SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
"Today's ruling from a MAGA judge—who was hand-selected to hear this case by the anti-abortion activists who brought it—is an audacious act of judicial meddling in our personal healthcare decisions," said one reproductive rights campaigner.
Reproductive rights advocates and Democratic U.S. lawmakers on Saturday condemned a far-right federal judge's ruling that threatens access to mifepristone—one of two drugs commonly used in abortion pills—while calling on the Biden administration to do everything in its power to ensure access to the medication.
On Saturday, more than 40 House Democrats urged President Joe Biden to "use all the tools at your disposal to protect access to abortion and reproductive healthcare" a day after U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas ruled in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000 was illegal. Kacsmaryk—an appointee of former President Donald Trump—stayed his preliminary injunction for seven days to give the FDA time to appeal.
Shortly after Kacsmaryk's ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas Rice in Washington state issued a contradictory decision that blocks the FDA from removing mifepristone from the market.
\u201cAbortion is health care and health care is a human right. \n\nThis morning, I joined @RepJasmine and 40 @HouseDemocrats in calling on the Biden Administration to use all means possible to preserve @US_FDA approval for #Mifepristone & protect access to these treatments nationwide.\u201d— Congresswoman Summer Lee (@Congresswoman Summer Lee) 1680967742
Meanwhile, Democratic Attorneys General Association co-chairs Kathy Jennings (Delaware) and Aaron Ford (Nevada) called Kacsmaryk's decision "a disturbing and extraordinarily dangerous attack against women across the country."
"We strongly condemn this decision and the ongoing right-wing assault on reproductive rights, medical freedom, and abortion access," they continued. "Millions of patients have used mifepristone safely over the last two decades, but as we've seen across the country, ultra-conservative groups—including some Republican attorneys general—are not letting science, facts, or basic human rights stand in the way of a medieval crusade against abortion access."
Meagan Hatcher-Mays, director of democracy policy at Indivisible, said in a statement that "today's ruling from a MAGA judge—who was hand-selected to hear this case by the anti-abortion activists who brought it—is an audacious act of judicial meddling in our personal healthcare decisions. And it confirms what we already know: Republicans do not give a damn about safety."
"They do not care about women," she added. "They couldn't care less about the well-being of pregnant people. If they did, they'd be fighting for access to healthcare and supporting paid leave policies."
\u201cThe abortion medication decision tonight was misogynist payback: Our ability to end a pregnancy with just a few pills was too much for them to take. \n\nAt least when we went to clinics they could stand outside and call us \u2018sluts\u2019. \n\nhttps://t.co/Bq78CfBG1H\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1680918981
Nancy Northup, president and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said that "today's decision has no basis in law or fact. This lawsuit was manufactured as part of an orchestrated campaign to deny all women in the U.S. access to abortion, even those living in states with strong abortion rights protections."
"While the decision is without merit, its impact will be devastating, threatening access to a safe and effective medicine used by over five million patients in the past two decades," Northup added. "The ruling should be swiftly reversed on appeal."
\u201cMifepristone is an exceedingly safe and effective medication that was approved more than 20 years ago.\n\nToday, a federal judge put that medication \u2014 and with it, access to abortion care across the country \u2014 in jeopardy.\n\nHere's what you need to know. \ud83e\uddf5\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1680916474
Last November, the right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom challenged the FDA's approval of mifepristone, one of two medications commonly taken in tandem to induce abortion.
Responding to the U.S. Supreme Court's cancellation of federal abortion rights in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the FDA announced in January that pharmacies could sell mifepristone. Walgreens, the nation's second-largest pharmacy chain, subsequently said it would not sell mifepristone in states where Republican attorneys general have threatened legal action.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights notes, "Without the FDA-approved medication, both clinics and patients across the country will struggle to provide and access time-sensitive abortion care."
"Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, providers across the country have already seen a massive influx of patients and increased wait times, pushing time-sensitive care out of reach for many," the group added. "The impacts of today's decision will fall hardest on communities who already face structural barriers in accessing health care, including communities of color, people living in rural areas, and those living on a low income."
\u201cFor confidential advice about abortion laws in your state or legal information regarding access or local resources: https://t.co/ThR4p8WHA4\n\n@ifwhenhow\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1680959597
Some congressional Democrats urged Biden to simply ignore Kacsmaryk's ruling.
"I think there's no basis for this ruling in law, and I think that the Biden administration can and must ignore the judge and keep mifepristone on the market and this medication available for every woman in America," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told KATU Friday.
Appearing on CNN Friday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said that "we've been preparing for and anticipating there being egregious overreaches by members of the judiciary appointed by a right-wing Republican Party whose goal for a very long time is to pack the courts with partisan judges, often underqualified or completely unqualified for their role."
\u201cShe\u2019s right. Kacsmaryk claimed a power that he simply does not have. He cannot force the FDA to suspend or revoke approval of mifepristone. The agency cannot simultaneously comply with tonight\u2019s order and adhere to the law. https://t.co/vL62mOFSMk\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1680919255
"I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling," Ocasio-Cortez asserted. "I think that the courts... rely upon the legitimacy of their rulings. And what they are currently doing is engaging in an unprecedented and dramatic erosion of the legitimacy of the courts."
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Reproductive rights advocates and Democratic U.S. lawmakers on Saturday condemned a far-right federal judge's ruling that threatens access to mifepristone—one of two drugs commonly used in abortion pills—while calling on the Biden administration to do everything in its power to ensure access to the medication.
On Saturday, more than 40 House Democrats urged President Joe Biden to "use all the tools at your disposal to protect access to abortion and reproductive healthcare" a day after U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas ruled in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000 was illegal. Kacsmaryk—an appointee of former President Donald Trump—stayed his preliminary injunction for seven days to give the FDA time to appeal.
Shortly after Kacsmaryk's ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas Rice in Washington state issued a contradictory decision that blocks the FDA from removing mifepristone from the market.
\u201cAbortion is health care and health care is a human right. \n\nThis morning, I joined @RepJasmine and 40 @HouseDemocrats in calling on the Biden Administration to use all means possible to preserve @US_FDA approval for #Mifepristone & protect access to these treatments nationwide.\u201d— Congresswoman Summer Lee (@Congresswoman Summer Lee) 1680967742
Meanwhile, Democratic Attorneys General Association co-chairs Kathy Jennings (Delaware) and Aaron Ford (Nevada) called Kacsmaryk's decision "a disturbing and extraordinarily dangerous attack against women across the country."
"We strongly condemn this decision and the ongoing right-wing assault on reproductive rights, medical freedom, and abortion access," they continued. "Millions of patients have used mifepristone safely over the last two decades, but as we've seen across the country, ultra-conservative groups—including some Republican attorneys general—are not letting science, facts, or basic human rights stand in the way of a medieval crusade against abortion access."
Meagan Hatcher-Mays, director of democracy policy at Indivisible, said in a statement that "today's ruling from a MAGA judge—who was hand-selected to hear this case by the anti-abortion activists who brought it—is an audacious act of judicial meddling in our personal healthcare decisions. And it confirms what we already know: Republicans do not give a damn about safety."
"They do not care about women," she added. "They couldn't care less about the well-being of pregnant people. If they did, they'd be fighting for access to healthcare and supporting paid leave policies."
\u201cThe abortion medication decision tonight was misogynist payback: Our ability to end a pregnancy with just a few pills was too much for them to take. \n\nAt least when we went to clinics they could stand outside and call us \u2018sluts\u2019. \n\nhttps://t.co/Bq78CfBG1H\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1680918981
Nancy Northup, president and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said that "today's decision has no basis in law or fact. This lawsuit was manufactured as part of an orchestrated campaign to deny all women in the U.S. access to abortion, even those living in states with strong abortion rights protections."
"While the decision is without merit, its impact will be devastating, threatening access to a safe and effective medicine used by over five million patients in the past two decades," Northup added. "The ruling should be swiftly reversed on appeal."
\u201cMifepristone is an exceedingly safe and effective medication that was approved more than 20 years ago.\n\nToday, a federal judge put that medication \u2014 and with it, access to abortion care across the country \u2014 in jeopardy.\n\nHere's what you need to know. \ud83e\uddf5\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1680916474
Last November, the right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom challenged the FDA's approval of mifepristone, one of two medications commonly taken in tandem to induce abortion.
Responding to the U.S. Supreme Court's cancellation of federal abortion rights in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the FDA announced in January that pharmacies could sell mifepristone. Walgreens, the nation's second-largest pharmacy chain, subsequently said it would not sell mifepristone in states where Republican attorneys general have threatened legal action.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights notes, "Without the FDA-approved medication, both clinics and patients across the country will struggle to provide and access time-sensitive abortion care."
"Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, providers across the country have already seen a massive influx of patients and increased wait times, pushing time-sensitive care out of reach for many," the group added. "The impacts of today's decision will fall hardest on communities who already face structural barriers in accessing health care, including communities of color, people living in rural areas, and those living on a low income."
\u201cFor confidential advice about abortion laws in your state or legal information regarding access or local resources: https://t.co/ThR4p8WHA4\n\n@ifwhenhow\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1680959597
Some congressional Democrats urged Biden to simply ignore Kacsmaryk's ruling.
"I think there's no basis for this ruling in law, and I think that the Biden administration can and must ignore the judge and keep mifepristone on the market and this medication available for every woman in America," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told KATU Friday.
Appearing on CNN Friday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said that "we've been preparing for and anticipating there being egregious overreaches by members of the judiciary appointed by a right-wing Republican Party whose goal for a very long time is to pack the courts with partisan judges, often underqualified or completely unqualified for their role."
\u201cShe\u2019s right. Kacsmaryk claimed a power that he simply does not have. He cannot force the FDA to suspend or revoke approval of mifepristone. The agency cannot simultaneously comply with tonight\u2019s order and adhere to the law. https://t.co/vL62mOFSMk\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1680919255
"I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling," Ocasio-Cortez asserted. "I think that the courts... rely upon the legitimacy of their rulings. And what they are currently doing is engaging in an unprecedented and dramatic erosion of the legitimacy of the courts."
Reproductive rights advocates and Democratic U.S. lawmakers on Saturday condemned a far-right federal judge's ruling that threatens access to mifepristone—one of two drugs commonly used in abortion pills—while calling on the Biden administration to do everything in its power to ensure access to the medication.
On Saturday, more than 40 House Democrats urged President Joe Biden to "use all the tools at your disposal to protect access to abortion and reproductive healthcare" a day after U.S. District Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk in Texas ruled in Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine v. FDA that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's approval of mifepristone in 2000 was illegal. Kacsmaryk—an appointee of former President Donald Trump—stayed his preliminary injunction for seven days to give the FDA time to appeal.
Shortly after Kacsmaryk's ruling, U.S. District Judge Thomas Rice in Washington state issued a contradictory decision that blocks the FDA from removing mifepristone from the market.
\u201cAbortion is health care and health care is a human right. \n\nThis morning, I joined @RepJasmine and 40 @HouseDemocrats in calling on the Biden Administration to use all means possible to preserve @US_FDA approval for #Mifepristone & protect access to these treatments nationwide.\u201d— Congresswoman Summer Lee (@Congresswoman Summer Lee) 1680967742
Meanwhile, Democratic Attorneys General Association co-chairs Kathy Jennings (Delaware) and Aaron Ford (Nevada) called Kacsmaryk's decision "a disturbing and extraordinarily dangerous attack against women across the country."
"We strongly condemn this decision and the ongoing right-wing assault on reproductive rights, medical freedom, and abortion access," they continued. "Millions of patients have used mifepristone safely over the last two decades, but as we've seen across the country, ultra-conservative groups—including some Republican attorneys general—are not letting science, facts, or basic human rights stand in the way of a medieval crusade against abortion access."
Meagan Hatcher-Mays, director of democracy policy at Indivisible, said in a statement that "today's ruling from a MAGA judge—who was hand-selected to hear this case by the anti-abortion activists who brought it—is an audacious act of judicial meddling in our personal healthcare decisions. And it confirms what we already know: Republicans do not give a damn about safety."
"They do not care about women," she added. "They couldn't care less about the well-being of pregnant people. If they did, they'd be fighting for access to healthcare and supporting paid leave policies."
\u201cThe abortion medication decision tonight was misogynist payback: Our ability to end a pregnancy with just a few pills was too much for them to take. \n\nAt least when we went to clinics they could stand outside and call us \u2018sluts\u2019. \n\nhttps://t.co/Bq78CfBG1H\u201d— Jessica Valenti (@Jessica Valenti) 1680918981
Nancy Northup, president and CEO at the Center for Reproductive Rights, said that "today's decision has no basis in law or fact. This lawsuit was manufactured as part of an orchestrated campaign to deny all women in the U.S. access to abortion, even those living in states with strong abortion rights protections."
"While the decision is without merit, its impact will be devastating, threatening access to a safe and effective medicine used by over five million patients in the past two decades," Northup added. "The ruling should be swiftly reversed on appeal."
\u201cMifepristone is an exceedingly safe and effective medication that was approved more than 20 years ago.\n\nToday, a federal judge put that medication \u2014 and with it, access to abortion care across the country \u2014 in jeopardy.\n\nHere's what you need to know. \ud83e\uddf5\u201d— ACLU (@ACLU) 1680916474
Last November, the right-wing legal group Alliance Defending Freedom challenged the FDA's approval of mifepristone, one of two medications commonly taken in tandem to induce abortion.
Responding to the U.S. Supreme Court's cancellation of federal abortion rights in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, the FDA announced in January that pharmacies could sell mifepristone. Walgreens, the nation's second-largest pharmacy chain, subsequently said it would not sell mifepristone in states where Republican attorneys general have threatened legal action.
As the Center for Reproductive Rights notes, "Without the FDA-approved medication, both clinics and patients across the country will struggle to provide and access time-sensitive abortion care."
"Since Roe v. Wade was overturned, providers across the country have already seen a massive influx of patients and increased wait times, pushing time-sensitive care out of reach for many," the group added. "The impacts of today's decision will fall hardest on communities who already face structural barriers in accessing health care, including communities of color, people living in rural areas, and those living on a low income."
\u201cFor confidential advice about abortion laws in your state or legal information regarding access or local resources: https://t.co/ThR4p8WHA4\n\n@ifwhenhow\u201d— NARAL (@NARAL) 1680959597
Some congressional Democrats urged Biden to simply ignore Kacsmaryk's ruling.
"I think there's no basis for this ruling in law, and I think that the Biden administration can and must ignore the judge and keep mifepristone on the market and this medication available for every woman in America," Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) told KATU Friday.
Appearing on CNN Friday, Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) said that "we've been preparing for and anticipating there being egregious overreaches by members of the judiciary appointed by a right-wing Republican Party whose goal for a very long time is to pack the courts with partisan judges, often underqualified or completely unqualified for their role."
\u201cShe\u2019s right. Kacsmaryk claimed a power that he simply does not have. He cannot force the FDA to suspend or revoke approval of mifepristone. The agency cannot simultaneously comply with tonight\u2019s order and adhere to the law. https://t.co/vL62mOFSMk\u201d— Mark Joseph Stern (@Mark Joseph Stern) 1680919255
"I believe that the Biden administration should ignore this ruling," Ocasio-Cortez asserted. "I think that the courts... rely upon the legitimacy of their rulings. And what they are currently doing is engaging in an unprecedented and dramatic erosion of the legitimacy of the courts."