October, 23 2008, 03:00pm EDT
![Earthjustice](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012672/origin.jpg)
Majority of Voters Oppose Mountaintop Removal Mining in First Nationwide Opinion Poll
Voters feel environment deteriorating, oppose push to repeal Stream Buffer Zone rule
WASHINGTON
In the first nationwide poll on mountaintop removal mining, two
out of three likely voters oppose recent efforts by the Bush
administration to repeal an environmental law known as the Stream
Buffer Zone rule, which prohibits mining activities within 100 feet of
a stream. Upon hearing that "more than 1,200 miles of streams in
Appalachia already have been buried or destroyed by mountaintop removal
coal mining," fully 85% of voters say they are concerned about the
effects of this mining practice.
The practice of mountaintop removal coal mining -- where hundreds of
feet are blown off the tops of mountains to get at thin coal seams, and
the remaining rock and waste is dumped into nearby valleys -- has long
been opposed by many residents of Appalachia. This newest poll, the
first to test voters' views of this practice nationwide, illustrates
that voters in every region of the country are similarly against
mountaintop removal mining.
"Throughout the entire term of the Bush administration, federal
agencies charged with enforcing the law have instead done all they
could to roll back regulations and ignore environmental protections to
allow mountaintop removal mining to continue. But people across the
country recognize what this administration has not: that mountaintop
removal mining is simply wrong," said Joan Mulhern, senior legislative
counsel at Earthjustice. "Voters aren't fooled by attempts to allow
this destruction to continue."
Last week, the Department of the Interior's Office of Surface Mining
(OSM) made the final moves on a proposal to repeal the Stream Buffer
Zone rule, a Reagan-era regulation that prohibits surface coal mining
activities from disturbing areas within 100 feet of permanent and
seasonal streams. OSM is trying to clear the path for more mountaintop
removal mining in Appalachia by allowing streams and headwaters to be
permanently buried with mining waste and "overburden."
The nationwide survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted by two firms,
Lake Research Partners and Bellwether Research and Consulting on behalf
of Earthjustice, the Sierra Club and Appalachian Center for the Economy
and Environment, shows overwhelming opposition to the changes to the
Stream buffer Zone rule. Fully 66% of those polled oppose the repeal of
the protections for streams, with nearly half (49%) who "strongly
oppose" the repeal.
"The level of public opposition to this rule change is remarkable,
until one considers the larger context: even in a tough economy,
Americans see environmental protections as an economic boon by a 2:1
margin," said Daniel Gottoff of Lake Research Partners.
"These poll results make very clear that people think we should not
sacrifice streams by allowing them to be filled in with mining waste,"
said Ed Hopkins, director of Sierra Club's Environmental Quality
Program. "The Environmental Protection Agency can and should protect
these streams by stopping the Office of Surface Mining's plan to gut
the Stream Buffer Zone rule."
"We have known for a long while that residents of West Virginia
oppose mountaintop removal and are against weakening environmental laws
that are meant to protect our mountains, streams, and communities from
this devastation," said Margaret Janes of the Appalachian Center for
the Economy and the Environment. "It is heartening to see now that many
Americans across the country are aware of the enormous destruction
being caused in our region and want to see an end to the practice
before it is too late."
"Americans make it very clear that, despite concerns they have about
the economy and our dependence on foreign oil, they do not want key
environmental protections rolled back for quick, cheap energy
production," said Christine L. Matthews of Bellwether Research and
Consulting. "Voters believe environmental protections -- such as the
Stream Buffer Zone Rule -- are, in fact, beneficial to the economy, and
play a critical role in protecting our water, air, and natural
surroundings."
The poll results showed that:
- A majority of American voters believes the environment in the
United States is deteriorating. Fully 55% say the quality of the
environment has gotten worse in recent years. Another quarter believes
the environment has stayed about the same and only 18 percent believe
the environment has improved. - By more than a 2:1 margin, voters believe environmental
protections are good for the economy. Voters categorically reject the
argument that environmental protections are bad for jobs and
business -- a common refrain of the Bush administration, as well as oil
and mining companies. A plurality (47%) believe environmental
protections are good for the economy and another 23% believe such
protections have no impact on the economy. Only 20% of Americans
believe environmental protections are bad for the economy. - Two-thirds of American voters oppose the Bush
administration's effort to repeal the Stream Buffer Zone Rule. Fully
66% oppose repeal, including roughly half (49%) who "strongly oppose"
repealing the rule, which for 25 years has protected our nation's water
resources from toxic debris caused by mountaintop removal coal mining.
Only two in ten (20%) support the Bush administration's effort to gut
this critical safeguard (just 8% support it strongly), and another 14%
are unsure. - Opposition to Bush's effort to repeal the Stream Buffer Zone
Rule is both broad and deep, transcending traditional partisan,
regional, and demographic divides. Majorities of all political parties
oppose repealing the rule, as do strong majorities of men (62%) and
women (69%), college-educated and non college-educated voters (65% for
each), and voters in all four corners of the country (74% in the
Northeast, 64% in the Midwest, 64% in the South, and 64% in the West). - Finally, voters also report high levels of concern over
water quality and take a firm stand against further destruction of
America's streams. Upon hearing that "more than 1,200 miles of streams
in Appalachia have already been buried or destroyed by mountaintop
removal coal mining, with another 1,000 miles projected for burial and
destruction in the next ten years," fully 86% of voters say they are
concerned about the effects of mountaintop removal, including a 60%
majority who are very concerned.
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
'Tragic Outcome' for Gig Workers as California Supreme Court Hands Win to Uber, DoorDash
"Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers," the case plaintiff said.
Jul 25, 2024
Labor advocates on Thursday decried a ruling by the California Supreme Court upholding a lower court's affirmation of a state ballot measure allowing app-based ride and delivery companies to classify their drivers as independent contractors, limiting their worker rights.
The court's seven justices ruled unanimously in Castellanos v. State of California that Proposition 22, which was approved by 58% of California voters in 2020, complies with the state constitution. Prop 22—which was overturned in 2021 by an Alameda County Superior Court judge in 2021—was upheld in March 2023 by the state's 1st District Court of Appeals.
The business models of app-based companies including DoorDash, Instacart, Lyft, and Uber rely upon minimizing frontline worker compensation by categorizing drivers as independent contractors instead of employees. Independent contractors are not entitled to unemployment insurance, health insurance, or compensation for business expenses.
There are approximately 1.4 million app-based gig workers in California, according to industry estimates.
While DoorDash hailed Thursday's ruling as "not only a victory for Dashers, but also for democracy itself," gig worker advocates condemned the decision.
"Over the last three years, gig workers across California have experienced firsthand that Prop 22 is nothing more than a bait-and-switch meant to enrich global corporations at the expense of the Black, brown, and immigrant workers who power their earnings," plaintiff Hector Castellanos, who drives for Uber and Lyft, said in a statement.
"Prop 22 has allowed gig companies like Uber, Lyft, and DoorDash to deprive us of a living wage, access to workers compensation, paid sick leave, and meaningful healthcare coverage," Castellanos added. "Today's ruling only strengthens our demand for the right to join together in a union so that we can begin improving the gig economy for workers and our customers."
Lorena Gonzalez, president of the California Federation of Labor Unions, AFL-CIO, said that "we are deeply disappointed that the state Supreme Court has allowed tech corporations to buy their way out of basic labor laws despite Proposition 22's inconsistencies with our state constitution."
"These companies have upended our social contract, forcing workers and the public to take on the inherent risk created by this work, while they profit," she continued. "A.B. 5 granted virtually all California workers the right to be paid for all hours worked, health and safety standards, unemployment insurance, workers compensation, and the right to organize."
"Rideshare and delivery drivers deserve those rights as well," Gonzalez stressed.
The Gig Workers Rising campaign said on social media that "Uber and other app corporations spent $220 million to buy this law, and they did it by tricking Californians."
Prop 22's passage in November 2020 with nearly 59% of the vote was the culmination of what was by far the most expensive ballot measure in California history. App-based companies and their backers outspent labor and progressive groups by more than 10 to 1, with proponents pouring a staggering $204.5 million into the "yes" campaign's coffers against just $19 million for the "no" side.
"Voters were told the initiative would provide us with 'historic new benefits' and guaranteed earnings," said Gig Workers Rising. "But since it went into effect, drivers have seen our pay go down, learned the benefits are a sham, and have to accept unsafe rides because of the constant threat of being 'deactivated,' kicked off the app with little explanation or warning."
"If Uber really cared about good benefits and fair wages, it could make that happen tomorrow," the campaign added. "Instead, it has shown it would rather slash pay, bamboozle voters, and put drivers' lives and livelihoods in danger—all while promising $7 billion in stock buybacks to banks and billionaires."
Veena Dubal, a law professor at the University of California, Irvine who focuses on labor and inequality, toldCalMatters that Thursday's ruling was "a really tragic outcome," but "it's not the end of the road."
Dubal's sentiment was echoed by some California state legislators, who said the ruling presents an opportunity to act.
"While this decision is frustrating, it must also be motivating," said state Senate Labor Committee Chair Lola Smallwood-Cuevas (D-28). "I'm more determined than ever to ensure that all workers—including our diverse and Black, Indigenous, and people of color-led gig workforce—have the basic protections of workers compensation, paid sick leave, family leave, disability insurance, and the right to form a union."
Prop 22 has served as a template for lawmakers in other states seeking to deny or limit basic worker rights, benefits, and protections.
In Massachusetts, app-based companies have been fighting for years to get a measure to classify drivers as contractors on the state ballot. In 2022, Lyft made the largest political donation in state history—$14.4 million—to a coalition funding one such proposal.
Last month, Uber and Lyft reached an agreement with the office of Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell, a Democrat, to pay $175 million to settle a lawsuit filed in 2020. As part of the deal, the companies also agreed to increase driver pay and provide paid sick leave, accident insurance, and some health benefits. The agreement does not address how app-based gig workers should be classified.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Young Voters Tell Kamala Harris to 'Fight for Our Future'
"This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Jul 25, 2024
Four youth-led groups on Thursday urged Vice President Kamala Harris, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, to "fight for our future" by pursuing a policy agenda the coalition unveiled in a March letter to U.S. President Joe Biden.
It's been less than a week since Biden left the race and endorsed Harris, who is expected to face former Republican Donald Trump and his running mate, U.S. Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio), in the November election. Since then, she's racked up endorsements from Democratic members of Congress and progressive groups focused on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
March for Our Lives, which was launched after the 2018 mass shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, honored Harris with the group's first-ever endorsement on Wednesday, calling her "the right person to stand up for us and fight for the country we deserve."
"To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters."
The gun violence prevention organization is part of the youth-led coalition behind the new letter, which also includes the climate-focused Sunrise Movement; Gen-Z for Change, which advocates on a range of issues; and the national immigrant network United We Dream Action.
"You have an urgent and important task. To defeat Trump, you must rebuild support and enthusiasm among young voters," the coalition told Harris on Thursday, noting that she sought the Democratic nomination during the last cycle. "You should build on your 2020 campaign platform where you put forward a strong vision to make the economy work for everyday people and ensure a livable future for us all."
The groups urged Harris to support the Green New Deal, Medicare for All, and the Reverse Mass Incarceration Act. They pushed her to expand pathways to citizenship, keep families together, end fossil fuel subsidies, and create good, union jobs. They also called on her to prioritize gun violence prevention and investments in public health solutions and green, affordable housing.
"Democrats are at a critical crossroads with young people," the coalition wrote to Harris on Thursday. "Polls showed Biden and Trump neck-and-neck among young voters."
ANew York Times/Siena College poll conducted July 22-24 shows Trump leading Harris 48% to 47% among likely voters and 48% to 46% among registered voters—differences that fall within the margin of error.
Forbesnoted Thursday that "Democrats are far more enthusiastic about Harris than they were Biden, the Times/Siena survey found, with nearly 80% of voters who lean Democrat saying they would like Harris to be the nominee, compared to 48% of Democrats who said the same about Biden three weeks ago."
The outlet also pointed to two other polls conducted by Morning Consult and Reuters/Ipsos since Biden dropped out, which both show Harris with a narrow lead over Trump.
"You have an opportunity to win the youth vote by turning the page and differentiating yourself from Biden policies that are deeply unpopular with us, such as approving new oil and gas projects, denying people their right to seek refuge and asylum, and funding the Israeli government's killing of civilians in Gaza," the youth coalition highlighted Thursday. "You must speak to the economic pain young people are facing from crushing student debt and skyrocketing housing and food prices."
Looking beyond November, the groups told Harris—who could be the first Black woman and person of Asian descent elected to the country's highest office—that "you could be a historic president. Not just because of who you are, but what you can accomplish."
"Young people are energized and ready to organize against fascism and for the future we deserve," they concluded. "This is your chance to energize young people and our communities to vote, mount one of the greatest political comebacks in decades, and deliver a resounding defeat to the far-right agenda of Trump and Vance."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Video Game Actors Strike for AI Protections
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said one union leader. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games."
Jul 25, 2024
After nearly two years of negotiations with video game giants and no deal that would protect performers from artificial intelligence, unionized voice and motion capture actors who work in video game development announced Thursday that they will go on strike starting at 12:01 am on Friday, July 26.
The performers are represented by Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA), which last year won a contract for TV and film actors that included "unprecedented provisions for consent and compensation that will protect members from the threat of AI," after the union went on strike for four months.
The union has been negotiating on behalf of video game actors with major production companies including Disney Character Voices Inc., Activision Productions Inc., and WB Games Inc., and has won concessions over wages and job safety—but "AI protections remain the sticking point," said SAG-AFTRA on Thursday as the impending strike was announced.
Unionized actors want protections that would stop video game companies from training AI to replicate actors' voices or likeness without their consent and without compensating them.
"The video game industry generates billions of dollars in profit annually," said Duncan Crabtree-Ireland, national executive director and chief negotiator for SAG-AFTRA. "The driving force behind that success is the creative people who design and create those games. That includes the SAG-AFTRA members who bring memorable and beloved game characters to life, and they deserve and demand the same fundamental protections as performers in film, television, streaming, and music: fair compensation and the right of informed consent for the AI use of their faces, voices, and bodies."
"Frankly, it's stunning that these video game studios haven't learned anything from the lessons of last year—that our members can and will stand up and demand fair and equitable treatment with respect to AI, and the public supports us in that," he added.
Sarah Elmaleh, negotiating committee chair for the union's interactive media agreement, said the negotiations have shown the companies "are not interested in fair, reasonable AI protections, but rather flagrant exploitation."
"We look forward to collaborating with teams on our interim and independent contracts, which provide AI transparency, consent, and compensation to all performers, and to continuing to negotiate in good faith with this bargaining group when they are ready to join us in the world we all deserve," said Elmaleh.
The unionized actors voted in favor of the strike authorization with a 98.32% yes vote, said SAG-AFTRA.
The strike was announced as more than 500 workers who help develop the popular World of Warcraft video game franchise voted to join the Communications Workers of America (CWA), with the games publisher, Blizzard Entertainment, recognizing the bargaining unit.
CWA noted that the workers' journey to union representation began with a walkout in 2021 at Activision Blizzard, which was later bought by Microsoft, over sexual harassment and discrimination.
"What we've accomplished at World of Warcraft is just the beginning," Eric Lanham, a World of Warcraft test analyst, said in a statement. "We know that when workers have a protected voice, it's a win-win for employee standards, the studio, and World of Warcraft fans looking for the best gaming experience."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular