March, 25 2010, 03:17pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Friends of the Earth: Scott Baumgartner, sbaumgartner@foe.org, 202-222-0751
American Meat Institute: Dave Ray, dray@meatami.com, 202-587-4243
Clean Air Task Force: Jonathan Lewis, jlewis@catf.us, 617-894-3788
Grocery Manufacturers Association: Scott Openshaw, sopenshaw@gmaonline.org, 202-295-3957
National Council of Chain Restaurants: Kathy Grannis, grannisk@nrf.com, 202-783-7971
Natural Resources Defense Council: Suzanne Struglinski, sstruglinski@nrdc.org, 202-423-6004
Oxfam America: Laura Rusu, lrusu@oxfamamerica.org, 202-496-1169
Taxpayers for Common Sense: Steve Ellis, steve@taxpayer.net, 202-546-8500 ext. 126
Bill Introduced to Extend Wasteful Ethanol Tax Credits
Broad coalition says providing subsidies for the ethanol industry bad for environment, food prices and taxpayers
WASHINGTON
Today, Congressman Earl Pomeroy (D-ND) introduced a bill that would
extend ethanol tax credits for another five years, to 2015. This tax
credit is set to expire on December 31, 2010. If extended, the tax
credits will provide the conventional ethanol industry with $30 billion
over five years.
A group of organizations representing environmental, hunger, industry
and taxpayer interests denounced the proposed extension of ethanol tax
credits.
Kate McMahon, Energy Policy Campaigner at Friends of the
Earth, said:
"Continuing to subsidize dirty corn ethanol is outrageous. Congress
already mandates a market for ethanol use. The oil and ethanol
industries need no further help from the American people. This money
should be invested in more cutting-edge, clean, and renewable energy
that won't cause environmental degradation and increase food prices."
J. Patrick Boyle, President and CEO, American Meat Institute,
said:
"Unfortunately, this bill continues the unfair support and protection
corn-based ethanol has enjoyed for more than 30 years at the expense of
the American taxpayer and the livestock and poultry producers who rely
on corn for feed. It's time for the corn-based ethanol industry to stop
using the American taxpayers as a crutch and finally compete on its own
in our free market system."
Jonathan Lewis, Attorney and Climate Specialist for the Clean
Air Task Force, said:
"If we hope to get ourselves out of the global climate change hole,
the first thing we need to do is stop digging. This bill does just the
opposite by lavishing taxpayer dollars on corn ethanol, a fuel that's
even worse for the climate than gasoline. Renewing the corn ethanol
subsidy makes no sense for our economy or for the environment."
Geoff Moody, Manager of Federal Affairs at the Grocery
Manufacturers Association, said:
"The Grocery Manufacturers Association fully supports truly
sustainable advanced biofuels and extension of the cellulosic ethanol
tax credit. Unfortunately, this bill would also extend the unnecessary
corn ethanol tax credit and import tariff at the expense of more
sustainable biofuels. We urge Congress to instead shift government
investments to advanced biofuels that do not pit our energy security
against our food security."
Scott Vinson, Vice President of the National Council of Chain
Restaurants, said
"In a time of ballooning federal deficits, it is high time for the
government to say no to the ethanol lobby's seemingly endless demands
for more subsidies from the hard-pressed American taxpayer. Restaurants
have to do business without government support in an intensely
competitive market, and the ethanol industry needs to prove it can exist
without taxpayers and consumers footing the bill. Congress is going to
have to make some tough choices about how it spends taxpayers' money,
and the ethanol sector is looking increasingly like a bad investment."
Franz Matzner, Climate Center Legislative Director at the Natural
Resources Defense Council, said:
"Taxpayers should no longer throw good money after bad when it comes
to subsidizing corn ethanol. The public should get something in return
for its hard earned money, and that means demanding real environmental
performance. It's time to invest in the future, not the past."
Gawain Kripke, Director of Policy & Research at Oxfam
America, said:
"Congress should not waste taxpayer dollars by extending the current
tax credits. The current package of ethanol mandates, incentives and
subsidies is driving a rapid growth in ethanol production and the
diversion of huge volumes of agriculture products from food markets to
energy use. This year, the US will burn nearly one-third of our corn
harvest in gas tanks, which drives up the price of corn. This has big
implications for hunger, climate change, and land use around the world,
contributing to food insecurity in developing countries."
Steve Ellis, Vice President at Taxpayers for Common Sense,
said:
"For more than three decades the ethanol industry has received
generous subsidies from taxpayers. With Americans staring into a
budgetary abyss for the foreseeable future, blowing billions on more
ethanol subsidies doesn't make sense. Expanding the ethanol tax credit
is fiscally reckless. Instead, Congress should be considering its
repeal."
LATEST NEWS
X Suspends Journalist Ken Klippenstein Over Publication of JD Vance Dossier
"The 'free speech absolutist' has once again silenced a journalist he didn't like," said one observer.
Sep 26, 2024
X—the social media platform formerly known as Twitter—suspended Ken Klippenstein's account Thursday after the investigative journalist posted an article containing a link to a dossier on Republican U.S. vice presidential candidate JD Vance that allegedly came from an Iranian hack of former President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign.
Klippenstein, who formerly worked at The Intercept, said on his paid Substack Thursday that his X account was suspended for violating the platform's ban on posting private information.
"I know that it is general practice to delete 'private' information from leaks and classified documents, but in this case, not only is Vance an elected official and vice presidential candidate, but the information is readily available for anyone to buy," he wrote. Vance is also the junior U.S. senator from Ohio.
Klippenstein continued:
We should be honest about so-called private information contained in the dossier and "private" information in general. It is readily available to anyone who can buy it. The campaign purchased this information from commercial information brokers. Those dealers make huge profits from selling this data. And the media knows it, because they buy the data for reporting purposes, just like the campaign. They don't like to mention that though.
According to Klippenstein, the corporate media has "been sitting on" the dossier since June, "declining to publish in fear of finding itself at odds with the government's campaign against 'foreign malign influence.'"
"If the document had been hacked by some 'Anonymous'-like hacker group, the news media would be all over it," he contended. "I'm just not a believer of the news media as an arm of the government, doing its work combatting foreign influence. Nor should it be a gatekeeper of what the public should know."
Klippenstein shared a general overview of the contents of the dossier, which he described as "a 271-page research paper the Trump campaign prepared to vet" Vance, pulling out select quotes from the document:
- "Vance has been one of the chief obstructionists to U.S. efforts to providing [sic] assistance to Ukraine."
- "Vance criticized public health experts and elected officials for supporting Black Lives Matter protests while condemning anti-lockdown [Covid] protests."
- "Vance 'embraced non-interventionism."
- "In 2020, Vance criticized President Trump's airstrike killing Iranian General Qasem Soleimani, worrying it would continue to bog down America in the Middle East to the advantage of China."
- "Vance suggested that the country had been entangled in wars in the Middle East so 'financial elites' could profit from the rise of China."
"While the news media has paraphrased some of the contents of the dossier, what they haven't done is provide the American people with the underlying document, in the language in which it appeared, so they can decide for themselves what they think," Klippenstein said. "You decide for yourself."
An X spokesperson toldZeteo's Justin Baragona that "Ken Klippenstein was temporarily suspended for violating our rules on posting unredacted private personal information, specifically Sen. Vance's physical addresses and the majority of his Social Security number."
The Federal Bureau of Investigation is investigating the Trump campaign's claim of an Iranian hack. Iran's government denies any such action.
Numerous observers accused Musk—a self-described "free speech absolutist"—of hypocrisy over X's suspension of Klippenstein's account, although it is not known if the billionaire owner had any role in the decision. Other users also reported punitive action against their accounts over the dossier post.
"I'm old enough to remember when free speech zealot Elon Musk was outraged by Twitter's censorship," journalist Seth Hettena said on X.
Jacobin writer Branko Marcetic posted that "this scenario is actually a good preview of the future none of us want, but that we're heading to currently: A major story breaks, establishment press refuses to cover it, and the indy media that does is throttled by tech censors."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Helene's Catastrophic Potential Stokes Fear Amid Florida Insurance Crisis
Florida already has one of the nation's largest shares of homeowners "who don't have meaningful insurance."
Sep 26, 2024
Hurricane Helene continued barreling toward Florida on Thursday, highlighting the impacts of the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency, including difficulties securing insurance coverage in regions most affected by extreme weather.
"The Air Force Hurricane Hunters found that the maximum sustained winds have increased to near 120 mph," the National Hurricane Center said Thursday afternoon. "This makes Helene a dangerous Category 3 major hurricane. Additional strengthening is expected before Helene makes landfall in the Florida Big Bend this evening."
Federal Emergency Management Agency Director Deanne Criswell said during a White House briefing that forecasts suggest Helene will make a "dead-on hit to Tallahassee" and "this is going to be a multistate event with the potential for significant impacts from Florida all the way to Tennessee."
Although this Atlantic hurricane season hasn't yet been as intense as U.S. scientists expected, trends in extreme weather disasters have led some insurance companies to exit the Florida market in recent years. Farmers Insurance announced last year that it would stop covering property in the state, in an effort to "effectively manage risk exposure."
While the Insurance Information Institute, an industry trade group, said in May that "legislative reforms passed in 2022 and 2023 have created a pathway to a stable Florida market," reporting from this week shows that residents—who aren't ultrarich—are still struggling to get and keep coverage.
"Florida ranks sixth among states with the largest shares of homeowners who don't have meaningful insurance. About 18% of homeowners across the state—about 1 in 6—are without it," NBC Newsnoted Wednesday. "Nearly 20% of Florida homeowners pay $4,000 or more a year for homeowners insurance—the largest share in the country, according to the Census Bureau."
According toThe Palm Beach Post, the global reinsurance broker Gallagher Re said in a Wednesday analysis that "landfall in the Big Bend or Panhandle region of Florida as a major hurricane (Category 3, 4, or 5) has historically translated to insured losses in the low single-digit billions."
"But Helene is not a typical storm," the firm explained. "Given Helene's very large wind radius, this would still bring hurricane-force wind gusts and high storm surge to coastal areas in the heavily populated Tampa Bay area, tropical storm force winds across most of the Florida peninsula, Georgia, the Carolinas, Tennessee, and southern Appalachia."
Gallagher Re suggested that "Helene's private insurance market losses should be expected to land in the range" of $3 billion to $6 billion, but if the hurricane "unexpectedly" moves toward Tampa, it could be over $10 billion.
Florida isn't the only state facing insurance trouble thanks to climate chaos. Voxreported last year that "insuring property in California has been a dicey proposition," pointing to torrential rainfall that "caused as much as $1.5 billion in insured losses" and "the costliest wildfires in U.S. history, including the 2018 Camp Fire, which led to more than $10 billion in losses."
Amid the intertwined climate and insurance crises, scientists, campaigners, and homeowners have demanded policy action—and elevated criticism of right-wing attacks on crucial programs.
In a June blog post, Rachel Cleetus, policy director with the Union of Concerned Scientists' Climate and Energy program, wrote that "Congress and regulators need to ensure more transparency in the insurance market on how companies are evaluating risks as they make decisions about premiums. There also needs to be better information on what kinds of incentives companies are providing for adaptation measures that would help reduce risks."
"Alongside the necessary but ultimately bounded role of insurance in a warming world, public and private decision-makers must also shift investments away from business-as-usual maladaptive and risky choices to more resilient ones," Cleetus continued. "The nation must scale up resources for climate resilience and ensure they are reaching communities in a just and equitable way. Funding for safe, affordable, and climate-resilient housing must be expanded."
The Climate & Community Institute on Wednesday also shared recommendations in a new report—Shared Fates: A Housing Resilience Policy Vision for the Home Insurance Crisis—using case studies from California, Florida, and Minnesota.
"We propose the creation of Housing Resilience Agencies (HRAs), either by states or the federal government," the institute said. These agencies would:
- Provide public disaster insurance that offers fair and equitable protections;
- Coordinate and oversee comprehensive, community-oriented disaster risk reduction;
- Address existing market failures by providing coverage for oft-neglected sectors such as multifamily housing providers, mobile home dwellers, and heirs properties; and
- Host public risk models, climate risk advisory councils, and diverse governing boards to inform decision-making in a transparent and democratic manner.
"In order to confront the growing housing safety and affordability crisis, we need to understand our fates as shared," the institute added. "We must reimagine our home insurance system for it to reduce risk and provide equitable and fair protection."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Giuliani Permanently Disbarred in DC Over Effort to Overturn 2020 Election
"Imagine once being dubbed 'America's Mayor' and having an illustrious legal and political career, and throwing it all away for Donald Trump," said one observer.
Sep 26, 2024
Former Republican New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani can no longer practice law in the nation's capital after a federal appeals court on Thursday concurred with a disciplinary committee's recommendation for permanent disbarment over his efforts to "undermine the results of the 2020 presidential election" in service of then-President Donald Trump's "Big Lie."
In a one-page ruling, the Washington, D.C. Court of Appeals permanently revoked Giuliani's law license, finding that the former federal prosecutor and personal attorney for Trump failed to explain why he should not be subject to reciprocal punishment after the New York Supreme Court's Appellate Division disbarred him in July for lying about the 2020 election.
The New York tribunal found that Giuliani "repeatedly and intentionally made false statements, some of which were perjurious, to the federal court, state lawmakers, the public... and this court concerning the 2020 presidential election, in which he baselessly attacked and undermined the integrity of this country's electoral process."
Giuliani is also facing criminal charges related to alleged election subversion in Arizona and Georgia. He filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy last December following a $148 million defamation judgment for falsely accusing two former Georgia election workers of engaging in a nonexistent conspiracy to "steal" the 2020 election.
These blows, culminating in Thursday's D.C. disbarment, mark a stunning fall from grace for Giuliani, who, as "America's Mayor" in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, was named Time's "Person of the Year." Giuliani parlayed his popularity into a 2008 run for president in which he was an early GOP front-runner.
Giuliani spokesperson Ted Goodman slammed the D.C. court's ruling as a "miscarriage of justice."
"Members of the legal community who want to protect the integrity of our justice system should immediately speak out against this partisan, politically motivated decision," Goodman said in a statement.
Some observers linked Giuliani's disbarment to Thursday's indictment of current New York City Mayor Eric Adams, a Democrat, on corruption charges.
"Tough day for New York City mayors,"
quippedDemocracy Docket founder Marc Elias.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular