Nov 30, 2022
Rights groups are sharply condemning New York City Mayor Eric Adams' Tuesday directive requiring local law enforcement and emergency medical workers to respond to the intertwined mental health and homelessness crises with involuntary hospitalizations.
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help."
"If the circumstances support an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that the person appears to have a mental illness and cannot support their basic human needs to an extent that causes them harm, they may be removed for an evaluation," states a city document.
While the mayor framed the plan to forcibly remove people with severe mental illness from streets and subways as a compassionate policy for those "in urgent need of treatment," motivated by a "moral obligation" to act, critics called the former New York City Police Department captain's plan ineffective and harmful.
After Adams unveiled the directive at a Tuesday press conference, Harvey Rosenthal, chief executive of the New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services and a longtime critic of involuntary confinement, toldThe New York Times that "the mayor talked about a 'trauma-informed approach,' but coercion is itself traumatic."
The mayor's approach, Rosenthal said, relies on "the same failed system that's overburdened and can't address the people they already have now."
\u201c"We need fixes within the criminal legal system so that those people who do end up arrested can find a way out with treatment and support in the community and a road to real recovery and not jail," - @JeffreyBerman12.\nhttps://t.co/477ljZDFqW\u201d— The Legal Aid Society (@The Legal Aid Society) 1669761991
"New Yorkers will see this plan for what it is: a draconian attempt to say the Adams' administration is tackling a problem, while only making it worse," said Jawanza Williams, director of organizing at VOCAL-NY. "Mayor Adams is using progressive language around care and compassion to distract from his continued budget cuts to services and agency staff, while fueling the NYPD budget."
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help: permanent housing, equitable access to public health tools, and investments in community services that meet people where they are," Williams continued. "If the Adams administration actually cared about helping people experiencing mental health crises, Daniel's Law would be at the top of his legislative agenda, and he would halt his austerity budget measures immediately. Anything less, will only do more harm."
The proposed state law--named for Daniel Prude, a 41-year-old Black man who died in 2020 after being restrained by Rochester, New York police while experiencing a mental health crisis--would create trained response units to deescalate such emergencies instead of armed officers.
\u201cConsent is key & health infrastructure is necessary. Voluntary consent offered by the appropriate responders paired w ample & appropriate options. Transport to emergency rooms is often not the best answer & there needs to be deep investment in safe respites, clinics, OPCs & more.\u201d— Tiffany Cab\u00e1n (@Tiffany Cab\u00e1n) 1669741736
Jacquelyn Simone, policy director at the NYC-based Coalition for the Homeless, asserted Tuesday that "rather than further involving police in mental health responses and urging city workers to involuntarily transport more people to hospitals, the administration should focus on expanding access to voluntary inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care, offering individual hotel rooms to all unsheltered people, and cutting through red tape that has left far too many permanent supportive housing units sitting vacant."
Highlighting that many New Yorkers can't access psychiatric treatment even if they are seeking it out, Simone said that "Mayor Adams needs to focus on repairing our broken mental health system and prioritize bringing access to quality voluntary care and affordable, permanent housing with support services to New Yorkers who need it the most."
\u201cForced institutionalization is not \u201ccompassionate care,\u201d as Mayor Adams suggests. This strategy of involuntarily hospitalizing unhoused people with psychiatric disabilities is a major violation of long established civil and disability rights. #Disability https://t.co/atLAnG7S9G\u201d— AAPD (@AAPD) 1669745333
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman noted that Adams' new plan may also violate state and federal restrictions on detaining people with mental illness. She declared that "the mayor is playing fast and loose with the legal rights of New Yorkers and is not dedicating the resources necessary to address the mental health crises that affect our communities."
"Forcing people into treatment is a failed strategy for connecting people to long-term treatment and care," Lieberman stressed. "The decades-old practice of sweeping deep-seated problems out of public view may play well for the politicians, but the problems will persist--for vulnerable people in desperate need of government services and for New Yorkers."
Adams' effort to "police away homelessness and sweep individuals out of sight'' is a page from the failed playbook of former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, she added. "With no real plan for housing, services, or supports, the administration is choosing handcuffs and coercion."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Rights groups are sharply condemning New York City Mayor Eric Adams' Tuesday directive requiring local law enforcement and emergency medical workers to respond to the intertwined mental health and homelessness crises with involuntary hospitalizations.
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help."
"If the circumstances support an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that the person appears to have a mental illness and cannot support their basic human needs to an extent that causes them harm, they may be removed for an evaluation," states a city document.
While the mayor framed the plan to forcibly remove people with severe mental illness from streets and subways as a compassionate policy for those "in urgent need of treatment," motivated by a "moral obligation" to act, critics called the former New York City Police Department captain's plan ineffective and harmful.
After Adams unveiled the directive at a Tuesday press conference, Harvey Rosenthal, chief executive of the New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services and a longtime critic of involuntary confinement, toldThe New York Times that "the mayor talked about a 'trauma-informed approach,' but coercion is itself traumatic."
The mayor's approach, Rosenthal said, relies on "the same failed system that's overburdened and can't address the people they already have now."
\u201c"We need fixes within the criminal legal system so that those people who do end up arrested can find a way out with treatment and support in the community and a road to real recovery and not jail," - @JeffreyBerman12.\nhttps://t.co/477ljZDFqW\u201d— The Legal Aid Society (@The Legal Aid Society) 1669761991
"New Yorkers will see this plan for what it is: a draconian attempt to say the Adams' administration is tackling a problem, while only making it worse," said Jawanza Williams, director of organizing at VOCAL-NY. "Mayor Adams is using progressive language around care and compassion to distract from his continued budget cuts to services and agency staff, while fueling the NYPD budget."
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help: permanent housing, equitable access to public health tools, and investments in community services that meet people where they are," Williams continued. "If the Adams administration actually cared about helping people experiencing mental health crises, Daniel's Law would be at the top of his legislative agenda, and he would halt his austerity budget measures immediately. Anything less, will only do more harm."
The proposed state law--named for Daniel Prude, a 41-year-old Black man who died in 2020 after being restrained by Rochester, New York police while experiencing a mental health crisis--would create trained response units to deescalate such emergencies instead of armed officers.
\u201cConsent is key & health infrastructure is necessary. Voluntary consent offered by the appropriate responders paired w ample & appropriate options. Transport to emergency rooms is often not the best answer & there needs to be deep investment in safe respites, clinics, OPCs & more.\u201d— Tiffany Cab\u00e1n (@Tiffany Cab\u00e1n) 1669741736
Jacquelyn Simone, policy director at the NYC-based Coalition for the Homeless, asserted Tuesday that "rather than further involving police in mental health responses and urging city workers to involuntarily transport more people to hospitals, the administration should focus on expanding access to voluntary inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care, offering individual hotel rooms to all unsheltered people, and cutting through red tape that has left far too many permanent supportive housing units sitting vacant."
Highlighting that many New Yorkers can't access psychiatric treatment even if they are seeking it out, Simone said that "Mayor Adams needs to focus on repairing our broken mental health system and prioritize bringing access to quality voluntary care and affordable, permanent housing with support services to New Yorkers who need it the most."
\u201cForced institutionalization is not \u201ccompassionate care,\u201d as Mayor Adams suggests. This strategy of involuntarily hospitalizing unhoused people with psychiatric disabilities is a major violation of long established civil and disability rights. #Disability https://t.co/atLAnG7S9G\u201d— AAPD (@AAPD) 1669745333
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman noted that Adams' new plan may also violate state and federal restrictions on detaining people with mental illness. She declared that "the mayor is playing fast and loose with the legal rights of New Yorkers and is not dedicating the resources necessary to address the mental health crises that affect our communities."
"Forcing people into treatment is a failed strategy for connecting people to long-term treatment and care," Lieberman stressed. "The decades-old practice of sweeping deep-seated problems out of public view may play well for the politicians, but the problems will persist--for vulnerable people in desperate need of government services and for New Yorkers."
Adams' effort to "police away homelessness and sweep individuals out of sight'' is a page from the failed playbook of former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, she added. "With no real plan for housing, services, or supports, the administration is choosing handcuffs and coercion."
Rights groups are sharply condemning New York City Mayor Eric Adams' Tuesday directive requiring local law enforcement and emergency medical workers to respond to the intertwined mental health and homelessness crises with involuntary hospitalizations.
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help."
"If the circumstances support an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that the person appears to have a mental illness and cannot support their basic human needs to an extent that causes them harm, they may be removed for an evaluation," states a city document.
While the mayor framed the plan to forcibly remove people with severe mental illness from streets and subways as a compassionate policy for those "in urgent need of treatment," motivated by a "moral obligation" to act, critics called the former New York City Police Department captain's plan ineffective and harmful.
After Adams unveiled the directive at a Tuesday press conference, Harvey Rosenthal, chief executive of the New York Association of Psychiatric Rehabilitation Services and a longtime critic of involuntary confinement, toldThe New York Times that "the mayor talked about a 'trauma-informed approach,' but coercion is itself traumatic."
The mayor's approach, Rosenthal said, relies on "the same failed system that's overburdened and can't address the people they already have now."
\u201c"We need fixes within the criminal legal system so that those people who do end up arrested can find a way out with treatment and support in the community and a road to real recovery and not jail," - @JeffreyBerman12.\nhttps://t.co/477ljZDFqW\u201d— The Legal Aid Society (@The Legal Aid Society) 1669761991
"New Yorkers will see this plan for what it is: a draconian attempt to say the Adams' administration is tackling a problem, while only making it worse," said Jawanza Williams, director of organizing at VOCAL-NY. "Mayor Adams is using progressive language around care and compassion to distract from his continued budget cuts to services and agency staff, while fueling the NYPD budget."
"This 'compassionate' approach neglects the demands of the vulnerable communities he's claiming to help: permanent housing, equitable access to public health tools, and investments in community services that meet people where they are," Williams continued. "If the Adams administration actually cared about helping people experiencing mental health crises, Daniel's Law would be at the top of his legislative agenda, and he would halt his austerity budget measures immediately. Anything less, will only do more harm."
The proposed state law--named for Daniel Prude, a 41-year-old Black man who died in 2020 after being restrained by Rochester, New York police while experiencing a mental health crisis--would create trained response units to deescalate such emergencies instead of armed officers.
\u201cConsent is key & health infrastructure is necessary. Voluntary consent offered by the appropriate responders paired w ample & appropriate options. Transport to emergency rooms is often not the best answer & there needs to be deep investment in safe respites, clinics, OPCs & more.\u201d— Tiffany Cab\u00e1n (@Tiffany Cab\u00e1n) 1669741736
Jacquelyn Simone, policy director at the NYC-based Coalition for the Homeless, asserted Tuesday that "rather than further involving police in mental health responses and urging city workers to involuntarily transport more people to hospitals, the administration should focus on expanding access to voluntary inpatient and outpatient psychiatric care, offering individual hotel rooms to all unsheltered people, and cutting through red tape that has left far too many permanent supportive housing units sitting vacant."
Highlighting that many New Yorkers can't access psychiatric treatment even if they are seeking it out, Simone said that "Mayor Adams needs to focus on repairing our broken mental health system and prioritize bringing access to quality voluntary care and affordable, permanent housing with support services to New Yorkers who need it the most."
\u201cForced institutionalization is not \u201ccompassionate care,\u201d as Mayor Adams suggests. This strategy of involuntarily hospitalizing unhoused people with psychiatric disabilities is a major violation of long established civil and disability rights. #Disability https://t.co/atLAnG7S9G\u201d— AAPD (@AAPD) 1669745333
NYCLU executive director Donna Lieberman noted that Adams' new plan may also violate state and federal restrictions on detaining people with mental illness. She declared that "the mayor is playing fast and loose with the legal rights of New Yorkers and is not dedicating the resources necessary to address the mental health crises that affect our communities."
"Forcing people into treatment is a failed strategy for connecting people to long-term treatment and care," Lieberman stressed. "The decades-old practice of sweeping deep-seated problems out of public view may play well for the politicians, but the problems will persist--for vulnerable people in desperate need of government services and for New Yorkers."
Adams' effort to "police away homelessness and sweep individuals out of sight'' is a page from the failed playbook of former Mayor Rudy Giuliani, she added. "With no real plan for housing, services, or supports, the administration is choosing handcuffs and coercion."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.