SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The empty Security Council Chamber is pictured at U.N. headquarters in New York City on December 20, 2023.
"Will the U.S. government listen to the world's demands? Or will it continue in its deadly inhuman course?" asked the secretary-general of Amnesty International.
For the third time this week, the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday delayed a closely watched vote on a Gaza resolution at the request of the Biden administration, which is becoming increasingly lonely on the world stage as it continues to arm the Israeli military and oppose global calls for a lasting cease-fire.
An earlier version of the resolution, led by the United Arab Emirates, called for a "cessation of hostilities" in Gaza and Israel. But under the threat of another U.S. veto, negotiators altered the text to demand an "urgent suspension of hostilities."
The vote has been rescheduled for 10:00 am ET Thursday.
Reutersreported that the U.S. is objecting to language in the draft text that asks U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres to "establish a U.N. mechanism in Gaza 'to exclusively monitor all humanitarian relief consignments to Gaza provided through land, sea, and air routes of those states that are not parties to the conflict.'"
U.N. officials have repeatedly warned that nowhere near enough aid is reaching Gazans and that conditions in the territory—including Israel's relentless bombardment—have made it impossible to safely deliver humanitarian supplies.
According toThe New York Times, Israel "has been pressuring the United States to reject putting the U.N. in charge of inspections, because it would effectively leave Israel with no role in screening the shipments."
In addition, the U.S. is reportedly "wary" of language calling on Israel and Hamas to allow "the use of all land, sea, and air routes" throughout the Gaza Strip for humanitarian aid deliveries, which displaced and starving Gazans desperately need. A study released Tuesday estimated that more than 70% of Gazans are suffering from extreme hunger, and Amnesty International has accused Israel of using starvation as a "method of warfare."
The besieged territory is also facing a worsening water crisis, according to the United Nations Children's Fund, which described Gaza as the world's most dangerous place for kids as Israel's indiscriminate bombing campaign, ground assault, and blockade carry on, undeterred by mild prodding from U.S. officials to protect civilians.
Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International's secretary-general, wrote on social media Wednesday that "millions of people around the world have advocated for a cease-fire and are now waiting for the U.N. Security Council vote over humanitarian access to Gaza."
"Will the U.S. government listen to the world's demands?" she asked. "Or will it continue in its deadly inhuman course?"
"The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
Before the third delay was announced, HuffPost's Akbar Shahid Ahmed reported Wednesday morning that diplomats at the U.N. Security Council were preparing for the U.S. to wield its veto power for the second time in less than two weeks to tank a Gaza resolution. Earlier this month, a U.S. veto stopped the body from calling for an "immediate humanitarian cease-fire."
"The whole world is watching the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza," U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote as the Security Council convened Wednesday. "The U.S. must not veto a reasonable resolution to stop the hostilities and get in the massive humanitarian aid needed."
Louis Charbonneau, U.N. director at Human Rights Watch, said that another Biden administration veto would be "a huge nail in the coffin of U.S. credibility when it comes to its stated commitment to the laws of war."
During a press conference in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken criticized nations calling for a cease-fire and said the Biden administration is engaging "extensively and constructively with a number of countries to try to resolve some of the outstanding issues" in the UAE-led Security Council resolution.
"I hope we can get to a good place," said Blinken.
James Zogby, founder and president of the Arab American Institute, argued Wednesday that "events of the past week have highlighted how the U.S.'s feckless indulgent behavior toward policies pursued by Israel has damaged America's standing in the world."
"Instead of addressing with any seriousness the massive loss of Palestinian life and the desperate conditions under which the survivors have been forced to live, the U.S. continues to prioritize Israel's fantasy military objective of 'eliminating Hamas.' As a result, U.S. policymakers deem calls for a ceasefire as disruptive," Zogby wrote. "The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
This story has been updated from an earlier version to reflect new developments at the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday afternoon.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
For the third time this week, the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday delayed a closely watched vote on a Gaza resolution at the request of the Biden administration, which is becoming increasingly lonely on the world stage as it continues to arm the Israeli military and oppose global calls for a lasting cease-fire.
An earlier version of the resolution, led by the United Arab Emirates, called for a "cessation of hostilities" in Gaza and Israel. But under the threat of another U.S. veto, negotiators altered the text to demand an "urgent suspension of hostilities."
The vote has been rescheduled for 10:00 am ET Thursday.
Reutersreported that the U.S. is objecting to language in the draft text that asks U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres to "establish a U.N. mechanism in Gaza 'to exclusively monitor all humanitarian relief consignments to Gaza provided through land, sea, and air routes of those states that are not parties to the conflict.'"
U.N. officials have repeatedly warned that nowhere near enough aid is reaching Gazans and that conditions in the territory—including Israel's relentless bombardment—have made it impossible to safely deliver humanitarian supplies.
According toThe New York Times, Israel "has been pressuring the United States to reject putting the U.N. in charge of inspections, because it would effectively leave Israel with no role in screening the shipments."
In addition, the U.S. is reportedly "wary" of language calling on Israel and Hamas to allow "the use of all land, sea, and air routes" throughout the Gaza Strip for humanitarian aid deliveries, which displaced and starving Gazans desperately need. A study released Tuesday estimated that more than 70% of Gazans are suffering from extreme hunger, and Amnesty International has accused Israel of using starvation as a "method of warfare."
The besieged territory is also facing a worsening water crisis, according to the United Nations Children's Fund, which described Gaza as the world's most dangerous place for kids as Israel's indiscriminate bombing campaign, ground assault, and blockade carry on, undeterred by mild prodding from U.S. officials to protect civilians.
Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International's secretary-general, wrote on social media Wednesday that "millions of people around the world have advocated for a cease-fire and are now waiting for the U.N. Security Council vote over humanitarian access to Gaza."
"Will the U.S. government listen to the world's demands?" she asked. "Or will it continue in its deadly inhuman course?"
"The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
Before the third delay was announced, HuffPost's Akbar Shahid Ahmed reported Wednesday morning that diplomats at the U.N. Security Council were preparing for the U.S. to wield its veto power for the second time in less than two weeks to tank a Gaza resolution. Earlier this month, a U.S. veto stopped the body from calling for an "immediate humanitarian cease-fire."
"The whole world is watching the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza," U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote as the Security Council convened Wednesday. "The U.S. must not veto a reasonable resolution to stop the hostilities and get in the massive humanitarian aid needed."
Louis Charbonneau, U.N. director at Human Rights Watch, said that another Biden administration veto would be "a huge nail in the coffin of U.S. credibility when it comes to its stated commitment to the laws of war."
During a press conference in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken criticized nations calling for a cease-fire and said the Biden administration is engaging "extensively and constructively with a number of countries to try to resolve some of the outstanding issues" in the UAE-led Security Council resolution.
"I hope we can get to a good place," said Blinken.
James Zogby, founder and president of the Arab American Institute, argued Wednesday that "events of the past week have highlighted how the U.S.'s feckless indulgent behavior toward policies pursued by Israel has damaged America's standing in the world."
"Instead of addressing with any seriousness the massive loss of Palestinian life and the desperate conditions under which the survivors have been forced to live, the U.S. continues to prioritize Israel's fantasy military objective of 'eliminating Hamas.' As a result, U.S. policymakers deem calls for a ceasefire as disruptive," Zogby wrote. "The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
This story has been updated from an earlier version to reflect new developments at the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday afternoon.
For the third time this week, the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday delayed a closely watched vote on a Gaza resolution at the request of the Biden administration, which is becoming increasingly lonely on the world stage as it continues to arm the Israeli military and oppose global calls for a lasting cease-fire.
An earlier version of the resolution, led by the United Arab Emirates, called for a "cessation of hostilities" in Gaza and Israel. But under the threat of another U.S. veto, negotiators altered the text to demand an "urgent suspension of hostilities."
The vote has been rescheduled for 10:00 am ET Thursday.
Reutersreported that the U.S. is objecting to language in the draft text that asks U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres to "establish a U.N. mechanism in Gaza 'to exclusively monitor all humanitarian relief consignments to Gaza provided through land, sea, and air routes of those states that are not parties to the conflict.'"
U.N. officials have repeatedly warned that nowhere near enough aid is reaching Gazans and that conditions in the territory—including Israel's relentless bombardment—have made it impossible to safely deliver humanitarian supplies.
According toThe New York Times, Israel "has been pressuring the United States to reject putting the U.N. in charge of inspections, because it would effectively leave Israel with no role in screening the shipments."
In addition, the U.S. is reportedly "wary" of language calling on Israel and Hamas to allow "the use of all land, sea, and air routes" throughout the Gaza Strip for humanitarian aid deliveries, which displaced and starving Gazans desperately need. A study released Tuesday estimated that more than 70% of Gazans are suffering from extreme hunger, and Amnesty International has accused Israel of using starvation as a "method of warfare."
The besieged territory is also facing a worsening water crisis, according to the United Nations Children's Fund, which described Gaza as the world's most dangerous place for kids as Israel's indiscriminate bombing campaign, ground assault, and blockade carry on, undeterred by mild prodding from U.S. officials to protect civilians.
Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International's secretary-general, wrote on social media Wednesday that "millions of people around the world have advocated for a cease-fire and are now waiting for the U.N. Security Council vote over humanitarian access to Gaza."
"Will the U.S. government listen to the world's demands?" she asked. "Or will it continue in its deadly inhuman course?"
"The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
Before the third delay was announced, HuffPost's Akbar Shahid Ahmed reported Wednesday morning that diplomats at the U.N. Security Council were preparing for the U.S. to wield its veto power for the second time in less than two weeks to tank a Gaza resolution. Earlier this month, a U.S. veto stopped the body from calling for an "immediate humanitarian cease-fire."
"The whole world is watching the humanitarian disaster unfolding in Gaza," U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) wrote as the Security Council convened Wednesday. "The U.S. must not veto a reasonable resolution to stop the hostilities and get in the massive humanitarian aid needed."
Louis Charbonneau, U.N. director at Human Rights Watch, said that another Biden administration veto would be "a huge nail in the coffin of U.S. credibility when it comes to its stated commitment to the laws of war."
During a press conference in Washington, D.C. on Wednesday, U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken criticized nations calling for a cease-fire and said the Biden administration is engaging "extensively and constructively with a number of countries to try to resolve some of the outstanding issues" in the UAE-led Security Council resolution.
"I hope we can get to a good place," said Blinken.
James Zogby, founder and president of the Arab American Institute, argued Wednesday that "events of the past week have highlighted how the U.S.'s feckless indulgent behavior toward policies pursued by Israel has damaged America's standing in the world."
"Instead of addressing with any seriousness the massive loss of Palestinian life and the desperate conditions under which the survivors have been forced to live, the U.S. continues to prioritize Israel's fantasy military objective of 'eliminating Hamas.' As a result, U.S. policymakers deem calls for a ceasefire as disruptive," Zogby wrote. "The bottom line is that while American and worldwide public opinion of Israeli behavior is shifting, U.S. policy is stuck and increasingly isolated."
This story has been updated from an earlier version to reflect new developments at the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday afternoon.
"U.S. officials are escalating deadly attacks on one of the poorest and most devastated nations in the Middle East, while recklessly pushing the U.S. toward a wider regional war with Iran," said one peace group.
This is a developing news story... Please check back for possible updates.
U.S. President Donald Trump announced Saturday that he had ordered the military to "launch decisive and powerful" action against the Houthis in war-torn Yemen, a glaring contradiction of what critics have called the Republican's "anti-war charade."
The U.S. bombing follows Trump redesignating the Houthis—also known as Ansar Allah—as a terrorist organization shortly after returning to office in January and comes just days after the group renewed a blockade on Israeli ships.
Shuaib Almosawa reported earlier this week for Drop Site News that "the military spokesperson for the Houthi-led government in Yemen on Tuesday announced the resumption of the naval blockade targeting Israeli ships traversing Yemen's waterways, following the expiration of its deadline for Israel to allow aid into the besieged Gaza Strip."
"In a televised statement broadcast by Almasirah TV channel, Houthi spokesperson, Brigadier General Yahya Saree, said that the blockade on Israeli ships now covers Yemen's waterways in the Red Sea, Arabian Sea, Gulf of Aden, and the Bab el-Mandeb Strait," according to Almosawa, a freelance journalist based in the Yemeni capital Sanaa.
Trump's lengthy Saturday post on his Truth Social platform did not explicitly mention Israel or Gaza. He said in part that "funded by Iran, the Houthi thugs have fired missiles at U.S. aircraft, and targeted our Troops and Allies. These relentless assaults have cost the U.S. and World Economy many BILLIONS of Dollars while, at the same time, putting innocent lives at risk."
Almosawa reported Saturday that at least nine civilians have been killed in Trump's new bombing campaign.
According to The Associated Press:
The Houthi media office said the U.S. strikes hit "a residential neighborhood" in Sanaa's northern district of Shouab. Sanaa residents said at least four airstrikes rocked the Eastern Geraf neighborhood in Shouab district, terrifying women and children in the area.
"The explosions were very strong," said Abdallah al-Alffi. "It was like an earthquake."
The United States, Israel, and Britain have previously hit Houthi-held areas in Yemen. Israel's military declined to comment.
Trump noted the bombings under former U.S. President Joe Biden, saying Saturday that his predecessor's "response was pathetically weak, so the unrestrained Houthis just kept going."
The U.S.-based peace group CodePink called out another part of Trump's post, saying that he "claimed that the Houthis have waged an 'unrelenting campaign of piracy, violence, and terrorism' against America and other ships, aircraft, and drones. However, he conveniently ignores critical context behind these actions. The Houthis' attacks on foreign cargo ships began in response to the ongoing genocide in Gaza, aimed at deterring the continuation of Israel's ongoing plan to ethnically cleanse Palestine."
"This campaign ceased when a cease-fire was finally put in place, only to resume due to Israel's ongoing violations of the cease-fire agreement," CodePink continued, noting Israeli strikes that just reportedly killed aid workers and journalists in Gaza. "Instead of confronting the root causes of this violence, U.S. officials are escalating deadly attacks on one of the poorest and most devastated nations in the Middle East, while recklessly pushing the U.S. toward a wider regional war with Iran."
"CodePink and its allies demand an immediate halt to U.S. military intervention in Yemen and across the Middle East," the group concluded. "We call on the government to prioritize peace and justice by immediately ending all military aid and funds to Israel and holding Israel accountable for breaking the cease-fire."
Members of Congress across the political spectrum have a history of criticizing U.S. bombings of Yemen throughout its decadelong civil war as illegal. Justin Amash, a libertarian former Michigan congressman, slammed the Saturday strikes on social media.
"I'll say it again. It is unconstitutional for President Trump to engage in acts of war in Yemen," Amash explained. "It doesn't matter how appropriate you think it is for the U.S. to take on Houthis or terrorists or anyone. Congress has not authorized war in Yemen. Engaging in war there is unlawful."
"It underscores that his critiques of white supremacy in the Age of Trump are perceived as threatening for one simple reason: He's right."
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has faced a flood of condemnation since announcing on social media Friday that "South Africa's ambassador to the United States is no longer welcome in our great country."
"Ebrahim Rasool is a race-baiting politician who hates America and hates President Donald Trump," the secretary claimed. "We have nothing to discuss with him and so he is considered PERSONA NON GRATA."
In the post on X—the social media site owned by Elon Musk, Trump's South Africa-born billionaire adviser—Rubio linked to an article by the right-wing news site Breitbart about Rasool saying during a Friday webinar that the U.S. president is leading global a white supremacist movement.
As examples of Trump's "Make America Great Again" movement exporting its "supremacist assault," Rasool pointed to Musk elevating Nigel Farage, leader of the far-right Reform U.K. party, and Vice President JD Vance meeting with the leader of the neo-Nazi Alternative for Germany party.
Responding to Rubio on X, North Carolina State University assistant teaching professor Nathan Lean said: "Ebrahim Rasool is a man of genuine decency, moral courage, and is a friend. This makes me absolutely embarrassed to be an American. And it underscores that his critiques of white supremacy in the Age of Trump are perceived as threatening for one simple reason: He's right."
The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) similarly responded: "Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool is a principled leader who fought alongside Nelson Mandela against apartheid and has dedicated his career to democracy, interfaith cooperation, and justice. Baseless attacks like this only serve to divide. We stand by him and his lifelong commitment to building a more just and inclusive world."
Laila Al-Arian, executive producer of Al Jazeera's "Fault Lines," declared that "this administration is virulently and unabashedly Islamophobic, not even trying to hide how unhinged they are as they go after people for speech."
Rasool previously served as ambassador during the Obama administration and returned to the role shortly before Trump began his second term. Earlier this week, Semafor reported on his difficulties dealing with the current administration:
He has failed to secure routine meetings with State Department officials and key Republican figures since Trump took office in January, Washington and South African government insiders told Semafor, drawing frustration in Pretoria.
Rasool is likely to have been frozen out for his prior vocal criticism of Israel, a South African diplomat, based in Washington, told Semafor. "A man named Ebrahim, who is Muslim, with a history of pro-Palestine politics, is not likely to do well in that job right now," said one of them. While South Africa brought a case against Israel to the International Court of Justice in December 2023, accusing it of genocide in Gaza, Rasool is nevertheless widely considered to be among the government's most ardent pro-Palestine voices.
South African political analyst Sandile Swana told Al Jazeera on Friday that the "core of the dispute" with the diplomatic was the genocide case against U.S.-armed Israel. In the fight against apartheid, the U.S. "supported the apartheid regime," said Swana. "Rasool continues to point out the behaviour of the United States, even now is to support apartheid and genocide."
Other critics also pointed to the ongoing court battle over Israel's utter destruction of Gaza and mass slaughter of Palestinians.
Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) national executive director Nihad Awad told Rubio: "Your declaration of Ambassador Ebrahim Rasool as persona non grata is a racist, Islamophobic, transparent act of retaliation for South Africa's opposition to Israel's genocide in Gaza."
Imraan Siddiqi, a former congressional candidate in Washington who now leads the state's branch of CAIR, said that "he stood up firmly against apartheid, so it's no coincidence you're punishing him in favor of an openly apartheid state."
South African President Cyril Ramaphosa's office said in a statement Saturday that "the presidency has noted the regrettable expulsion of South Africa's ambassador to the United States of America, Mr. Ebrahim Rasool.
"The presidency urges all relevant and impacted stakeholders to maintain the established diplomatic decorum in their engagement with the matter," the office added. "South Africa remains committed to building a mutually beneficial relationship with the United States of America."
The diplomat's expulsion follows Trump signing an executive order last month that frames South Africa's land law as "blatant discrimination" against the country's white minority. Writing about the order for Foreign Policy in Focus, Zeb Larson and William Minter noted that "his actions echo a long history of right-wing support in the United States for racism in Southern Africa, including mobilization of support for white Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) as well as the apartheid regime in South Africa."
##
"It's increasingly clear that we're entering a modern McCarthy moment," said the head of the ACLU.
U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign-like speech at the Department of Justice on Friday sparked a fresh wave of alarm over the Republican's attacks on his critics, disrespect for the rule of law, and plans for his second term.
Trump—who was convicted of 34 felonies in New York before returning to the White House—slammed his perceived opponents as "scum" and "thugs," called efforts to hold him accountable for alleged criminal activity "bullshit," and declared: "We will expel the rogue actors and corrupt forces from our government. We will expose... their egregious crimes and severe misconduct."
Trump's appearance with U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and props promoting drug enforcement displayed his intent to remake the federal judiciary and fueled speculation that he will appoint Florida-based District Judge Aileen Cannon, who dismissed the classified documents case against him, to the nation's Supreme Court.
"Some of the most hallowed halls of justice in America were disgraced by the president of the United States, who has inappropriately installed his personal lawyers and other loyalists into leadership roles at the Department of Justice," said Lena Zwarensteyn, senior director of the fair courts program and an adviser at the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.
"This reinforces what we knew: The independence of the department has been compromised. During his remarks, the president sought to undermine faith in our judicial system, attacked lawyers who support due process and the rule of law, and made it clear that he expects the attorney general and other leaders to use the full force and resources of the Justice Department to roll back our civil and human rights, target his enemies, and operationalize a worldview that perpetuates white supremacy," she said. "The anti-immigrant rhetoric that both he and the attorney general used was reprehensible and unacceptable."
Zwarensteyn stressed that "in our democracy, Justice Department lawyers—including the attorney general—are the people's lawyers, not the president's lawyers, and they have a sacred duty to enforce our nation's laws without prejudice and with an eye toward justice. The DOJ must be seen by the public—every member, from every community—as fair and independent arbiters of our legal system. Today's appearance at the DOJ by the president, during which he thanked and called out his appointees and personal lawyers, will further tarnish the public's trust of the department and undermine our democracy."
"This cannot be the way that the DOJ—the nation's signature agency for the enforcement of our federal civil rights laws—functions moving forward. We need a DOJ that is working for the people, not the president, and we demand better of our federal government and its leaders," she concluded, calling on the Senate to reject his nomination of Harmeet Dhillon to a key department post.
One of Trump's targets during the speech was Norm Eisen, who was involved with the president's first impeachment and previously served as White House special counsel for ethics and government reform, U.S. ambassador to the Czech Republic, and board chair of the watchdog Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW).
Eisen responded with a video on social media, highlighting his work with State Democracy Defenders Action, which he co-founded.
ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement that "Ambassador Norman Eisen is a great American patriot, with an extraordinary career in public service. He has served the American people for decades inside and outside of government. He has worked to defend democracy at home and abroad."
"It is a sad day when the president of the United States personally attacks an individual of such character," Romero continued. "When charitable organizations like CREW, the ACLU, and others sue the federal government to uphold the law, we are playing a vital role in upholding American values."
The ACLU leader also warned that "it's increasingly clear that we’re entering a modern McCarthy moment. When the government is targeting a former ambassador, a legal permanent resident, law firms, and even universities and treating them like enemies of the state, it is a dark day for American democracy."
Since Trump returned to power in January, his administration has not only empowered billionaire Elon Musk to dismantle the federal government but also targeted news outlets, student protesters, and education institutions while signaling a willingness to ignore court orders—fueling calls for Congress to hit him with a historic third impeachment.