May, 21 2010, 11:35am EDT
![Human Rights Watch (HRW)](https://assets.rbl.ms/50602809/origin.jpg)
DR Congo: New Round of LRA Killing Campaign
US Should Urgently Implement New Law to Help End Attacks
WASHINGTON
The Ugandan rebel Lord's Resistance Army (LRA) slaughtered 96
civilians and abducted dozens more between January and early April 2010
in a brutal killing campaign in northeastern Democratic Republic of
Congo, Human Rights Watch said today. There has been no letup of LRA
atrocities since Human Rights Watch reported on a deadly LRA rampage that took place in December 2009.
Human Rights Watch urged the US government to swiftly implement the
new legislation to develop a comprehensive strategy to protect
civilians in Central Africa from LRA attacks, to ensure the rule of
law, and, together with regional governments, to take steps to end
violence by the rebel group. Last week, the US Congress passed the
bill, the LRA Disarmament and Northern Uganda Recovery Act of 2009, with broad bipartisan support. President Barack Obama is expected to sign it soon.
"The LRA is killing civilians and abducting children at an alarming
rate," said Anneke Van Woudenberg, senior Africa researcher at Human
Rights Watch. "President Obama can play a crucial role by moving
quickly on the new US law to help find solutions that will end LRA
violence once and for all."
A recent Human Rights Watch research mission to the LRA-affected
areas of northeastern Congo found that from February 1 to13, a group of
about 20 LRA combatants killed at least 74 civilians during a series of
organized attacks on the small fishing and farming communities of
Munuku, Kpanga, Mapi, and Kpuru in Manziga chieftaincy of Niangara
territory. Many of those killed were elderly people who had been unable
to flee, and 14 were children.
One of the first communities attacked was the village of Munuku, 50
kilometers from the town of Niangara, where at least 24 civilians were
killed on February 1, including 15 elderly men and women. Witnesses
interviewed by Human Rights Watch said the LRA killed most of their
victims by crushing their skulls with large wooden sticks. Others were
shot, including a 70-year-old man who was shot and then stabbed to
death in the chest with a bayonet.
The LRA then moved on to the neighboring village of Kpanga,
attacking it on February 2, and continued toward Mapi and Kpuru in the
days that followed. In each village the LRA killed civilians, abducted
children and adults, and then looted and burned down homes. A young man
interviewed by Human Rights Watch who arrived in Kpanga just after the
attack found his grandmother and grandfather tied up and shot dead
outside his home. Nearby, another 70-year-old woman had been tied up
and beaten to death with a wooden bat.
During the same series of attacks, the LRA abducted at least 75
civilians, many of them children. As they did in the mid-December
massacres in the Makombo area, the LRA tied their captives at the waist
in human chains and forced them to carry looted goods back to camps in
the forest, killing anyone who appeared tired or who was deemed to be
too old to be useful.
In addition to the series of attacks in early February, the LRA killed 22 civilians
during smaller attacks throughout the Manziga area this year. On
January 20, for example, in the village of Nabo, the LRA tied up a
74-year-old man, then crushed his skull and stabbed him in the back
with a large wooden stick. His brother found his body a few days later
with the stick still stuck in his back.
On April 13, the LRA abducted and mutilated a 31-year-old woman from
Quartier Zande, a neighborhood on the outskirts of Niangara. After
clasping her lips together with pliers, the LRA combatants forced a
16-year-old Congolese boy, abducted during a previous attack, to slice
off her lips and her right ear with a knife.
Human Rights Watch research, including interviews with those
abducted who later escaped, found that the killings and other
atrocities were carried out by LRA commanders who report to Gen.
Dominic Ongwen, one of the LRA's top commanders. Ongwen, along with two
other LRA leaders, is sought by the International Criminal Court under
an arrest warrant issued in July 2005 for previous crimes committed in
northern Uganda. All three remain at large.
"The arrest warrants for LRA leaders have been outstanding for
nearly five years," Van Woudenberg said. "Meanwhile, heinous abuses
continue to be committed."
The United Nations peacekeeping mission in Congo (MONUC) has a base
in the town of Niangara, just south of the Manziga chieftaincy. With
few troops and poor roads in the area, the UN peacekeepers rarely leave
the town and have been unable to prevent or respond to the recent
attacks.
The Congolese and Ugandan armed forces also have a presence in the
town and the surrounding area but with poor logistics and
communications capabilities, they too have been unable to provide
adequate security for civilians. In recent weeks, Congolese officials
have been more active in documenting LRA atrocities. In April, a
high-level team from Kinshasa was sent to Niangara to investigate and
report on LRA crimes against Congolese civilians.
"Both the peacekeepers and the Congolese government need to increase
their presence in northeastern Congo with forces equipped to protect
civilians and to respond quickly to LRA attacks," Van Woudenberg said.
"Increased humanitarian assistance to victims and civilians forced to
flee the attacks is also urgently needed."
Human Rights Watch called on the Obama administration and other
donor governments to work with Congolese authorities to improve
communication systems in LRA-affected areas to permit UN peacekeepers
and others to respond quickly to attacks and to find out where LRA
leaders are hiding. This could include funding the expansion of cell
phone networks and community radio stations.
The killings in the Manziga chieftaincy followed a four-day massacre
in the nearby Makombo area in December 2009. LRA combatants, also
operating under Ongwen's command, attacked numerous villages, in one of
the single largest massacres by the LRA in its 23-year history. Local
leaders interviewed by Human Rights Watch reported they have recently
uncovered another 24 bodies from this LRA attack, bringing the death
toll to at least 345.
The recent killings are part of a longstanding practice of
atrocities and abuse by the LRA. Pushed out of northern Uganda in 2005,
the LRA now operates in the remote border area between southern Sudan,
Congo, and the Central African Republic.
In December 2008, the governments of the region, led by the Ugandan
armed forces and with intelligence and logistical support from the
United States, opened a military campaign against the LRA in
northeastern Congo, Operation Lightning Thunder. But the military
campaign has failed to end the violence or to apprehend the LRA's
leaders.
"The US government has depended on the Ugandan army to end the
threat of the LRA, but this strategy is not working," Van Woudenberg
said. "The Obama administration, together with governments in the
region and other concerned states, should go back to the drawing board
and develop new policy options to end the LRA's violence, including a
more effective strategy to apprehend LRA leaders implicated in
atrocities."
On May 19, human rights defenders in Niangara issued a public appeal
to President Obama: "We live each day in fear that there will be more
attacks by the LRA...We know that you alone can bring a concrete,
rapid, and decisive response before our women and children are wiped
out."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that campaigners linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular