SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Cambridge, Massachusetts student Cece Walsh declined to list any "positive" effects of imperialism on her homework assignment, arguing that the assignment "appeared to downplay the killing of Africans and the pillaging of their lands and resources by using phrases about how the Europeans 'obtained land' or merely 'took control' of colonies." (Photo: Twitter/@CallaWalsh)
US High Schooler's Answer Listing Zero 'Positive Effects of Imperialism' Goes Viral
"The 'positive' effects" of imperialism "are often only positive for the oppressors," said 15-year-old Cece Walsh.
Mar 23, 2022
A Massachusetts student's response to a homework assignment went viral Tuesday after the high schooler refused to list "positive effects of imperialism" but included a long list of its negative impacts on communities throughout history.
Cece Walsh, a 15-year-old student at Cambridge Rindge and Latin School, a public high school outside Boston, thought of numerous harmful effects of governments which expanding their influence and power by force, including the "genocide of Indigenous peoples," slavery, "destruction of cultures and traditions," "forced religion," and the exploitation of the planet.
The worksheet her older sister posted on Twitter Monday--which has been shared more than 18,000 times on the platform by Wednesday morning--showed her vehement disagreement with being asked to consider imperialism's supposed benefits.
\u201cMY LITTLE SISTER\u2019S HISTORY TEACHER IS MAKING THEM LIST THE \u201cPOSITIVE EFFECTS\u201d OF IMPERIALISM??????\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647962257
"I think that asking us to identify positives of imperialism, something that killed thousands and contributed to slavery, is extremely undermining and disrespectful to people whose ancestors were murdered because of colonization," wrote Walsh on the bottom of the page.
Walsh reported that her history teacher "agreed" with her statement about the question and explained that "he was teaching the text because it was part of the state's curriculum, but he planned to introduce other texts with different perspectives soon."
Walsh's sister argued on Twitter that the assignment is evidence that Republicans' crusade against discussions of anti-racism in public schools is only an extreme version of "racist, imperialist revisionism" in U.S. schools.
On Wednesday, Cambridge Public Schools released a statement saying Walsh was completing an assignment "designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."
\u201cNEW: Cambridge Public Schools describes this assignment in a statement, saying the unit "is designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."\n\nFull statement:\u201d— Christopher Gavin (@Christopher Gavin) 1648038949
Walsh told the Boston Globe that she felt the assignment "appeared to downplay the killing of Africans and the pillaging of their lands and resources by using phrases about how the Europeans 'obtained land' or merely 'took control' of colonies."
"The positive effects are often only positive for the oppressors," Walsh added.
Educator Collin Radix-Carter argued that Walsh showed she was "thinking critically" about imperialism, as the school district said it wanted students to.
Walsh "obviously didn't think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material," Radix-Carter said. "Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear."
\u201c@Mickelli38 @TheMongo @CallaWalsh And this student did. Read what they wrote at the bottom. They obviously didn\u2019t think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material. Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear.\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647968004
Marisa Natale, another educator, wrote that "you can teach critical thinking without opening doors for students to 'both-sides' things like slavery and imperialism."
"That is the opposite of critical thinking," she added.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A Massachusetts student's response to a homework assignment went viral Tuesday after the high schooler refused to list "positive effects of imperialism" but included a long list of its negative impacts on communities throughout history.
Cece Walsh, a 15-year-old student at Cambridge Rindge and Latin School, a public high school outside Boston, thought of numerous harmful effects of governments which expanding their influence and power by force, including the "genocide of Indigenous peoples," slavery, "destruction of cultures and traditions," "forced religion," and the exploitation of the planet.
The worksheet her older sister posted on Twitter Monday--which has been shared more than 18,000 times on the platform by Wednesday morning--showed her vehement disagreement with being asked to consider imperialism's supposed benefits.
\u201cMY LITTLE SISTER\u2019S HISTORY TEACHER IS MAKING THEM LIST THE \u201cPOSITIVE EFFECTS\u201d OF IMPERIALISM??????\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647962257
"I think that asking us to identify positives of imperialism, something that killed thousands and contributed to slavery, is extremely undermining and disrespectful to people whose ancestors were murdered because of colonization," wrote Walsh on the bottom of the page.
Walsh reported that her history teacher "agreed" with her statement about the question and explained that "he was teaching the text because it was part of the state's curriculum, but he planned to introduce other texts with different perspectives soon."
Walsh's sister argued on Twitter that the assignment is evidence that Republicans' crusade against discussions of anti-racism in public schools is only an extreme version of "racist, imperialist revisionism" in U.S. schools.
On Wednesday, Cambridge Public Schools released a statement saying Walsh was completing an assignment "designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."
\u201cNEW: Cambridge Public Schools describes this assignment in a statement, saying the unit "is designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."\n\nFull statement:\u201d— Christopher Gavin (@Christopher Gavin) 1648038949
Walsh told the Boston Globe that she felt the assignment "appeared to downplay the killing of Africans and the pillaging of their lands and resources by using phrases about how the Europeans 'obtained land' or merely 'took control' of colonies."
"The positive effects are often only positive for the oppressors," Walsh added.
Educator Collin Radix-Carter argued that Walsh showed she was "thinking critically" about imperialism, as the school district said it wanted students to.
Walsh "obviously didn't think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material," Radix-Carter said. "Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear."
\u201c@Mickelli38 @TheMongo @CallaWalsh And this student did. Read what they wrote at the bottom. They obviously didn\u2019t think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material. Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear.\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647968004
Marisa Natale, another educator, wrote that "you can teach critical thinking without opening doors for students to 'both-sides' things like slavery and imperialism."
"That is the opposite of critical thinking," she added.
A Massachusetts student's response to a homework assignment went viral Tuesday after the high schooler refused to list "positive effects of imperialism" but included a long list of its negative impacts on communities throughout history.
Cece Walsh, a 15-year-old student at Cambridge Rindge and Latin School, a public high school outside Boston, thought of numerous harmful effects of governments which expanding their influence and power by force, including the "genocide of Indigenous peoples," slavery, "destruction of cultures and traditions," "forced religion," and the exploitation of the planet.
The worksheet her older sister posted on Twitter Monday--which has been shared more than 18,000 times on the platform by Wednesday morning--showed her vehement disagreement with being asked to consider imperialism's supposed benefits.
\u201cMY LITTLE SISTER\u2019S HISTORY TEACHER IS MAKING THEM LIST THE \u201cPOSITIVE EFFECTS\u201d OF IMPERIALISM??????\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647962257
"I think that asking us to identify positives of imperialism, something that killed thousands and contributed to slavery, is extremely undermining and disrespectful to people whose ancestors were murdered because of colonization," wrote Walsh on the bottom of the page.
Walsh reported that her history teacher "agreed" with her statement about the question and explained that "he was teaching the text because it was part of the state's curriculum, but he planned to introduce other texts with different perspectives soon."
Walsh's sister argued on Twitter that the assignment is evidence that Republicans' crusade against discussions of anti-racism in public schools is only an extreme version of "racist, imperialist revisionism" in U.S. schools.
On Wednesday, Cambridge Public Schools released a statement saying Walsh was completing an assignment "designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."
\u201cNEW: Cambridge Public Schools describes this assignment in a statement, saying the unit "is designed to spark a conversation and to teach students how to critically think about how imperialism is written about."\n\nFull statement:\u201d— Christopher Gavin (@Christopher Gavin) 1648038949
Walsh told the Boston Globe that she felt the assignment "appeared to downplay the killing of Africans and the pillaging of their lands and resources by using phrases about how the Europeans 'obtained land' or merely 'took control' of colonies."
"The positive effects are often only positive for the oppressors," Walsh added.
Educator Collin Radix-Carter argued that Walsh showed she was "thinking critically" about imperialism, as the school district said it wanted students to.
Walsh "obviously didn't think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material," Radix-Carter said. "Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear."
\u201c@Mickelli38 @TheMongo @CallaWalsh And this student did. Read what they wrote at the bottom. They obviously didn\u2019t think there is a positive to imperialism, probably after thinking and reading through the material. Thinking critically is not regurgitating what you read or hear.\u201d— Calla (@Calla) 1647968004
Marisa Natale, another educator, wrote that "you can teach critical thinking without opening doors for students to 'both-sides' things like slavery and imperialism."
"That is the opposite of critical thinking," she added.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.