A volunteer welcomes members of a group of 25 asylum-seekers allowed into the United States on February 25, 2021 in Brownsville, Texas. (Photo: John Moore/Getty Images)
Jun 30, 2022
Immigrant rights advocates on Thursday welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of a challenge to the Biden administration's move to end a Trump-era program under which asylum-seekers arriving at the southwestern border are forced to remain in Mexico while their cases are decided.
"This is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
In a 5-4 decision--in which right-wing Justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts joined their liberal colleagues--the court in Biden v. Texasruled that the Biden administration can end the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), commonly known as "Remain in Mexico."
However, the justices are also sending the case back to a lower court, which will rule on the Biden administration's attempts to end the MPP program.
The administration announced it was ending MPP earlier this month. However, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the plan after Texas and Missouri sued to block the move.
"We're not done winning. And we're ready to demand a future where children are not ripped from their parents, lives are not lost at our border, and all of us are safe, not stranded," the advocacy group Families Belong Together tweeted in response to the ruling.
"Remain in Mexico--much like Title 42--is a shameful Trump policy that turns away vulnerable people and families seeking safety, forcing them to survive in dangerous makeshift camps without water, food, or medical care for months or even years," the group continued.
\u201cWe need to remember that the ability to seek asylum is a human right. In the past week alone we saw a tragedy in San Antonio that underscores further steps needed to end Title 42 and other cruel policies of the previous administration that limit the legal right to seek asylum.\u201d— Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda (@Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda) 1656600401
"Biden campaigned on repealing Remain in Mexico and the American people elected him to turn the page on Trump's cruelty," Families Belong Together added. "[The] president did the right thing when he moved to end Remain in Mexico and now his administration can finally follow through on the will of the American people."
Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, said in a statement that "the Supreme Court's decision to remand Biden v. Texas back to the lower court is a welcome development."
"It means, however, that the fight to help those fleeing persecution and seeking protection in the U.S. continues," she added. "Since 2019, more than 1,500 people forced to wait in Mexico have faced murder, rape, torture, kidnappings, and other violent acts... underscored by this week's heartbreaking and tragic loss of at least 53 souls seeking a better life."
\u201cThe decision is a small victory for immigrants at SCOTUS. Remain in Mexico used COVID as an excuse to turn people away at the southern border. However, the case does not end here, and it's going back to the Fifth Circuit\u2014which has a history of ruling against immigrants.\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1656599612
"America needs a functioning immigration system that is humane, capable of meeting the demands of 21st-century crises, and that upholds our legal obligation to allow people fleeing persecution to seek safety inside our borders," Vignarajah added.
Fernando Garcia, executive director of the Border Network for Human Rights, said that "this is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
"This decision was long overdue, and it is shocking that the Supreme Court waited until today to determine the danger that migrants have been subjected to since Trump enacted this deadly policy," he continued.
"Now is the turn for Congress to get rid of Title 42," Garcia added, "and provide a solution to the weakened asylum system in place, to provide a humane and fair alternative to vulnerable children, families, and individuals fleeing unsafe conditions and persecution in their home countries."
\u201c"Even if MPP, or 'Remain in Mexico' is lifted, as the Biden administration wants to do, there are still some concerns from that community about whether those migrants will have to still remain in Mexico because of Title 42," @gabegutierrez comments.\n\n@jdbalart \n@MSNBC\u201d— Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports (@Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports) 1656602355
Title 42, a provision of the Public Health Safety Act first invoked by the Trump administration as the coronavirus pandemic began in March 2020, has been used to remove more than one million asylum-seekers--the majority of them during the tenure of President Joe Biden.
"As long as Title 42 is in place there will continue to be devastating harm to asylum seekers," ACLU civil rights attorney Lee Gelernt toldAxios. "Unfortunately, the administration is clearly in no hurry to end Title 42."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Immigrant rights advocates on Thursday welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of a challenge to the Biden administration's move to end a Trump-era program under which asylum-seekers arriving at the southwestern border are forced to remain in Mexico while their cases are decided.
"This is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
In a 5-4 decision--in which right-wing Justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts joined their liberal colleagues--the court in Biden v. Texasruled that the Biden administration can end the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), commonly known as "Remain in Mexico."
However, the justices are also sending the case back to a lower court, which will rule on the Biden administration's attempts to end the MPP program.
The administration announced it was ending MPP earlier this month. However, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the plan after Texas and Missouri sued to block the move.
"We're not done winning. And we're ready to demand a future where children are not ripped from their parents, lives are not lost at our border, and all of us are safe, not stranded," the advocacy group Families Belong Together tweeted in response to the ruling.
"Remain in Mexico--much like Title 42--is a shameful Trump policy that turns away vulnerable people and families seeking safety, forcing them to survive in dangerous makeshift camps without water, food, or medical care for months or even years," the group continued.
\u201cWe need to remember that the ability to seek asylum is a human right. In the past week alone we saw a tragedy in San Antonio that underscores further steps needed to end Title 42 and other cruel policies of the previous administration that limit the legal right to seek asylum.\u201d— Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda (@Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda) 1656600401
"Biden campaigned on repealing Remain in Mexico and the American people elected him to turn the page on Trump's cruelty," Families Belong Together added. "[The] president did the right thing when he moved to end Remain in Mexico and now his administration can finally follow through on the will of the American people."
Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, said in a statement that "the Supreme Court's decision to remand Biden v. Texas back to the lower court is a welcome development."
"It means, however, that the fight to help those fleeing persecution and seeking protection in the U.S. continues," she added. "Since 2019, more than 1,500 people forced to wait in Mexico have faced murder, rape, torture, kidnappings, and other violent acts... underscored by this week's heartbreaking and tragic loss of at least 53 souls seeking a better life."
\u201cThe decision is a small victory for immigrants at SCOTUS. Remain in Mexico used COVID as an excuse to turn people away at the southern border. However, the case does not end here, and it's going back to the Fifth Circuit\u2014which has a history of ruling against immigrants.\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1656599612
"America needs a functioning immigration system that is humane, capable of meeting the demands of 21st-century crises, and that upholds our legal obligation to allow people fleeing persecution to seek safety inside our borders," Vignarajah added.
Fernando Garcia, executive director of the Border Network for Human Rights, said that "this is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
"This decision was long overdue, and it is shocking that the Supreme Court waited until today to determine the danger that migrants have been subjected to since Trump enacted this deadly policy," he continued.
"Now is the turn for Congress to get rid of Title 42," Garcia added, "and provide a solution to the weakened asylum system in place, to provide a humane and fair alternative to vulnerable children, families, and individuals fleeing unsafe conditions and persecution in their home countries."
\u201c"Even if MPP, or 'Remain in Mexico' is lifted, as the Biden administration wants to do, there are still some concerns from that community about whether those migrants will have to still remain in Mexico because of Title 42," @gabegutierrez comments.\n\n@jdbalart \n@MSNBC\u201d— Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports (@Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports) 1656602355
Title 42, a provision of the Public Health Safety Act first invoked by the Trump administration as the coronavirus pandemic began in March 2020, has been used to remove more than one million asylum-seekers--the majority of them during the tenure of President Joe Biden.
"As long as Title 42 is in place there will continue to be devastating harm to asylum seekers," ACLU civil rights attorney Lee Gelernt toldAxios. "Unfortunately, the administration is clearly in no hurry to end Title 42."
Immigrant rights advocates on Thursday welcomed the U.S. Supreme Court's rejection of a challenge to the Biden administration's move to end a Trump-era program under which asylum-seekers arriving at the southwestern border are forced to remain in Mexico while their cases are decided.
"This is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
In a 5-4 decision--in which right-wing Justices Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts joined their liberal colleagues--the court in Biden v. Texasruled that the Biden administration can end the Migrant Protection Protocols (MPP), commonly known as "Remain in Mexico."
However, the justices are also sending the case back to a lower court, which will rule on the Biden administration's attempts to end the MPP program.
The administration announced it was ending MPP earlier this month. However, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected the plan after Texas and Missouri sued to block the move.
"We're not done winning. And we're ready to demand a future where children are not ripped from their parents, lives are not lost at our border, and all of us are safe, not stranded," the advocacy group Families Belong Together tweeted in response to the ruling.
"Remain in Mexico--much like Title 42--is a shameful Trump policy that turns away vulnerable people and families seeking safety, forcing them to survive in dangerous makeshift camps without water, food, or medical care for months or even years," the group continued.
\u201cWe need to remember that the ability to seek asylum is a human right. In the past week alone we saw a tragedy in San Antonio that underscores further steps needed to end Title 42 and other cruel policies of the previous administration that limit the legal right to seek asylum.\u201d— Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda (@Congressman Chuy Garc\u00eda) 1656600401
"Biden campaigned on repealing Remain in Mexico and the American people elected him to turn the page on Trump's cruelty," Families Belong Together added. "[The] president did the right thing when he moved to end Remain in Mexico and now his administration can finally follow through on the will of the American people."
Krish O'Mara Vignarajah, president and CEO of Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, said in a statement that "the Supreme Court's decision to remand Biden v. Texas back to the lower court is a welcome development."
"It means, however, that the fight to help those fleeing persecution and seeking protection in the U.S. continues," she added. "Since 2019, more than 1,500 people forced to wait in Mexico have faced murder, rape, torture, kidnappings, and other violent acts... underscored by this week's heartbreaking and tragic loss of at least 53 souls seeking a better life."
\u201cThe decision is a small victory for immigrants at SCOTUS. Remain in Mexico used COVID as an excuse to turn people away at the southern border. However, the case does not end here, and it's going back to the Fifth Circuit\u2014which has a history of ruling against immigrants.\u201d— United We Dream (@United We Dream) 1656599612
"America needs a functioning immigration system that is humane, capable of meeting the demands of 21st-century crises, and that upholds our legal obligation to allow people fleeing persecution to seek safety inside our borders," Vignarajah added.
Fernando Garcia, executive director of the Border Network for Human Rights, said that "this is a bittersweet victory after so many lives have been lost to atrocious immigration deterrence policies."
"This decision was long overdue, and it is shocking that the Supreme Court waited until today to determine the danger that migrants have been subjected to since Trump enacted this deadly policy," he continued.
"Now is the turn for Congress to get rid of Title 42," Garcia added, "and provide a solution to the weakened asylum system in place, to provide a humane and fair alternative to vulnerable children, families, and individuals fleeing unsafe conditions and persecution in their home countries."
\u201c"Even if MPP, or 'Remain in Mexico' is lifted, as the Biden administration wants to do, there are still some concerns from that community about whether those migrants will have to still remain in Mexico because of Title 42," @gabegutierrez comments.\n\n@jdbalart \n@MSNBC\u201d— Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports (@Jos\u00e9 D\u00edaz-Balart Reports) 1656602355
Title 42, a provision of the Public Health Safety Act first invoked by the Trump administration as the coronavirus pandemic began in March 2020, has been used to remove more than one million asylum-seekers--the majority of them during the tenure of President Joe Biden.
"As long as Title 42 is in place there will continue to be devastating harm to asylum seekers," ACLU civil rights attorney Lee Gelernt toldAxios. "Unfortunately, the administration is clearly in no hurry to end Title 42."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.