December, 15 2009, 11:04am EDT

Yemen: End Harsh Repression in South
Shooting of Unarmed Demonstrators, Attacks on Media
SAN'A
Yemeni authorities should stop using unjustified lethal force
against protesters and end attacks on the media in southern Yemen,
Human Rights Watch said in a report released today.
The 73-page report, "In the Name of Unity: The Yemeni Government's Brutal Response to Southern Movement Protests,"
documents attacks by security forces on supporters of the so-called
Southern Movement as well as on journalists, academics, and other
opinion-makers. Based on over 80 interviews with victims in the
southern Yemeni cities of Aden and Mukalla, the report finds that
security forces used lethal force against unarmed demonstrators on at
least six occasions. Over the past year the authorities arbitrarily
arrested thousands of people for exercising their right to peaceful
assembly, suspended independent media critical of government policies,
and detained journalists and writers on spurious charges.
"Yemeni authorities are violating basic rights in the
name of maintaining national unity," said Joe Stork, deputy director at
Human Rights Watch's Middle East division. "Southern Yemenis should
have the right to peacefully assemble and express their opinions, even
on critical issues like secession."
North and South Yemen united as one country in May 1990, but
fought a brief civil war in 1994 in which the north prevailed. Southern
Yemenis contend that central authorities then dismissed many
southerners from the army and government employment and denied southern
Yemen its fair share of national resources. Protests in 2007, initially
led by retired military officers calling for increased pensions or
reinstatement, quickly grew to encompass demands for more jobs, less
corruption, and a greater share of oil revenues.Subsequently, the protests have been led by the Southern
Movement, a loose gathering of protest leaders whose demands have
escalated to include secession and formation of an independent state.
On six occasions during 2008 and 2009, Human Rights Watch found in its
investigation, security forces opened fire on unarmed protesters, often
without warning and aiming at them from short range. At least 11 people
were killed and dozens were wounded.
These protests occurred on May 31, 2009, in al-Dhali'; May 30,
2009, in Shahr; May 21, 2009, in Hashimi Square, Aden; April 15, 2009,
in Habilain; July 4, 2008, in Mafraq al-Shu'aib, al-Dhali'; and January
13, 2008, also in Aden's Hashimi Square.
The Southern Movement is avowedly peaceful, though many civilians
in the south have weapons. Since July there have been more reports of
protesters bringing weapons to demonstrations. Following a Southern
Movement protest on July 23, in Zanjibar, Abyan province, armed guards
of Shaikh Tariq al-Fadhli, a Southern Movement leader, fought a pitched
gun battle with security forces some distance from the protest site in
which at least 12 died and 18 were wounded.
The southern protests often are planned for days of historical
significance, such as the anniversary of independence from Great
Britain in 1967. In its report, Human Rights Watch documents arbitrary
arrests of scores of people, including children, before or during these
protests. Some of those arrested were peaceful participants, while
others were simply passers-by. Although the authorities released most
within a matter of days, suspected protest leaders have been held for
longer periods, resulting in subsequent demonstrations demanding their
release, which have led to fresh police violence.
In a campaign that appeared to escalate in May, Yemeni
authorities have also suspended newspapers, attacked media offices, and
arrested - and in some cases charged and tried -journalists, apparently
for expressing their views peacefully.
The information minister, Hasan al-Luzi, suspended distribution of
eight newspapers in May. By July, some, but not all, were allowed to
resume publication. On May 12, security forces fought an hour-long gun
battle with guards at the Aden compound of Al-Ayyam, Yemen's oldest and largest-circulation independent newspaper, killing one bystander and severely wounding another.
Gha'id Nasr Ali, the Radfan correspondent for Al-Shari' and Al-Thawri
newspapers, was arrested in April 2008 and again in January 2009 over
coverage of protests. In May, and again in July, security forces
prevented Al Jazeera satellite television station correspondents in
Aden from leaving their hotel rooms to cover protests. Authorities also
arrested website editors and writers covering protests.
Trials have begun in 2009 against a few dissidents and
opinion-makers based on charges that criminalize free expression. Qasim
'Askar, a former ambassador of the South Yemeni state, is on trial for
"threatening national unity," as is Husain 'Aqil, an Aden university
professor and Southern Movement spokesperson. Salah al-Saqladi, a
website editor, went on trial in mid-November, on charges of "insulting
the president," "stirring up strife and inciting against unity," "being
in contact with secessionists abroad," and "incitement of violence." In
July, a court of first instance in Qubaita, Lahj province sentenced the
local Al-Ayyam correspondent, Anis Mansur, to 14 months in prison for his coverage of southern protests.
"Yemen's reputation as a country where one can freely speak one's
mind is being badly damaged," said Stork. "The government's recent
attacks on the media and journalists are unprecedented and herald a
dark chapter of state repression if they continue."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
EPA Will Close All Environmental Justice Offices, Zeldin Says
"So many people will needlessly die because of this," said one critic.
Mar 12, 2025
In the Trump administration's latest move to obliterate three decades of work to address the systemic injustices faced by low-income and minority communities across the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday announced plans to shutter all ten of the agency's environmental justice regional offices as well as its central hub addressing the issue in Washington, D.C.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin sent an internal memo to agency officials saying that "reorganizing" and eliminating the offices would help fulfill President Donald Trump's "mandate" to end "forced discrimination programs.
The EPA's Office of Environmental Justice was opened during the Clinton administration and expanded by former Democratic President Joe Biden, who emphasized the office's mission of ensuring "the fair treatment and meaningful involvement of all people regardless of race, color, national origin, or income" with respect to environmental policies.
But Zeldin likened the office's goal of addressing pollution in regions like "Cancer Alley," an 85-mile stretch of land in Louisiana where the high number of petrochemical plants has been linked to higher-than-average cancer rates in predominantly Black and poor communities, to "discrimination"—apparently against wealthy households and white Americans.
"Wait a second, so trying to address environmental pollution and high cancer rates in poor, rural, or minority areas is racist, but the actual fact that polluting is happening is not bad?" asked one critic on social media.
Zeldin's memo came days after the EPA and the Department of Justice dropped a lawsuit filed by the Biden administration against Denka Performance Elastomer plant in Louisiana, where regulators found the company's chloroprene emissions were fueling health problems across nearby communities.
"If anybody needed a clearer sign that this administration gives not a single damn for the people of the United States, this is it," Matthew Tejada, who led EPA environmental justice work for a decade until 2023, toldThe New York Times after Zeldin sent the memo Tuesday.
Zeldin also announced on Monday that he was cancelling 400 grants for environmental justice and diversity initiatives—despite numerous court orders against Trump's attempt to freeze federal funding that has already been appropriated, including one in which the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland prohibited federal agencies from terminating "equity-related" grants.
The administrator claimed Monday that the EPA is "working hand-in-hand with [the Department of Government Efficiency] to rein in wasteful federal spending," but Margie Alt, director of the Climate Action Campaign, said that "cleaning up pollution is only 'wasteful' if you don't believe everyone in America has the equal right to breathe clean air."
"Lee Zeldin's idea of 'accountability' is apparently to create a world of hurt for the most vulnerable while spitting in the face of the law and giving wealthy corporate interests the ability to pollute at will," said Alt. "All the while Elon Musk lines his pockets with billions of taxpayer dollars as his so-called efficiency agents take a hatchet to programs designed to help people at risk survive. Congress must put a stop to Trump's brazen refusal to follow the law and demand these illegally canceled funds already promised to disadvantaged communities are released."
The coming closure of all EPA environmental justice offices suggested that "the GOP way" includes letting "the kids drink sewage water and breathe polluted air to make the 1% richer," said columnist Wajahat Ali.
Former New Hampshire Democratic Party Chair Kathy Sullivan said that for the Trump administration, it is "not enough to ban talking about discrimination," a reference to words and phrases like "inclusiveness" and "inequality" that agencies have flagged in government documents.
"Trump's policies bring back discrimination," said Sullivan.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Bring Him Home': Mahmoud Khalil's Wife Describes 'Nightmare' Arrest, Demands His Safe Return
"Khalil's abduction, in its cruelty and unlawfulness, has horrified people around the country. Let us be clear: This is what fascism looks like, and it is part of a much broader campaign," said the director of Palestine Legal.
Mar 12, 2025
When legal resident and Palestinian student activist Mahmoud Khalil was arrested by U.S. Department of Homeland Security agents on Saturday, his 8-months pregnant wife was with him. In a statement released Tuesday, Khalil's wife recounted the couple's encounter with DHS and begged for her husband's release.
"I demand the U.S. government release him, reinstate his green card, and bring him home," said Khalil's wife, who is not named in the statement.
Khalil, who completed his graduate coursework at Columbia University in December in December and played a prominent role in pro-Palestine protests at the campus last year, was confronted by immigration agents on March 8 who said they were acting on State Department orders to revoke his student visa. Khalil's lawyer told the agents that Khalil has a green card, and the agents said that that had been revoked, too, according to Khalil's attorney.
"This last week has been a nightmare," said Khalil's wife, who said that Mahmoud had emailed Columbia University the day before his arrest and asked the university for legal support because he had been the target of an "intense and targeted doxxing campaign." That email went unanswered, she said.
"Anti-Palestinian organizations were spreading false claims about my husband that were simply not based in reality," she said.
The couple was confronted by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents after coming home from an Iftar dinner in the later evening on Saturday. An officer told Khalil's wife to go upstairs, but she refused, according to the statement.
"The officers later barricaded Mahmoud from me," she said. "We were not shown any warrant and the ICE officers hung up the phone on our lawyer. When my husband attempted to give me his phone so I could speak with our lawyer, the officers got increasingly aggressive, despite Mahmoud being fully cooperative."
She said that the officers handcuffed Khalil and forced him into an unmarked vehicle. "Watching this play out in front of me was traumatizing: It felt like a scene from a movie I never signed up to watch," she said. "I am pleading with the world to continue to speak up against his unjust and horrific detention by the Trump administration."
After Khalil was arrested on Saturday he was transferred multiple states away to an ICEprocessing center in Jena, Louisiana.
A federal judge on Monday temporarily halted the Trump administration's effort to deport Khalil, and on Wednesday Khalil's legal defense is set to appear in court for a hearing before that same judge.
"Khalil's abduction, in its cruelty and unlawfulness, has horrified people around the country. Let us be clear: This is what fascism looks like, and it is part of a much broader campaign," said Dima Khalidi, the founder and director of Palestine Legal, in an article for The Nation published Tuesday.
U.S. President Donald Trump, who has pledged to crack down on pro-Palestine protesters on university campuses, said Khalil's arrest is "the first arrest of many to come."
The administration accuses Khalil of supporting Hamas, but neither White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, DHS, nor ICE have provided evidence to support their accusations against Khalil, according to CNN.
Reuters reported that the judge could order Khalil's release, but deportation proceedings could still continue in a separate immigration court, teeing up a test of "where immigration courts draw the line between protected free speech and alleged support for groups the United States calls terrorists."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Will Senate Democrats Cave to Trump and Musk by Helping GOP Pass Its Anti-Working Class Funding Bill?
Opposing the Republican president's lawless rampage against the federal government, a massive giveaway to billionaires, and vicious attacks on the working class "should be an open-and-shut case," said one commentator.
Mar 12, 2025
House Republicans on Tuesday pushed through a six-month government funding package with the help of just one Democrat—Rep. Jared Golden of Maine.
But Republicans in the Senate are going to need much more assistance from the minority party to pass the legislation, which would give the Trump administration and unelected billionaire Elon Muskfree rein to continue their assault on the nation's working class.
With Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) expected to break ranks and oppose the stopgap funding measure, the GOP will need the support of at least eight Democratic senators to get the bill to President Donald Trump's desk before the government shuts down on Friday at midnight.
Senate Democrats are publicly agonizing over their options, torn between effectively greenlighting the Trump administration's lawless rampage through federal agencies and allowing a painful government shutdown. The House skipped town following Tuesday's vote, meaning a shutdown is virtually guaranteed if the GOP funding bill goes down in the Senate.
The American Prospect's David Dayen argued Wednesday that opposing the bill "should be an open-and-shut case" for Democratic senators given the damage the measure itself would inflict—including $13 billion in cuts to non-military spending, from affordable housing to public health programs to IRS enforcement—as well as the green light it would give Trump and Musk to "continue to ignore Congress and toss out disfavored spending."
"In fact, the House Republican bill gives the president more leeway to move money around," Dayen observed. "It appropriates money for things that Musk has eliminated, meaning that money can operate as a floating slush fund for Trump's priorities, as long as the courts don't roll back the illegal impoundments."
"If you're a member of Congress, you're being told that your work product doesn't matter, that the constitutional power of the purse doesn't matter, and that there's no guarantee that anything you pass will actually reach the people you serve," he added. "Yet Senate Democrats, really the last line of defense against a unilateral government where all spending runs through Donald Trump, haven't committed to the simple proposition that any budgetary requirement they pass must actually be spent. If they can't stand for that, what can they stand for?"
"Who would that hurt the most? Working people. Billionaires win, families lose. Republicans' values are clear."
At least one Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.), has pledged to support the Republican package, and other members of the caucus are on the fence.
"It's a very tough choice," said Sen. Angus King (D-Maine).
Politicoreported Wednesday that most of the 20 Democrats it surveyed shortly after the House vote "were noncommital" on the GOP bill, which would fund the government through September.
Some Democratic senators have unequivocally denounced the Republican funding stopgap, which comes in lieu of full-year, bipartisan appropriations bills that typically impose constraints on the executive branch.
"After months of bipartisan talks, they're walking away from the negotiating table and offering a non-starter House bill that forces us to the brink of a full government shutdown," Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) said of GOP lawmakers in a scathing floor speech on Tuesday. "And who would that hurt the most? Working people. Billionaires win, families lose. Republicans' values are clear."
"In addition to giving co-presidents Trump and Musk the power to spend taxpayer money wherever they want, the House Republicans also propose general cuts," said Warren. "Cuts from programs that help families put food on the table, afford child care, and keep our communities safe. Cuts from local communities for projects like improving hospitals, teaching facilities, and childcare centers—millions of funding that the House and Senate had already agreed to."
Kobie Christian, a spokesperson for the advocacy coalition Unrig Our Economy, echoed Warren, calling the House GOP bill "a fundamental betrayal of veterans, seniors, and working-class Americans nationwide."
"Why are Republicans pushing these drastic cuts and enabling Trump's costly tariffs that will make things worse for millions of Americans, including their own constituents? The answer is simple," said Christian. "This is just another step in congressional Republicans' plot to give billionaires a massive payday, while everyday Americans pay the price. Next week, Congress will head home for House recess and hear from their constituents who want their representatives to stand up against corporate interests, stop their pro-billionaire agenda, and fight for working people instead."
As an alternative to the Republican bill, the top Democratic appropriators in the House and Senate have put forth a short-term continuing resolution that would fund the government through April 11 and give lawmakers time to complete full-year spending negotiations.
There's no indication Republicans, who control both chambers of Congress, would be willing to support the alternative offered by Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) and Rep. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.).
"Speaker Johnson's slush fund continuing resolution empowers President Trump and Elon Musk to pick winners and losers with taxpayer dollars, and make no mistake: it shortchanges families and includes painful funding cuts for bipartisan domestic priorities like cancer research, Army Corps projects, and much more," Murray and DeLauro warned.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular