,500 lower than the national average"--resulting in a gap of more than $12,000 between the two groups of states.
Moreover, "unemployed workers are twice as likely to receive unemployment benefits if they live in high-union-density states than if they live in low-union-density states," according to EPI.
In addition to drawing attention to how the labor movement helps increase wages and access to unemployment insurance, researchers at EPI also examined the relationship between unions and personal well-being and concluded that states with higher union density are more likely than states with weaker workers' rights to enact policies that encourage better physical and mental health.
The report finds that residents of high-union-density states are more likely to have health insurance, with an average uninsured rate of 6.8%, compared with 11.3% in low-union-density states.
All 17 high-union-density states elected to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. By contrast, just five low-union-density states did so.
Highlighting "an important connection between unionization rates, health outcomes, economic security, and racial disparities," the report points out that "many of the low- and medium-density-states that have the highest shares of uninsured residents, and many of the states that have not expanded Medicaid, also have relatively high concentrations of Black workers."
"Given the ugly racist origins of 'right-to-work' anti-union laws," says the report, "it is not surprising that these states with relatively large Black populations have continued to suppress unions and worker collective action."
"Conversely," researchers wrote, "the surprising victory of Medicaid expansion in low-union-density, high-Black-population states such as Louisiana and Virginia suggests that when unions advocate for popular issues across the nation, the momentum can spread, and further victories can contribute to lowering racial and economic disparities despite the odds and even in states with a low union presence."
They added that "union-supported Medicaid expansions are one more example of a 'spillover effect' and channel through which unionization benefits not only union members, but also members of the broader community."
EPI tells a similar story with respect to paid sick and family leave policies. "Unions have played an integral role in coalition campaigns" to pass such laws at the state and local level, researchers wrote. "The tangible impact that unions have had in their advocacy for such laws is evident in the pattern of progress so far."
Finally, when it comes to democratic well-being, EPI found that "there is a strong correlation between voting restrictions and low union density."
Because the analysis does not extend past 2019, researchers didn't capture the ongoing assault on the franchise by state-level Republicans nationwide. However, they did stress that "recent sustained attacks" on the right to vote "threaten to undermine democratic stability."
Although four of the 17 highest-union-density states enacted laws limiting ballot access between 2011 and 2019, "they have passed significantly fewer restrictive voting laws than in the middle 17 states and the 17 lowest-union-density states," the report notes, adding that "over 70% of low-union-density states passed at least one voter suppression law" during that time period.
Margaret Poydock, policy analyst and government affairs specialist at EPI and co-author of the report, said in a statement that "through long-standing advocacy and work to protect the right to vote, unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions," Poldock added, "play a key role in mobilizing workers to vote, helping to determine which political leaders are elected and what occupational backgrounds they come from."
Thanks to the ongoing assault on organized labor by corporations and their allies in government, however, union membership in the U.S. has been declining for decades, contributing to skyrocketing inequality.
"Unions give workers a voice at work, with a direct impact on wages and working conditions," notes the report, which was published in the wake of two recent workplace disasters that killed several non-union workers at a candle factory in Kentucky and an Amazon warehouse in Illinois.
Some commentators have argued that those deaths--caused by profit-maximizing bosses who forced employees to attend shifts despite impending tornadoes and refused to let them leave before the storms hit--may have been prevented by a union.
\u201cAs we contemplate the workers lost at the candle factory in Kentucky and the Amazon warehouse workers we lost, it is important to recall this @EconomicPolicy study from April:\nDeath by inequality: How workers\u2019 lack of power harms their health and safety https://t.co/woxWWfBBWD\u201d— William E. Spriggs (@William E. Spriggs) 1639581376
As the report emphasizes, unions have powerful, even lifesaving, effects on workers--both in and outside of work.
"However, union density levels across the country are not as high as they could be," the authors wrote. "While nearly half of all non-union workers say they want a union in their workplace, only 12% of all workers are covered by a union contract."
"Current law places too many obstacles in the way of workers trying to organize and gives employers too much power to interfere with workers' free choice," they continued. "It is therefore critical that policymakers enact reforms that restore a meaningful right to organize and collectively bargain. One simple way to help accomplish this would be to pass the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which will help restore the right to organize and give workers access to a union and the well-being it promotes."
"Building union density is not just a worker or workplace issue, but it is also a mechanism to uplift families and communities," researchers added. "The relationship we have demonstrated between high union density and higher household incomes, access to healthcare and paid leave, and fewer voting restrictions highlights the importance of protecting the right of workers to organize. This right could be a fundamental component in strengthening economic security, quality of life, civil and voting rights, and racial justice in our communities."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
While it is well-established that unions strengthen worker power on the job and reduce inequality, a new report out Wednesday shows that higher unionization rates are also associated with improved conditions outside of the workplace, including better access to healthcare, paid leave, and the ballot box.
"Unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions," said Asha Banerjee, economic analyst at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) and co-author of the report. "But the benefits of unions extend far beyond the workplace. The data suggest that unions also give workers a voice in shaping their communities and political representation."
To document the correlation between organized labor and various indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being, researchers at EPI compared Census Bureau data on minimum wages, median annual incomes, access to unemployment insurance, lack of health insurance, Medicaid expansion, paid sick and family leave laws, and voter suppression laws in states with "high" (13.5% to 24.7%), "medium" (8.3% to 13/3%), and "low" (3.2% to 7.7%) levels of union density.
All 50 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia were sorted into three equally sized categories based on their average level of union density--defined as the percentage of workers in a state who are members of a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement--from 2015 to 2019. The past two years were excluded "to avoid any potential distortions related to the... Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing recession."
Echoing an extensive body of research, EPI's analysis underscores the positive economic benefits that correspond with unionization.
"The 17 U.S. states with the highest union densities have state minimum wages that are on average 19% higher than the national average and 40% higher than those in low-union-density states," says the report.
"Unions," the authors emphasize, "have played a central role in organizing and mobilizing campaigns to increase state and local minimum wages." The Service Employees International Union, for instance, "has had a crucial role in the successful national Fight for $15 campaign," helping to win raises for millions of workers nationwide.
Researchers noted that "Black, Hispanic, and Asian American/Pacific Islander women--along with Black and brown workers as a whole, who have long been overrepresented in low-wage service sectors--have benefited disproportionately from these efforts."
EPI also found that "high-union-density states had an average median income about $6,000 higher than the national average," while "the low-union-density states had an average median income about $6,500 lower than the national average"--resulting in a gap of more than $12,000 between the two groups of states.
Moreover, "unemployed workers are twice as likely to receive unemployment benefits if they live in high-union-density states than if they live in low-union-density states," according to EPI.
In addition to drawing attention to how the labor movement helps increase wages and access to unemployment insurance, researchers at EPI also examined the relationship between unions and personal well-being and concluded that states with higher union density are more likely than states with weaker workers' rights to enact policies that encourage better physical and mental health.
The report finds that residents of high-union-density states are more likely to have health insurance, with an average uninsured rate of 6.8%, compared with 11.3% in low-union-density states.
All 17 high-union-density states elected to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. By contrast, just five low-union-density states did so.
Highlighting "an important connection between unionization rates, health outcomes, economic security, and racial disparities," the report points out that "many of the low- and medium-density-states that have the highest shares of uninsured residents, and many of the states that have not expanded Medicaid, also have relatively high concentrations of Black workers."
"Given the ugly racist origins of 'right-to-work' anti-union laws," says the report, "it is not surprising that these states with relatively large Black populations have continued to suppress unions and worker collective action."
"Conversely," researchers wrote, "the surprising victory of Medicaid expansion in low-union-density, high-Black-population states such as Louisiana and Virginia suggests that when unions advocate for popular issues across the nation, the momentum can spread, and further victories can contribute to lowering racial and economic disparities despite the odds and even in states with a low union presence."
They added that "union-supported Medicaid expansions are one more example of a 'spillover effect' and channel through which unionization benefits not only union members, but also members of the broader community."
EPI tells a similar story with respect to paid sick and family leave policies. "Unions have played an integral role in coalition campaigns" to pass such laws at the state and local level, researchers wrote. "The tangible impact that unions have had in their advocacy for such laws is evident in the pattern of progress so far."
Finally, when it comes to democratic well-being, EPI found that "there is a strong correlation between voting restrictions and low union density."
Because the analysis does not extend past 2019, researchers didn't capture the ongoing assault on the franchise by state-level Republicans nationwide. However, they did stress that "recent sustained attacks" on the right to vote "threaten to undermine democratic stability."
Although four of the 17 highest-union-density states enacted laws limiting ballot access between 2011 and 2019, "they have passed significantly fewer restrictive voting laws than in the middle 17 states and the 17 lowest-union-density states," the report notes, adding that "over 70% of low-union-density states passed at least one voter suppression law" during that time period.
Margaret Poydock, policy analyst and government affairs specialist at EPI and co-author of the report, said in a statement that "through long-standing advocacy and work to protect the right to vote, unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions," Poldock added, "play a key role in mobilizing workers to vote, helping to determine which political leaders are elected and what occupational backgrounds they come from."
Thanks to the ongoing assault on organized labor by corporations and their allies in government, however, union membership in the U.S. has been declining for decades, contributing to skyrocketing inequality.
"Unions give workers a voice at work, with a direct impact on wages and working conditions," notes the report, which was published in the wake of two recent workplace disasters that killed several non-union workers at a candle factory in Kentucky and an Amazon warehouse in Illinois.
Some commentators have argued that those deaths--caused by profit-maximizing bosses who forced employees to attend shifts despite impending tornadoes and refused to let them leave before the storms hit--may have been prevented by a union.
\u201cAs we contemplate the workers lost at the candle factory in Kentucky and the Amazon warehouse workers we lost, it is important to recall this @EconomicPolicy study from April:\nDeath by inequality: How workers\u2019 lack of power harms their health and safety https://t.co/woxWWfBBWD\u201d— William E. Spriggs (@William E. Spriggs) 1639581376
As the report emphasizes, unions have powerful, even lifesaving, effects on workers--both in and outside of work.
"However, union density levels across the country are not as high as they could be," the authors wrote. "While nearly half of all non-union workers say they want a union in their workplace, only 12% of all workers are covered by a union contract."
"Current law places too many obstacles in the way of workers trying to organize and gives employers too much power to interfere with workers' free choice," they continued. "It is therefore critical that policymakers enact reforms that restore a meaningful right to organize and collectively bargain. One simple way to help accomplish this would be to pass the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which will help restore the right to organize and give workers access to a union and the well-being it promotes."
"Building union density is not just a worker or workplace issue, but it is also a mechanism to uplift families and communities," researchers added. "The relationship we have demonstrated between high union density and higher household incomes, access to healthcare and paid leave, and fewer voting restrictions highlights the importance of protecting the right of workers to organize. This right could be a fundamental component in strengthening economic security, quality of life, civil and voting rights, and racial justice in our communities."
While it is well-established that unions strengthen worker power on the job and reduce inequality, a new report out Wednesday shows that higher unionization rates are also associated with improved conditions outside of the workplace, including better access to healthcare, paid leave, and the ballot box.
"Unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions promote economic equality and build worker power, helping workers to win increases in pay, better benefits, and safer working conditions," said Asha Banerjee, economic analyst at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) and co-author of the report. "But the benefits of unions extend far beyond the workplace. The data suggest that unions also give workers a voice in shaping their communities and political representation."
To document the correlation between organized labor and various indicators of economic, personal, and democratic well-being, researchers at EPI compared Census Bureau data on minimum wages, median annual incomes, access to unemployment insurance, lack of health insurance, Medicaid expansion, paid sick and family leave laws, and voter suppression laws in states with "high" (13.5% to 24.7%), "medium" (8.3% to 13/3%), and "low" (3.2% to 7.7%) levels of union density.
All 50 U.S. states plus the District of Columbia were sorted into three equally sized categories based on their average level of union density--defined as the percentage of workers in a state who are members of a union or covered by a collective bargaining agreement--from 2015 to 2019. The past two years were excluded "to avoid any potential distortions related to the... Covid-19 pandemic and ensuing recession."
Echoing an extensive body of research, EPI's analysis underscores the positive economic benefits that correspond with unionization.
"The 17 U.S. states with the highest union densities have state minimum wages that are on average 19% higher than the national average and 40% higher than those in low-union-density states," says the report.
"Unions," the authors emphasize, "have played a central role in organizing and mobilizing campaigns to increase state and local minimum wages." The Service Employees International Union, for instance, "has had a crucial role in the successful national Fight for $15 campaign," helping to win raises for millions of workers nationwide.
Researchers noted that "Black, Hispanic, and Asian American/Pacific Islander women--along with Black and brown workers as a whole, who have long been overrepresented in low-wage service sectors--have benefited disproportionately from these efforts."
EPI also found that "high-union-density states had an average median income about $6,000 higher than the national average," while "the low-union-density states had an average median income about $6,500 lower than the national average"--resulting in a gap of more than $12,000 between the two groups of states.
Moreover, "unemployed workers are twice as likely to receive unemployment benefits if they live in high-union-density states than if they live in low-union-density states," according to EPI.
In addition to drawing attention to how the labor movement helps increase wages and access to unemployment insurance, researchers at EPI also examined the relationship between unions and personal well-being and concluded that states with higher union density are more likely than states with weaker workers' rights to enact policies that encourage better physical and mental health.
The report finds that residents of high-union-density states are more likely to have health insurance, with an average uninsured rate of 6.8%, compared with 11.3% in low-union-density states.
All 17 high-union-density states elected to expand Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act. By contrast, just five low-union-density states did so.
Highlighting "an important connection between unionization rates, health outcomes, economic security, and racial disparities," the report points out that "many of the low- and medium-density-states that have the highest shares of uninsured residents, and many of the states that have not expanded Medicaid, also have relatively high concentrations of Black workers."
"Given the ugly racist origins of 'right-to-work' anti-union laws," says the report, "it is not surprising that these states with relatively large Black populations have continued to suppress unions and worker collective action."
"Conversely," researchers wrote, "the surprising victory of Medicaid expansion in low-union-density, high-Black-population states such as Louisiana and Virginia suggests that when unions advocate for popular issues across the nation, the momentum can spread, and further victories can contribute to lowering racial and economic disparities despite the odds and even in states with a low union presence."
They added that "union-supported Medicaid expansions are one more example of a 'spillover effect' and channel through which unionization benefits not only union members, but also members of the broader community."
EPI tells a similar story with respect to paid sick and family leave policies. "Unions have played an integral role in coalition campaigns" to pass such laws at the state and local level, researchers wrote. "The tangible impact that unions have had in their advocacy for such laws is evident in the pattern of progress so far."
Finally, when it comes to democratic well-being, EPI found that "there is a strong correlation between voting restrictions and low union density."
Because the analysis does not extend past 2019, researchers didn't capture the ongoing assault on the franchise by state-level Republicans nationwide. However, they did stress that "recent sustained attacks" on the right to vote "threaten to undermine democratic stability."
Although four of the 17 highest-union-density states enacted laws limiting ballot access between 2011 and 2019, "they have passed significantly fewer restrictive voting laws than in the middle 17 states and the 17 lowest-union-density states," the report notes, adding that "over 70% of low-union-density states passed at least one voter suppression law" during that time period.
Margaret Poydock, policy analyst and government affairs specialist at EPI and co-author of the report, said in a statement that "through long-standing advocacy and work to protect the right to vote, unions have linked voting rights to workers' rights."
"Unions," Poldock added, "play a key role in mobilizing workers to vote, helping to determine which political leaders are elected and what occupational backgrounds they come from."
Thanks to the ongoing assault on organized labor by corporations and their allies in government, however, union membership in the U.S. has been declining for decades, contributing to skyrocketing inequality.
"Unions give workers a voice at work, with a direct impact on wages and working conditions," notes the report, which was published in the wake of two recent workplace disasters that killed several non-union workers at a candle factory in Kentucky and an Amazon warehouse in Illinois.
Some commentators have argued that those deaths--caused by profit-maximizing bosses who forced employees to attend shifts despite impending tornadoes and refused to let them leave before the storms hit--may have been prevented by a union.
\u201cAs we contemplate the workers lost at the candle factory in Kentucky and the Amazon warehouse workers we lost, it is important to recall this @EconomicPolicy study from April:\nDeath by inequality: How workers\u2019 lack of power harms their health and safety https://t.co/woxWWfBBWD\u201d— William E. Spriggs (@William E. Spriggs) 1639581376
As the report emphasizes, unions have powerful, even lifesaving, effects on workers--both in and outside of work.
"However, union density levels across the country are not as high as they could be," the authors wrote. "While nearly half of all non-union workers say they want a union in their workplace, only 12% of all workers are covered by a union contract."
"Current law places too many obstacles in the way of workers trying to organize and gives employers too much power to interfere with workers' free choice," they continued. "It is therefore critical that policymakers enact reforms that restore a meaningful right to organize and collectively bargain. One simple way to help accomplish this would be to pass the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which will help restore the right to organize and give workers access to a union and the well-being it promotes."
"Building union density is not just a worker or workplace issue, but it is also a mechanism to uplift families and communities," researchers added. "The relationship we have demonstrated between high union density and higher household incomes, access to healthcare and paid leave, and fewer voting restrictions highlights the importance of protecting the right of workers to organize. This right could be a fundamental component in strengthening economic security, quality of life, civil and voting rights, and racial justice in our communities."
Attorney General Josh Kaul accused the world's richest person and top Trump adviser of "a blatant attempt to violate" Wisconsin's election bribery law.
Democratic Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul filed a lawsuit Friday seeking to stop Elon Musk—the world's richest person and a senior adviser to President Donald Trump—from handing out $1 million checks to voters this weekend in an apparent blatant violation of bribery law meant to swing next Tuesday's crucial state Supreme Court election.
"Wisconsin law forbids anyone from offering or promising to give anything of value to an elector in order to induce the elector to go to the polls, vote or refrain from voting, or vote for a particular person," the lawsuit notes. "Musk's announcement of his intention to pay $1 million to two Wisconsin electors who attend his event on Sunday night, specifically conditioned on their having voted in the upcoming April 3, 2025, Wisconsin Supreme Court election, is a blatant attempt to violate Wis. Stat. § 12.11. This must not happen."
On Thursday, Musk announced on his X social media site that he will "give a talk" at an undisclosed location in Wisconsin, and that "entrance is limited to those who have signed the petition in opposition to activist judges."
"I will also hand over checks for a million dollars to two people to be spokesmen for the petition," the Tesla and SpaceX CEO and de facto head of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency wrote.
As Common Dreams reported earlier last week, Musk's super political action committee, America PAC, is offering registered Wisconsin voters $100 to sign a petition stating that they reject "the actions of activist judges who impose their own views" and demand "a judiciary that respects its role—interpreting, not legislating."
The cash awards—which critics have decried as bribery—are part of a multimillion dollar effort by Musk and affiliated super PACs to boost Judge Brad Schimel of Waukesha County, the Trump-backed, right-wing state Supreme Court candidate locked in a tight race with Dane County Judge Susan Crawford.
Left-leaning justices are clinging to a 4-3 advantage on the Wisconsin Supreme Court. Crawford and Schimel are vying to fill the seat now occupied by Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, a liberal who is not running for another 10-year term. Control of the state's highest court will likely impact a wide range of issues, from abortion to labor rights to voter suppression.
Musk has openly admitted why he's spending millions of dollars on the race: It "will decide how congressional districts are drawn." That's what he said while hosting Schimel and U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) for a discussion on X last weekend.
"In my opinion that's the most important thing, which is a big deal given that the congressional majority is so razor-thin," Musk argued. "It could cause the House to switch to Democrat if that redrawing takes place."
Crawford campaign spokesperson Derrick Honeyman issued a statement Friday calling Musk's planned cash giveaway a "last-minute desperate distraction."
"Wisconsinites don't want a billionaire like Musk telling them who to vote for," Honeyman added, "and on Tuesday, voters should reject Musk's lackey Brad Schimel."
Greenlanders are giving the administration of President Donald Trump—who renewed threats to take the Danish territory—the cold shoulder.
U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Second Lady Usha Vance, and two top Trump administration officials traveled to Greenland on Friday on an itinerary that was markedly curtailed from its original plans due to Greenlanders' frosty reception amid President Donald Trump's ongoing threats to take the Arctic island from NATO ally Denmark—even by armed force if deemed necessary.
Vance visited Pituffik Space Base—a U.S. Space Force installation on the northwestern coast of Greenland about 930 miles (1,500 km) north of the capital, Nuuk—with his wife, National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, and Energy Secretary Chris Wright.
The vice president's wife originally planned on a more interactive and cultural itinerary, including attending a dogsled race. However, Greenland's leftist government said earlier this week that is had "not extended any invitations for any visits, neither private nor official."
Compounding the Trump administration's embarrassment, U.S. representatives reportedly came up empty handed after canvassing door to door in Nuuk in an effort to drum up support for the visit. The administration denies this ever happened.
And so the Trump officials' audience was limited to U.S. troops stationed at Pituffik. After arriving at the base, the vice president told troops in the mess hall he was surprised to find the snow- and ice-covered Arctic island is "cold as shit."
"Nobody told me!" he added.
Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha Vance visited a U.S. Space Force base in Greenland Friday. Vance is expected to receive briefings on Arctic security and address US service members.
Read more: https://t.co/1OIkkT3VnD pic.twitter.com/lbXeObJTgq
— Newsweek (@Newsweek) March 28, 2025
Getting down to more serious business, Vance said: "Our message to Denmark is very simple—you have not done a good job by the people of Greenland. You have under-invested in the people of Greenland and you have under-invested in the security architecture of this incredible, beautiful land mass."
Addressing Arctic geopolitics, Vance argued that "we can't just bury our head in the sand—or in Greenland, bury our head in the snow—and pretend that the Chinese are not interested in this very large land mass. We know that they are."
"The president said we have to have Greenland, and I think that we do have to be more serious about the security of Greenland," Vance continued. "We respect the self-determination of the people of Greenland, but my argument to them is: I think that you'd be a lot better coming under the United States' security umbrella than you have been under Denmark's security umbrella. Because what Denmark's security umbrella has meant is effectively they've passed it all off to brave Americans and hoped that we would pick up the tab."
This follows remarks earlier this week from Vance, who said during a Fox News interview that Denmark, which faithfully sent troops to fight in both Afghanistan and Iraq—43 of whom died, the highest per capita casualty rate of the alliance—is "not being a good ally" to the United States.
Asked by reporters on Friday if the U.S. would ever conquer Greenland by military force, Vance said he didn't think that would be necessary.
However, just a day earlier, Trump—who on Friday posted a video highlighting defense cooperation between the U.S. and Greenland—said his administration will "go as far as we have to go" to acquire the island, which he claimed the United States needs "for national security and international security."
It was far from the first time that Trump—who has also threatened to take over parts or all of countries including Panama and even Canada—vowed to annex Greenland, and other administration officials have repeated the president's threats.
"It's oil and gas. It's our national security. It's critical minerals," Waltz said in January, explaining why Trump wants Greenland.
The U.S. has long been interested in Greenland, and while the close relationship between the United States and Denmark has been mostly mutually beneficial, it has sometimes come at the expense of Greenland's people, environment, and wildlife.
Such was the case when a U.S. Air Force B-52 bomber laden with four thermonuclear warheads crashed into the sea ice of Wolstenholme Fjord in 1968. The accident caused widespread radioactive contamination, and the nuclear fuel components of one of the bombs remain unrecovered to this day.
Elected officials from across Greenland and Denmark's political spectrum expressed alarm over the Trump administration's actions.
Outgoing Greenland Prime Minister Múte Bourup Egede earlier this week
called Vance's trip "highly aggressive" and said that it "can in no way be characterized as a harmless visit."
"Because what is the security advisor doing in Greenland?" Egede asked. "The only purpose is to show a demonstration of power to us, and the signal is not to be misunderstood."
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke called Vance's remarks on Friday "a bit inappropriate," adding that maybe the Trump administration "should look at yourself in the mirror too."
"When the vice president.. creates an image that the only way Greenland can be protected is by coming under the American umbrella, so you can say that Greenland is already there," Løkke elaborated. "They are part of the common security umbrella that we created together with the Americans after the end of World War II called NATO."
"We have always looked at America like the nice big brother to help you out and now it's like the big brother is bullying you."
Ordinary Greenlanders and Danish residents of the island were not happy about the Trump delegation's visit.
Anders Laursen, who owns a local water taxi company, told NBC News that "we have always looked at America like the nice big brother to help you out and now it's like the big brother is bullying you."
Nuuk resident Marie Olsen said of Vance, "I think he's a big child who wants it all."
In the Danish capital Copenhagen, hundreds of people rallied Friday against the U.S. delegation's visit to Greenland. One protester decried what she called the U.S. administration's "mafia methods."
"I hope American law firms—Paul Weiss and Skadden—are proud of the cowardice they are instilling and inspiring among the legal profession," wrote one former state senator.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom on Friday became the latest white-shoe law firm to acquiesce to the Trump administration as the White House ramps up attacks on the legal profession. The news prompted a wave of outrage at the law firm, which was accused of being "pathetic."
The firm has agreed to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services to the federal government during his administration "and beyond," according to a Truth Social post from U.S. President Donald Trump. Also, the "firm will not engage in illegal" diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) "discrimination and preferences," according to the post, which also noted that the firm proactively reached out to the administration about an agreement.
Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump called the deal "essentially a settlement," according to Reuters.
"Pathetic when the richest and most powerful lawyers in America won't stand up for the profession that made them rich and powerful," wrote U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) on X on Friday, reacting to earlier reporting that the firm was in discussions with the White House over a deal.
Author and commentator Wajahat Ali wrote that the move was "shameful" on Bluesky on Friday. "Pathetic and selfish," wrote Pod Save America podcast co-host Jon Favreau.
Former New York state Sen. Alessandra Biaggi (D-34) wrote: "I hope American law firms—Paul Weiss and Skadden—are proud of the cowardice they are instilling and inspiring among the legal profession."
The news comes on the heels of news that another top law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, last week brokered a deal with the White House in order to spare the firm from an executive order that suspended security clearances for lawyers and staff.
As part of that deal, the firm will dedicate $40 million in pro bono legal services during Trump's administration "to support the administration's initiatives."
Meanwhile, also last week, Trump issued a memo directing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to "seek sanctions" against firms and lawyers that, according to him, "engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States."
With the agreement, Skadden Arps has likely avoided joining a list of elite law firms that have been singled out via executive order from Trump, targeting them with various punishments. Three of the firms that have been targeted with an executive order, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, and Perkins Coie, have sued the Trump administration in response.
Last week, prior to the deal between Skadden Arps and the Trump administration and in response to the deal struck between the White House and Paul Weiss, an associate at Skadden Arps sent an all-staff email saying she would resign if the firm did not do more to stand up to Trump.
"This is not what I saw for my career or for my evening, but Paul Weiss' decision to cave to the Trump administration on DEI, representation, and staffing has forced my hand," she wrote. "We do not have time. It is either now or never, and if it's never, I will not continue to work here."