April, 15 2009, 02:20pm EDT
Groups Sue National Marine Fisheries Service to Protect Sea Turtles
Seek emergency action to correct violation of Endangered Species Act
TALLAHASSEE, Florida
A group of conservation organizations is suing the National
Marine Fisheries Service to force action quickly to protect threatened
and endangered sea turtles from death and injury in the Gulf of Mexico
bottom longline fishery. Earthjustice, the Center for Biological
Diversity, Defenders of Wildlife, and a coalition of conservation
groups are urging the Fisheries Service to impose immediate protections
for the imperiled species.
"Important populations of sea turtles in the Gulf have been
illegally killed by the hundreds since 2006 in flagrant violation of
the Endangered Species Act," said Steve Roady, an attorney with
Earthjustice. "Now that the fishery is in full force for the season, it
has become necessary to go to court to require the new administration
to take emergency action to protect these vulnerable turtles."
The National Marine Fisheries Service, an agency of the U.S.
Department of Commerce's National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration ("NMFS" or "NOAA Fisheries") is responsible for ensuring
that bottom longline fishing does not pose a threat to sea turtle
populations. In 2005, the agency determined that the Gulf of Mexico
fishery could capture up to 114 sea turtles, including 85 loggerheads,
during a three-year period without violating the Endangered Species
Act. But the agency has released new information estimating that
vessels in the Gulf caught nearly 1,000 turtles between July 2006 and
December 2008 - more than eight times the number allowed. Although the
agency was required to issue a report on the number of turtles captured
by the bottom longline fishery every year starting in 2006, it failed
to do so. As a result, the high numbers of turtles caught in longline
equipment was not discovered at that time and hundreds more sea turtles
were captured in 2007 and 2008.
"The current emergency could have been avoided if the National
Marine Fisheries Service simply had been paying attention and making
adjustments in the fishery before the turtle takes soared to
astronomical levels in the past several years," said Andrea Treece, an
attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity. "Now the agency's
only lawful choice is to suspend the bottom longline fishery until the
agency figures out how to prevent more turtles from being hurt or
killed."
Following on the conservation organizations' notice of its intent to
sue the agency for violations of the Endangered Species Act in January,
the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council also weighed in,
recommending the closure of the bottom longline fishery until the
National Marine Fisheries Service can ensure the protection of the
turtles. But in March, the bottom longline fishery fully re-opened for
the season - greatly increasing the immediate threat to sea turtles.
"Information indicates that the sea turtles are in trouble now.
April has been a high time for turtle takes in the past and the agency
has no basis for thinking they are not currently at risk," said Sierra
Weaver, an attorney for Defenders of Wildlife.
In addition to the high rate of capture from the bottom longline
fishery, other troubling news from Florida researchers has documented a
startling decline in loggerhead sea turtle nesting over the past decade.
"Loggerhead nesting in Florida has declined by nearly 41% in the
last decade while green and leatherback turtle nesting on the very same
beaches is increasing dramatically," said Marydele Donnelly of the
Caribbean Conservation Corporation. "This fishery is undermining nearly
three decades of conservation work to protect loggerheads from a
multitude of threats. By failing to act, the National Marine Fisheries
Service is not serving as a good steward for the nation's sea turtles."
"We must end the indiscriminate killing of sea turtles," said Manley
Fuller, president of the Florida Wildlife Federation. "The adult and
sub-adult turtles harmed by bottom longline fishing are simply too
valuable to the overall health and survival of these populations - and
we need them to be able to reach our local beaches to nest."
"The National Marine Fisheries Service has
the responsibility to protect endangered and threatened turtle
populations from destructive fishing practices," said Cynthia Sarthou,
Executive Director of the Gulf Restoration Network. "The public needs
to know that no more sea turtles are killed just to put grouper on a
dinner plate."
Bottom longline fishing is a fishing process that uses hundreds or
even thousands of baited hooks along miles of lines laid behind fishing
vessels and stretching down to the reef and Gulf floor. The fishing
hooks target species like grouper, tilefish, and sharks, but often
catch other fish or wildlife, including endangered and threatened sea
turtles. Injuries from these hooks affect a sea turtle's ability to
feed, swim, avoid predators, and reproduce. Many times the turtles
drown or, unable to recover from the extreme physiological stress, die
soon after being released from the longlines.
Conservation groups are calling on the new administration to halt
the Gulf of Mexico bottom longline fishery until it can analyze what
measures are necessary to follow the Endangered Species Act. The
continued operation of the bottom longline fishery in the Gulf is
likely to result in the continued death and injury of sea turtles. The
loggerhead turtle faces an especially serious threat from Gulf longline
fishing due to the severe nesting decline over recent years, according
to research by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission.
"In addition to loggerheads, the Kemp's ridley population in the
Gulf of Mexico is struggling to increase from numbers that threatened
extinction in the mid-1980s," said Carole Allen, Gulf office director
at the Sea Turtle Restoration Project. "We simply cannot risk losing
more sea turtles to longline fishing, which has shown no regard for
endangered species."
ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:
A copy of the complaint
filed against the National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic
and Atmospheric Administration, and Department of Commerce in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of Florida.
A copy of the letter
the groups sent to the National Marine Fisheries Service outlining the
immediate dangers to threatened and endangered sea turtles.
Earthjustice is a non-profit public interest law firm dedicated to protecting the magnificent places, natural resources, and wildlife of this earth, and to defending the right of all people to a healthy environment. We bring about far-reaching change by enforcing and strengthening environmental laws on behalf of hundreds of organizations, coalitions and communities.
800-584-6460LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that campaigners linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular