August, 23 2010, 09:00am EDT
War Veterans/Military Family Members Successfully Blockade Fort Hood Deployment to Iraq
KILLEEN, Texas
Five peace activists successfully blockaded
six buses carrying Fort Hood Soldiers deploying to Iraq outside Fort
Hood's Clarke gate this morning at around 4 a.m. While the activists
took the width of Clarke Rd. and slowed the buses to a halt, police made
no arrests, but instead beat the activists out of the streets using
automatic weapons and police dogs so the deploying Soldiers could
proceed.
Among
those blockading were three veterans of the wars in Iraq and
Afghanistan and one military spouse. (See attached bios) The action,
organized by a group calling themselves "Fort Hood Disobeys," was aimed
at preventing the deployment of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment
Soldiers to what the veterans termed an illegal and immoral occupation.
While
standing in the street, the activists held banners reading "Occupation
is a Crime" and "Please Don't Make the Same Mistake We Did. RESIST NOW."
From the TX HW-190 overpass, additional supporters attempted to hang
larger banners that read, "Tell the Brass: 'KISS MY ASS' Your family
needs you more" "Sick of Fighting Your Wars" and "Col. Allen [3 ACR
Commander]: Do not deploy wounded Soldiers."
This
latest deployment comes less than two weeks after President Obama
announced the second end to combat operations in Iraq. FHD organizers
denounced this as a lie, and pointed to the deployment of the 3rd ACR, a
combat regiment, to Iraq as clear proof. They have stated they will
continue to organize direct action in the Fort Hood community to oppose
the wars as long as troops continue to deploy.
The action organizers have established a website at forthooddisobeys.blogspot.com
where they will be posting statements, photographs and video from the
actions as they become available during the next 48 hours. As well, for
the length of the day, FHD ran live webcasts updating their supporters
and depicting portions of the direct action. All live broadcasts from
the day are archived at https://bit.ly/b1WEyv.
For more information or to arrange coverage of today's events, call 347-613-8964 or write to forthooddisobeys@hushmail.com. See attached bios for more information on those who participated in today's action.
------------------
Participant Bios:
I
am Bobby Whittenberg-James, a Marine veteran of the war against the
people of Iraq, a Purple Heart recipient and a third generation military
service member. I joined the Marines in June of 2003, believing the
lies about weapons of mass destruction and an imminent threat to our
safety. I have since come to learn that these wars and occupations do
not keep the people of the United States or the Middle East safe, but
instead serve the interests of politicians, capitalists and
corporations; the ruling elite.
These
unjust wars and occupations rob the people of Iraq, Afghanistan,
Pakistan and Yemen of their dignity and their right to
self-determination and serve to make the people of both the Middle East
and the United States less safe. They also serve to further destabilize a
region that has suffered under the boot-heel of western colonialism for
over a century. The US Empire also supports both financially and
militarily the brutal apartheid regime that occupies Palestine. All of
this is done in our name with our money, and I am here to say "Not in my
name!"
The
recent information leaks about the US Empire's wars lay bare their war
crimes and crimes against humanity. We must face the truth, even if it
makes us uncomfortable or shows us something about ourselves that we
don't want to see. When we find the truth, we must respond accordingly. I
will not be complicit in the killing of people. Since I do not believe
that the government or the capitalists will end these wars, I will vote
with my body.
Bobby Whittenberg-James
Disobedient
------------------------------
I
am Crystal Colon. I was a sergeant in the Army for five years,
stationed at Fort Hood the entire time, save two deployments to Iraq
totaling 26 months. I was a Signal Support Systems Noncommissioned
Officer, coordinating communications for various commands. I was
honorably discharged in Jan., 2010, and have been organizing in the
veterans peace movement ever since.
I
first began to question the war in Iraq during my first deployment in
'05-'06. After my friend Robbie was killed, I was very deeply affected. I
started questioning why we were in Iraq. It felt like he had died for
nothing. After returning from Iraq, I planned to leave the military. I
was stop-lossed and forced to return to Iraq for 15 months, in total
held beyond the length of my enlistment more than 450 days. Since
leaving the military, I have been active with the veterans peace
movement, speaking out about my experiences and supporting troops who
refuse to fight.
I
am doing this today because I can't allow this war in which I have
fought to continue. I can't allow other Soldiers to make the same
mistake I did, deploying in support of a war crime. As a veteran of
Iraq, how could I not do this today? For the people I helped occupy, for
the friends I lost and stilI have over there, for the Soldiers on those
buses. How could I not do this today? I should have disobeyed. I should
have never boarded those buses to Iraq. I wish someone had tried to
stop me.
Crystal Colon
Disobedient
----------------------
I
am Matthis Chiroux, former Army sergeant and War Resister. I was
press-ganged into the Army by the Alabama Juvenile "Justice" System in
2002. While in the military, I occupied the nations of Japan and Germany
for more than four years, with shorter tours in the Philippines and
Afghanistan. I was a Public Affairs Noncommissioned Officer specializing
in strategic communications. In reality, I was a propaganda artist. I
was discharged honorably to the Individual Ready Reserve in 2007.
While
I have always been against the war in Iraq, I began resisting it
actively in 2008, after I received mobilization orders for a year-long
deployment to Iraq. I refused those orders in Congress in May of 2008,
calling my orders illegal and unconstitutional. I believed appealing to
Congress would end the war. When 13 Members signed a letter of support
for my decision and sent it to Bush, I thought we had won a victory for
peace. This was more than two years ago. The president has changed, and
the wars and destruction drag on.
Today,
I am blocking the deployment of the 3rd Armored Cavalry Regiment with
my fellow vets and military family members because the wars will
continue to victimize our communities until we halt this bloody machine
from within. I am putting my body on the line in solidarity with the
people of the Middle East, whose bodies have been shot, burned,
tortured, raped and violated by our men and women in and out of uniform.
I cannot willfully allow Americans in uniform to put their lives and
the lives of Iraqis in jeopardy for a crime. We are here because we have
a responsibility to ourselves as veterans and as humans of the world. I
will not rest until my people, ALL PEOPLE, are free.
In Struggle and Solidarity,
Matthis Chiroux
Disobedient
------------------------------
I
am Cynthia Thomas, and I have been an Army Wife for 18 years. My
husband has been deployed three times since the wars began. During his
second deployment, he was severley wounded and medevaced to Walter Reed
Army Hospital on Life Support. Even though he had Post Traumatic Stress
Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, suffered three fractures in his back,
three fractures on his pelvis and countless other injuries, the Army
deployed him a third time. This was devastating to our two daughters,
our step-son and to me.
Three
months after my husband deployed for the third time, our step-son
called to inform me he was joining the Marines. That was the exact
moment I realized that our children would be fighting these endless
wars. I decided that I needed to start resisting.
The
reason I am doing this today is because for the past 3 years that I
have been speaking out and advocating for Soldiers, things have only
gotten worse. I have heard countless stories from Vets and Active Duty
Soldiers that give people nightmares. I have heard stories from family
members that would shock people awake if they would just listen! Our
military community is being destroyed!
If
these wars are destroying our Soldiers and military families with 12 to
15-month, often repeat deployments, how do you think the Iraqi and
Afghan people doing? They have been living these wars 24/7, 365 days a
year for nearly a decade! My youngest daughter is an Operation Iraqi
Freedom baby. She was less than one-year-old when her father left to
invade Iraq. I look at her, and I see an Iraqi or Afghan child having to
live in constant fear with no end in sight! I am doing this for our
community, for my girls, for my husband and our Marine. I am doing this
for the Iraqi and Afghan People. Enough is enough. If Soldiers really
want to go fight, they'll have to go through me.
Cynthia Thomas
Disobedient
---------------------
Photograph
ID: All five participants in the blockade action. From left to right
are Iraq Veterans Bobby Whittenberg-James and Crystal Colon, Jeff Grant,
Military Spouse Cynthia Thomas and Afghanistan Veteran Matthis Chiroux.
LATEST NEWS
Dems Spotlight Project 2025 Plan to Wield 'Zombie Law' Against Abortion Rights
Project 2025 "includes a detailed blueprint for a future Republican president to impose a backdoor national abortion ban with a stroke of the pen," a pair of House Democrats warned.
Jul 18, 2024
Two congressional Democrats who spearheaded the Stop Project 2025 Task Force warned Thursday that abortion rights opponents are laying the groundwork to revive and wield a 151-year-old "zombie law" to ban abortion nationwide.
In a letter to U.S. President Joe Biden, who is under growing pressure to drop out of the 2024 race, Reps. Jared Huffman (D-Calif.) and Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) noted that the Project 2025 agenda crafted by the Heritage Foundation and other right-wing groups "includes a detailed blueprint for a future Republican president to impose a backdoor national abortion ban with a stroke of the pen by willfully misapplying this antiquated and unconstitutional statute."
The statute in question is the Comstock Act, an 1873 law that prohibits the mailing of any "instrument, substance, drug, medicine, or thing" that "may, or can, be used or applied for producing abortion." Rep. Cori Bush (D-Mo.) is leading the Democratic effort to defang the law.
According to the health policy research organization KFF, the Comstock Act "has not been applied to the mailing of abortion materials in the last fifty years." A trio of legal experts recently described the law as the "most significant national threat to reproductive rights."
Huffman and Raskin noted in their letter Thursday that the statute "was used to prosecute freethinking publisher DeRobigne Mortimer 'D.M.' Bennett," who "was sentenced to 13 months of hard labor in 1879 for mailing an anti-marriage pamphlet that advocated for women's bodily autonomy."
"Emma Goldman was hounded, silenced, and incarcerated for speaking out in favor of contraception," the House Democrats added. "Ida Craddock was charged multiple times for distributing writings on women's rights and sexual relations between husband and wife; she was re-arrested in 1902 after serving a three-month prison sentence, convicted, and died by suicide before serving her five-year sentence in a federal penitentiary. Anna Trow Lohman also died by suicide rather than facing trial for distributing birth control and abortifacients."
"MAGA activists are now working to resuscitate this near-dormant law to advance their far-right agenda."
Huffman and Raskin wrote that while the U.S. Supreme Court "largely overturned most of the Comstock Act through landmark decisions on free speech, abortion, and birth control" over the course of the 20th Century, "many of these decisions have been eroded and attacked" by the current conservative-dominated Supreme Court.
"MAGA activists are now working to resuscitate this near-dormant law to advance their far-right agenda," warned the two Democrats, who called on Biden to issue pardons for "Bennett, Goldman, Craddock, and any others who were unjustly convicted under the Comstock Act" to make clear that he "stands against any efforts in the past, present, or future to weaponize the Comstock Act against Americans' individual rights to free speech and reproductive autonomy."
Huffman and Raskin's letter came a day after The Washington Posthighlighted that Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio)—the running mate of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump—joined dozens of GOP lawmakers last year in calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to "shut down all mail-order abortion operations," citing the Comstock Act and other federal statutes.
The Biden Justice Department has said the Comstock Act "does not prohibit the mailing of certain drugs that can be used to perform abortions where the sender lacks the intent that the recipient of the drugs will use them unlawfully."
While Trump has sought to distance himself from Project 2025 and stopped short of explicitly endorsing a federal abortion ban, the platform that Republican delegates approved earlier this week at the party's convention in Milwaukee declares, "We believe that the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States guarantees that no person can be denied life or liberty without due process, and that the states are, therefore, free to pass laws protecting those rights."
As The Intercept's Shawn Musgrave observed Wednesday, abortion opponents welcomed that line as an endorsement of the notion of "fetal personhood."
"Far from moderating on abortion, the GOP platform now suggests that fetuses and embryos already have full constitutional rights—without the need for any new laws or amendments," Musgrave wrote. "This aligns neatly with Project 2025's roadmap and Vance's views."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Amnesty Condemns Israel's 'Mass Incommunicado Detention and Torture' of Palestinians
The head of the human rights group said Israel's Unlawful Combatants Law is enabling "rampant torture" of Palestinian detainees and "institutionalizes enforced disappearance."
Jul 18, 2024
Israel is using its dubious Unlawful Combatants Law to arbitrarily detain Palestinians from the Gaza Strip—including women and children—indefinitely without charge and trial, according to an Amnesty International report published Thursday.
All 27 former detainees interviewed by the rights group described being tortured by Israeli forces.
Amnesty documented the cases of 21 men, five women, and one 14-year-old boy taken from Gaza and held in indefinite incommunicado detention in facilities including the notorious Sde Teiman camp in Israel's Negev Desert for periods of up to four-and-a-half months, without access to lawyers or contact with their families.
"All those interviewed by Amnesty International said that during their incommunicado detention, which in some cases amounted to enforced disappearance, Israeli military, intelligence, and police forces subjected them to torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment," the report states.
"Israeli authorities are using the Unlawful Combatants Law to arbitrarily round up Palestinian civilians from Gaza and toss them into a virtual black hole."
Israel's Unlawful Combatants Law allows the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) to detain anyone from Gaza that they suspect of being engaged in the fight against Israel or posing a threat to its national security indefinitely without charge, trial, or evidence. Last December, the law was amended to allow the IDF to hold suspects for up to 96 hours without a detention order, up to 75 days without being brought before a judge, and up to three months without seeing a lawyer.
"While international humanitarian law allows for the detention of individuals on imperative security grounds in situations of occupation, there must be safeguards to prevent indefinite or arbitrary detention and torture and other ill-treatment," Amnesty International secretary general AgnèsCallamard said in a statement. "This law blatantly fails to provide these safeguards. It enables rampant torture and, in some circumstances, institutionalizes enforced disappearance."
"Our documentation illustrates how the Israeli authorities are using the Unlawful Combatants Law to arbitrarily round up Palestinian civilians from Gaza and toss them into a virtual black hole for prolonged periods without producing any evidence that they pose a security threat and without minimum due process," Callamard added. "Israeli authorities must immediately repeal this law and release those arbitrarily detained under it."
According to the report, "those detained included doctors taken into custody at hospitals for refusing to abandon their patients; mothers separated from their infants while trying to cross the so-called 'safe corridor' from northern Gaza to the south; human rights defenders, [United Nations] workers, journalists, and other civilians."
Former detainees at Sde Teiman said they were blindfolded and handcuffed for their entire imprisonment, forced to remain in painful stress positions for hours on end, and prevented from speaking to other prisoners or even raising their heads.
Said Maarouf, a 57-year-old pediatrician kidnapped by Israeli troops during an attack on al-Ahli Baptist Hospital in Gaza City in December 2023, was detained for 45 days at Sde Teiman. He described being constantly blindfolded and handcuffed, beaten, starved, and forced to sit on his knees for long periods.
A 14-year-old boy taken from his home in Jabalia in January was held for 24 days at Sde Teiman. He told Amnesty that he was jailed with more than 100 adults in a single barrack and was kicked, punched in the head, and repeatedly burned with cigarettes. Amnesty observed bruises and burns on the child's body when it examined him in February. Like other detainees interviewed by the rights group, the boy said he was always blindfolded and handcuffed and was not permitted to see a lawyer or his relatives.
Earlier this year, Israeli medics working at Sde Teiman said amputations of hands and feet due to injuries from constant handcuffing were "a routine event."
The five women interviewed by Amnesty were initially jailed at a military detention center in an illegal Israeli settler colony in the occupied West Bank, then at Dimon women's prison in northern Israel. All five said they were beaten during transport.
One woman taken on December 6 said she was separated from her two children—ages 4 and 9 months—and initially held alongside hundreds of male prisoners. She was beaten, forced to remove her veil and photographed without it, and subjected to the mock execution of her husband.
"On the third day of detention, they put us in a ditch and started throwing sand," she said. "A soldier fired two shots in the air and said they executed my husband and I broke down and begged him to kill me too, to relieve me from the nightmare."
Another woman said guards threatened: "We will do to you what Hamas did to us. We will kidnap and rape you."
These and other accounts are consistent with the testimonies of Israeli whistleblowers and former prisoners at Sde Teiman and other Israeli detention facilities.
Former detainees and human rights defenders have described Sde Teiman as "Israel's Guantánamo" and "more horrific than Abu Ghraib"—the notorious U.S. military prison in Iraq where prisoners were tortured and dozens died. Palestinians held at Sde Teiman and at other detention sites described being electrocuted, mauled and even raped by dogs, constantly beaten, starved, and subjected to other torture and abuse. Other former Sde Teiman detainees said they witnessed a prisoner raped to death, possible executions, and other atrocities.
IDF officials told the Israeli newspaper Haaretz last month that the IDF is investigating the in-custody deaths of dozens of detainees, including 36 who died or were killed at Sde Teiman since October, when Israel began its retaliatory war following the attack by Hamas-led militants that left more than 1,100 Israelis and foreign nationals dead—some of whom were killed by Israeli troops.
Over 240 other people, mostly Israelis, were kidnapped and taken to Gaza. A Human Rights Watch report published Wednesday details war crimes and crimes against humanity including murder and rape perpetrated by members of five Palestinian armed groups that took part in the October 7 attacks.
Since October, Israel's siege, bombardment, and invasion of Gaza has left at least 139,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, around 90% of Gaza's 2.3 million people forcibly displaced, and starvation—sometimes deadly—running rampant.
Israel is on trial for genocide at the International Court of Justice in The Hague. International Criminal Court Prosecutor Karim Khan has also applied for warrants to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity, including "extermination."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Report Shows How Lawmakers in GOP-Dominated South Harm Workers
"It will be important for Southerners from all backgrounds," one expert wrote, "to stand together and build the coalitions needed to demand policymakers create a new economic development model."
Jul 18, 2024
"For at least the last 40 years, pay and job quality for workers across the South has been inferior compared to other regions—thanks to the racist and anti-worker Southern economic development model."
That's according to a Thursday report by Chandra Childers, a senior policy and economic analyst at the Economic Policy Institute (EPI). The new publication is part of her "Rooted in Racism and Economic Exploitation" series.
Previous documents in the series have discussed how "Southern politicians claim that 'business-friendly' policies lead to an abundance of jobs and economic prosperity" but in reality, their failed model is designed "to extract the labor of Black and brown Southerners as cheaply as possible" and has resulted in "economic underperformance."
"Because of the political opposition to unions, when workers try to organize, employers know that they can illegally intimidate them, refuse to recognize the union, or negotiate a contract in bad faith."
Thursday's report dives into various elements of the Southern economic development model, which "is characterized by low wages, limited regulations on businesses, a regressive tax system, subsidies that funnel tax dollars to the wealthy and corporations, a weak safety net, and staunchly anti-union policies and practices."
Childers uses a U.S. Census Bureau definition of the South, which includes: Alabama, Arkansas, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Mississippi, North Carolina, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia, and the District of Columbia.
The EPI report highlights that "Southern states have lower median wages than other regions," "low-wage workers make up a larger share of the workforce across the South," and "every state that lacks a state minimum wage" is in the region.
The publication also points out the decline of coverage from employer-provided health insurance and pensions in the South, as well as how workers there "have less access to paid leave than their peers in other regions" and "Southern state lawmakers have also disempowered local communities."
"Across the South, most states have passed so-called right-to-work laws, with the exceptions of Delaware, Maryland, and the District of Columbia," Childers detailed. "Right-to-work laws do not, in any way, guarantee workers will have access to a job if they want one. They simply make it harder for unions to be financially sustainable."
"In addition to right-to-work laws and the overall opposition from political leaders across the region, workers seeking to organize a union typically face intense opposition from employers," she continued. "Further, because of the political opposition to unions, when workers try to organize, employers know that they can illegally intimidate them, refuse to recognize the union, or negotiate a contract in bad faith—with little to no fear of being held accountable by political leaders."
While "there are city and county officials who support higher minimum wages and access to pensions and paid leave for workers" in the South, she explained, their ability to take action is limited by preemption, which "is when state policymakers either block a local ordinance or dismantle an existing ordinance" intended to help the working class.
Childers' report doesn't explicitly point fingers at particular political parties, but the region has been largely dominated by Republican officials during the past four decades covered by the analysis.
While the Republican presidential campaign of former President Donald Trump is clearly making a play for working-class voters by selecting Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) as the vice presidential candidate and inviting International Brotherhood of Teamsters general president Sean O'Brien to speak at this week's convention—provoking criticism from progressive politicians and labor leaders—Southern GOP leaders continue to display disdain toward efforts to organize workers.
As Volkswagen employees in Tennessee began voting on whether to join the United Auto Workers in April, six Southern GOP governors put out a joint statement saying they were "highly concerned about the unionization campaign driven by misinformation and scare tactics that the UAW has brought into our states."
EPI said at the time that the governors' anti-union statement "clearly shows how scared they are that workers organizing with UAW to improve jobs and wages will upend the highly unequal, failed anti-worker economic development model of Southern states."
The Chattanooga vote was a success, but the following month organizers faced a tough loss at a pair of Mercedes-Benz plants in Alabama, where the UAW is now seeking a new election. Meanwhile, regional GOP policymakers have ramped up attacks on unions, advancing legislation that makes organizing harder.
"To begin to work toward changing the Southern economic development model," Childers argued, "it will be important for Southerners from all backgrounds—across race, ethnicity, gender, immigrant statuses, and income levels—to stand together and build the coalitions needed to demand policymakers create a new economic development model."
The expert urged people across the South to fight for a model that includes a living wage, guaranteed health insurance, pensions, and paid leave.
"Finally, and perhaps most important, workers must be able to come together in a union to demand fair wages and benefits, a safe working environment, and the ability to have a say about their workplace—even when politicians are intransigent," she stressed. "This is a model that would serve the interests of all Southerners."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular