September, 22 2009, 02:28pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brad Luna | Phone: 202/216.1514,Trevor Thomas | Phone: 202/216.1547
Majority of Workers Still Hide Sexual Orientation, Gender Identity at Work
New “Degrees of Equality” report finds persistent negative climate for LGBT workers
WASHINGTON
A
majority - 51 percent - of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
workers continue to hide their identity from most or all co-workers,
according to a new report released today from the Human Rights Campaign
Foundation that examines the real-life experiences of LGBT workers.
The report, "Degrees of Equality: A National Study Examining Workplace
Climate for LGBT Employees," found that, despite significant advances
in employment policies at major U.S. corporations, a majority of LGBT
workers continue to experience a range of negative consequences because
of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Younger workers are
even more likely to hide their LGBT identity - only 5 percent of LGBT
employees ages 18 to 24 say they are totally open at work, compared to
more than 20 percent in older age cohorts. The report is available for
download at www.DegreesOfEquality.org.
majority - 51 percent - of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender
workers continue to hide their identity from most or all co-workers,
according to a new report released today from the Human Rights Campaign
Foundation that examines the real-life experiences of LGBT workers.
The report, "Degrees of Equality: A National Study Examining Workplace
Climate for LGBT Employees," found that, despite significant advances
in employment policies at major U.S. corporations, a majority of LGBT
workers continue to experience a range of negative consequences because
of their sexual orientation and gender identity. Younger workers are
even more likely to hide their LGBT identity - only 5 percent of LGBT
employees ages 18 to 24 say they are totally open at work, compared to
more than 20 percent in older age cohorts. The report is available for
download at www.DegreesOfEquality.org.
"Overall
attitudes towards LGBT people have come a long way, but we can't forget
that people still struggle at work and that this has a profound impact
on LGBT workers' careers," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human
Rights Campaign Foundation. "Degrees of Equality helps us bridge the
gap between policy and practice to fully understand LGBT workers'
experiences. The more we understand the workplace, the more we can
help usher it to a place where all employees can thrive."
attitudes towards LGBT people have come a long way, but we can't forget
that people still struggle at work and that this has a profound impact
on LGBT workers' careers," said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human
Rights Campaign Foundation. "Degrees of Equality helps us bridge the
gap between policy and practice to fully understand LGBT workers'
experiences. The more we understand the workplace, the more we can
help usher it to a place where all employees can thrive."
The
study examined why workers chose to disclose their LGBT identity or
not, how these issues arise in the workplace, the impact they have for
businesses and what can be done to improve productivity and retention.
In recent years, businesses have engaged in sustained efforts to
implement policies aimed at creating safe and productive workplaces for
talented LGBT employees. The number of companies that receive top
ratings on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation Corporate Equality
Index, for example, rose from just 13 in 2002 to 305 in the 2010 report
released last week.
study examined why workers chose to disclose their LGBT identity or
not, how these issues arise in the workplace, the impact they have for
businesses and what can be done to improve productivity and retention.
In recent years, businesses have engaged in sustained efforts to
implement policies aimed at creating safe and productive workplaces for
talented LGBT employees. The number of companies that receive top
ratings on the Human Rights Campaign Foundation Corporate Equality
Index, for example, rose from just 13 in 2002 to 305 in the 2010 report
released last week.
Nevertheless,
significant numbers of LGBT employees continue to experience a negative
workplace climate that affects productivity, retention and professional
relationships. At least once in the past year, 42 percent of LGBT
employees report lying about their personal lives, 27 percent have felt
distracted, 21 percent have job searched and 13 percent have stayed
home from work as a result of working in an environment that is not
always accepting of LGBT people.
significant numbers of LGBT employees continue to experience a negative
workplace climate that affects productivity, retention and professional
relationships. At least once in the past year, 42 percent of LGBT
employees report lying about their personal lives, 27 percent have felt
distracted, 21 percent have job searched and 13 percent have stayed
home from work as a result of working in an environment that is not
always accepting of LGBT people.
As
reasons for hiding their identities, 39 percent fear losing
connections, 28 percent fear not being considered for advancement, 17
percent fear getting fired and more than one in ten (13 percent) fear
for their personal safety. Transgender workers are much more likely
than other groups to report fearing for their personal safety - 40
percent compared to 20 percent of gay men. And 42 percent of
transgender workers feared getting fired if they revealed their LGBT
identity, compare to 22 percent of gay men.
reasons for hiding their identities, 39 percent fear losing
connections, 28 percent fear not being considered for advancement, 17
percent fear getting fired and more than one in ten (13 percent) fear
for their personal safety. Transgender workers are much more likely
than other groups to report fearing for their personal safety - 40
percent compared to 20 percent of gay men. And 42 percent of
transgender workers feared getting fired if they revealed their LGBT
identity, compare to 22 percent of gay men.
An
employee's sexual orientation or gender identity are often unavoidable
in casual, non-work related conversations. These conversations occur
frequently and are an essential component to building productive work
relationships. At least once per week, 89 percent of LGBT employees
say conversations about social lives, 80 percent confront conversations
involving spouses, relationships and dating at least once per week and
50 percent say the topic of sex arises at least once a week. These
conversations are the most likely to make LGBT employees feel
uncomfortable: fewer than half feel very comfortable talking about any
of these topics.
employee's sexual orientation or gender identity are often unavoidable
in casual, non-work related conversations. These conversations occur
frequently and are an essential component to building productive work
relationships. At least once per week, 89 percent of LGBT employees
say conversations about social lives, 80 percent confront conversations
involving spouses, relationships and dating at least once per week and
50 percent say the topic of sex arises at least once a week. These
conversations are the most likely to make LGBT employees feel
uncomfortable: fewer than half feel very comfortable talking about any
of these topics.
Derogatory
comments and jokes still happen at work and are a major indicator that
it is unsafe to be open about their sexual orientation and/or gender
identity at work. A total of 58 percent of LGBT workers say someone at
work makes a joke or derogatory comment about LGBT people at least once
in a while. Similarly, jokes and derogatory comments about other
minority groups are equally indicative of a negative climate. About
two-thirds (62 percent) of LGBT employees say negative comments about
minority groups are made at least once in a while at work.
comments and jokes still happen at work and are a major indicator that
it is unsafe to be open about their sexual orientation and/or gender
identity at work. A total of 58 percent of LGBT workers say someone at
work makes a joke or derogatory comment about LGBT people at least once
in a while. Similarly, jokes and derogatory comments about other
minority groups are equally indicative of a negative climate. About
two-thirds (62 percent) of LGBT employees say negative comments about
minority groups are made at least once in a while at work.
Even
with inclusive employment policies, significant numbers of employees
report negative consequences of an unwelcoming environment for LGBT
employees. Moreover, the vast majority of LGBT workers do not report
instances when they hear an anti-LGBT remark to HR or management. On
average, 67 percent ignore it or let it go, 9 percent raise the issue
with a supervisor and only 5 percent go to HR.
with inclusive employment policies, significant numbers of employees
report negative consequences of an unwelcoming environment for LGBT
employees. Moreover, the vast majority of LGBT workers do not report
instances when they hear an anti-LGBT remark to HR or management. On
average, 67 percent ignore it or let it go, 9 percent raise the issue
with a supervisor and only 5 percent go to HR.
"We've
found that inclusive non-discrimination policies and equal benefits are
the essential first step toward cultivating a productive and engaged
LGBT employee, but they are not the last step," said Daryl Herrschaft,
director of the Workplace Project. "By understanding how LGBT identity
surfaces and unfolds in the workplace, we will be better able to turn
policy into practice and address opportunities to improve productivity
and retention of LGBT employees."
found that inclusive non-discrimination policies and equal benefits are
the essential first step toward cultivating a productive and engaged
LGBT employee, but they are not the last step," said Daryl Herrschaft,
director of the Workplace Project. "By understanding how LGBT identity
surfaces and unfolds in the workplace, we will be better able to turn
policy into practice and address opportunities to improve productivity
and retention of LGBT employees."
The
study is the cornerstone of a new project that will provide employers
with a climate assessment tool and toolkits for improving their
workplaces. The HRC Foundation conducted 14 focus groups to examine
current LGBT workplace experiences and identify key elements of
workplace climate. Since there is no uniform LGBT experience, the
diversity of the working LGBT community was accounted for by conducting
focus groups around race, ethnicity and gender, among other
sub-groupings. In addition, the HRC Foundation commissioned the
largest national survey of LGBT workplace experiences to date,
administered to 761 LGBT workers from across the country. Finally,
in-depth interviews supplemented the research.
study is the cornerstone of a new project that will provide employers
with a climate assessment tool and toolkits for improving their
workplaces. The HRC Foundation conducted 14 focus groups to examine
current LGBT workplace experiences and identify key elements of
workplace climate. Since there is no uniform LGBT experience, the
diversity of the working LGBT community was accounted for by conducting
focus groups around race, ethnicity and gender, among other
sub-groupings. In addition, the HRC Foundation commissioned the
largest national survey of LGBT workplace experiences to date,
administered to 761 LGBT workers from across the country. Finally,
in-depth interviews supplemented the research.
The Human Rights Campaign represents a grassroots force of over 750,000 members and supporters nationwide. As the largest national lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender civil rights organization, HRC envisions an America where LGBT people are ensured of their basic equal rights, and can be open, honest and safe at home, at work and in the community.
LATEST NEWS
Critics Shred JD Vance as He Shrugs Off Millions of Americans Losing Medicaid as 'Minutiae'
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Jul 01, 2025
Vice President J.D. Vance took heat from critics this week when he downplayed legislation that would result in millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage as mere "minutiae."
Writing on X, Vance defended the budget megabill that's currently being pushed through the United States Senate by arguing that it will massively increase funding to Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which he deemed to be a necessary component of carrying out the Trump administration's mass deportation operation.
"The thing that will bankrupt this country more than any other policy is flooding the country with illegal immigration and then giving those migrants generous benefits," wrote Vance. "The [One Big Beautiful Bill] fixes this problem. And therefore it must pass."
He then added that "everything else—the CBO score, the proper baseline, the minutiae of the Medicaid policy—is immaterial compared to the ICE money and immigration enforcement provisions."
It was this line that drew the ire of many critics, as the Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the Senate version of the budget bill would slash spending on Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program by more than $1 trillion over a ten-year-period, which would result in more than 10 million people losing their coverage. Additionally, Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) has proposed an amendment that would roll back the expansion of Medicaid under the 2010 Affordable Care Act, which would likely kick millions more off of the program.
Many congressional Democrats were quick to pounce on Vance for what they said were callous comments about a vital government program.
"So if the only thing that matters is immigration... why didn't you support the bipartisan Lankford-Murphy bill that tackled immigration far better than your Ugly Bill?" asked Rep. Daniel Goldman (D-N.Y.). "And it didn't have 'minutiae' that will kick 12m+ Americans off healthcare or raise the debt by $4tn."
"What happened to you J.D. Vance—author of Hillbilly Elegy—now shrugging off Medicaid cuts that will close rural hospitals and kick millions off healthcare as 'minutiae?'" asked Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.).
Veteran healthcare reporter Jonathan Cohn put some numbers behind the policies that are being minimized by the vice president.
"11.8M projected to lose health insurance," he wrote. "Clinics and hospitals taking a hit, especially in rural areas. Low-income seniors facing higher costs. 'Minutiae.'"
Activist Leah Greenberg, the co-chair of progressive organizing group Indivisible, zeroed in on Vance's emphasis on ramping up ICE's funding as particularly problematic.
"They are just coming right out and saying they want an exponential increase in $$$ so they can build their own personal Gestapo," she warned.
Washington Post global affairs columnist Ishaan Tharoor also found himself disturbed by the sheer size of the funding increase for ICE that Vance is demanding and he observed that "nothing matters more apparently than giving ICE a bigger budget than the militaries of virtually every European country."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Heinrich Should Be Ashamed': Lone Senate Dem Helps GOP Deliver Big Pharma Win
The provision, part of the Senate budget bill, was described as "a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars."
Jul 01, 2025
The deep-pocketed and powerful pharmaceutical industry notched a significant victory on Monday when the Senate parliamentarian ruled that a bill described by critics as a handout to drug corporations can be included in the Republican reconciliation package, which could become law as soon as this week.
The legislation, titled the Optimizing Research Progress Hope and New (ORPHAN) Cures Act, would exempt drugs that treat more than one rare disease from Medicare's drug-price negotiation program, allowing pharmaceutical companies to charge exorbitant prices for life-saving medications in a purported effort to encourage innovation. (Medications developed to treat rare diseases are known as "orphan drugs.")
The consumer advocacy group Public Citizen observed that if the legislation were already in effect, Medicare "would have been barred from negotiating lower prices for important treatments like cancer drugs Imbruvica, Calquence, and Pomalyst."
Among the bill's leading supporters is Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-N.M.), whose spokesperson announced the parliamentarian's decision to allow the measure in the reconciliation package after previously advising that it be excluded. Heinrich is listed as the legislation's only co-sponsor in the Senate, alongside lead sponsor Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.).
"Sen. Heinrich should be ashamed of prioritizing drug corporation profits over lower medicine prices for seniors and people with disabilities," Steve Knievel, access to medicines advocate at Public Citizen, said in a statement Monday. "Patients and consumers breathed a sigh of relief when the Senate parliamentarian stripped the proposal from Republicans' Big Ugly Betrayal, so it comes as a gut punch to hear that Sen. Heinrich welcomed the reversal and continued to champion a proposal that will transfer billions from taxpayers to Big Pharma."
"People across the country are demanding lower drug prices and for Medicare drug price negotiations to be expanded, not restricted," Knievel added. "Sen. Heinrich should apologize to his constituents and start listening to them instead of drug corporation lobbyists."
The Biotechnology Innovation Organization, a lobbying group whose members include pharmaceutical companies, has publicly endorsed and promoted the legislation, urging lawmakers to pass it "as soon as possible."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients."
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office has estimated that the ORPHAN Cures Act would cost U.S. taxpayers around $5 billion over the next decade.
Merith Basey, executive director of Patients For Affordable Drugs Now, said that "patients are infuriated to see the Senate cave to Big Pharma by reviving the ORPHAN Cures Act at the eleventh hour."
"This is a blatant giveaway to the pharmaceutical industry that would keep drug prices high for patients while draining $5 billion in taxpayer dollars," said Basey. "We call on lawmakers to remove this unnecessary provision immediately and stand with an overwhelming majority of Americans who want the Medicare Negotiation program to go further. Medicare negotiation will deliver huge savings for seniors and taxpayers; this bill would undermine that progress."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump-Musk Gutting of USAID Could Lead to More Than 14 Million Deaths Over Five Years: Study
"For many low and middle income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict," said the coordinator behind the study.
Jul 01, 2025
A study published Monday by the medical journal The Lancet found that deep funding cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development, a main target of the Department of Government Efficiency's government-slashing efforts, could result in more than 14 million additional deaths by the year 2030.
For months, humanitarian programs and experts have sounded the alarm on the impact of cutting funding for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which is the largest funding agency for humanitarian and development aid around the globe, according to the study.
"Our analysis shows that USAID funding has been an essential force in saving lives and improving health outcomes in some of the world's most vulnerable regions over the past two decades," said Daniella Cavalcanti, postdoctoral researcher at the Institute of Collective Health and an author of the study, according to a statement published Tuesday. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 91 million deaths were prevented in low and middle income countries thanks programs supported by USAID, according to the study.
The study was coordinated by researchers from the Barcelona Institute for Global Health with the help of the Institute of Collective Health of the Federal University of Bahia, the University of California Los Angeles, and the Manhiça Centre for Health Research, as well as others.
To project the future consequences of USAID funding cuts and arrive at the 14 million figure, the researchers used forecasting models to simulate the impact of two scenarios, continuing USAID funding at 2023 levels versus implementing the reductions announced earlier this year, and then comparing the two.
Those estimated 14 million additional deaths include 4.5 million deaths among children younger than five, according to the researchers.
The journalist Jeff Jarvis shared reporting about the study and wrote "murder" on X on Tuesday.
In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced that the 83% of the programs at USAID were being canceled. In the same post on X, he praised the Department of Government Efficiency, which at that point had already infiltrated the agency. "Thank you to DOGE and our hardworking staff who worked very long hours to achieve this overdue and historic reform," he wrote.
Davide Rasella, research professor at Barcelona Institute for Global Health and coordinator of the study, said in a statement Tuesday that "our projections indicate that these cuts could lead to a sharp increase in preventable deaths, particularly in the most fragile countries. They risk abruptly halting—and even reversing—two decades of progress in health among vulnerable populations. For many low- and middle-income countries, the resulting shock would be comparable in scale to a global pandemic or a major armed conflict."
One country where USAID cuts have had a particularly deadly impact is Sudan, according to The Washington Post, which reported on Monday that funding shortages have led to lack of medical supplies and food in the war-torn nation.
"There's a largely unspoken and growing death toll of non-American lives thanks to MAGA," wrote Ishaan Tharoor, a Post columnist, of the paper's reporting on Sudan.
In reference to the reporting on Sudan, others laid blame on billionaire Elon Musk, the billionaire and GOP mega-donor who was initially tapped to lead the Department of Government Efficiency.
"In a less imperfect world, Musk and [President Donald] Trump would be forever cast as killers of children, and this would be front-page news for months and the subject of Sunday sermons in every church," wrote the journalist David Corn.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular