March, 24 2011, 03:10pm EDT
25 American Mayors Speak Out Against Controversial Tar Sands Pipeline
City Leaders Concerned High-Carbon Tar Sands Undermine Their Municipal Clean Energy Initiatives
WASHINGTON
More than two dozen American mayors have sent a letter expressing concern over the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Representing cities and towns across the United States, their letter notes that the controversial project might "undermine the good work being done in local communities across the country to fight climate change and reduce our dependence on oil." In light of an expected new environmental review of the proposed pipeline, the Mayors are asking the State Department to be detailed and comprehensive including an evaluation of the "impacts of this pipeline on local community efforts to build clean energy economies."
"This letter is so important because our cities and towns are where the rubber hits the road on environmental policies," said Susan Casey-Lefkowitz, director of the International Program for the Natural Resources Defense Council. "They are on the clean energy frontlines in the United States and do not want to see increase of a high-carbon fuel like tar sands undermine their achievements. They deliver services that are imperiled by projects like this pipeline. And, they are responsible for cleaning up spills when things go wrong, so it is no surprise that they are calling for detailed and comprehensive environmental review of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline that includes the impacts on local communities."
The letter:
- Notes that the United States Conference of Mayors adopted a High Carbon Fuels Resolution in 2008 calling for measures that discourage the use of tar sands fuel.
- Calls for a thorough and detailed supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) for the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline that includes evaluation of impacts on local communities.
- Calls for opportunities for public review and comment on the SEIS.
- Notes that projects like the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline send the wrong message to our communities and citizens who work hard to lessen our dependence on oil, using innovative conservation, efficiency and other measures.
Mayors signing the letter include Frank Cownie (Des Moines IA), Kitty Piercy (Eugene OR), Ralph Becker (Salt Lake City, UT), Pat Hays (North Little Rock AR), Jennifer Hosterman (Pleasanton CA), John DeStefano Jr. (New Haven, CT), Gayle McLaughlin (Richmond CA), Tom Bates (Berkeley CA), Bob Kiss (Burlington VT), John Dickert (Racine, WI), William V. "Bill" Bell (Durham, NC), Craig Lowe (Gainesville, FL), George Heartwell (Grand Rapids MI), Dave Cieslewicz (Madison, Wisconsin), John Marks (Tallahassee, FL), Patrick J. Morris (San Bernardino, CA), Chris Cabaldon (West Sacramento, CA), Roy Buol (Dubuque, IA), Ed Malloy (Fairfield, IA), Dana Williams (Park City, UT), Christopher A. Doherty (Scranton, PA), David Coss (Santa Fe, NM), Former Mayor Heidi Davison (Athens, GA), Former Mayor Pegeen Hanrahan (Gainesville, FL), Former Mayor Greg Nickels (Seattle, WA).
Quotes from some of the signers follow:
Mayor Frank Cownie - Des Moines, Iowa
"Des Moines and many other communities in the Midwest, and around the country, are working hard to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. None of us want to see our vision of a lighter carbon footprints washed away by the tide of new emissions that this tar sands pipeline could cause. We want to protect our investments in energy efficiency and conservation which is why we are asking for a detailed environmental review of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline."
Mayor John DeStefano Jr. - New Haven, Connecticut
"Earlier this year, Connecticut joined 10 others in the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic region in a collaborative effort to develop regional lower-carbon alternatives to gasoline, and this kind of initiative takes us in the direction we need to go in these days, not the high carbon direction of using tar sands crude from the Keystone XL pipeline. While we're already making strong efforts to green our transportation sector
in New Haven, the Low Carbon Fuel Standard will help us reduce our dependence on oil even further and hasten the transition to cleaner fuels."
Former Mayor Greg Nickels - Seattle, Washington (and Past President, U.S. Conference of Mayors)
"This joint effort by mayors across the country to voice their concerns about the environmental impacts of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline, and call upon our federal government to study these impacts carefully should surprise no one. Mayors care deeply about climate change, and are leading the way to reduce greenhouse gases and improve air quality. While Mayor of Seattle, I worked with my colleagues at the U.S. Conference of Mayors to launch the Mayors' Climate Protection Agreement. Today 1049 mayors from across the USA have signed on, and they don't want to see their labors erased by high carbon fuels like tar sands oil."
Mayor John Dickert - Racine, Wisconsin
"Here in Racine, at the edge of the largest source of freshwater in the world - the Great Lakes - we've always had concerns about the oil pipeline that crosses Wisconsin north to south because it sometimes carries tar sands oil from Canada and the lack of information about what's in the pipeline at any point in time is disturbing. We need to know, in case a tar sands oil spill occurs like the one to the Kalamazoo River last year. Residents in the vicinity of the proposed Keystone XL tar sands pipeline have the same right to a comprehensive environmental review that includes a detailed look at the safety issues of tar sands."
Mayor Kitty Piercy - Eugene, Oregon
"A key principle of local efforts is to lead by example, and if we increase our imports of tar sands oil, then we deepen our dependence on dirty, high-carbon fuels and this sends the wrong message to cities and citizens as they work on innovative energy conservation and efficiency measures that - by the way - save them money. In Eugene and elsewhere, people are starting to catch on that saving fuel isn't just good for the planet and air quality, it's good for their wallets and that's fundamental these days."
Mayor Jennifer Hosterman - Pleasanton, California
"Like many Californian communities, in Pleasanton we understand just how important it is to preserve and protect fresh water sources, and one of the very troubling aspects of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline project is that it poses risks to so many important fresh water bodies in our country. As Co-chair of the Mayor's Water Council for the U.S. Conference of Mayors, I must consider the big picture, and threats to the Great Lakes, some of our greatest rivers, and the Ogallala aquifer, which provides freshwater to over 2 million Americans, must be studied with utmost care."
Former Mayor Pegeen Hanrahan - Gainesville, Florida
"Throughout Florida, we watched as the BP oil spill devastated communities in the Gulf region. With an extremely large project like the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline it is critical that there be a detailed analysis of safety, environmental and health impacts. The first environmental review of the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline was given a failing grade by EPA and this is reason for grave concern, because when sub-standard projects are allowed to go forward, the results can be disastrous."
The letter is available at https://docs.nrdc.org/energy/files/ene_11032401a.pdf
Susan Casey-Lefkowitz posted more information on her blog at https://switchboard.nrdc.org/blogs/sclefkowitz/mayors_ask_state_department_to.html
NRDC works to safeguard the earth--its people, its plants and animals, and the natural systems on which all life depends. We combine the power of more than three million members and online activists with the expertise of some 700 scientists, lawyers, and policy advocates across the globe to ensure the rights of all people to the air, the water, and the wild.
(212) 727-2700LATEST NEWS
National Team Member Becomes at Least 265th Palestinian Footballer Killed by Israel in Gaza
Muhannad al-Lili's killing by Israeli airstrike came as the world mourned the death of Portugal and Liverpool star Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva in a car crash in Spain.
Jul 04, 2025
Muhannad Fadl al-Lili, captain of the Al-Maghazi Services Club and a member of Palestine's national football team, died Thursday from injuries suffered during an Israeli airstrike on his family home in the central Gaza Strip earlier this week, making him the latest of hundreds of Palestinian athletes killed since the start of Israel's genocidal onslaught.
Al-Maghazi Services Club announced al-Lili's death in a Facebook tribute offering condolences to "his family, relatives, friends, and colleagues" and asking "Allah to shower him with his mercy."
The Palestine Football Association (PFA) said that "on Monday, a drone fired a missile at Muhannad's room on the third floor of his house, which led to severe bleeding in the skull."
"During the war of extermination against our people, Muhannad tried to travel outside Gaza to catch up with his wife, who left the strip for Norway on a work mission before the outbreak of the war," the association added. "But he failed to do so, and was deprived of seeing his eldest son, who was born outside the Gaza Strip."
According to the PFA, al-Lili is at least the 265th Palestinian footballer and 585th athlete to be killed by Israeli forces since they launched their assault and siege on Gaza following the October 7, 2023 Hamas-led attack on Israel. Sports journalist Leyla Hamed says 439 Palestinian footballers have been killed by Israel.
Overall, Israel's war—which is the subject of an International Court of Justice (ICJ) genocide case—has left more than 206,000 Palestinians dead, maimed, or missing, and around 2 million more forcibly displaced, starved, or sickened, according to Gaza officials.
The Palestine Chronicle contrasted the worldwide press coverage of the car crash deaths of Portuguese footballer Diogo Jota and his brother André Silva with the media's relative silence following al-Lili's killing.
"Jota's death was a tragedy that touched millions," the outlet wrote. "Yet the death of Muhannad al-Lili... was met with near-total silence from global sports media."
Last week, a group of legal experts including two United Nations special rapporteurs appealed to the Fédération Internationale de Football Association, the world football governing body, demanding that its Governance Audit and Compliance Committee take action against the Israel Football Association for violating FIFA rules by playing matches on occupied Palestinian territory.
In July 2024, the ICJ found that Israel's then-57-year occupation of Palestine—including Gaza—is an illegal form of apartheid that should be ended as soon as possible.
During their invasion and occupation of Gaza, Israeli forces have also used sporting facilities including Yarmouk Stadium for the detention of Palestinian men, women, and children—many of whom have reported torture and other abuse at the hands of their captors.
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Highly Inspiring' Court Ruling Affirms Nations' Legal Duty to Combat Climate Emergency
"While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections," said one observer.
Jul 04, 2025
In a landmark advisory opinion published Thursday, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights—of which the United States, the world's second-biggest carbon polluter, is not a member—affirmed the right to a stable climate and underscored nations' duty to act to protect it and address the worsening planetary emergency.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change," a summary of the 234-page ruling states. "Any rollback of climate or environmental policies that affect human rights must be exceptional, duly justified based on objective criteria, and comply with standards of necessity and proportionality."
"The court also held that... states must take all necessary measures to reduce the risks arising, on the one hand, from the degradation of the global climate system and, on the other, from exposure and vulnerability to the effects of such degradation," the summary adds.
"States must refrain from any conduct that reverses, slows down, or truncates the outcome of measures necessary to protect human rights in the face of the impacts of climate change."
The case was brought before the Costa-Rica based IACtHR by Chile and Colombia, both of which "face the daily challenge of dealing with the consequences of the climate emergency, including the proliferation of droughts, floods, landslides, and fires, among others."
"These phenomena highlight the need to respond urgently and based on the principles of equity, justice, cooperation, and sustainability, with a human rights-based approach," the court asserted.
IACtHR President Judge Nancy Hernández López said following the ruling that "states must not only refrain from causing significant environmental damage but have the positive obligation to take measures to guarantee the protection, restoration, and regeneration of ecosystems."
"Causing massive and irreversible environmental harm...alters the conditions for a healthy life on Earth to such an extent that it creates consequences of existential proportions," she added. "Therefore, it demands universal and effective legal responses."
The advisory opinion builds on two landmark decisions last year. In April 2024, the European Court of Human Rights ruled that the Swiss government violated senior citizens' human rights by refusing to abide by scientists' warnings to rapidly phase out fossil fuel production.
The following month, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea found in an advisory opinion that greenhouse gas emissions are marine pollution under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and that signatories to the accord "have the specific obligation to adopt laws and regulations to prevent, reduce, and control" them.
The IACtHR advisory opinion is expected to boost climate and human rights lawsuits throughout the Americas, and to impact talks ahead of November's United Nations Climate Change Conference, or COP30, in Belém, Brazil.
Climate defenders around the world hailed Thursday's advisory opinion, with United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk calling it "a landmark step forward for the region—and beyond."
"As the impact of climate change becomes ever more visible across the world, the court is clear: People have a right to a stable climate and a healthy environment," Türk added. "States have a bedrock obligation under international law not to take steps that cause irreversible climate and environmental damage, and they have a duty to act urgently to take the necessary measures to protect the lives and rights of everyone—both those alive now and the interests of future generations."
Amnesty International head of strategic litigation Mandi Mudarikwa said, "Today, the Inter-American Court affirmed and clarified the obligations of states to respect, ensure, prevent, and cooperate in order to realize human rights in the context of the climate crisis."
"Crucially, the court recognized the autonomous right to a healthy climate for both individuals and communities, linked to the right to a healthy environment," Mudarikwa added. "The court also underscored the obligation of states to protect cross-border climate-displaced persons, including through the issuance of humanitarian visas and protection from deportation."
Delta Merner, lead scientist at the Science Hub for Climate Litigation at the Union of Concerned Scientists, said in a statement that "this opinion sets an important precedent affirming that governments have a legal duty to regulate corporate conduct that drives climate harm."
"Though the United States is not a party to the treaty governing the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, this opinion should be a clarion call for transnational fossil fuel companies that have deceived the public for decades about the risks of their products," Merner added. "The era of accountability is here."
Markus Gehring, a fellow and director of studies in law at Hughes Hall at the University of Cambridge in England, called the advisory opinion "highly inspiring" and "seminal."
Drew Caputo, vice president of litigation for lands, wildlife, and oceans at Earthjustice, said that "the Inter-American Court's ruling makes clear that climate change is an overriding threat to human rights in the world."
"Governments must act to cut carbon emissions drastically," Caputo stressed. "While the United States and some other major polluters have chosen to ignore climate science, the rest of the international community is advancing protections for all from the realities of climate harm."
Climate litigation is increasing globally in the wake of the 2015 Paris climate agreement. In the Americas, Indigenous peoples, children, and green groups are among those who have been seeking climate justice via litigation.
However, in the United States, instead of acknowledging the climate emergency, President Donald Trump has declared an "energy emergency" while pursuing a "drill, baby, drill" policy of fossil fuel extraction and expansion.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Trump Admin Quietly Approves Massive Crude Oil Expansion Project
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest," said one environmental attorney.
Jul 04, 2025
The Trump administration has quietly fast-tracked a massive oil expansion project that environmentalists and Democratic lawmakers warned could have a destructive impact on local communities and the climate.
As reported recently by the Oil and Gas Journal, the plan "involves expanding the Wildcat Loadout Facility, a key transfer point for moving Uinta basin crude oil to rail lines that transport it to refineries along the Gulf Coast."
The goal of the plan is to transfer an additional 70,000 barrels of oil per day from the Wildcat Loadout Facility, which is located in Utah, down to the Gulf Coast refineries via a route that runs along the Colorado River. Controversially, the Trump administration is also plowing ahead with the project by invoking emergency powers to address energy shortages despite the fact that the United States for the last couple of years has been producing record levels of domestic oil.
Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.) and Rep. Joe Neguse (D-Colo.) issued a joint statement condemning the Trump administration's push to approve the project while rushing through environmental impact reviews.
"The Bureau of Land Management's decision to fast-track the Wildcat Loadout expansion—a project that would transport an additional 70,000 barrels of crude oil on train tracks along the Colorado River—using emergency procedures is profoundly flawed," the Colorado Democrats said. "These procedures give the agency just 14 days to complete an environmental review—with no opportunity for public input or administrative appeal—despite the project's clear risks to Colorado. There is no credible energy emergency to justify bypassing public involvement and environmental safeguards. The United States is currently producing more oil and gas than any country in the world."
On Thursday, the Bureau of Land Management announced the completion of its accelerated environmental review of the project, drawing condemnation from climate advocates.
Wendy Park, a senior attorney at the Center for Biological Diversity, described the administration's rush to approve the project as "pure hubris," especially given its "refusal to hear community concerns about oil spill risks." She added that "this fast-tracked review breezed past vital protections for clean air, public safety and endangered species."
Landon Newell, staff attorney for the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, accused the Trump administration of manufacturing an energy emergency to justify plans that could have a dire impact on local habitats.
"This thinly analyzed decision threatens the lifeblood of the American Southwest by authorizing the transport of more than 1 billion gallons annually of additional oil on railcars traveling alongside the Colorado River," he said. "Any derailment and oil spill would have a devastating impact on the Colorado River and the communities and ecosystems that rely upon it."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular