SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
People vote at a polling location at Indianola Church of Christ on November 8, 2022 in Columbus, Ohio.
Republicans' "true motivation, aside from their insatiable desire for power, is to stop women from having the reproductive freedom that we so deserve," said one state lawmaker.
The Ohio Supreme Court's right-wing majority on Friday handed down a ruling that critics said will ultimately make it more difficult for residents to participate in popular democracy by introducing ballot initiatives in future elections—including the one coming up in November, in which reproductive rights advocates aim to hold a referendum on abortion rights.
The court ruled 4-3 in favor of allowing a special election scheduled for August 8 to go forward, even though Republican Gov. Mike DeWine signed a law earlier this year banning August elections in most cases.
The majority said that the state Constitution "authorizes the General Assembly to impose or direct a special election in furtherance of a proposed constitutional amendment."
In the election, Ohioans will vote on a proposal put forward by Republican legislators to increase the threshold needed to amend the state Constitution via referendum from a simple majority to 60%. The proposal would also make it harder for voters to get citizen-led initiatives onto ballots.
"If it passes, the measure would dramatically curtail a tool of direct democracy that has existed in the state for more than a century," wrote Cameron Joseph at Bolts earlier this month.
Mia Lewis, associate director of Common Cause Ohio, told the outlet that the Republican proposal is "an attempt to fool voters into giving away their power."
The special election, which is being held at a time of year that's typically plagued by low voter turnout, will take place as abortion rights advocates are pushing to hold a referendum during the November elections on whether to enshrine the right to abortion care in Ohio's Constitution. States including California and Michigan have affirmed that abortion is a constitutional right since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade a year ago.
\u201cThis means that Ohio *will* have a critically important election on August 8.\n\nSo, why? Republicans are rushing the vote to get ahead of a potential initiative on abortion rights on the November ballot, & make it harder for that to pass in advance. See:\n\nhttps://t.co/YTaZusNj5t\u201d— Taniel (@Taniel) 1686925710
"Their true motivation" for holding the August election, Ohio House Minority Whip Jessica Miranda (D-28) told Bolts, "aside from their insatiable desire for power, is to stop women from having the reproductive freedom that we so deserve."
Ohio Republicans have joined GOP lawmakers in several other states in attempting to make it harder for ballot measures to be put to a popular vote. Arkansas Republicans passed a law earlier this year making it harder for residents to place proposals on ballots and the Utah GOP passed a similar law in 2021.
Abortion is currently legal in Ohio up to 22 weeks of pregnancy, but Republicans have attempted to ban the procedure at six weeks of pregnancy.
A poll by Baldwin Wallace University last year found that 59% of Ohio residents supported a constitutional amendment that would enshrine abortion access as a right for all Ohioans.
Kelly Hall, executive director of the pro-democracy group Fairness Project, said the question being put to voters in August "is a blatant attempt to undermine direct democracy and diminish voters' rights to make their own decisions on issues that matter to them."
"Despite this unfortunate ruling," Hall said, "we’re confident in the strong, pro-democracy coalition that has formed" to mobilize against the Republican proposal.
Trump and Musk are on an unconstitutional rampage, aiming for virtually every corner of the federal government. These two right-wing billionaires are targeting nurses, scientists, teachers, daycare providers, judges, veterans, air traffic controllers, and nuclear safety inspectors. No one is safe. The food stamps program, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are next. It’s an unprecedented disaster and a five-alarm fire, but there will be a reckoning. The people did not vote for this. The American people do not want this dystopian hellscape that hides behind claims of “efficiency.” Still, in reality, it is all a giveaway to corporate interests and the libertarian dreams of far-right oligarchs like Musk. Common Dreams is playing a vital role by reporting day and night on this orgy of corruption and greed, as well as what everyday people can do to organize and fight back. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. |
The Ohio Supreme Court's right-wing majority on Friday handed down a ruling that critics said will ultimately make it more difficult for residents to participate in popular democracy by introducing ballot initiatives in future elections—including the one coming up in November, in which reproductive rights advocates aim to hold a referendum on abortion rights.
The court ruled 4-3 in favor of allowing a special election scheduled for August 8 to go forward, even though Republican Gov. Mike DeWine signed a law earlier this year banning August elections in most cases.
The majority said that the state Constitution "authorizes the General Assembly to impose or direct a special election in furtherance of a proposed constitutional amendment."
In the election, Ohioans will vote on a proposal put forward by Republican legislators to increase the threshold needed to amend the state Constitution via referendum from a simple majority to 60%. The proposal would also make it harder for voters to get citizen-led initiatives onto ballots.
"If it passes, the measure would dramatically curtail a tool of direct democracy that has existed in the state for more than a century," wrote Cameron Joseph at Bolts earlier this month.
Mia Lewis, associate director of Common Cause Ohio, told the outlet that the Republican proposal is "an attempt to fool voters into giving away their power."
The special election, which is being held at a time of year that's typically plagued by low voter turnout, will take place as abortion rights advocates are pushing to hold a referendum during the November elections on whether to enshrine the right to abortion care in Ohio's Constitution. States including California and Michigan have affirmed that abortion is a constitutional right since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade a year ago.
\u201cThis means that Ohio *will* have a critically important election on August 8.\n\nSo, why? Republicans are rushing the vote to get ahead of a potential initiative on abortion rights on the November ballot, & make it harder for that to pass in advance. See:\n\nhttps://t.co/YTaZusNj5t\u201d— Taniel (@Taniel) 1686925710
"Their true motivation" for holding the August election, Ohio House Minority Whip Jessica Miranda (D-28) told Bolts, "aside from their insatiable desire for power, is to stop women from having the reproductive freedom that we so deserve."
Ohio Republicans have joined GOP lawmakers in several other states in attempting to make it harder for ballot measures to be put to a popular vote. Arkansas Republicans passed a law earlier this year making it harder for residents to place proposals on ballots and the Utah GOP passed a similar law in 2021.
Abortion is currently legal in Ohio up to 22 weeks of pregnancy, but Republicans have attempted to ban the procedure at six weeks of pregnancy.
A poll by Baldwin Wallace University last year found that 59% of Ohio residents supported a constitutional amendment that would enshrine abortion access as a right for all Ohioans.
Kelly Hall, executive director of the pro-democracy group Fairness Project, said the question being put to voters in August "is a blatant attempt to undermine direct democracy and diminish voters' rights to make their own decisions on issues that matter to them."
"Despite this unfortunate ruling," Hall said, "we’re confident in the strong, pro-democracy coalition that has formed" to mobilize against the Republican proposal.
The Ohio Supreme Court's right-wing majority on Friday handed down a ruling that critics said will ultimately make it more difficult for residents to participate in popular democracy by introducing ballot initiatives in future elections—including the one coming up in November, in which reproductive rights advocates aim to hold a referendum on abortion rights.
The court ruled 4-3 in favor of allowing a special election scheduled for August 8 to go forward, even though Republican Gov. Mike DeWine signed a law earlier this year banning August elections in most cases.
The majority said that the state Constitution "authorizes the General Assembly to impose or direct a special election in furtherance of a proposed constitutional amendment."
In the election, Ohioans will vote on a proposal put forward by Republican legislators to increase the threshold needed to amend the state Constitution via referendum from a simple majority to 60%. The proposal would also make it harder for voters to get citizen-led initiatives onto ballots.
"If it passes, the measure would dramatically curtail a tool of direct democracy that has existed in the state for more than a century," wrote Cameron Joseph at Bolts earlier this month.
Mia Lewis, associate director of Common Cause Ohio, told the outlet that the Republican proposal is "an attempt to fool voters into giving away their power."
The special election, which is being held at a time of year that's typically plagued by low voter turnout, will take place as abortion rights advocates are pushing to hold a referendum during the November elections on whether to enshrine the right to abortion care in Ohio's Constitution. States including California and Michigan have affirmed that abortion is a constitutional right since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade a year ago.
\u201cThis means that Ohio *will* have a critically important election on August 8.\n\nSo, why? Republicans are rushing the vote to get ahead of a potential initiative on abortion rights on the November ballot, & make it harder for that to pass in advance. See:\n\nhttps://t.co/YTaZusNj5t\u201d— Taniel (@Taniel) 1686925710
"Their true motivation" for holding the August election, Ohio House Minority Whip Jessica Miranda (D-28) told Bolts, "aside from their insatiable desire for power, is to stop women from having the reproductive freedom that we so deserve."
Ohio Republicans have joined GOP lawmakers in several other states in attempting to make it harder for ballot measures to be put to a popular vote. Arkansas Republicans passed a law earlier this year making it harder for residents to place proposals on ballots and the Utah GOP passed a similar law in 2021.
Abortion is currently legal in Ohio up to 22 weeks of pregnancy, but Republicans have attempted to ban the procedure at six weeks of pregnancy.
A poll by Baldwin Wallace University last year found that 59% of Ohio residents supported a constitutional amendment that would enshrine abortion access as a right for all Ohioans.
Kelly Hall, executive director of the pro-democracy group Fairness Project, said the question being put to voters in August "is a blatant attempt to undermine direct democracy and diminish voters' rights to make their own decisions on issues that matter to them."
"Despite this unfortunate ruling," Hall said, "we’re confident in the strong, pro-democracy coalition that has formed" to mobilize against the Republican proposal.
"The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists," said fired commissioner Alvaro Bedoya. "Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lap dog for his golfing buddies."
U.S. President Donald Trump said he fired the two Democrats on the Federal Trade Commission Tuesday, a move blasted by consumer rights and democracy advocates as yet another illegal abuse of power by the twice-impeached Republican felon.
The White House announced the termination of Commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya from the FTC, a five-member body tasked with enforcing civil antiitrust law and protecting consumers.
"Today the president illegally fired me from my position as a federal trade commissioner, violating the plain language of a statute and clear Supreme Court precedent," Slaughter said in a statement. "Why? Because I have a voice. And he is afraid of what I'll tell the American people."
Just got a statement from Rebecca Kelly Slaughter, a Democratic FTC commissioner, who was unlawfully fired today, furthering a showdown in the courts over control of independent agencies.
[image or embed]
— David Dayen (@ddayen.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:22 PM
"The administration clearly fears the accountability that opposition voices would provide if the president orders Chair [Andrew] Ferguson to treat the most powerful corporations and their executives—like those that flanked the president at his inauguration—with kid gloves," Slaughter continued, referring to multibillionaire tech CEOs Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, and Mark Zuckerberg.
Last month, Ferguson endorsed the fringe legal theory that the president can terminate commissioners without cause—despite federal legislation against this. Bolstered by obsequious Republicans in his administration and Congress as well as a Supreme Court that critics say has granted the president king-like powers, Trump has moved to assert greater control over the federal government, including agencies meant to be independent.
Bedoya
wrote on social media: "The president just illegally fired me. This is corruption, plain and simple."
Full statement of @bedoyaftc.bsky.social, in my opinion the best FTC commissioner ever to commish, who was just fired by Trump
[image or embed]
— Evan Greer (@evangreer.bsky.social) March 18, 2025 at 2:22 PM
"The FTC is an independent agency founded 111 years ago to fight fraudsters and monopolists, our staff is unafraid of the Martin Shkrelis and Jeff Bezos of the world. They take them to court and they win," Bedoya continued. "Now, the president wants the FTC to be a lap dog for his golfing buddies."
"I'll see the president in court," he added.
Responding to Trump's move, Jeff Hauser, founder and executive director of the watchdog group Revolving Door Project, said that "on the surface, this constitutional crime is about law and process and other abstract topics people often tune out—but underneath, it is motivated by good old-fashioned greed that will hurt every one of us who isn't a corrupt financier."
"Americans are rapidly losing their defenders against corporate fraud and malfeasance," Hauser continued. "First, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau was gutted illegally by billionaire Elon Musk and his lackeys. Now, Trump is attempting, without a legal basis, to fire the FTC's two Democratic commissioners."
"As antitrust enforcement dies out and a handful of corporations accumulate even more economic power, Americans will only have one person to blame for the new fraud economy: Donald Trump," he added.
Emily Peterson-Cassin, the corporate power director at Demand Progress Education Fund, warned: "President Trump's illegal attempt to fire Alvaro Bedoya and Rebecca Slaughter opens the floodgates to unfettered corruption and self-dealing. This reckless attack on the FTC invites a return to the rampant, corporate graft that brought on the Great Depression."
"Billionaires like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, and Jeff Bezos paid a lot for their concierge access to the White House and now President Trump is repaying their investment," she continued. "The FTC is currently investigating or suing many of the biggest corporations—including Google, which announced a multibillion-dollar merger just this afternoon."
"These illegal firing attempts put these investigations in doubt and could seriously curb the agency's power and responsibility to protect everyday Americans and honest, Main Street businesses from being scammed and trampled by megacorporations," Peterson-Cassin added. "With this action, the president is choosing to please his billionaire cronies, wreck the rule of law, and do generations of damage to a critical consumer protection agency."
"My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza, which resumed in full force Monday night."
"My name is Mahmoud Khalil and I am a political prisoner."
That's the beginning of a letter from a former organizer of pro-Palestine protests at Columbia University who is fighting the Trump administration's effort to deport him. The letter, which he dictated from the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) facility in Louisiana where he is now detained, was posted on social media Tuesday by groups representing him in court.
Khalil finished his graduate studies at Columbia in December. He is an Algerian citizen of Palestinian descent and was living in the United States with a green card when he was arrested by Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officers in New York City earlier this month. His family—including his wife Noor, who is a U.S. citizen and expecting their first child—shared a video of the arrest on Friday.
"DHS would not tell me anything for hours—I did not know the cause of my arrest or if I was facing immediate deportation," Khalil said Tuesday. "At 26 Federal Plaza, I slept on the cold floor. In the early morning hours, agents transported me to another facility in Elizabeth, New Jersey. There, I slept on the ground and was refused a blanket despite my request."
"My arrest was a direct consequence of exercising my right to free speech as I advocated for a free Palestine and an end to the genocide in Gaza, which resumed in full force Monday night," he continued. "With January's cease-fire now broken, parents in Gaza are once again cradling too-small shrouds, and families are forced to weigh starvation and displacement against bombs. It is our moral imperative to persist in the struggle for their complete freedom."
Khalil also called out administrative leaders at Columbia for not only enabling his arrest but also "the expulsion or suspension of at least 22 Columbia students—some stripped of their B.A. degrees just weeks before graduation—and the expulsion" of Grant Miner, president of United Auto Workers Local 2710, which represents thousands of student workers, on the eve of contract negotiations.
"If anything, my detention is a testament to the strength of the student movement in shifting public opinion toward Palestinian liberation," Khalil said. "Students have long been at the forefront of change—leading the charge against the Vietnam War, standing on the frontlines of the Civil Rights Movement, and driving the struggle against apartheid in South Africa. Today, too, even if the public has yet to fully grasp it, it is students who steer us toward truth and justice."
The letter came a day after Khalil's attorneys filed a motion asking the federal court in the Southern District of New York to immediately release the "recent Columbia graduate student, activist, soon-to-be father, and legal permanent resident."
Samah Sisay, staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights, said Monday that "as a result of the federal government's unlawful decision to detain and transfer Mahmoud Khalil to Louisiana in retaliation for his support for Palestinian rights, he faces the loss of his freedom, a profound silencing of his speech, lack of meaningful access to legal counsel, separation from his pregnant U.S. citizen wife, and the prospect of missing the birth of his first child. We filed an emergency bail motion because these extraordinary circumstances require Mr. Khalil's release—and the court has inherent authority to release him and send him home."
Crystal Carey is a partner at Morgan Lewis, the "top choice of union-busting rat bastards everywhere," one labor journalist said, highlighting how "Amazon has taken full advantage of their evil talents."
Amid widespread frustrations with U.S. President Donald Trump's attacks on working people, including his pursuit of an economic agenda "of, by, and for billionaires," the Republican is reportedly considering yet another betrayal: installing a partner at "a go-to union-busting law firm" as the next general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board.
That's according to David Dayen, executive editor of The American Prospect. Shortly after taking office in January, Trump fired NLRB General Counsel Jennifer Abruzzo—and Democratic board member Gwynne Wilcox, who is fighting her ouster in court. Dayen exclusively reported Monday that Trump plans to replace Abruzzo with Crystal Carey from "the notorious anti-union law firm Morgan Lewis."
Carey is "a former NLRB attorney with experience on both the general counsel and board sides of the agency," according to her biography on the firm's website. Now, "she represents employers" across a wide range of industries for collective bargaining, labor law counseling, and NLRB investigations and litigation.
Since the 1950s, her firm has been "involved in some of the most prominent labor battles in America... from the 1981 air traffic controllers strike to efforts by McDonald's to resist the Fight for $15," Dayen explained. "One of Morgan Lewis' biggest current clients is Amazon, which used algorithmic management and surveillance tactics to prevent unionization at its warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama, in 2021. Amazon also has an active lawsuit that seeks to declare the NLRB unconstitutional."
While Dayen's multiple sources didn't know when a formal announcement would be made and the White House did not respond to a request for comment, the journalist—and many readers of his report—highlighted that "the selection would confirm that any talk of the second term of President Trump being in any way pro-labor was largely lip service or sheer fantasy."
The Philadelphia Council AFL-CIO said on social media: "Union-busting is disgusting, especially when it's coming from the highest office. When unelected billionaires have the ear of an already corrupt president, workers and working families will continue to be on the chopping block. This is what oligarchy looks like, folks."
Labor journalist Kim Kelly sarcastically said, "More great stuff from the 'pro-worker' administration."
"To emphasize how much this sucks, Morgan Lewis is *the* top choice of union-busting rat bastards everywhere and Amazon has taken full advantage of their evil talents to harass and intimidate low-wage workers in the South out of organizing," she added.
Jimmy Williams, general president of the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, said Trump's reported selection of Carey "comes as a complete shock to No ONE."
Some critics took aim at International Brotherhood of Teamsters president Sean O'Brien, who has repeatedly faced backlash for cozying up to Trump's GOP since he spoke at the Republican National Convention last summer. He also came under fire for praising Lori Chavez-DeRemer, Trump's labor secretary pick, who was confirmed last week.
Dayen noted that "labor secretary is not a big policymaking job, at least not compared to the NLRB general counsel. The general counsel sets priorities for NLRB cases, which govern union elections and rights in the workplace. The Labor Department has important priorities as well, but the work to end the slide in union density in the United States really begins at the NLRB."
In response to Dayen's reporting, Emma Lydon, managing director of government relations at Progressive Change Campaign Committee, said: "Great work, Sean O'Brien. Cozying up to fascists and billionaires really worked out well for all of us."
Jonathan Cohn, political director for Progressive Mass, similarly quipped, "Congratulations to Sean O'Brien!"
The labor podcast Work Stoppage said: "Thanks Sean O'Brien for claiming Trump wants to help U.S. workers! He just gave the most powerful labor law post in the country to one of the lawyers fighting the Teamsters at Amazon."
"Allying with the right didn't work for Teamsters" under former Presidents Richard Nixon or Ronald Reagan, the podcast's account added, "and it won't work now."