SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

Tel:
+1-212-216-1832
Email: hrwpress@hrw.org
The Iranian judiciary should immediately suspend plans to execute
Mohammad Reza Haddadi and permanently revoke his death sentence, Human
Rights Watch said today. Haddadi, now 23, is scheduled to be executed on
July 7, 2010, for a murder he allegedly committed when he was just 15
years old. International law prohibits the imposition of the death
sentence on child offenders.
On July 4, Haddadi's family received a summons indicating that their
son is scheduled to be executed on July 7. This is at least the third
time prison authorities have notified Haddadi's family of his imminent
execution. On May 27, 2009, Ayatollah Hashemi Shahroudi, who was then
head of the judiciary, intervened at the last minute and halted the
execution. The government rescheduled Haddadi's execution for July 16,
2009, but the judiciary spared his life again.
"Haddadi's execution order is not just unlawful - it is cruel and
inhuman," said Sarah Leah Whitson, Middle East director at Human Rights
Watch. "It is also needlessly cruel to his family that they have had to
endure constant reminders during the past seven years that their child
is at imminent risk of execution."
Under Iranian law, majority is attained at the age of puberty as
stipulated by Sharia law. Under Iran's 1991 Civil Code, puberty is
attainted at 15 lunar years (14 years and 5 months) for boys and 9 lunar
years (8 years and 8 months) for girls, allowing judges to sentence
children at these ages as adults. However, Iran is a party to the United
Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child and the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, both of which explicitly
prohibit sentencing individuals to death for crimes committed under age
18.
On January 6, 2004, a court in Shiraz found Haddadi and his
co-defendants guilty of kidnapping and hiding the body of Mohammad
Bagher Rahmat in an attempt to steal the victim's car. In addition, the
court convicted Haddadi of Rahmat's murder. Rahmat's body was burned and
buried at the side of a road. Mohammad Mostafaei, Haddadi's lawyer,
said his client initially confessed to suffocating Rahmat with a belt
after his co-defendants had struck Rahmat over the head with a stone and
locked him in the trunk of the car. Later, on October 30, 2003, Haddadi
again confessed to the killing during a court session.
After Haddadi's family received the latest summons, Human Rights
Watch spoke to Haddadi's father who told Human Rights Watch that he was
en route to Shiraz to visit his son before the order is carried out and
indicated that he had spoken to his son once during the past few weeks.
He called on the authorities to spare his son's life and retry him in
light of strong evidence suggesting his innocence and said his son's
co-defendants manipulated him into taking the blame for the murder by
promising that they would give his family money in return.
At the time of the murder, Haddadi was the only one under age 18 who
was implicated in the crime.
In his blog, Mostafaei indicated that when his client realized that
he had been fooled by his co-defendants, he wrote a letter to the court
informing it that he had taken no part in the murder and had only
accepted blame because of his co-defendants' false promises. Despite
this, Branch 24 of the Supreme Court confirmed Haddadi's death sentence
on July 3, 2005. Mostafaei has also cited other evidence indicating that
Haddadi was not guilty of the crime.
"The allegation that Haddadi was manipulated into taking the blame
precisely because he was younger than the other co-defendants should
provide compelling reason of itself to suspend his execution" Whitson
said.
Iran leads all countries of the world in executing juvenile
offenders. Since January 2005, only four other countries are known to
have executed juvenile offenders - Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Pakistan, and
Yemen. The judiciary issued Haddadi's death sentence despite a 2004
order by then-Head of the Judiciary Ayatollah Hashemi Shahrudi banning
death sentences for individuals convicted of crimes committed under the
age of 18.
Iran executed at least four juvenile offenders in 2009 and eight in
2008. According to human rights lawyers in Iran, more than a 100
juvenile offenders are currently on death row.
"Regardless of guilt or innocence, no one should be executed for a
crime committed as a child," Whitson said. "The Iranian judiciary should
show Haddadi mercy and abide by Iran's international obligations
banning executions for crimes committed by children."
Human Rights Watch is one of the world's leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and protecting human rights. By focusing international attention where human rights are violated, we give voice to the oppressed and hold oppressors accountable for their crimes. Our rigorous, objective investigations and strategic, targeted advocacy build intense pressure for action and raise the cost of human rights abuse. For 30 years, Human Rights Watch has worked tenaciously to lay the legal and moral groundwork for deep-rooted change and has fought to bring greater justice and security to people around the world.
"Mullin’s long list of conflicts of interest even as he seeks this next level of public office is reprehensible."
Government watchdog Public Citizen on Thursday slammed the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee for voting to advance the nomination of Republican Sen. Markwayne Mullin to be the next US homeland security secretary.
Shortly after the committee delivered an 8-to-7 vote to advance Mullin's (R-Okla.) nomination out of committee, Public Citizen co-president Lisa Gilbert described the move as "simply inappropriate."
"It is inappropriate because of his self-enrichment," Gilbert said. "Mullin’s long list of conflicts of interest even as he seeks this next level of public office is reprehensible."
The New York Times reported on Sunday that Mullin has grown significantly wealthier throughout his tenure first as a US congressman then as a US senator, in part because he is "one of the most prolific stock buyers in Congress."
According to financial disclosure forms cited by the Times, Mullin's net worth in 2024 was between $29 million and $97 million, a massive jump from the estimated net worth of $2.8 million to $9 million he reported in 2012.
In addition to citing Mullin's self-enrichment during his political career, Gilbert decried the senator's past statements defending actions taken by federal immigration enforcement officials, including the fatal shootings of Minneapolis residents Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
"It is inappropriate because Mullin has consistently defended ICE agents involved in fatal shootings," said Gilbert, "and justified the use of lethal force in enforcement operations, rather than calling for accountability or reform of use-of-force policies. It is inappropriate because he treats protest against ICE operations as a prosecutable offense rather than a legitimate exercise of First Amendment rights and an expression of community concern."
While Mullin on Wednesday walked back his past attack on Pretty as "deranged," he stood by his claim that the shooting of Good was entirely justified.
Mullin's nomination advanced to the Senate floor after Sen. John Fetterman (D-Pa.) broke with his party, canceling out the "no" vote on the committee delivered by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.), who got into an angry spat with Mullin on Wednesday over past comments the Oklahoma Republican made justifying a 2017 assault on his colleague from Kentucky.
In a social media post defending his vote to advance Mullin, Fetterman argued that "we need a leader" at the US Department of Homeland Security and said his vote in favor of the nomination was "rooted in a strong committed, constructive working relationship with Senator Mullin for our nation’s security."
A majority of those polled in a new Data for Progress survey also said that the war "is not worth the risk."
As President Donald Trump says he's "not afraid" of a Vietnam-style invasion of Iran and is reportedly considering sending thousands more US troops to the Middle East, polling published Thursday reveals that most American voters strongly oppose boots on the ground in a war a majority believe isn't worth it.
Just over two-thirds—68%—of respondents to the Data for Progress survey said they oppose deploying US ground troops to Iran, while just 26% support such action. Among Democratic respondents, 86% were against a ground invasion, which is also opposed by 71% of Independents. Republicans were split, with 48% supporting and 48% opposing sending troops into Iran.
Slightly more than half (52%) of those polled said they agree with the statement "going to war with Iran is not worth the risk because it will cost billions of dollars and result in the deaths of civilians and more American service members," 13 of whom have been killed during a war whose globally defining moment thus far has been the massacre of around 175 children and staff at a girls' school bombed by the US.
Among Democrats, 77% of survey respondents said the war isn't worth it. Conversely, 64% of Republicans said the war on Iran is worthwhile.
NEW: A strong majority of voters (68%) would oppose the U.S. putting boots on the ground in Iran.This includes 85% of Democrats, 71% of Independents, and about half of Republicans.
[image or embed]
— Data for Progress (@dataforprogress.org) March 19, 2026 at 8:38 AM
The Data for Progress survey follows Wednesday's publication of a Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft poll revealing that nearly 8 in 10 people who voted for Trump in 2024—when he campaigned heavily on a "no new wars" platform—want a swift end to the war on Iran.
Nearly three weeks into the US-Israeli war that Trump said was "won" more than a week ago, Iran remains undefeated, launching missiles and drones at targets throughout the Middle East, paralyzing international shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, and demonstrating continuity of government as Israel assassinates one of its leaders after another.
As the war grinds on with no clear objective or exit strategy, the Pentagon is reportedly seeking more money and more troops for the fight. Democratic senators have warned that the US is "on a path" to a land invasion of Iran. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has reportedly approved the deployment of more warships and thousands of Marines to the region.
Asked Wednesday by a reporter if he is afraid of "another Vietnam"—where more than 58,000 US troops and around 50 times as many Vietnamese, Cambodians, and Laotians were killed over two decades—Trump replied, "I'm really not afraid of anything."
The Pentagon is now reportedly asking Congress to authorize another $200 billion for a war that's already costing taxpayers around a billion dollars a day.
This, as American workers and families struggle to make ends meet as the price of gas and other consumer goods spike amid an expensive betrayal of Trump's campaign promise to "make America affordable again."
"The American people do not want the government to bypass the courts and buy our private information in bulk from data brokers."
With Republican leadership in the US House of Representatives aiming for "a straightforward extension of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or FISA, next week," a diverse coalition on Thursday renewed calls for Congress to impose "much-needed privacy protections against government agencies' warrantless mass surveillance of people in the United States."
Section 702 empowers the US government to spy on electronic communications of noncitizens located outside the United States to acquire foreign intelligence information, without a warrant. However, Americans' data is also collected, and advocates and lawmakers have long demanded reforms to the abused authority, which is set to expire next month unless reauthorized.
As President Donald Trump's White House—including Stephen Miller, his pro-spying deputy chief of staff—pushes for a "clean" reauthorization, 133 artificial intelligence, civil rights, and other progressive groups convened by Demand Progress and the Project On Government Oversight sent a Thursday letter to Republican and Democratic leaders in both chambers of Congress.
The coalition's letter argues that "FISA's sunsets were designed to prompt Congress to consider privacy protections" and calls for "closing the data broker loophole" that intelligence and law enforcement agencies use to buy their way around the Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution, which is supposed to protect Americans against unreasonable searches and seizures.
"Data brokers sell private information about all Americans, often surreptitiously obtaining that data from our phones and other internet-connected devices," the letter explains. "This information paints a mosaic of each and every American's life, which exposes where we sleep, what we believe, whom we vote for, and a staggering amount more."
The loophole "facilitates mass surveillance and circumvents FISA reforms Congress enacted in 2015 to prohibit domestic bulk data collection," the missive continues. Closing it "would ensure government agencies obtain judicial approval before buying information about people in the United States from data brokers if it would otherwise require a court order to seize."
"This would establish a critical legal process to protect privacy before such warrantlessly acquired information is fed into artificial intelligence surveillance systems, and help avert looming and unprecedented threats to Americans' civil liberties," it adds, citing a poll that shows 80% of Americans think the government should have to obtain a warrant before being able to buy such data.
The letter also highlights recent reporting from The New York Times that the US Department of Defense wants AI companies to "allow for the collection and analysis of unclassified, commercial bulk data on Americans, such as geolocation and web browsing data," and appears to have already secured one agreement that could permit any use the government deems lawful.
Demand Progress executive director Sean Vitka warned in a Thursday statement that "by rushing to renew FISA without any reforms, Congress is poised to allow AI companies and government agencies to supercharge mass domestic surveillance systems with our location and web browsing data—all without a warrant or any involvement from the courts."
"The American people do not want the government to bypass the courts and buy our private information in bulk from data brokers," Vitka stressed. "To protect Americans' privacy, our Fourth Amendment rights and the fundamental liberties that privacy protects, Congress must close the data broker loophole before renewing the government's surveillance power."
The letter—whose other signatories include the ACLU, Amnesty International US, Center for Democracy & Technology, Consumer Action, Electronic Privacy Information Center, Fight for the Future, Friends of the Earth US, MoveOn, No Tech for Apartheid, Peace Action, Progressive Democrats of America, Reporters Without Borders, and more—points out that "several already introduced pieces of legislation both reauthorize Section 702 and effectively close the data broker loophole."
Among them is the bipartisan Security and Freedom Enhancement (SAFE) Act, introduced last month by Sens. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Mike Lee (R-Utah), and backed by organizations including Demand Progress.
"Section 702 is a valuable tool to help keep our nation safe," Durbin said at the time. "However, it's being used to conduct thousands of warrantless searches of Americans' private communications. That's unacceptable. Our bipartisan SAFE Act is a commonsense solution to continue protecting our country from foreign threats—while safeguarding Americans' civil liberties and privacy."