Judge Dismisses Adams Corruption Case But Aims to Kill Trump's Leverage Over NYC Mayor

A federal judge in Manhattan dismissed the corruption case against New York City Mayor Eric Adams on Wednesday but also tried to ensure that going forward, the Trump administration cannot use the charges as leverage over the Democrat—who had agreed to help with the White House's mass deportation agenda in exchange for what opponents blasted as an "openly corrupt legal bailout."

In February, just weeks after Republican President Donald Trump returned to office, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) instructed prosecutors to drop federal charges against Adams, triggering widespread outrage over the attempted "illegal quid pro quo," as some congressional critics have called it.

"DOJ's motion states that dismissal of this case is justified for several reasons, including because 'continuing these proceedings would interfere with" the mayor's ability to govern, thereby threatening 'federal immigration initiatives and policies,'" Judge Dale Ho, appointed to the Southern District of New York by former President Joe Biden, wrote Wednesday in a 78-page opinion and order.

Ho explained that "a critical feature of DOJ's motion is that it seeks dismissal without prejudice—that is, DOJ seeks to abandon its prosecution of Mayor Adams at this time, while reserving the right to reinitiate the case in the future. DOJ does not seek to end this case once and for all. Rather, its request, if granted, would leave Mayor Adams under the specter of reindictment at essentially any time, and for essentially any reason. The court declines, in its limited discretion under Rule 48(a), to endorse that outcome."

"Instead, it dismisses this case with prejudice—meaning that the government may not bring the charges in the Indictment against Mayor Adams in the future," he continued. "In light of DOJ's rationales, dismissing the case without prejudice would create the unavoidable perception that the mayor's freedom depends on his ability to carry out the immigration enforcement priorities of the administration, and that he might be more beholden to the demands of the federal government thanto the wishes of his own constituents. That appearance is inevitable, and it counsels in favor of dismissal with prejudice."

Ho noted that "various groups that have submitted friend-of-the-court briefs urge this court to go further and deny DOJ's motion altogether, arguing that the reasons DOJ has given to justify dismissing this case are unsubstantiated or contrary to the public interest. The court ultimately declines their invitation to deny the motion. But it concludes that many of their arguments have merit."

However, as the judge detailed, he ultimately did not deny the DOJ's motion for two reasons: "The first is that a court's principal role in deciding a motion of this nature is to protect the rights of the defendant... The second and perhaps more fundamental reason is that a court, if it were so inclined, would have no way to compel the government to prosecute a case in circumstances like those presented here."

As The Citypointed out, "The dismissal comes just weeks before the June 24 mayor primary and a day before the mayor is required to file petition signatures his campaign is collecting to get on the ballot."

In the crowded Democratic primary contest, Adams' challengers include former Gov. Andrew Cuomo—who resigned in 2021 in the face of sexual harassment allegations he has denied—and state Rep. Zohran Kwame Mamdani, a Democratic socialist who represents New York's 36th Assembly District in Queens.

A 2024 Democratic National Convention delegate known as Candidly Tiff on social media said Wednesday that "the judge actually helped Eric Adams with this ruling. He should be thankful the [White House] can no longer dangle this case over his big head. Should be a sign for him to walk away from politics but his ego is too damn big."

The development also sparked calls for Democratic New York Attorney General Letitia James to bring state charges against Adams. Attorney Tristan Snell said that she "can and should" do so "immediately."