September, 14 2010, 11:55am EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Brenda Bowser Soder,bowsersoderb@humanrightsfirst.org,O -202/370-3323, C - 301/906-4460
Retired Military Leaders To Urge Administration Officials Memebers Of Congress Campaign Committees To Press Ahead With Closing Guantanamo, Pursue Federal Trials For Terrorism Suspects
WASHINGTON
During meetings this week with Attorney General Eric Holder, members
of Congress and DC-based campaign committees, a contingent of retired
military leaders will push for the closure of the U.S. detention
facility at Guantanamo Bay and ask that terrorism suspects be brought to
justice in federal civilian courts. The meetings, slated to take place
between Sept. 14-16, will come as the retired military leaders return to
the nation's capital after months in the states educating candidates of
both parties about the national security benefits of carrying out these
policies.
"We are here to send a clear message that detention policy and
efforts to bring terrorists to justice in federal civil courts are not
issues that should be subject to political posturing," General Joseph
Hoar, USMC (Ret.), who served as Commander-in-Chief of U.S. Central
Command. "The politicization of these issues runs counter to America's
national security interests. It is imperative that we close the U.S.
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay as quickly as possible and bring
accused terrorists to justice in federal civilian courts, the only venue
with a proven track record of successfully handling these cases."
The group notes that federal civil courts have successfully convicted
more than 400 terrorists, but military commissions have secured only
four convictions. They also argue that treating accused terrorists as
warriors by trying them in military commissions does a disservice to
America's men and women in uniform who serve the nation honorably.
Joining General Hoar in Washington, DC will be Lieutenant General
Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.), former Deputy Chairman of the NATO Military
Committee; Major General Paul Eaton, USA (Ret.), former Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security
Forces; Rear Admiral John Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), former Navy Judge
Advocate General; and Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.),
former intelligence officer and Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional
Readiness Command. The group's meetings include sit-downs with Attorney
General Holder, CIA Director Panetta, Ambassador Daniel Fried,
High-Value Interrogation Groups (HIG) Director Andrew McCabe, and a half
dozen members of Congress. The group will also meet with the National
Republican Congressional Committee and the Republican Senatorial
Campaign Committee.
These retired military leaders are part of a group that works with
Human Rights First and came together in 2005, united by concern about
the report of abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and elsewhere in U.S.
Custody. At that time, they urged that prisoner treatment and detention
policies comply with the Geneva Conventions and reflect U.S. laws,
values and security interests. The group was instrumental in winning
passage of legislation, known as the McCain amendment, which prohibited
the use of torture techniques such as waterboarding.
Since then, dozens of retired Generals and Admirals have joined this
nonpartisan effort. These same retired military leaders were active in
the last election cycle and met with eight of the presidential
candidates to urge action on these same issues. President Obama, Vice
President Biden, Governor Huckabee and Secretary Clinton have all
publicly credited this group with influencing their thinking on the
treatment of enemy prisoners. As a direct result of their efforts, on
his second full day in office, President Barack Obama signed Executive
Orders ending torture, secret prisons, and promising to close the
detention facility at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Many of this group of
retired military leaders stood with the President in the Oval Office as
he signed these orders.
This year, fueled by concerns regarding the politicized tenor that
has shaped the debate about these important national security issues,
the retired military leader groups has renewed its commitment to educate
candidates and make themselves available for candid discussions.
Earlier this summer, they held meetings with congressional candidates
from Delaware, Illinois, and Pennsylvania. Just this past weekend, they
aired a 30-second television advertisement during Sunday news programs
in Indiana. That state's U.S. Senate race has featured a debate over
each candidate's position on closing the Guantanamo Bay detention
facility.
"Guantanamo is a symbol of America's failure to adhere to the Geneva
Conventions and the country's fundamental principles. It remains a
primary recruiting tool for terrorists. It's time to turn the page on
this failed facility and the failed policies," Hoar concluded.
Bios of Participating Generals & Admirals
General Joseph Hoar, USMC (Ret.)
General
Hoar served as Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Central Command. After the first
Gulf War, General Hoar led the effort to enforce the naval embargo in
the Red Sea and the Persian Gulf, and to enforce the no-fly zone in the
south of Iraq. He oversaw the humanitarian and peacekeeping operations
in Kenya and Somalia and also supported operations in Rwanda, and the
evacuation of U.S. civilians from Yemen during the 1994 civil war. He
was the Deputy for Operations for the Marine Corps during the Gulf War
and served as General Norman Schwarzkopf's Chief of Staff at Central
Command. General Hoar currently runs a consulting business in
California.
Lieutenant General Charles Otstott, USA (Ret.)
General
Otstott served 32 years in the Army. As an Infantryman, he commanded at
every echelon including command of the 25th Infantry Division (Light)
from 1988-1990. His service included two combat tours in Vietnam. He
completed his service in uniform as Deputy Chairman, NATO Military
Committee, 1990-1992.
Major General Paul D. Eaton, USA (Ret.)
General
Eaton recently retired from the U.S. Army after more than 33 years
service. His assignments include Infantry command from the company to
brigade levels, command of the Infantry Center at Fort Benning and Chief
of Infantry. His most recent operational assignment was Commanding
General of the command charged with reestablishing Iraqi Security Forces
2003-2004, where he built the command and established the structure and
infrastructure for the Iraqi Armed Forces. Other operational
assignments include Somalia, Bosnia and Albania. Other assignments
include the Joint Staff, Deputy Commanding General for Transformation
and Stryker Unit Development and Assistant Professor and head of the
French Department at West Point. He is a 1972 graduate of West Point. He
and his wife PJ have three children, all Soldiers.
Rear Admiral John D. Hutson, JAGC, USN (Ret.)
Rear
Admiral John D. Hutson served in the U. S. Navy from 1973 to 2000. He
was the Navy's Judge Advocate General from 1997 to 2000. Admiral Hutson
now serves as President and Dean of the Franklin Pierce Law Center in
Concord, New Hampshire. He also joined Human Rights First's Board of
Directors in 2005.
Brigadier General David R. Irvine, USA (Ret.)
Brigadier
General Irvine enlisted in the 96th Infantry Division, United States
Army Reserve, in 1962. He received a direct commission in 1967 as a
strategic intelligence officer. He maintained a faculty assignment for
18 years with the Sixth U.S. Army Intelligence School, and taught
prisoner of war interrogation and military law for several hundred
soldiers, Marines, and airmen. He retired in 2002, and his last
assignment was Deputy Commander for the 96th Regional Readiness Command.
General Irvine is an attorney, and practices law in Salt Lake City,
Utah. He served 4 terms as a Republican legislator in the Utah House of
Representatives, has served as a congressional chief of staff, and
served as a commissioner on the Utah Public Utilities Commission.
Human Rights First is a non-profit, nonpartisan international human rights organization based in New York and Washington D.C. Human Rights First believes that building respect for human rights and the rule of law will help ensure the dignity to which every individual is entitled and will stem tyranny, extremism, intolerance, and violence.
LATEST NEWS
Sanders Warns Musk's Call for $700 Billion in Cuts Is a 'Prelude' to Social Security Privatization
"Why do you lie so much about Social Security? To get people to lose faith in the system, and then you can give it over to Wall Street," said Sen. Bernie Sanders.
Mar 11, 2025
U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders warned late Monday that billionaire Elon Musk's new call for up to $700 billion in cuts to mandatory federal spending is an alarming step in the direction of Social Security privatization, a longstanding—and deeply unpopular—goal of right-wing politicians and corporate-funded think tanks.
Musk, who is spearheading a large-scale assault on federal agencies and workers, told Fox Business host Larry Kudlow on Monday that "waste and fraud" in "entitlement spending"—a category that includes Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid—is "the big one to eliminate," estimating that up to $700 billion could be cut from such programs.
It's not clear where Musk, who has lied repeatedly about Social Security in recent weeks, got the $700 billion figure. As Rolling Stone's Andrew Perez noted, "There is no expert on the planet who thinks there is $700 billion worth of annual fraud in America's safety net programs."
"Musk at one point in the interview cited a Government Accountability Office report which estimated that the government may lose between $233 billion and $521 billion annually to fraud, but that report covered the whole of the federal government—not just those programs," Perez wrote.
A 2024 report from the Social Security Administration's inspector general found that of the $8.6 trillion in Social Security benefits paid out between 2015 and 2022, roughly $71.8 billion was dispensed improperly—0.84% of the total.
"I think this is a prelude not only to cutting benefits, but to privatizing Social Security itself. I think that's in the back of their mind."
Musk also baselessly claimed that mandatory federal spending on programs such as Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid is a "mechanism by which the Democrats attract and retain illegal immigrants, by essentially paying them to come here and then turning them into voters." (In reality, undocumented immigrants pay taxes that help finance Social Security and Medicare but cannot receive benefits from the programs.)
Sanders (I-Vt.) couldn't hide his disgust when he was asked during a CNN appearance to respond to Musk's remarks.
"Well, he has called Social Security a Ponzi scheme. They have already laid off 2,500 employees of the Social Security Administration," said Sanders. "If you ask me, I think this is a prelude not only to cutting benefits, but to privatizing Social Security itself. I think that's in the back of their mind."
"Why do you lie so much about Social Security? Why do you make it look like it's a broken, dysfunctional system?" Sanders asked. "The reason is to get people to lose faith in the system, and then you can give it over to Wall Street. That's my view."
Musk's latest attack on Social Security, a remarkably efficient program that has never missed a payment, came as his Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, has effectively taken over the Social Security Administration (SSA) and is pushing for massive cuts to the agency's staff and budget based on egregious lies.
"Appearing to misread a chart, for example, Musk said on social media in February that DOGE had identified payments to 'tens of millions' of deceased Americans—an incorrect assertion repeated by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt," The Washington Postreported last week.
Everett Kelley, president of the American Federation of Government Employees—a union engaged in a legal fight against the Trump administration's purge of the federal workforce—wrote Monday that Musk's latest comments show that he "doesn't just want to cut the SSA workforce."
"He wants to eliminate Social Security entirely," Kelley added.
Joel Payne, chief communications officer at MoveOn Civic Action, said in a statement Tuesday that "Elon Musk and the Trump-led Republican Party are promising exactly what they have been trying to do for years: gut Social Security."
"Republicans want to illegally fire tens of thousands of workers responsible for making sure American seniors get their Social Security and then let Musk take his chainsaw to our benefits," said Payne. "We won't let them do it. Elon Musk, Donald Trump, and Republicans need to keep their hands off our Social Security."
The progressive advocacy group Social Security Works sounded a similarly defiant note.
"Elon Musk is a conman and a criminal, born with an emerald mine instead of a moral compass," the group wrote on social media. "Of course he wants to destroy Social Security, because he can't get his tiny greedy fingers on it any other way. HELL NO!"
Keep ReadingShow Less
Senators Want to Know Why RFK Jr. Dined With Pharma Execs at Trump's Private Club
"You owe the American public an explanation for why you took part in PhRMA's influence-peddling events with President Trump," wrote Sens. Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden, and Bernie Sanders.
Mar 11, 2025
A group of progressive U.S. senators on Monday pushed Robert F. Kennedy Jr., secretary of the Health and Human Services Department, to disclose what he and President Donald Trump discussed with pharmaceutical executives at recent private dinners as the industry pressures the new administration to end Medicare drug price negotiations.
In a letter to Kennedy, Sens. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) pointed to Wall Street Journalreporting from last month on the millions of dollars that healthcare industry executives spent to dine with Trump at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida ahead of his inauguration.
Kennedy, according to the Journal, "attended several of the dinners, but largely stayed quiet as Trump and others talked."
Warren, Wyden, and Sanders wrote to Kennedy that "the dinners may have served as an opportunity for Big Pharma to gain insider access to both you and President Trump" and asked the HHS chief to reveal information about the meetings with industry executives, including how many there have been since the November election and whether Medicare drug price negotiations or other critical matters were discussed.
"Big Pharma stands to profit immensely from a second Trump administration, especially if they can convince you and President Trump to abandon policies like Medicare drug price negotiations and patent reform that would save Americans hundreds of billions of dollars on lifesaving drugs," the senators wrote. "Indeed, the executives that attended these dinners have called on him to 'pause drug negotiations'—negotiations that are expected to save taxpayers $100 billion by 2032."
"You owe the American public an explanation for why you took part in PhRMA's influence-peddling events with President Trump, what happened at these meetings, and whether they will affect your commitment to ensuring that Americans receive the relief they deserve from high drug prices," the senators added.
RFK Jr. said he'd "clean up corruption" as HHS Secretary. So why'd he have dinner with Big Pharma executives at Mar-a-Lago with Trump? The American people deserve to know what kind of deals might have been made at those "million-dollar" dinners.
[image or embed]
— Elizabeth Warren (@warren.senate.gov) March 10, 2025 at 7:29 PM
The Journal reported that the CEO of Pfizer, which pumped $1 million into Trump's inaugural committee, was among the executives who attended the private Mar-a-Lago dinners. Eli Lilly's chief executive also joined at least one of the dinners.
Though Kennedy, an anti-vaccine conspiracy theorist, has vocally criticized Big Pharma and its political influence, the industry did not lobby against his nomination to lead HHS, which oversees the Medicare drug price negotiations that began during the Biden administration.
Last month, the head of the pharmaceutical industry's biggest lobbying group and several pharma CEOs met with Trump as part of a campaign to weaken the price negotiations, which threaten drugmakers' ability to jack up prices at will.
The negotiations have yielded significant results, but Trump's Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services—an agency within HHS—has signaled it is open to altering the program.
"The Trump administration's statement is far from an embrace of drug price negotiation," Wyden and other senators warned earlier this year, "and appears to be opening the door to changes that could undermine Medicare's ability to get the best price possible on drugs."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Attacks Public Service Workers With 'Blatantly Illegal' Loan Forgiveness Order
"Threatening to punish hardworking Americans for their employers' perceived political views is about as flagrant a violation of the First Amendment as you can imagine," said one critic.
Mar 10, 2025
Criticism of U.S. President Donald Trump's executive order intended to limit a program that forgives the federal student loans of borrowers who take public service jobs has grown since he signed it on Friday.
Opponents frame the order as yet another attempt by Trump to quash dissent. The Republican president directed Education Secretary Linda McMahon to propose revisions to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) Program, in coordination with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, to exclude "organizations that engage in activities that have a substantial illegal purpose."
The order targets employers "aiding or abetting" violations of federal immigration law and the administration's definition of illegal discrimination, engaging in a pattern of violating state law such as disorderly conduct and obstruction of highways, "supporting terrorism," and "child abuse, including the chemical and surgical castration or mutilation of children or the trafficking of children to so-called transgender sanctuary states for purposes of emancipation from their lawful parents."
Student Defense president Aaron Ament said in a statement that "when PSLF was created by a bipartisan act of Congress and signed into law by [President] George W. Bush, it was a promise from the United States government to its citizens—if you give back to America, America will give back to you."
"In the nearly two decades since, across administrations of both parties, Americans have worked hard and made life decisions under the assumption that the U.S. keeps its word," Ament continued. "Threatening to punish hardworking Americans for their employers' perceived political views is about as flagrant a violation of the First Amendment as you can imagine."
Nadine Chabrier, senior policy counsel at the Center for Responsible Lending, similarly highlighted "serious" First Amendment concerns, saying that "by penalizing individuals seeking loan forgiveness for their associations and the expressive conduct of their employers, new rulemakings could infringe on fundamental rights to speech and association."
"The executive order also undermines the very purpose of PSLF, which Congress established to encourage careers in public service across a broad range of fields," she said. "Stripping PSLF eligibility from nonprofit employees based on the nature of their work will deter skilled professionals from pursuing careers that benefit the public good, weaken critical services for underserved populations and hamper efforts to strengthen vulnerable communities."
American Federation of Teachers (AFT) president Randi Weingarten explained that "PSLF is based on the idea that borrowers who make 10 years of repayments, and who often forgo higher wages in the private sector, can avoid a lifelong debt sentence."
The teachers union sued the Trump's first-term education secretary, Betsy DeVos, "and rogue loan servicers for their failure to administer the program—and we won," Weingarten noted. "This latest assault on borrowers' livelihoods is a cruel attempt to finish the demolition job that DeVos started. The goal is to sow chaos and confusion—separately, the PSLF application form has already been taken offline, making it effectively inaccessible."
The Economic Policy Institute pointed out Monday that "since the creation of the PSLF program, more than 1 million borrowers have received student loan forgiveness, largely due to fixes made under the Biden administration."
"More than 2 million individuals currently qualify for the PSLF program, according to the Department of Education," the think tank added. "The executive order could potentially narrow which organizations qualify for the program."
Student Borrower Protection Center executive director Mike Pierce blasted the order as "blatantly illegal and an all-out weaponization of debt intended to silence speech that does not align with President Trump's MAGA agenda."
"It is an attack on working families everywhere and will have a chilling effect on our public service workforce doing the work every day to support our local communities," Pierce warned. "Teachers, nurses, service members, and other public service workers deserve better than to be used as pawns in Donald Trump's radical right-wing political project to destroy civil society. This will raise costs for working people while doing nothing to make America safer or healthier."
In addition to scathing critiques, some groups threatened to challenge the order. Weingarten vowed that "the AFT won't stop fighting, in court and in Congress, until every single public service worker gets the help the law affords them."
Ament declared that "if the Trump administration follows through on this threat, they can plan to see us in court."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular