
Activists participate in a rally urging the expansion of Social Security benefits in front of the White House on July 13, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Activists participate in a rally urging the expansion of Social Security benefits in front of the White House on July 13, 2015 in Washington, D.C. (Photo: Win McNamee/Getty Images)
As progressive lawmakers renewed calls for protecting Social Security from GOP attacks, Data for Progress on Monday pointed to polling that shows about 80% of U.S. voters across partisan divides support boosting benefits.
"While Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance Social Security, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program!"
As a recent Social Security Administration report explains, "The Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program makes monthly income available to insured workers and their families at retirement, death, or disability."
The program traces back to the Social Security Act, signed into law on August 14, 1935 by then-U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Marking the 87th anniversary Sunday, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) warned that the program is "under attack from Republicans," despite its popularity among voters.
Data for Progress highlighted Monday that 86% of voters surveyed in June said they are "very" or "somewhat" concerned that the U.S. government will reduce Social Security benefits for those who currently receive them.
In July, the progressive think tank found that 70% of all voters--including 76% of Independents, 71% of Republicans, and 64% of Democrats--said they had heard "nothing at all" about GOP proposals to "sunset" the program.
Data for Progress also found last month that 81% of all likely voters--including 88% of Democrats, 79% of Independents, and 75% of Republicans--support legislation to raise Social Security benefits to match the cost of living.
"Moreover, voters strongly support the pay-fors introduced in new legislation that would increase the solvency of Social Security and pay for new, expanded benefits," the group noted in a blog post. "We find that 76% of voters support imposing a payroll tax on Americans making more than $400,000 annually, including 88% of Democrats, 76% of Independents, and 65% of Republicans."
The July polling further showed that 79% of all voters--including 89% of Democrats, 72% of Independents, and 72% of Republicans--believe Congress "should vote to expand Social Security benefits now, even though Democratic proposals only expand benefits for five years and would raise taxes on Americans earning more than $400,000 per year."
As Democrats worry about losing control of Congress this November, the think tank pointed out that polls from this year suggest candidates would do better in elections if voters knew they want to expand Social Security.
Carly Berke, the strategic partnerships coordinator at Data for Progress and co-author of the new blog post, tweeted that amid GOP attacks on Social Security, Democrats "need to make clear they're fighting to protect and expand benefits."
\u201cSocial Security is a sacred program relied upon by millions of Americans. With Republicans threatening to cut benefits - and worse, eliminate the program entirely - Dems need to make clear they\u2019re fighting to protect + expand benefits. New @DataProgress: https://t.co/9I31DSSCwq\u201d— Carly Berke (@Carly Berke) 1660594340
U.S. Rep Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the CPC's chair, and other members of Congress made that message clear in a Monday afternoon event hosted by Social Security Works.
Jayapal urged those benefiting from the program to share their stories and pressure lawmakers to pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust, legislation introduced by Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.).
\u201cIn this time of rising costs and people's monthly Social Security payments not keeping up, #Secure2100 would provide beneficiaries with desperately needed breathing room. - @RepJayapal \n#SocSec87\u201d— Social Security Works (@Social Security Works) 1660583708
"Social Security has provided our nation with the most comprehensive retirement, disability, and survivors benefits for 87 years," Larson said in a statement. "Democrats are fighting to expand and protect it, yet my Republican colleagues have plans to cut benefits and even end the program as a whole."
"Congress has not acted in 50 years to enhance benefits," he noted. "The American people have made clear they want to protect the program they pay into with each and every paycheck so they can retire with dignity. With the Covid-19 pandemic still impacting our country and Republicans revealing their plans to end benefits, there is a fierce urgency to protect and enhance Social Security now."
\u201cWhile Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance #SocialSecurity, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program! We must pass Social Security 2100: A #SacredTrust to ensure this program serves our country for years to come!\u202f@RepJohnLarson\u201d— Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare (@Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare) 1660579538
Advocating for his bill, Larson said that "alongside commemorating 87 years of this program, Congress must pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust to make much-needed benefit improvements and ensure this program can serve our nation for years to come. Congress must vote!"
Some progressive lawmakers--including Jayapal--also support the Social Security Expansion Act, legislation introduced in June by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
\u201cMillions of Americans depend on the benefits they have earned. Instead of threatening to cut SS, Republicans should support my bill, which would ensure solvency for 75 years, increase benefits, & update the COLA formula to meet the everyday needs of our nation\u2019s seniors.\u201d— Rep. Peter DeFazio (@Rep. Peter DeFazio) 1660589028
"A lot has changed in 87 years, but Americans' reliance on Social Security has not," DeFazio said Monday. "My bill, the Social Security Expansion Act (SSEA) would enhance monthly benefits and keep the program solvent through 2096."
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
As progressive lawmakers renewed calls for protecting Social Security from GOP attacks, Data for Progress on Monday pointed to polling that shows about 80% of U.S. voters across partisan divides support boosting benefits.
"While Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance Social Security, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program!"
As a recent Social Security Administration report explains, "The Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program makes monthly income available to insured workers and their families at retirement, death, or disability."
The program traces back to the Social Security Act, signed into law on August 14, 1935 by then-U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Marking the 87th anniversary Sunday, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) warned that the program is "under attack from Republicans," despite its popularity among voters.
Data for Progress highlighted Monday that 86% of voters surveyed in June said they are "very" or "somewhat" concerned that the U.S. government will reduce Social Security benefits for those who currently receive them.
In July, the progressive think tank found that 70% of all voters--including 76% of Independents, 71% of Republicans, and 64% of Democrats--said they had heard "nothing at all" about GOP proposals to "sunset" the program.
Data for Progress also found last month that 81% of all likely voters--including 88% of Democrats, 79% of Independents, and 75% of Republicans--support legislation to raise Social Security benefits to match the cost of living.
"Moreover, voters strongly support the pay-fors introduced in new legislation that would increase the solvency of Social Security and pay for new, expanded benefits," the group noted in a blog post. "We find that 76% of voters support imposing a payroll tax on Americans making more than $400,000 annually, including 88% of Democrats, 76% of Independents, and 65% of Republicans."
The July polling further showed that 79% of all voters--including 89% of Democrats, 72% of Independents, and 72% of Republicans--believe Congress "should vote to expand Social Security benefits now, even though Democratic proposals only expand benefits for five years and would raise taxes on Americans earning more than $400,000 per year."
As Democrats worry about losing control of Congress this November, the think tank pointed out that polls from this year suggest candidates would do better in elections if voters knew they want to expand Social Security.
Carly Berke, the strategic partnerships coordinator at Data for Progress and co-author of the new blog post, tweeted that amid GOP attacks on Social Security, Democrats "need to make clear they're fighting to protect and expand benefits."
\u201cSocial Security is a sacred program relied upon by millions of Americans. With Republicans threatening to cut benefits - and worse, eliminate the program entirely - Dems need to make clear they\u2019re fighting to protect + expand benefits. New @DataProgress: https://t.co/9I31DSSCwq\u201d— Carly Berke (@Carly Berke) 1660594340
U.S. Rep Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the CPC's chair, and other members of Congress made that message clear in a Monday afternoon event hosted by Social Security Works.
Jayapal urged those benefiting from the program to share their stories and pressure lawmakers to pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust, legislation introduced by Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.).
\u201cIn this time of rising costs and people's monthly Social Security payments not keeping up, #Secure2100 would provide beneficiaries with desperately needed breathing room. - @RepJayapal \n#SocSec87\u201d— Social Security Works (@Social Security Works) 1660583708
"Social Security has provided our nation with the most comprehensive retirement, disability, and survivors benefits for 87 years," Larson said in a statement. "Democrats are fighting to expand and protect it, yet my Republican colleagues have plans to cut benefits and even end the program as a whole."
"Congress has not acted in 50 years to enhance benefits," he noted. "The American people have made clear they want to protect the program they pay into with each and every paycheck so they can retire with dignity. With the Covid-19 pandemic still impacting our country and Republicans revealing their plans to end benefits, there is a fierce urgency to protect and enhance Social Security now."
\u201cWhile Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance #SocialSecurity, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program! We must pass Social Security 2100: A #SacredTrust to ensure this program serves our country for years to come!\u202f@RepJohnLarson\u201d— Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare (@Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare) 1660579538
Advocating for his bill, Larson said that "alongside commemorating 87 years of this program, Congress must pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust to make much-needed benefit improvements and ensure this program can serve our nation for years to come. Congress must vote!"
Some progressive lawmakers--including Jayapal--also support the Social Security Expansion Act, legislation introduced in June by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
\u201cMillions of Americans depend on the benefits they have earned. Instead of threatening to cut SS, Republicans should support my bill, which would ensure solvency for 75 years, increase benefits, & update the COLA formula to meet the everyday needs of our nation\u2019s seniors.\u201d— Rep. Peter DeFazio (@Rep. Peter DeFazio) 1660589028
"A lot has changed in 87 years, but Americans' reliance on Social Security has not," DeFazio said Monday. "My bill, the Social Security Expansion Act (SSEA) would enhance monthly benefits and keep the program solvent through 2096."
As progressive lawmakers renewed calls for protecting Social Security from GOP attacks, Data for Progress on Monday pointed to polling that shows about 80% of U.S. voters across partisan divides support boosting benefits.
"While Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance Social Security, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program!"
As a recent Social Security Administration report explains, "The Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program makes monthly income available to insured workers and their families at retirement, death, or disability."
The program traces back to the Social Security Act, signed into law on August 14, 1935 by then-U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Marking the 87th anniversary Sunday, the Congressional Progressive Caucus (CPC) warned that the program is "under attack from Republicans," despite its popularity among voters.
Data for Progress highlighted Monday that 86% of voters surveyed in June said they are "very" or "somewhat" concerned that the U.S. government will reduce Social Security benefits for those who currently receive them.
In July, the progressive think tank found that 70% of all voters--including 76% of Independents, 71% of Republicans, and 64% of Democrats--said they had heard "nothing at all" about GOP proposals to "sunset" the program.
Data for Progress also found last month that 81% of all likely voters--including 88% of Democrats, 79% of Independents, and 75% of Republicans--support legislation to raise Social Security benefits to match the cost of living.
"Moreover, voters strongly support the pay-fors introduced in new legislation that would increase the solvency of Social Security and pay for new, expanded benefits," the group noted in a blog post. "We find that 76% of voters support imposing a payroll tax on Americans making more than $400,000 annually, including 88% of Democrats, 76% of Independents, and 65% of Republicans."
The July polling further showed that 79% of all voters--including 89% of Democrats, 72% of Independents, and 72% of Republicans--believe Congress "should vote to expand Social Security benefits now, even though Democratic proposals only expand benefits for five years and would raise taxes on Americans earning more than $400,000 per year."
As Democrats worry about losing control of Congress this November, the think tank pointed out that polls from this year suggest candidates would do better in elections if voters knew they want to expand Social Security.
Carly Berke, the strategic partnerships coordinator at Data for Progress and co-author of the new blog post, tweeted that amid GOP attacks on Social Security, Democrats "need to make clear they're fighting to protect and expand benefits."
\u201cSocial Security is a sacred program relied upon by millions of Americans. With Republicans threatening to cut benefits - and worse, eliminate the program entirely - Dems need to make clear they\u2019re fighting to protect + expand benefits. New @DataProgress: https://t.co/9I31DSSCwq\u201d— Carly Berke (@Carly Berke) 1660594340
U.S. Rep Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), the CPC's chair, and other members of Congress made that message clear in a Monday afternoon event hosted by Social Security Works.
Jayapal urged those benefiting from the program to share their stories and pressure lawmakers to pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust, legislation introduced by Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.).
\u201cIn this time of rising costs and people's monthly Social Security payments not keeping up, #Secure2100 would provide beneficiaries with desperately needed breathing room. - @RepJayapal \n#SocSec87\u201d— Social Security Works (@Social Security Works) 1660583708
"Social Security has provided our nation with the most comprehensive retirement, disability, and survivors benefits for 87 years," Larson said in a statement. "Democrats are fighting to expand and protect it, yet my Republican colleagues have plans to cut benefits and even end the program as a whole."
"Congress has not acted in 50 years to enhance benefits," he noted. "The American people have made clear they want to protect the program they pay into with each and every paycheck so they can retire with dignity. With the Covid-19 pandemic still impacting our country and Republicans revealing their plans to end benefits, there is a fierce urgency to protect and enhance Social Security now."
\u201cWhile Democrats have a plan to protect and enhance #SocialSecurity, Republicans have shared their plans to privatize, cut, and even end this program! We must pass Social Security 2100: A #SacredTrust to ensure this program serves our country for years to come!\u202f@RepJohnLarson\u201d— Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare (@Nat. Cmte. to Preserve Social Security & Medicare) 1660579538
Advocating for his bill, Larson said that "alongside commemorating 87 years of this program, Congress must pass Social Security 2100: A Sacred Trust to make much-needed benefit improvements and ensure this program can serve our nation for years to come. Congress must vote!"
Some progressive lawmakers--including Jayapal--also support the Social Security Expansion Act, legislation introduced in June by Rep. Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) and Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.).
\u201cMillions of Americans depend on the benefits they have earned. Instead of threatening to cut SS, Republicans should support my bill, which would ensure solvency for 75 years, increase benefits, & update the COLA formula to meet the everyday needs of our nation\u2019s seniors.\u201d— Rep. Peter DeFazio (@Rep. Peter DeFazio) 1660589028
"A lot has changed in 87 years, but Americans' reliance on Social Security has not," DeFazio said Monday. "My bill, the Social Security Expansion Act (SSEA) would enhance monthly benefits and keep the program solvent through 2096."
Rep. Jamie Raskin called Trump's memorandum "the kind of edict you'd expect from a power-mad dictator in a Banana Republic."
U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday launched his latest attack on political opponents by directing the Justice Department to investigate ActBlue, a critical fundraising platform for Democrats and progressive organizations.
The order came in the form of a memorandum that the president signed shortly before heading to his Virginia golf course for a $1 million-per-plate fundraiser for MAGA Inc., a pro-Trump super PAC that has been accused of receiving illegal straw-donor contributions.
In his memorandum, Trump raised "concerns" about straw donations—when a donor makes a contribution through another person or entity—and directed U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi to "investigate allegations regarding the unlawful use of online fundraising platforms to make 'straw' or 'dummy' contributions or foreign contributions to political candidates and committees, and to take all appropriate actions to enforce the law."
Trump's memorandum cites a recent report from House Republicans accusing ActBlue of "a lack of commitment to stopping fraud." ActBlue and House Democrats rejected the GOP findings at the time, calling the document "less of a report and more of a desperate effort to change the subject."
"This president, with his approval ratings underwater and sinking like a stone, is desperately seeking to undermine his political opposition by cutting off their access to funding."
Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, said Thursday that Trump's broadside against ActBlue marks a similar attempt to divert attention from the president's own corruption.
"Donald Trump pocketed millions of dollars in unlawful payments from foreign governments during his first term, his administration shut down a probe into whether his campaign received an illegal and urgent $10 million bribe from Egypt, and foreign nationals are spending millions on Trump-owned cryptocurrencies right now in apparent hopes of buying their way out of federal criminal investigations through undisclosed payments," Raskin said in a statement.
"The Trump administration has also systematically dismantled crime-fighting efforts at the Department of Justice aimed at foreign corruption of our politics and actually announced its indifference to violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act," he continued. "So it's rich indeed for Americans to read now that Trump has launched a big initiative to 'crack down on foreign influence' in American politics with one purpose—crippling the fundraising platform of his political opponents."
"Today's presidential decree targeting the campaign infrastructure of the Democratic Party with precisely zero evidence of wrongdoing is the kind of edict you'd expect from a power-mad dictator in a Banana Republic. This president, with his approval ratings underwater and sinking like a stone, is desperately seeking to undermine his political opposition by cutting off their access to funding."
Since its inception in 2004, ActBlue has raised nearly $17 billion through its platform, and it is widely used by Democratic candidates and progressive groups, including organizations critical of the Democratic leadership such as Justice Democrats. (Common Dreams is among the organizations that use ActBlue to process donations.)
According to ActBlue, nearly 15 million Democratic donors have saved their payment information on the platform.
In a statement, ActBlue said that "today's escalation by the White House is blatantly unlawful and needs to be seen for what it is: Donald Trump's latest front in his campaign to stamp out all political, electoral, and ideological opposition."
"ActBlue will immediately pursue all legal avenues to protect and defend itself," the organization added.
Ken Martin, chair of the Democratic National Committee, called Trump's investigation order "authoritarianism in action." In a joint statement, Martin and the heads of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, and Democratic Governors Association said that "Trump's memorandum targeting ActBlue is designed to undermine democratic participation—and it's no wonder why."
"He knows Americans are already fed up with his chaotic agenda that is driving the economy off a cliff, so he's trying to block lawful grassroots donations from supporters giving just $5 or $10 to candidates who oppose him while further empowering the corrupt billionaires who already control his administration," the Democratic leaders said. "As Democrats, we're unified in standing with the millions of Americans who are fighting back against Trump's dangerous abuses of power."
"The harm caused by deep-sea mining isn't restricted to the ocean floor: It will impact the entire water column, top to bottom, and everyone and everything relying on it," one campaigner warned.
Amid global calls for a ban on deep-sea mining to protect marine ecosystems, U.S. President Donald Trump on Thursday signed an executive order to advance the risky practice and "restore American dominance in offshore critical minerals and resources."
"The broad order avoids a direct confrontation with the United Nations-backed International Seabed Authority and seeks essentially to jump-start the mining of U.S. waters as part of a push to offset China's sweeping control of the critical minerals industry," noted Reuters, which had previewed the measure aimed at attaining nickel, cobalt, copper, manganese, titanium, and rare earth elements.
"The International Seabed Authority—created by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, which the U.S. has not ratified—has for years been considering standards for deep-sea mining in international waters, although it has yet to formalize them due to unresolved differences over acceptable levels of dust, noise, and other factors from the practice," the agency reported.
Trump's order directs Cabinet members including Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick—whose department oversees the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)—to expedite the permit process and work on various related reports.
"Authorizing deep-sea mining outside international law is like lighting a match in a room full of dynamite—it threatens ecosystems, global cooperation, and U.S. credibility all at once."
Deep-sea mining is opposed by over 30 countries as well as academics and advocacy groups worldwide. Among them is Greenpeace USA, whose campaigner Arlo Hemphill said Thursday that "authorizing deep-sea mining outside international law is like lighting a match in a room full of dynamite—it threatens ecosystems, global cooperation, and U.S. credibility all at once."
"We condemn this administration's attempt to launch this destructive industry on the high seas in the Pacific by bypassing the United Nations process," Hemphill declared. "This is an insult to multilateralism and a slap in the face to all the countries and millions of people around the world who oppose this dangerous industry."
"But this executive order is not the start of deep-sea mining. Everywhere governments have tried to start deep-sea mining, they have failed. This will be no different," he added. "We call on the international community to stand against this unacceptable undermining of international cooperation by agreeing to a global moratorium on deep-sea mining. The United States government has no right to unilaterally allow an industry to destroy the common heritage of humankind, and rip up the deep sea for the profit of a few corporations."
No exaggeration, deep sea mining could cause the massive collapse of the entire deep sea ecosystem and food chain. This is an existential risk to every person on this planet. www.nytimes.com/2025/04/24/c...
[image or embed]
— Alejandra Caraballo (@esqueer.net) April 24, 2025 at 5:54 PM
Ocean Conservancy vice president for external affairs Jeff Watters also blasted the move, saying that "this executive order flies in the face of NOAA's mission. NOAA is charged with protecting, not imperiling, the ocean and its economic benefits, including fishing and tourism; and scientists agree that deep-sea mining is a deeply dangerous endeavor for our ocean and all of us who depend on it."
"Areas of the U.S. seafloor where test mining took place over 50 years ago still haven't fully recovered," Watters pointed out. "The harm caused by deep-sea mining isn't restricted to the ocean floor: It will impact the entire water column, top to bottom, and everyone and everything relying on it. Evidence tells us that areas targeted for deep-sea mining often overlap with important fisheries, raising serious concerns about the impacts on the country's $321 billion fishing industry."
He highlighted that "NOAA is already being threatened by this administration's unprecedented cuts. NOAA is the eyes and ears for our water and air. NOAA provides Americans with accessible and accurate weather forecasts; it tracks hurricanes and tsunamis; it responds to oil spills; it keeps seafood on the table; and so much more. Forcing the agency to carry out deep-sea mining permitting while these essential services are slashed will only harm our ocean and our country."
"It's not just our country this executive order would harm: This action has far-reaching implications beyond the U.S.," Watters added, warning that by unilaterally allowing deep-sea mining, "the administration is opening a door for other countries to do the same—and all of us, and the ocean we all depend on, will be worse off for it."
As The New York Times reported:
The executive order could pave the way for the Metals Company, a prominent seabed mining company, to receive an expedited permit from NOAA to actively mine for the first time. The publicly traded company, based in Vancouver, British Columbia, disclosed in March that it would ask the Trump administration through a U.S. subsidiary for approval to mine in international waters. The company has already spent more than $500 million doing exploratory work.
"We have a boat that's production-ready," said Gerard Barron, the company's chief executive, in an interview on Thursday. "We have a means of processing the materials in an allied friendly partner nation. We're just missing the permit to allow us to begin."
In response to the late March disclosure—which came during International Seabed Authority negotiations—Louisa Casson, senior campaigner for Greenpeace International, said that "this is another of the Metals Company's pathetic ploys and an insult to multilateralism. It shows that a moratorium on deep-sea mining is more urgently needed than ever. It also proves that the company's CEO Gerard Barron's plans never focused on solutions for the climate catastrophe."
"The Metals Company is desperate and now is encouraging a breach of customary international law by announcing their intent to mine the international seabed through the United States' Deep-Sea Hard Mineral Resources Act," the camapigner asserted. "This comes after the Metals Company has spent years exerting immense pressure on the International Seabed Authority to try and force governments to allow mining in the international seabed—the common heritage of humankind."
Casson stressed that "states, civil society, scientists, companies, and Indigenous communities continue to resist these efforts. Having tried and failed to pressure the international community to meet their demands, this reckless announcement is a slap in the face to international cooperation."
Less than a week later, the Norwegian deep-sea mining company Loke Marine Minerals declared bankruptcy—which Haldis Tjeldflaat Helle, a campaigner for Greenpeace Nordic, noted came "on the same day that we shut down a deep-sea mining conference in Bergen."
The Norwegian government in December halted plans to move forward with deep-sea mining in the Arctic Ocean, which Steve Trent, CEO and founder of the Environmental Justice Foundation, had called "a testament to the power of principled, courageous political action, and... a moment to celebrate for environmental advocates, ocean ecosystems, and future generations alike."
"We are an emergency response organization, but we have never seen anything like this massive disruption to global health and humanitarian programs."
As the Trump administration, spearheaded by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, dramatically slashes U.S. humanitarian assistance, the international medical charity Doctors Without Borders warned Thursday that the cuts are already "having devastating consequences for people who rely upon aid" across the Global South.
"The U.S. has long been the leading supporter of global health and humanitarian programs, responsible for around 40% of all related funding," Doctors Without Borders, known by its French acronym MSF, said in a statement. "These U.S. investments have helped improve the health and well-being of communities around the globe—and totaled less than 1% of the annual federal budget."
"It's shocking to see the U.S. abandon its leadership role in advancing global health and humanitarian efforts."
However, with the Trump administration slashing funding for U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) contracts by 90%, including for programs that fed and provided healthcare for millions of people and fought diseases like malaria and HIV/AIDS, MSF USA CEO Avril Benoît said there will be "more preventable deaths and untold suffering around the world."
"These sudden cuts by the Trump administration are a human-made disaster for the millions of people struggling to survive amid wars, disease outbreaks, and other emergencies," Benoît warned. "We are an emergency response organization, but we have never seen anything like this massive disruption to global health and humanitarian programs."
"The risks are catastrophic, especially since people who rely on foreign assistance are already among the most vulnerable in the world," she added.
Although MSF received no U.S. government funding, the group noted that "we work closely with other health and humanitarian organizations to deliver vital services, and many of our activities involve programs that have been disrupted due to funding cuts."
"It will be much more difficult and costly to provide care when so many ministries of health have been affected globally and there are fewer community partners overall," the group said. "We will also be facing fewer places to refer patients for specialized services, as well as shortages and stockouts due to hamstrung supply chains."
"It's shocking to see the U.S. abandon its leadership role in advancing global health and humanitarian efforts," Benoît said. "U.S. assistance has been a lifeline for millions of people... We urge the administration and Congress to maintain commitments to support critical global health and humanitarian aid."
The MSF warning comes after the United Nations World Food Program said earlier this month that the Trump cuts to lifesaving aid programs "could amount to a death sentence for millions of people facing extreme hunger and starvation."