SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A medical worker puts on a mask before entering a negative pressure room with a Covid-19 patient in the ICU ward at UMass Memorial Medical Center in Worcester, Massachusetts on January 4, 2022. (Photo: Joseph Prezioso/AFP via Getty Images)
The United States would have had nearly 50% fewer Covid-19 hospitalizations in recent months if its vaccination rates were the same as those of major European countries such as Denmark, where roughly 81% of the population has been fully inoculated.
That's a key finding of an analysis released Sunday by the Financial Times, which concluded that the comparatively low U.S. vaccination rate--64%--was responsible for roughly half of the country's hospitalizations this winter as the highly contagious Omicron tore through the population.
The figures compiled and visualized by FT show that "large pockets of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated people in the U.S. have placed more pressure on hospitals during the Omicron wave than in European nations with higher immunization rates," the newspaper reported.
"The analysis supports the findings of scientists and accounts of frontline medics who say lower vaccination levels are perpetuating the pandemic in the U.S.," FT added.
If the U.S. had the same vaccination levels across age groups as Denmark, the number of coronavirus patients in U.S. hospitals on January 19 would've peaked at 91,000, according to FT. If U.S. vaccination rates matched the U.K.'s or Portugal's, that figure would have been 100,000 and 109,000, respectively.
Instead, U.S. hospitalizations topped out at 161,000 on January 19, FT noted.
While hospitalizations have begun to level off in recent days after spiking due to Omicron, Covid-19 deaths in the U.S. remain sky-high. On Friday, the rolling seven-day average of daily U.S. coronavirus deaths hit 2,379, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.
At the start of 2021, the U.S. vaccine rollout ranked among the best in the world, quickly making shots available to the elderly, healthcare workers, and the immunocompromised while incrementally expanding eligibility to the rest of the adult population.
But by mid-year the pace of vaccinations had slowed rapidly, even as much of the eligible population had yet to receive one or both doses. Meanwhile, the U.S. denied much of the world its surplus doses and vaccine technology, hindering global inoculation efforts.
As FT put it Sunday, the U.S. "squandered its vaccination head start, falling far behind European peers in the race to vaccinate the most vulnerable."
The U.S. has since fallen well behind European countries in the administration of booster shots. Just 26% of the U.S. population has received a booster dose, compared to 61% in Denmark and 56% in the U.K.
Experts have attributed the lagging U.S. vaccination campaign to a number of factors, from rampant disinformation efforts by right-wing media outlets and politicians to structural impediments such as the lack of guaranteed paid leave.
"Wow, vaccine misinformation and anti-science have serious consequences," Madhu Pai, Canada research chair of epidemiology and global health at McGill University, tweeted in response to the FT findings.
In a blog post last month, researchers at The Commonwealth Fund argued that "efforts to improve access among populations with low vaccination rates and educate people about effectiveness and safety are necessary, but not sufficient, to increase vaccination rates in the U.S."
"Research suggests that some obstacles are especially prevalent in the U.S," they noted. "Despite the abundant supply, there are still 'vaccine deserts' where access is limited. Where vaccines are available, many people are unable to take time from off work."
The Biden administration's vaccination rule for large businesses would have required employers to provide workers with paid time off to get their shots, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the rule earlier this month.
"This is a rogue, anti-science Supreme Court," Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) tweeted at the time. "The far-right majority is risking the lives of millions of Americans to score cheap political points."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The United States would have had nearly 50% fewer Covid-19 hospitalizations in recent months if its vaccination rates were the same as those of major European countries such as Denmark, where roughly 81% of the population has been fully inoculated.
That's a key finding of an analysis released Sunday by the Financial Times, which concluded that the comparatively low U.S. vaccination rate--64%--was responsible for roughly half of the country's hospitalizations this winter as the highly contagious Omicron tore through the population.
The figures compiled and visualized by FT show that "large pockets of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated people in the U.S. have placed more pressure on hospitals during the Omicron wave than in European nations with higher immunization rates," the newspaper reported.
"The analysis supports the findings of scientists and accounts of frontline medics who say lower vaccination levels are perpetuating the pandemic in the U.S.," FT added.
If the U.S. had the same vaccination levels across age groups as Denmark, the number of coronavirus patients in U.S. hospitals on January 19 would've peaked at 91,000, according to FT. If U.S. vaccination rates matched the U.K.'s or Portugal's, that figure would have been 100,000 and 109,000, respectively.
Instead, U.S. hospitalizations topped out at 161,000 on January 19, FT noted.
While hospitalizations have begun to level off in recent days after spiking due to Omicron, Covid-19 deaths in the U.S. remain sky-high. On Friday, the rolling seven-day average of daily U.S. coronavirus deaths hit 2,379, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.
At the start of 2021, the U.S. vaccine rollout ranked among the best in the world, quickly making shots available to the elderly, healthcare workers, and the immunocompromised while incrementally expanding eligibility to the rest of the adult population.
But by mid-year the pace of vaccinations had slowed rapidly, even as much of the eligible population had yet to receive one or both doses. Meanwhile, the U.S. denied much of the world its surplus doses and vaccine technology, hindering global inoculation efforts.
As FT put it Sunday, the U.S. "squandered its vaccination head start, falling far behind European peers in the race to vaccinate the most vulnerable."
The U.S. has since fallen well behind European countries in the administration of booster shots. Just 26% of the U.S. population has received a booster dose, compared to 61% in Denmark and 56% in the U.K.
Experts have attributed the lagging U.S. vaccination campaign to a number of factors, from rampant disinformation efforts by right-wing media outlets and politicians to structural impediments such as the lack of guaranteed paid leave.
"Wow, vaccine misinformation and anti-science have serious consequences," Madhu Pai, Canada research chair of epidemiology and global health at McGill University, tweeted in response to the FT findings.
In a blog post last month, researchers at The Commonwealth Fund argued that "efforts to improve access among populations with low vaccination rates and educate people about effectiveness and safety are necessary, but not sufficient, to increase vaccination rates in the U.S."
"Research suggests that some obstacles are especially prevalent in the U.S," they noted. "Despite the abundant supply, there are still 'vaccine deserts' where access is limited. Where vaccines are available, many people are unable to take time from off work."
The Biden administration's vaccination rule for large businesses would have required employers to provide workers with paid time off to get their shots, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the rule earlier this month.
"This is a rogue, anti-science Supreme Court," Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) tweeted at the time. "The far-right majority is risking the lives of millions of Americans to score cheap political points."
The United States would have had nearly 50% fewer Covid-19 hospitalizations in recent months if its vaccination rates were the same as those of major European countries such as Denmark, where roughly 81% of the population has been fully inoculated.
That's a key finding of an analysis released Sunday by the Financial Times, which concluded that the comparatively low U.S. vaccination rate--64%--was responsible for roughly half of the country's hospitalizations this winter as the highly contagious Omicron tore through the population.
The figures compiled and visualized by FT show that "large pockets of unvaccinated or partially vaccinated people in the U.S. have placed more pressure on hospitals during the Omicron wave than in European nations with higher immunization rates," the newspaper reported.
"The analysis supports the findings of scientists and accounts of frontline medics who say lower vaccination levels are perpetuating the pandemic in the U.S.," FT added.
If the U.S. had the same vaccination levels across age groups as Denmark, the number of coronavirus patients in U.S. hospitals on January 19 would've peaked at 91,000, according to FT. If U.S. vaccination rates matched the U.K.'s or Portugal's, that figure would have been 100,000 and 109,000, respectively.
Instead, U.S. hospitalizations topped out at 161,000 on January 19, FT noted.
While hospitalizations have begun to level off in recent days after spiking due to Omicron, Covid-19 deaths in the U.S. remain sky-high. On Friday, the rolling seven-day average of daily U.S. coronavirus deaths hit 2,379, according to data from Johns Hopkins University.
At the start of 2021, the U.S. vaccine rollout ranked among the best in the world, quickly making shots available to the elderly, healthcare workers, and the immunocompromised while incrementally expanding eligibility to the rest of the adult population.
But by mid-year the pace of vaccinations had slowed rapidly, even as much of the eligible population had yet to receive one or both doses. Meanwhile, the U.S. denied much of the world its surplus doses and vaccine technology, hindering global inoculation efforts.
As FT put it Sunday, the U.S. "squandered its vaccination head start, falling far behind European peers in the race to vaccinate the most vulnerable."
The U.S. has since fallen well behind European countries in the administration of booster shots. Just 26% of the U.S. population has received a booster dose, compared to 61% in Denmark and 56% in the U.K.
Experts have attributed the lagging U.S. vaccination campaign to a number of factors, from rampant disinformation efforts by right-wing media outlets and politicians to structural impediments such as the lack of guaranteed paid leave.
"Wow, vaccine misinformation and anti-science have serious consequences," Madhu Pai, Canada research chair of epidemiology and global health at McGill University, tweeted in response to the FT findings.
In a blog post last month, researchers at The Commonwealth Fund argued that "efforts to improve access among populations with low vaccination rates and educate people about effectiveness and safety are necessary, but not sufficient, to increase vaccination rates in the U.S."
"Research suggests that some obstacles are especially prevalent in the U.S," they noted. "Despite the abundant supply, there are still 'vaccine deserts' where access is limited. Where vaccines are available, many people are unable to take time from off work."
The Biden administration's vaccination rule for large businesses would have required employers to provide workers with paid time off to get their shots, but the U.S. Supreme Court blocked the rule earlier this month.
"This is a rogue, anti-science Supreme Court," Rep. Mondaire Jones (D-N.Y.) tweeted at the time. "The far-right majority is risking the lives of millions of Americans to score cheap political points."
The appeal to the Supreme Court is the latest move in an unfolding battle between the judiciary and the White House.
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to lift a lower court restriction on the Trump administration's ability to continue to carrying out deportations using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, a wartime authority U.S. President Donald Trump invoked in mid-March to deport Venezuelan immigrants he alleged, without evidence, were criminal gang members but who legal experts say are the victims of authoritarian overreach and still entitled to due process.
The deportees are currently being held at a megaprison in El Salvador, which U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem toured on Wednesday, in part to film a video in front of the incarcerated men—a move that was widely decried as sadistic and fascist behavior by a senior administration official.
On March 15, the same day that Trump published an executive order stating its intention to use the Alien Enemies Act to carry out deportations, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg issued a nationwide temporary restraining order, halting furthering removals of noncitizens under The Alien Enemies Act. The rarely used provision, never before invoked when the U.S. was not engaged in a war authorized by Congress, gives the president the ability to detain or deport noncitizens without first appearing before an immigration judge or federal court judge.
On Wednesday, a federal appeals court panel kept in place Boasberg's order while the court decides on the underlying legal issues in the case—prompting the Trump administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The administration is asking the court to overturn Boasberg's block, arguing that—in the words of Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris—the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the president, through Article II, or the judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."
As with other recent appeals from the Trump administration, according to CNN, the White House's argument before the Supreme Court leaned on complaints that the lower courts are standing in Trump's way.
"Only this court can stop rule-by-[temporary restraining order] from further upending the separation of powers—the sooner, the better," Harris told the Supreme Court. "Here, the district court's orders have rebuffed the president's judgments as to how to protect the nation against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations."
On March 18, Trump called Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator," and also said that "this judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!" Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said a few days prior that he would be would "be filing articles of impeachment against activist Judge James Boasberg."
Days later, John Roberts, the conservative chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, issued a rare statement rebuking calls from Trump and members of his orbit for the impeachment of federal judges who have ruled against the administration.
"Elon and his all-male team lie about Social Security like other people chew gum," said one former head of the agency.
Elon Musk, the de facto head of the Trump administration's Department of Government Efficiency, was berated anew Friday after insidiously tarring millions of Social Security recipients as "fraudsters"—a tactic critics called part of an orchestrated Republican scheme to destroy the vital earned benefits program.
Musk and seven DOGE staffers—all of them men—appeared on Fox News Thursday, where the world's richest person called the Trump administration's crusade to eviscerate the federal government under pretext of improving efficiency "the biggest revolution in the government since the original revolution" in 1776.
The DOGE staffers repeated unfounded claims that Social Security is riddled with fraud; that in some cases, 40% of calls to the Social Security Administration phone center are fraudulent; and that millions of people aged 120 and older are registered with SSA.
Acknowledging that DOGE's wrecking-ball approach to government reform is getting "a lot of complaints along the way," Musk said: "You know who complains the loudest, and with the most amount of fake righteous indignation? The fraudsters."
Musk's comments echoed those of billionaire U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who suggested on a podcast last week that only a "fraudster" would complain about a missed Social Security check.
Responding to what she called Musk's "absurd claim," Nancy Altman, president of the advocacy group Social Security Works (SSW), said Friday that "the truth is that Social Security has a fraud rate of 0.00625%, far lower than private sector retirement programs."
"It is Musk and DOGE who are inviting in fraudsters," she continued. "Scammers are already rushing in to take advantage of the confusion created by DOGE's service cuts."
Critics have denounced the Trump administration for sowing chaos at SSA and other federal agencies by planning to lay off thousands of workers, slashc spending, and implement other disruptive policies. Cuts in SSA phone services were reportedly carried out in response to a direct request from the White House, which claimed it is simply working to eliminate "waste, fraud, and abuse."
"The truth is that Social Security has a fraud rate of 0.00625%, far lower than private sector retirement programs."
This "DOGE-manufactured chaos," as Altman calls it, has already led to the SSA website crashing several times in recent weeks and hold times of as long as 4-5 hours for those calling the agency.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass) on Thursday noted that while it would be clearly illegal for President Donald Trump and DOGE to cut Social Security benefits without congressional authorization, there are other ways for the administration to hamstring the agency.
Referencing a new in-person verification rule that was delayed and partly rolled back this week, Warren said:
Say a 66-year-old man qualifies for Social Security. Say he calls the helpline to apply, but he's told about a new DOGE rule, so he has to go online or in person. He can't drive. He has trouble with the website, so he waits until his niece can get a day off to take him to the local office, but DOGE closed that office, so they have to drive two hours to get to the next closest office. When they get there, there are only two people staffing a 50-person line, so he doesn't even make it to the front of the line before the office closes and he has to come back. Let's assume it takes him three months to straighten this out, and he misses a total of $5,000 in benefits checks, which, by law, he will never get back.
"This scenario is a backdoor way Musk and Trump could cut Social Security," the senator added. "That's what I'm fighting to prevent."
Democratic lawmakers and others argue that the Trump administration's approach is "a prelude to privatizing Social Security and handing it over to private equity," as Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said earlier this week.
"Improving Social Security doesn't start with shuttering the offices that handle modernization, anti-fraud activities, and civil rights violations," the senator asserted. "It doesn't start with indiscriminately firing or buying out thousands of workers, and it doesn't start with restricting customer service over the phone and drawing up plans to close field and regional offices."
These and other moves, including the nomination of financial services executive Frank Bisignano as SSA commissioner, belie Trump's claim that he is "not touching" Social Security, upon which 70 million Americans—including nearly 9 in 10 people aged 65 or older—rely for their earned benefits.
So do Trump and Musk's own words. The president has called Social Security a "scam" and Musk recently referred to it as "the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time."
"No one who thinks Social Security is a criminal Ponzi scheme should be anywhere near our earned Social Security benefits or the sensitive data we provide the Social Security Administration," said SSW's Altman.
Over 200 actions are expected this weekend at dealership locations across multiple continents.
Outraged by Elon Musk's devastating contributions to the Trump administration, people around the world continue to target the billionaire CEO's electric vehicle company, planning "Tesla Takedown" protests at over 200 locations for Saturday, March 29.
"Elon Musk is destroying our democracy, and he's using the fortune he built at Tesla to do it," organizers wrote on Action Network, which has an interactive map of the protest sites. "We are taking action at Tesla to stop Musk's illegal coup."
Organizers also have a message for people with ties to the company: "Sell your Teslas, dump your stock, join the picket lines."
Frustration over Musk's effort to gut the U.S. government has impacted the company's value. Democratic Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz—who ran for vice president last November—told a crowd at a recent political event that he added Tesla to his smartphone's stock application "to give me a little boost during the day," and urged EV owners to remove the logo with dental floss.
Since Musk began dismantling the federal bureaucracy as chief of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency, critics have protested at Tesla facilities and posted videos on social media about selling their vehicles.
As CNN reported last week, "Despite the record low prices for a Tesla on the used market and a prominent advertisement by the president of the United States, the cars have been having a tough time finding buyers, according to a March survey from Cars.com."
The #TeslaTakedown Global Day of Action on March 29 needs you! Even if you don’t live near a showroom, you can plan an action & fight back. Pick a Supercharger station, a busy corner, a park—just get out there & make your voice heard with a peaceful protest. Info: actionnetwork.org/event_campai...
[image or embed]
— Mark Ruffalo (@markruffalo.bsky.social) March 27, 2025 at 10:49 AM
Earlier this month, Trump held a Tesla sales event at the White House, and Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick encouraged Fox News viewers to buy stock in the company, triggering an ethics complaint against him. The president and U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi have also described people who have vandalized Tesla property as "terrorists." On Monday, federal law enforcement agencies launched a task force "to coordinate investigative activity and crack down on violent Tesla attacks."
Organizers of the Saturday demonstrations stressed that "Tesla Takedown is a peaceful protest movement. We oppose violence, vandalism, and destruction of property. This protest is a lawful exercise of our First Amendment right to peaceful assembly."
In addition to protests planned across North America and Europe, actions are also coordinated Australia and New Zealand. Supporters are sharing updates about the global day of action on social media—including Musk-owned X—with the hashtags #TeslaTakedown and #BoycottTesla.
"Nobody voted for this, and nobody voted for Elon," Vickie Mueller Olvera, who has been organizing Tesla Takedown protests in the Bay Area, told The Guardian. "He's an unelected superbillionaire and he's a thug."
"I see Elon Musk as hijacking our government, and he's just dismantling everything that we hold dear," Olvera added. "Everything that people have fought long and hard for, like social security, Medicare and Medicaid and our beautiful national parks... it just feels like the rug is getting pulled out from under us."