SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Doctor Caitlin Bernard in Indianapolis on September 28, 2022.
(Photo: Kaiti Sullivan/The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Indiana Doctors Sue to Protect Reports That Could ID Abortion Patients
"We are once again in court defending our patients and their right to privacy," the two doctors said.
Feb 10, 2025
Two Indiana OB-GYN physicians, Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse, filed a lawsuit in Marion County Superior Court last week in an effort to halt the Indiana Department of Health from publicly releasing "terminated pregnancy reports," documents that physicians are required to submit in connection with every abortion performed in the state.
Specifically, the plaintiffs want the court to rule that the terminated pregnancy reports submitted to IDOH are exempt from disclosure under Indiana's Access to Public Records Act.
"We are once again in court defending our patients and their right to privacy," Bernard and Rouse said in a joint statement, according to The Hill.
"Everyone receiving medical care deserves to have their personal health decisions and pregnancy outcomes protected. There is no reason to release this sensitive information to the public. We will keep fighting to protect patients' privacy and the trust between doctors and patients," they wrote.
Bernard made headlines in 2022 after she performed an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio girl who had been raped and shared that information with a reporter.
The terminated pregnancy reports don't include a patient's name, but they do include other information such as the patient's age, race, and the county where they live, as well as the name of the physicians performing the abortion.
In January 2024, following the state's imposition of a near-total abortion ban, IDOH decided it would no longer release individual terminated pregnancy reports, opting instead to release quarterly aggregated reports.
The number of abortions in the state dropped off sharply after the ban went into effect in August 2023, and "due to the small number and increased reporting requirements, the agency had concerns about violating patient confidentiality by releasing full individual records," according to The Indiana Capitol Chronicle. In particular, there was concern that there was enough information about patients that it would be possible to figure out their identity.
An anti-abortion group, Voices for Life, then sued the state seeking access to the individual reports. That case was dismissed by a Marion County judge in September 2024, and Voices of Life said it would appeal. But then in January 2025, Republican Indiana Gov. Mike Braun issued an executive order declaring the reports to be public.
IDOH entered into a settlement with Voices of Life to release the reports on February 3. Under the terms of the settlement, IDOH agrees to make redactions to the reports that "adequately protect personal health identifiers and that do not inhibit examination of the terminated pregnancy reports to determine whether a physician performed an abortion in accordance with Indiana law," per the Capitol Chronicle.
The court has set a hearing to consider the latest suit brought by Bernard and Rouse on Tuesday, according to the Capital Chronicle.
An Unconstitutional Rampage
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Two Indiana OB-GYN physicians, Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse, filed a lawsuit in Marion County Superior Court last week in an effort to halt the Indiana Department of Health from publicly releasing "terminated pregnancy reports," documents that physicians are required to submit in connection with every abortion performed in the state.
Specifically, the plaintiffs want the court to rule that the terminated pregnancy reports submitted to IDOH are exempt from disclosure under Indiana's Access to Public Records Act.
"We are once again in court defending our patients and their right to privacy," Bernard and Rouse said in a joint statement, according to The Hill.
"Everyone receiving medical care deserves to have their personal health decisions and pregnancy outcomes protected. There is no reason to release this sensitive information to the public. We will keep fighting to protect patients' privacy and the trust between doctors and patients," they wrote.
Bernard made headlines in 2022 after she performed an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio girl who had been raped and shared that information with a reporter.
The terminated pregnancy reports don't include a patient's name, but they do include other information such as the patient's age, race, and the county where they live, as well as the name of the physicians performing the abortion.
In January 2024, following the state's imposition of a near-total abortion ban, IDOH decided it would no longer release individual terminated pregnancy reports, opting instead to release quarterly aggregated reports.
The number of abortions in the state dropped off sharply after the ban went into effect in August 2023, and "due to the small number and increased reporting requirements, the agency had concerns about violating patient confidentiality by releasing full individual records," according to The Indiana Capitol Chronicle. In particular, there was concern that there was enough information about patients that it would be possible to figure out their identity.
An anti-abortion group, Voices for Life, then sued the state seeking access to the individual reports. That case was dismissed by a Marion County judge in September 2024, and Voices of Life said it would appeal. But then in January 2025, Republican Indiana Gov. Mike Braun issued an executive order declaring the reports to be public.
IDOH entered into a settlement with Voices of Life to release the reports on February 3. Under the terms of the settlement, IDOH agrees to make redactions to the reports that "adequately protect personal health identifiers and that do not inhibit examination of the terminated pregnancy reports to determine whether a physician performed an abortion in accordance with Indiana law," per the Capitol Chronicle.
The court has set a hearing to consider the latest suit brought by Bernard and Rouse on Tuesday, according to the Capital Chronicle.
Two Indiana OB-GYN physicians, Caitlin Bernard and Caroline Rouse, filed a lawsuit in Marion County Superior Court last week in an effort to halt the Indiana Department of Health from publicly releasing "terminated pregnancy reports," documents that physicians are required to submit in connection with every abortion performed in the state.
Specifically, the plaintiffs want the court to rule that the terminated pregnancy reports submitted to IDOH are exempt from disclosure under Indiana's Access to Public Records Act.
"We are once again in court defending our patients and their right to privacy," Bernard and Rouse said in a joint statement, according to The Hill.
"Everyone receiving medical care deserves to have their personal health decisions and pregnancy outcomes protected. There is no reason to release this sensitive information to the public. We will keep fighting to protect patients' privacy and the trust between doctors and patients," they wrote.
Bernard made headlines in 2022 after she performed an abortion for a 10-year-old Ohio girl who had been raped and shared that information with a reporter.
The terminated pregnancy reports don't include a patient's name, but they do include other information such as the patient's age, race, and the county where they live, as well as the name of the physicians performing the abortion.
In January 2024, following the state's imposition of a near-total abortion ban, IDOH decided it would no longer release individual terminated pregnancy reports, opting instead to release quarterly aggregated reports.
The number of abortions in the state dropped off sharply after the ban went into effect in August 2023, and "due to the small number and increased reporting requirements, the agency had concerns about violating patient confidentiality by releasing full individual records," according to The Indiana Capitol Chronicle. In particular, there was concern that there was enough information about patients that it would be possible to figure out their identity.
An anti-abortion group, Voices for Life, then sued the state seeking access to the individual reports. That case was dismissed by a Marion County judge in September 2024, and Voices of Life said it would appeal. But then in January 2025, Republican Indiana Gov. Mike Braun issued an executive order declaring the reports to be public.
IDOH entered into a settlement with Voices of Life to release the reports on February 3. Under the terms of the settlement, IDOH agrees to make redactions to the reports that "adequately protect personal health identifiers and that do not inhibit examination of the terminated pregnancy reports to determine whether a physician performed an abortion in accordance with Indiana law," per the Capitol Chronicle.
The court has set a hearing to consider the latest suit brought by Bernard and Rouse on Tuesday, according to the Capital Chronicle.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.