July, 23 2014, 12:45pm EDT
For Immediate Release
Contact:
Katherine Cirullo, Food & Water Watch, 202-683-4914 (w), 860-559-1024 (c)
Tracey Eno, Calvert Citizens for a Healthy Community, 443-624-8022
52 Organizations and Calvert County Residents to Governor O'Malley: Safety Assessment for Cove Point LNG Export Facility Needed
Residents ask why governor opposed Sparrows Point but supports Cove Point
Annapolis, Maryland
Residents living closest to the proposed Cove Point Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) export facility joined with public interest groups for a press conference in Annapolis today, calling on Governor Martin O'Malley to step up for their families and conduct a basic safety study to reveal the risk of danger that an explosion or other catastrophe at the plant would pose to human lives. To date, no federal or state agency has conducted such a study, called a Quantitative Risk Assessment.
The Governor, as a member of the Board of Public Works, will be voting the same afternoon on whether or not to grant a wetlands license for a construction pier for the Dominion Cove Point facility, marking the first time he will preside over a permit decision for the project.
The groups pointed out how little Governor O'Malley has done to protect Maryland residents from Cove Point, in contrast to his strong opposition--due to health and safety concerns--to the AES Sparrows Point LNG import facility in Baltimore County in 2007, even stating his administration had "very serious concerns regarding the safety of the proposed project." The residents and groups questioned why the Governor is remaining silent now, especially considering the Cove Point export facility would require a greater concentration of hazardous processes and chemicals in close proximity to people's homes (there are 2,473 people in one mile radius of the facility).
Rachel Heinhorst, a mother of three and teacher from Lusby who lives in the home closest to the Cove Point site stated, "We are here today asking Governor O'Malley why he stood up to protect the people in Baltimore County from the Sparrows Point LNG facility but has failed to protect those of us in Calvert County from the dangerous Cove Point LNG export facility. We deserve better than to live in fear of an explosion, of the water we drink, of the air we breathe."
For months, members of Calvert Citizens for a Healthy Community have been calling on federal, state and local officials to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment, as recommended in the most current fire safety standards (NFPA 59A: Standard for the Production, Storage, and Handling of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), 2013 Edition) for LNG. This study would assess offsite risks as a vital fire safety mitigation measure for nearby residents. A report conducted by consulting firm Ricardo-AEA found that the facility could pose "intolerable risks" to workers and residents living close to the facility.
"Governor O'Malley is the highest ranking state official responsible for the safety of Maryland residents, and we believe Lusby residents deserve nothing less than the most current safety protections," said Tracey Eno of Calvert Citizens for a Healthy Community. "The Governor's reluctance to order this assessment for the export expansion at Cove Point leaves residents wondering - what is our Governor so afraid that the public will learn about this project?"
Following the press conference, Food & Water Watch delivered a letter signed from more than 52 organizations across the country calling on Governor O'Malley to step up and call for the study, citing the impacts that the facility would have on their communities from the fracking wells, pipelines, compressor stations and frac sand mining. The groups also delivered over 1,000 petitions from individuals calling for the study.
"Governor O'Malley's inaction on Cove Point is being noted by organizations across the country that are increasingly concerned about the damaging effects fracking has on their communities," said Emily Wurth, Water Program Director at Food & Water Watch. "From fracking in the Marcellus Shale in Pennsylvania to frac sand mining in Iowa, sacrificing our communities to ship natural gas to Asia through Cove Point is a giant leap backwards."
The press conference was held prior to the 1pmBoard of Public Works meeting, where Governor O'Malley will for the first time be confronted in person by residents of Calvert County. The Governor is one of the board members voting on whether or not to grant a wetlands license to Dominion Resources for a construction pier on the Patuxent river -- bringing the company one step closer to building the Cove Point LNG export facility in Calvert County.
"Public officials and agencies are failing to protect the health and safety of the residents of Calvert County and people throughout the Chesapeake region," said Robin Broder, Board Member, Waterkeepers Chesapeake. "Upstream impacts of fracking are being ignored. Economic impacts to local economies are being ignored. Pollution impacts to the Bay, the Patuxent River and upstream rivers and drinking water supplies are being ignored. When will the governor, our federal lawmakers and state agencies begin to listen to the people instead of rubber stamping everything the oil and gas industry wants to do?"
Food & Water Watch mobilizes regular people to build political power to move bold and uncompromised solutions to the most pressing food, water, and climate problems of our time. We work to protect people's health, communities, and democracy from the growing destructive power of the most powerful economic interests.
(202) 683-2500LATEST NEWS
'Epic Ocean Victory': Biden Permanently Bans Offshore Drilling Across 625 Million Acres
The authority President Joe Biden used could make it difficult for the incoming Trump administration to reverse the sweeping drilling ban.
Jan 06, 2025
Outgoing President Joe Biden on Monday moved to permanently ban offshore oil and gas drilling across more than 625 million acres of U.S. coastal territory, protecting swaths of the East Coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific, and Alaska's Northern Bering Sea from fossil fuel exploitation just before President-elect Donald Trump is set to retake power.
Biden said in a statement that his decision "reflects what coastal communities, businesses, and beachgoers have known for a long time: that drilling off these coasts could cause irreversible damage to places we hold dear and is unnecessary to meet our nation's energy needs."
Invoking the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill—the largest in U.S. history—Biden said future drilling off the coasts he's seeking to protect "is not worth the risks." Recent polling indicates that a majority of the American public agrees: 64% support action to shield U.S. coastlines from new offshore drilling, according to a 2024 survey conducted by Ipsos on behalf of the advocacy group Oceana.
"As the climate crisis continues to threaten communities across the country and we are transitioning to a clean energy economy," the president said Monday, "now is the time to protect these coasts for our children and grandchildren."
Biden's move comes just two weeks before Trump, a fervent champion of fossil fuel drilling, is set to be sworn in as the nation's 47th president. During his first term in office, Trump moved to expand offshore drilling to nearly all U.S. coastal waters before temporarily banning drilling off the coasts of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina in 2020.
The far-right Project 2025 agenda crafted by members of Trump's first administration calls for a major increase in offshore fossil fuel drilling.
"Our treasured coastal communities are now safeguarded for future generations."
While Trump and his proposed Cabinet—which is stacked with allies of the oil and gas industry—is expected to aggressively roll back climate protections put in place by the Biden administration, the outgoing president's new executive action could have staying power.
In a fact sheet, the White House said Biden is using his authority under Section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to "protect all U.S. Outer Continental Shelf areas off the East and West coasts, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and additional portions of the Northern Bering Sea in Alaska from future oil and natural gas leasing." The withdrawals, according to the White House, "have no expiration date, and prohibit all future oil and natural gas leasing in the areas withdrawn."
As The Washington Postobserved, "a federal judge ruled in 2019 that such withdrawals cannot be undone without an act of Congress.
"Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), the new chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, suggested that he would seek to overturn the decision using the Congressional Review Act, which allows lawmakers to nullify an executive action within 60 days of enactment with a simple majority vote," the Post added.
A spokesperson for Trump's transition team called Biden's action "disgraceful," adding, "Rest assured, Joe Biden will fail, and we will drill, baby, drill."
Predictably, the fossil fuel lobby also denounced Biden's executive action and implored lawmakers to "use every tool at their disposal to reverse this politically motivated decision."
While Biden has faced criticism from environmentalists throughout his four-year term for approving drilling permits in the face of intensifying climate chaos in the U.S. and around the world, advocates celebrated the president's latest executive action as a critical win.
"This is an epic ocean victory!" said Joseph Gordon, campaign director at Oceana. "Thank you, President Biden, for listening to the voices from coastal communities and contributing to the bipartisan tradition of protecting our coasts."
"Our coastlines are home to millions of Americans and support billions of dollars of economic activity that depend on a clean coast, abundant wildlife, and thriving fisheries," Gordon added. "Our treasured coastal communities are now safeguarded for future generations."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage
'For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption'
Jan 05, 2025
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute - representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world - are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state's damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law - the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River. (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Keep ReadingShow Less
Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos
Jan 04, 2025
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes has resigned from the Washington Post, where she has worked since 2008, due to what she claims was editorial interference.
Telnaes claimed an editor at the paper killed her draft cartoon depicting Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos and other billionaire tech and media chief executives groveling on their knees at the feet of President-elect Donald Trump.
Along with Bezos, Telnaes depicted Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman bringing Trump sacks of cash. Los Angeles Times owner and billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong was shown with a tube of lipstick.
In a post to her Substack, Telnaes wrote:
“I have had editorial feedback and productive conversations – and some differences – about cartoons I have submitted for publication, but in all that time, I’ve never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now.”
"As an editorial cartoonist, my job is to hold powerful people and institutions accountable. For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post. I doubt my decision will cause much of a stir and that it will be dismissed because I’m just a cartoonist. But I will not stop holding truth to power through my cartooning because, as they say, “Democracy dies in darkness.”
Over three hundred thousand people canceled their digital subscriptions after Jeff Bezos decided to squash a Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris in October.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular