SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A protester holds a sign at the Reclaim Pride Coalition's third annual Queer Liberation March on June 27, 2021 in New York, New York. (Photo: Erik McGregor/LightRocket via Getty Images)
Civil rights organizations on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and the Department of Family and Protective Services in order to halt state investigations into parents with transgender children.
"A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
After Abbott directed the DFPS to treat gender-affirming healthcare for transgender minors as child abuse and pursue parents who are supportive of their children's use of puberty-blockers or other gender-affirming care, at least one family is already under investigation, according to Melissa Gira Grant of The New Republic.
The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, and Lambda Legal are suing the state, representing a family and a psychologist who want the directive blocked.
"No family should have to fear being torn apart because they are supporting their trans child," said Adri Perez, policy and advocacy strategist at the ACLU of Texas. "A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
"Families with trans kids in Texas have been under attack for too long," Perez added. "Gender-affirming healthcare saved my life, and other trans Texans should be able to access medically necessary, lifesaving care."
As Common Dreams reported last week, based on a legal opinion released by Paxton, Abbott has warned healthcare providers, educators, other licensed professionals, and even members of the general public to report gender-affirming care to the state.
At least two county attorneys have said they won't prosecute any families referred by DFPS, but a woman who works for the department is now being investigated after disclosing to her supervisor that her daughter is receiving medically necessary gender-affirming care.
As Grant reported:
Jane Doe, the mother of a trans child, Mary, is herself a DFPS employee, according to the filing. On February 23, after the Paxton and Abbott directives, she sought guidance from her supervisor about how the changes would impact her work. "Such clarification was important for her family as well as to her ability to perform her job at DFPS," the filing states. "That same day, and just mere hours later, Jane Doe was placed on leave from her employment because she has a transgender daughter with a medical need for treatment of gender dysphoria."
The Does are also now being investigated by DFPS. Two days after Jane was sent home on leave, a DFPS Child Protective Services investigator came to the Doe home. "The CPS investigator disclosed that the sole allegation against Jane Doe and John Doe is that they have a transgender daughter and that their daughter may have been provided with medically necessary gender-affirming health care and is 'currently transitioning from male to female.'"
"While I was working on this story this morning," Grant tweeted Tuesday, "CPS showed up at the door of one mom in Texas I am in touch with. This is all going down very fast."
With Abbott and Paxton both facing elections this year amid a nationwide right-wing campaign attacking the rights of transgender children--despite evidence that the general public has little appetite for placing restrictions on them--critics have accused the two Republicans of blatantly using vulnerable young people in Texas as political pawns.
\u201cThe Salem Witch trials -Inquisition style attack on trans youth and gender-affirming care and their parents is one of the most shameful examples of far right politicians exploiting human lives for partisan political purposes. No wonder they want to block people from voting\u201d— Charles Idelson (@Charles Idelson) 1646158920
"In Texas and many other states, trans and non-binary people are under attack by legislators and political leaders, many of whom are exploiting them as political fodder for their election campaigns," said Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer, president of the United Church of Christ, and Andrew Lang, executive director of the church's Open and Affirming Coalition, on Tuesday. "We call on Gov. Abbott to rescind this onerous, harmful directive, and we call on state legislatures in other states to overturn any anti-transgender legislation that may currently exist in their state and defeat any pending anti-transgender legislation."
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive."
The national non-profit advocacy group Children's Rights applauded the plaintiffs in the lawsuit "for challenging Gov. Abbott's blatantly political directive."
"If Gov. Abbott and other Texas leaders really cared about children, they would focus their efforts on better serving the children in Texas's badly broken child welfare system, not on cruelly targeting transgender children and their families for seeking affirming healthcare," said Samantha Bartosz, deputy litigation director at the group.
Studies have shown that transgender and non-binary children whose parents are unsupportive are far more likely than children with supportive families to attempt suicide.
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive," said Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU.
In Austin, grassroots organizers demonstrated on the steps of the Texas State Capitol, chanting, "Stop the hate!"
"We cannot allow politicians to use trans youth to score political points," said Strangio. "We must speak up when lies and misinformation about trans youth are being spread. We must show up for trans youth today and every day."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Civil rights organizations on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and the Department of Family and Protective Services in order to halt state investigations into parents with transgender children.
"A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
After Abbott directed the DFPS to treat gender-affirming healthcare for transgender minors as child abuse and pursue parents who are supportive of their children's use of puberty-blockers or other gender-affirming care, at least one family is already under investigation, according to Melissa Gira Grant of The New Republic.
The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, and Lambda Legal are suing the state, representing a family and a psychologist who want the directive blocked.
"No family should have to fear being torn apart because they are supporting their trans child," said Adri Perez, policy and advocacy strategist at the ACLU of Texas. "A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
"Families with trans kids in Texas have been under attack for too long," Perez added. "Gender-affirming healthcare saved my life, and other trans Texans should be able to access medically necessary, lifesaving care."
As Common Dreams reported last week, based on a legal opinion released by Paxton, Abbott has warned healthcare providers, educators, other licensed professionals, and even members of the general public to report gender-affirming care to the state.
At least two county attorneys have said they won't prosecute any families referred by DFPS, but a woman who works for the department is now being investigated after disclosing to her supervisor that her daughter is receiving medically necessary gender-affirming care.
As Grant reported:
Jane Doe, the mother of a trans child, Mary, is herself a DFPS employee, according to the filing. On February 23, after the Paxton and Abbott directives, she sought guidance from her supervisor about how the changes would impact her work. "Such clarification was important for her family as well as to her ability to perform her job at DFPS," the filing states. "That same day, and just mere hours later, Jane Doe was placed on leave from her employment because she has a transgender daughter with a medical need for treatment of gender dysphoria."
The Does are also now being investigated by DFPS. Two days after Jane was sent home on leave, a DFPS Child Protective Services investigator came to the Doe home. "The CPS investigator disclosed that the sole allegation against Jane Doe and John Doe is that they have a transgender daughter and that their daughter may have been provided with medically necessary gender-affirming health care and is 'currently transitioning from male to female.'"
"While I was working on this story this morning," Grant tweeted Tuesday, "CPS showed up at the door of one mom in Texas I am in touch with. This is all going down very fast."
With Abbott and Paxton both facing elections this year amid a nationwide right-wing campaign attacking the rights of transgender children--despite evidence that the general public has little appetite for placing restrictions on them--critics have accused the two Republicans of blatantly using vulnerable young people in Texas as political pawns.
\u201cThe Salem Witch trials -Inquisition style attack on trans youth and gender-affirming care and their parents is one of the most shameful examples of far right politicians exploiting human lives for partisan political purposes. No wonder they want to block people from voting\u201d— Charles Idelson (@Charles Idelson) 1646158920
"In Texas and many other states, trans and non-binary people are under attack by legislators and political leaders, many of whom are exploiting them as political fodder for their election campaigns," said Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer, president of the United Church of Christ, and Andrew Lang, executive director of the church's Open and Affirming Coalition, on Tuesday. "We call on Gov. Abbott to rescind this onerous, harmful directive, and we call on state legislatures in other states to overturn any anti-transgender legislation that may currently exist in their state and defeat any pending anti-transgender legislation."
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive."
The national non-profit advocacy group Children's Rights applauded the plaintiffs in the lawsuit "for challenging Gov. Abbott's blatantly political directive."
"If Gov. Abbott and other Texas leaders really cared about children, they would focus their efforts on better serving the children in Texas's badly broken child welfare system, not on cruelly targeting transgender children and their families for seeking affirming healthcare," said Samantha Bartosz, deputy litigation director at the group.
Studies have shown that transgender and non-binary children whose parents are unsupportive are far more likely than children with supportive families to attempt suicide.
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive," said Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU.
In Austin, grassroots organizers demonstrated on the steps of the Texas State Capitol, chanting, "Stop the hate!"
"We cannot allow politicians to use trans youth to score political points," said Strangio. "We must speak up when lies and misinformation about trans youth are being spread. We must show up for trans youth today and every day."
Civil rights organizations on Tuesday filed a lawsuit against Texas Republican Gov. Greg Abbott and the Department of Family and Protective Services in order to halt state investigations into parents with transgender children.
"A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
After Abbott directed the DFPS to treat gender-affirming healthcare for transgender minors as child abuse and pursue parents who are supportive of their children's use of puberty-blockers or other gender-affirming care, at least one family is already under investigation, according to Melissa Gira Grant of The New Republic.
The American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of Texas, and Lambda Legal are suing the state, representing a family and a psychologist who want the directive blocked.
"No family should have to fear being torn apart because they are supporting their trans child," said Adri Perez, policy and advocacy strategist at the ACLU of Texas. "A week before an election, Gov. Abbott and Attorney General Ken Paxton issued a partisan political attack that isn't rooted in the needs of families, the evidence from doctors, and the expertise from child welfare professionals."
"Families with trans kids in Texas have been under attack for too long," Perez added. "Gender-affirming healthcare saved my life, and other trans Texans should be able to access medically necessary, lifesaving care."
As Common Dreams reported last week, based on a legal opinion released by Paxton, Abbott has warned healthcare providers, educators, other licensed professionals, and even members of the general public to report gender-affirming care to the state.
At least two county attorneys have said they won't prosecute any families referred by DFPS, but a woman who works for the department is now being investigated after disclosing to her supervisor that her daughter is receiving medically necessary gender-affirming care.
As Grant reported:
Jane Doe, the mother of a trans child, Mary, is herself a DFPS employee, according to the filing. On February 23, after the Paxton and Abbott directives, she sought guidance from her supervisor about how the changes would impact her work. "Such clarification was important for her family as well as to her ability to perform her job at DFPS," the filing states. "That same day, and just mere hours later, Jane Doe was placed on leave from her employment because she has a transgender daughter with a medical need for treatment of gender dysphoria."
The Does are also now being investigated by DFPS. Two days after Jane was sent home on leave, a DFPS Child Protective Services investigator came to the Doe home. "The CPS investigator disclosed that the sole allegation against Jane Doe and John Doe is that they have a transgender daughter and that their daughter may have been provided with medically necessary gender-affirming health care and is 'currently transitioning from male to female.'"
"While I was working on this story this morning," Grant tweeted Tuesday, "CPS showed up at the door of one mom in Texas I am in touch with. This is all going down very fast."
With Abbott and Paxton both facing elections this year amid a nationwide right-wing campaign attacking the rights of transgender children--despite evidence that the general public has little appetite for placing restrictions on them--critics have accused the two Republicans of blatantly using vulnerable young people in Texas as political pawns.
\u201cThe Salem Witch trials -Inquisition style attack on trans youth and gender-affirming care and their parents is one of the most shameful examples of far right politicians exploiting human lives for partisan political purposes. No wonder they want to block people from voting\u201d— Charles Idelson (@Charles Idelson) 1646158920
"In Texas and many other states, trans and non-binary people are under attack by legislators and political leaders, many of whom are exploiting them as political fodder for their election campaigns," said Rev. Dr. John C. Dorhauer, president of the United Church of Christ, and Andrew Lang, executive director of the church's Open and Affirming Coalition, on Tuesday. "We call on Gov. Abbott to rescind this onerous, harmful directive, and we call on state legislatures in other states to overturn any anti-transgender legislation that may currently exist in their state and defeat any pending anti-transgender legislation."
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive."
The national non-profit advocacy group Children's Rights applauded the plaintiffs in the lawsuit "for challenging Gov. Abbott's blatantly political directive."
"If Gov. Abbott and other Texas leaders really cared about children, they would focus their efforts on better serving the children in Texas's badly broken child welfare system, not on cruelly targeting transgender children and their families for seeking affirming healthcare," said Samantha Bartosz, deputy litigation director at the group.
Studies have shown that transgender and non-binary children whose parents are unsupportive are far more likely than children with supportive families to attempt suicide.
"They are trying to stop kids from being trans--but you can't make us not trans, you can only make us not alive," said Chase Strangio, deputy director for transgender justice at the ACLU.
In Austin, grassroots organizers demonstrated on the steps of the Texas State Capitol, chanting, "Stop the hate!"
"We cannot allow politicians to use trans youth to score political points," said Strangio. "We must speak up when lies and misinformation about trans youth are being spread. We must show up for trans youth today and every day."
"I hope American law firms—Paul Weiss and Skadden—are proud of the cowardice they are instilling and inspiring among the legal profession," wrote one former state senator.
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom on Friday became the latest white-shoe law firm to acquiesce to the Trump administration as the White House ramps up attacks on the legal profession. The news prompted a wave of outrage at the law firm, which was accused of being "pathetic."
The firm has agreed to provide at least $100 million in pro bono legal services to the federal government during his administration "and beyond," according to a Truth Social post from U.S. President Donald Trump. Also, the "firm will not engage in illegal" diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) "discrimination and preferences," according to the post, which also noted that the firm proactively reached out to the administration about an agreement.
Speaking at the White House on Friday, Trump called the deal "essentially a settlement," according to Reuters.
"Pathetic when the richest and most powerful lawyers in America won't stand up for the profession that made them rich and powerful," wrote U.S. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.) on X on Friday, reacting to earlier reporting that the firm was in discussions with the White House over a deal.
Author and commentator Wajahat Ali wrote that the move was "shameful" on Bluesky on Friday. "Pathetic and selfish," wrote Pod Save America podcast co-host Jon Favreau.
Former New York state Sen. Alessandra Biaggi (D-34) wrote: "I hope American law firms—Paul Weiss and Skadden—are proud of the cowardice they are instilling and inspiring among the legal profession."
The news comes on the heels of news that another top law firm, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, last week brokered a deal with the White House in order to spare the firm from an executive order that suspended security clearances for lawyers and staff.
As part of that deal, the firm will dedicate $40 million in pro bono legal services during Trump's administration "to support the administration's initiatives."
Meanwhile, also last week, Trump issued a memo directing U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to "seek sanctions" against firms and lawyers that, according to him, "engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States."
With the agreement, Skadden Arps has likely avoided joining a list of elite law firms that have been singled out via executive order from Trump, targeting them with various punishments. Three of the firms that have been targeted with an executive order, WilmerHale, Jenner & Block, and Perkins Coie, have sued the Trump administration in response.
Last week, prior to the deal between Skadden Arps and the Trump administration and in response to the deal struck between the White House and Paul Weiss, an associate at Skadden Arps sent an all-staff email saying she would resign if the firm did not do more to stand up to Trump.
"This is not what I saw for my career or for my evening, but Paul Weiss' decision to cave to the Trump administration on DEI, representation, and staffing has forced my hand," she wrote. "We do not have time. It is either now or never, and if it's never, I will not continue to work here."
"Democratic voters are sending a clear message," said the head of Data for Progress. "The base is tired of weak opposition and business-as-usual politics."
A large majority of registered Democrats and Independent voters who lean Democratic are frustrated with the party, see no clear leader of it, and want to see elected officials fight harder for working people and against Republican President Donald Trump, according to a pair of polls released Friday.
"Democratic voters are sending a clear message: They want leaders who will fight Trump and put working people first," said Danielle Deiseroth, executive director of Data for Progress, the progressive think tank behind the surveys. "The base is tired of weak opposition and business-as-usual politics."
"This level of discontent is unsustainable for a party looking to build back in the wake of major losses—at a certain point, Democratic leaders will need to show voters that they are taking a stronger stance against Trump, or step aside for someone who will," Deiseroth added.
"This level of discontent is unsustainable for a party looking to build back in the wake of major losses."
The polling—released nearly five months after the election in which Democrats lost the White House and both chambers of Congress—shows that when asked how they would grade the Democratic Party on its response to Trump, who returned to power in January, 70% of voters said C or below, and 21% said F.
Voters were also divided in terms of who they see as the current leader of the Democratic Party. Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who lost the race for the White House in November, was at the top, but with only 17%. She was followed by former President Barack Obama and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), who tied at 15%.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) tied with "no one" at 11%, followed by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) at 9% and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) at 6%.
Sanders, who sought the Democratic Party's presidential nomination in 2016 and 2020, announced Friday that Ocasio-Cortez will join the Los Angeles stop of his "Fighting Oligarchy: Where We Go From Here" tour on Saturday—as she did across the U.S. West last week, drawing the biggest crowd of either of their careers at a rally in Denver, Colorado.
"Today, the oligarchs and the billionaire class are getting richer and richer and have more and more power," Sanders said Friday. "Meanwhile, 60% of Americans live paycheck to paycheck, and most of our people are struggling to pay for healthcare, childcare, and housing. This country belongs to all of us, not just the few. We must fight back."
The new polling makes clear that voters want elected officials to fight back in a variety of ways, including legal challenges, media appearances, voter registration drives, letter-writing and phone-banking campaigns, procedural tactics like the filibuster, supporting worker walkouts, consumer boycotts, mass protests—including at government buildings—and disrupting Trump campaign events.
Voters are specifically disappointed with Schumer: 61% said he isn't doing enough to fight Trump. After being told about the Senate majority leader's decision earlier this month to lead a group of 10 caucus members who helped Republicans pass a stopgap spending bill, 51% said Democrats in the chamber should choose a new leader—and if they did, 66% of voters would want "someone who fights harder against Trump and the Republican agenda."
A large majority of voters of all ages want elderly Democratic Party leaders "to retire and pass the torch to the younger generation." Big majorities also want party leadership to be diverse in race and gender, and to prioritize funding for programs addressing issues such as healthcare and housing, even if it increases the national deficit.
As the party battles Trump and rebuilds after November's devastating losses, voters are stressing that Democrats must emphasize how they will fight for the working class. Large majorities urged them to focus on taking on corporate interests and the Democratic establishment, taxing the wealthy, lowering prices, and "laying out a bold, progressive agenda for economic and political reform."
The Data for Progress polling follows an internal survey conducted earlier this month by Our Revolution, the progressive political organizing group launched as a continuation of Sanders' 2016 presidential campaign. That survey of 9,024 members found that nearly 90% of respondents believe Schumer should step aside as Senate minority leader and 86% would support a primary challenger for his Senate seat, should he refuse to step aside. Calls for Ocasio-Cortez to primary him have mounted throughout the month.
"These survey results point to an undeniable crisis of confidence in Chuck Schumer and Democratic leadership at a time of unprecedented executive overreach and corporate takeover of the American federal government," Joseph Geevarghese, the executive director of Our Revolution, said at the time. "It's time to step up or step down."
The appeal to the Supreme Court is the latest move in an unfolding battle between the judiciary and the White House.
The U.S. Department of Justice on Friday appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court to lift a lower court restriction on the Trump administration's ability to continue to carrying out deportations using the 1798 Alien Enemies Act, a wartime authority U.S. President Donald Trump invoked in mid-March to deport Venezuelan immigrants he alleged, without evidence, were criminal gang members but who legal experts say are the victims of authoritarian overreach and still entitled to due process.
The deportees are currently being held at a megaprison in El Salvador, which U.S. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem toured on Wednesday, in part to film a video in front of the incarcerated men—a move that was widely decried as sadistic and fascist behavior by a senior administration official.
On March 15, the same day that Trump published an executive order stating its intention to use the Alien Enemies Act to carry out deportations, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg issued a nationwide temporary restraining order, halting furthering removals of noncitizens under The Alien Enemies Act. The rarely used provision, never before invoked when the U.S. was not engaged in a war authorized by Congress, gives the president the ability to detain or deport noncitizens without first appearing before an immigration judge or federal court judge.
On Wednesday, a federal appeals court panel kept in place Boasberg's order while the court decides on the underlying legal issues in the case—prompting the Trump administration to appeal to the Supreme Court.
The administration is asking the court to overturn Boasberg's block, arguing that—in the words of Acting Solicitor General Sarah Harris—the "case presents fundamental questions about who decides how to conduct sensitive national-security-related operations in this country—the president, through Article II, or the judiciary, through [temporary restraining orders]."
As with other recent appeals from the Trump administration, according to CNN, the White House's argument before the Supreme Court leaned on complaints that the lower courts are standing in Trump's way.
"Only this court can stop rule-by-[temporary restraining order] from further upending the separation of powers—the sooner, the better," Harris told the Supreme Court. "Here, the district court's orders have rebuffed the president's judgments as to how to protect the nation against foreign terrorist organizations and risk debilitating effects for delicate foreign negotiations."
On March 18, Trump called Boasberg a “Radical Left Lunatic of a Judge, a troublemaker and agitator," and also said that "this judge, like many of the Crooked Judges' I am forced to appear before, should be IMPEACHED!!!" Rep. Brandon Gill (R-Texas) said a few days prior that he would be would "be filing articles of impeachment against activist Judge James Boasberg."
Days later, John Roberts, the conservative chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, issued a rare statement rebuking calls from Trump and members of his orbit for the impeachment of federal judges who have ruled against the administration.