December, 23 2008, 05:17am EDT
![Oxfam International](https://assets.rbl.ms/32012667/origin.jpg)
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Sean Kenny +44 7766 443 506Â - skenny@oxfam.org.uk
Roy Probert +44 (0)77 3800 3555 - roy.probert@oxfaminternational.org
Louis Belanger +1 917 224 0834 - Louis.belanger@oxfaminternational.org
Oxfam Closes Historic Tsunami Response
WASHINGTON
Oxfam International is
preparing to close its response to Indian Ocean tsunami at the end of
this month, four years after the disaster. Oxfam and its local partner
organizations assisted 2.5 million people in seven tsunami-affected
countries in the largest emergency program in its history.
In a
report published today, Barbara Stocking, the chair of the Oxfam
International Tsunami Fund Board, said: "What has been achieved is
astounding. Hundreds of thousands of people are now living in better
conditions than they were in before the tsunami thanks to the generous
support we received from the public, the hard work of our staff and
local partners and the resilience of the affected communities to
rebuild their lives".
Oxfam received $294 million in donations to
help affected people - more than 90 per cent of it from the public. The
sum was used in Indonesia for instance where Oxfam was the first
international agency to provide housing to tsunami survivors in Aceh,
going on to build 1,566 permanent houses. In Sri Lanka, the
international aid agency helped to restore the livelihoods of almost
170,000 people. Oxfam also funded, amongst other projects, the
reconstruction of eight tsunami-affected secondary schools serving
around 6,000 students each year. In India, Oxfam helped to restore the
livelihoods of 660,000 people and create structures to allow them to
save money.
"The money we received allowed us not only to help
meet the immediate emergency needs of tsunami-affected populations, but
also to try to address the factors that made them vulnerable: not least
poverty and a lack of influence over their own lives," Stocking said.
The
activities of Oxfam and its partners ranged from the provision of
emergency clean water and sanitation to people displaced by the
disaster; improving the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of poor
and displaced people, especially women; and the construction of
permanent houses to better protect communities against future disasters.
"The
tangible results, such as the new houses and fishing boats, are only
one marker of progress," Stocking said. "The less visible interventions
are just as important. We have helped to give people better access to
markets for their goods. We have helped them gain the knowledge they
need to protect themselves against future disasters and the confidence
to demand a say in decisions that affect them."
Oxfam hopes that
the world's generous and speedy response to the devastation wrought by
the tsunami will be regarded as landmark. There are processes in place
to keep improving the coordination between international agencies.
Oxfam itself has extracted many lessons from the tsunami response which
have already been applied in subsequent disasters.
Notes to editors
The
Oxfam International Tsunami Fund was established in March 2005 as an
independent company and registered charity in the UK. The Fund
officially closes on 31 December 2008 Oxfam has received $294
million, more than 90% of it from the public. Less than five per cent
has been spent on administration and fundraising costs. The Oxfam
International Tsunami Fund End of Program Report can be found at: https://www.oxfam.org/en/emergencies/tsunami
Among the many successes of the Oxfam tsunami program are:
In Indonesia (where Oxfam spent $114.4 million, or 44% of the total program spend):
- As
well as delivering emergency water supplies, Oxfam built a piped
municipal water supply system in Lhokseumawe to serve 10,000 people and
constructed or repaired more than 50 gravity flow water supply systems
serving 170 villages. - Oxfam's advocacy efforts led to the
agreement by Indonesian authorities to grant all people in Aceh who
rented or squatted on other people's land before the tsunami the legal
right to their own home, as well as giving women joint ownership with
their husbands of newly constructed houses. - Oxfam paid for the construction of 30 elementary schools, serving 7,000 children, and the training of 1,200 teachers.
- Oxfam helped strengthen the fledgling civil society sector by helping to fund 75 organizations.
- Oxfam
was the first international agency to provide housing to tsunami
survivors in Aceh, going on to build 1,566 permanent houses.
In Sri Lanka (where Oxfam spent $86.6 million, or 33% of the total program spend):
- Oxfam
helped to restore the livelihoods of almost 170,000 people. Our
partner, BRAC, assisted 60,000 women to set up small businesses and now
reports that 88 per cent of them have higher incomes today than they
did before the tsunami. - Oxfam funding, technical assistance and
market research helped more than 3,000 poor women coir (coconut fiber)
workers in southern Sri Lanka to revive and expand their businesses.
They have now doubled, and in some cases tripled, their incomes. - Oxfam funded the reconstruction of eight tsunami-affected secondary schools serving around 6,000 students each year.
- Oxfam has funded the establishment of a national disaster risk reduction resource center
In India (where Oxfam spent $45.2 million, or 17% of the total program spend):
- Oxfam helped to restore the livelihoods of 660,000 people and create structures to allow them to save money for the first time.
- Oxfam provided 360 new boats to fishermen and repaired another 900 boats and 800 outboard motors.
- Oxfam
funded the creation of Village Information Centers in 106 villages,
which now provide services such as a disaster early warning system,
market information and computer training courses to 34,000 people.
In
Indonesia, Sri Lanka and India Oxfam also funded the Green Coast
program, which combined environmental rehabilitation, the restoration
of livelihoods and disaster risk reduction. This program directly
helped 106,000 people.
Oxfam International is a global movement of people who are fighting inequality to end poverty and injustice. We are working across regions in about 70 countries, with thousands of partners, and allies, supporting communities to build better lives for themselves, grow resilience and protect lives and livelihoods also in times of crisis.
LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that campaigners linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular