March, 08 2018, 07:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Thursday March, 08 2018, 07:00am EDT
Contact:
Timothy Karr: 201-533-8838,,tkarr@freepress.net
Sen. Kennedy Introduces Fake Net Neutrality Legislation
On Wednesday, Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) announced he had introduced anti-Net Neutrality legislation that is a companion to the so-called "Open Internet Preservation Act" introduced in the House by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) late last year.
WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON - On Wednesday, Sen. John Kennedy (R-Louisiana) announced he had introduced anti-Net Neutrality legislation that is a companion to the so-called "Open Internet Preservation Act" introduced in the House by Rep. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tennessee) late last year.
Kennedy's legislation lacks many of the fundamental guarantees that prevent internet access providers from interfering with online traffic and discriminating against websites and services. It reportedly includes some prohibitions on blocking or throttling of internet traffic, but would not prevent pay-to-play prioritization schemes. The legislation would also constrain FCC authority to contend with future abuses and prevent states from enacting their own Net Neutrality protections.
Free Press Action Fund President and CEO Craig Aaron made the following statement:
"Lobbyists for AT&T and Comcast have lost their fight against Net Neutrality in the court of public opinion. So they have pressured lawmakers to introduce fake Net Neutrality bills that would end all effective oversight of ISPs' anti-competitive, anti-consumer practices.
"While Senator Kennedy claims his bill was written in defense of an open internet, it's borrowing the language of Net Neutrality to allow a few unregulated monopolies to stifle competition and control the future of communications. This cynical attempt to offer fake protections to internet users is an insult to the millions of people who have called on Congress to pass a Congressional Review Act resolution of disapproval, which would repeal the FCC's bad 2017 ruling against Net Neutrality.
"It's a betrayal of Kennedy's own constituents, who have shown up week after week outside his offices urging him to do the right thing and back the CRA. The only way to stand up for real Net Neutrality right now is to reject the Trump FCC ruling and restore Title II authority. The way to do that is by sponsoring the resolutions of disapproval introduced last month in the House and Senate. The Net Neutrality protections put in place in 2015 were working extraordinarily well, with investment and innovation flourishing across the sector.
"Kennedy's bill defies the will of Louisianians on both sides of the political aisle, and suggests he was never seriously considering the facts about Net Neutrality, despite his claims in the press. Public support for real Net Neutrality is greater than it has ever been -- and Internet users won't be fooled by half-measures or industry attempts to confuse the issue. They can see through this sham. Lawmakers should reject Kennedy's bill, pass the resolution of disapproval and restore the vital bipartisan principles enshrined in the law by Title II."
Free Press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. We believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse and independent ownership of media platforms, and journalism that holds leaders accountable and tells people what's actually happening in their communities.
(202) 265-1490LATEST NEWS
'We Need Urgent Global Action': Study Warns Humanity on Path to Trigger 16 Climate Tipping Points
"It is clear that we are currently on a dangerous trajectory," said one University of Exeter professor.
Apr 23, 2025
Scientists on Wednesday released yet another study warning that humankind is at risk of triggering various climate "tipping points" absent urgent action to dramatically reduce planet-heating emissions from fossil fuels.
The new peer-reviewed paper, published Wednesday in the journal Earth System Dynamics, comes from a trio of experts at the United Kingdom's University of Exeter and the University of Hamburg in Germany.
Climate scholars use the term "tipping point" to describe a critical threshold which, when crossed, "leads to significant and long-term changes of the system," the paper notes. Debate over it "has intensified over the past two decades," prompting several studies of specific risks.
"Climate tipping points could have devastating consequences for humanity," said co-author Tim Lenton in a statement. "It is clear that we are currently on a dangerous trajectory—with tipping points likely to be triggered unless we change course rapidly."
"We need urgent global action—including the triggering of 'positive tipping points' in our societies and economies—to reach a safe and sustainable future," added the Exeter professor and Global Systems Institute director.
Lenton's team calculated the probabilities of triggering 16 tipping points. They looked at the risks of serious damage to key glaciers, ice sheets, sea ice, and permafrost; the dieback of forests such as the Amazon; the die-off of low-latitute coral reefs; and the collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which is part of a crucial "global conveyor belt" of ocean currents.
To assess the risk of current policies triggering climate tipping points, the researchers focused on a scenario in which median warming of 2.8°C takes place by the end of the century.
On that pathway, the study says, "our most conservative estimate of triggering probabilities averaged over all tipping points is 62%... and nine tipping points have a more than 50% probability of getting triggered."
Under scenarios with lower temperature rise, "the risk of triggering climate tipping points is reduced significantly," the study continues. "However, it also remains less constrained since the behaviour of climate tipping points in the case of a temperature overshoot is still highly uncertain."
The paper concludes that "rapid action is needed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, since climate tipping points are already close, and it will be decided within the coming decades if they will be crossed or not."
Lead author Jakob Deutloff shared that takeaway a bit more optimistically, saying that "the good news from our study is that the power to prevent climate tipping points is still in our hands."
"By moving towards a more sustainable future with lower emissions, the risk of triggering these tipping points is significantly reduced," he added. "And it appears that breaching tipping points within the Amazon and the permafrost region should not necessarily trigger others."
▶️New paper from Jakob Deutloff, Hermann Held and Tim Lenton highlights the need for action to prevent triggering climate tipping points. More on this at The Global Tipping Points conference @exeter.ac.uk Register now! global-tipping-points.org/conference-2... esd.copernicus.org/articles/16/...
[image or embed]
— Global Systems Institute (@gsiexeter.bsky.social) April 23, 2025 at 4:45 AM
The paper was published during Covering Climate Now's joint week of media coverage drawing attention to the 89% of people worldwide who want their governments to do more to address the global crisis; ahead of a Global Systems Institute conference on tipping points this summer; and just over six months away from the next United Nations climate summit, COP30, in Brazil.
While some governments are trying to prevent the worst-case scenario by taking action to cut emissions, U.S. President Donald Trump has made clear since returning to office in January that he aims to deliver on his pro-fossil fuel campaign pledge to "drill, baby, drill."
On the heels of the
hottest year in human history, Trump is working to gut key agencies, ditched the Paris climate agreement, and has taken executive action to boost planet-wrecking coal, gas, and oil, including declaring a national energy emergency.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Decry Rubio's 'Deeply Unserious' State Department Overhaul Plan
One observer called the proposal "nothing less than an assault on American diplomacy."
Apr 23, 2025
Secretary of State Marco Rubio's plan to streamline what he called the "bloated" State Department by slashing staff and closing or consolidating bureaus was widely criticized Tuesday as a dangerous retreat from diplomacy and soft power that would weaken U.S. standing abroad and boost adversaries.
"In its current form, the department is bloated, bureaucratic, and unable to perform its essential diplomatic mission in this new era of great power competition," Rubio said in a statement. "Over the past 15 years, the department's footprint has had unprecedented growth and costs have soared."
"But far from seeing a return on investment, taxpayers have seen less effective and efficient diplomacy," he added. "The sprawling bureaucracy created a system more beholden to radical political ideology than advancing America's core national interests. That is why today I am announcing a comprehensive reorganization plan that will bring the department into the 21st century."
Marco Rubio says the State Department has been “beholden to radical political ideology.” Also known as democracy.
[image or embed]
— Mark Jacob ( @markjacob.bsky.social) April 22, 2025 at 9:45 AM
Rubio's proposal includes a 15% department-wide staff reduction, the elimination of 132 of the agency's 734 bureaus and offices, and the consolidation of many others, according to reports. Bureaus and programs expected to be eliminated or merged include the Office of Global Women's Issues; the war crimes and civilian protection divisions; and the agency's diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts, which have been banned throughout the executive branch. The position of special climate envoy will also be eliminated.
The Office of Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights is slated to be replaced by a new division for the coordination for foreign assistance and humanitarian affairs that will assume responsibilities once shouldered by the embattled U.S. Agency for International Development. Already under siege by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, USAID is reeling from Rubio's announcement last month that the vast majority of its programs would be canceled.
Christopher Le Mon, a former senior department official during the Biden administration, toldThe New York Times Tuesday that the plan's human rights scaleback "sends a clear signal that the Trump administration cares less about fundamental freedoms than it does about cutting deals with autocrats and tyrants."
In a Substack post published Tuesday, Rubio accused the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor of becoming "a platform for left-wing activists to wage vendettas against 'anti-woke' leaders" and the Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration of funneling "millions of taxpayer dollars to international organizations and NGOs that facilitated mass migration around the world, including the invasion on our southern border."
Responding to this, Brandon Wu, director of policy and campaigns at ActionAid USA, said that "Secretary Rubio's rant against the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor as the carrier of a leftist agenda lays the administration's intentions bare: Their decimation of the State Department is part of an unhinged crusade against perceived 'woke' policies and practices, not a coherent plan for reform."
"The idea that any part of the State Department was supporting an 'invasion' of the U.S. southern border is similarly ludicrous," Wu added. "The proposed staff reductions at the State Department, when taken in conjunction with the dismantling of USAID, will hamper the diplomatic engagement with the rest of the world. This is a deeply unserious proposal that will not make the U.S. safer or stronger."
"Trump has said he wants to be a president who ends wars, but moves like this will make that much more difficult."
Dylan Williams, vice president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy, a Washington, D.C.-based think tank, called Rubio's plan "nothing less than an assault on American diplomacy" that will "further decimate U.S. influence and standing in the world, undermining our fundamental security and other critical interests."
"Coupled with the administration's intention to dramatically increase military spending, this decimation of the State Department also serves as a clear indication that it is prioritizing militarism over diplomacy," Williams said. "Donald Trump has said he wants to be a president who ends wars, but moves like this will make that much more difficult."
Democratic lawmakers also condemned Rubio's proposal, with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), the ranking member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, asserting that "any changes to the State Department and USAID must be carefully weighed with the real costs to American security and leadership."
"As I and many of my Democratic colleagues have made clear, we welcome reforms where needed—but they must be done with care," she continued. "Elon Musk and his team have engaged in a slash-and-burn campaign targeting federal employees, terminating critical programs at State and USAID, undermining our allies, and diminishing American leadership in the world."
"A strong and mission-ready State Department advances American national security interests, opens up new markets for American workers and companies, and promotes global peace and stability," Shaheen added. "It remains to be seen how the administration's latest proposals will achieve that goal."
Rep. Gregory Meeks (D-N.Y.), the ranking member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, warned that Rubio's proposed reorganization "would leave the State Department ill-equipped to advance U.S. national security interests."
"The vital work left on Secretary Rubio's cutting-room floor represents significant pillars of our foreign policy long supported by Democrats and Republicans alike, including former Sen. Rubio—not 'radical ideologies' as he now claims," Meeks added. "Retreating from this work will further erode our national security and undermine our influence on the world stage."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Israeli Strikes Destroy Machinery Used for Recovering Bodies Buried Under the Rubble in Gaza
One aid worker described conditions in Gaza as the "stuff of nightmares."
Apr 23, 2025
As Israel's blockade of aid into Gaza continues, misery in the enclave has been compounded after Israeli airstrikes on Tuesday destroyed several bulldozers used to clear streets and remove bodies from beneath rubble.
According to the United Nations, citing local officials, the destruction of the heavy machinery has brought rescue and recovery efforts to a halt, making it even more challenging to reach the thousands of bodies trapped under rubble.
A recent investigation from Sky Newshighlighted how Gazans trapped under debris and rubble die slow deaths as residents attempt to dig them out with inadequate equipment such as a trowel or hammer. The U.N., relying on local reports, estimates that 11,000 bodies are trapped under the rubble.
According to Gaza's Civil Defense, nine bulldozers were brought into the enclave during the six-week cease-fire that Israel upended on March 18. The general directorate of the Civil Defense called their destruction a "targeted attack" on the Jabalia al-Nazla Municipality headquarters in northern Gaza.
On Tuesday, the Center for Palestinian Human Rights, which is based in Gaza City, released a statement condemning the destruction of the bulldozers.
"Such equipment is essential for saving lives and facilitating the movement of ambulance and Civil Defense crews," said the group. These acts by Israeli security forces "reflect their policy of deliberately inflicting on Palestinians conditions of life calculated to bring about their physical destruction, in whole or in part, constituting integral act of the crime of genocide ongoing for over 18 months."
In a statement on Tuesday, the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said it carried out attacks on "engineering vehicles" used for "terror purposes."
Meanwhile, Israel has imposed a complete blockade of aid into Gaza since early March and relaunched its military campaign on the strip on March 18, shattering the cease-fire that went into effect in mid-January.
One Oxfam aid worker described the conditions in Gaza as the "stuff of nightmares," according to a Tuesday statement from the global organization.
According to the group, Oxfam and its partners have not received any aid trucks, food parcels, hygiene kits, or other essential equipment since the siege began. Oxfam has a few water tanks remaining, otherwise its supplies is nearly exhausted.
The group also condemned repeated evacuation orders given by the Israeli military.
"It's hard to explain just how terrible things are in Gaza at the moment. Our staff and partners are witnessing scenes of carnage and despair every day," said Clemence Lagouardat, Oxfam's humanitarian response lead in Gaza. "People are in terror, fearing for their lives as displacement orders tell them, with little notice, to move with whatever they can carry."
The Guardiandescribed the siege as imposing conditions "unmatched in severity" since the start of the war, due to the new evacuation orders, strikes targeting civilian infrastructure, and dwindling food, fuel, and medical supplies.
"Gaza City is packed with displaced people who have fled Israeli troops moving into the north, and they are living on the street or putting their tents inside damaged buildings that are going to collapse," Amande Bazerolle, the Gaza emergency coordinator for Médecins Sans Frontières, or Doctors Without Borders, told The Guardian. "There are not enough points of care for so many people. At our burns clinic in Gaza City, we are refusing patients by 10:00 am and we have to tell them to come back the next day, as we are triaging to make our drug supplies last as long as possible."
In October 2023, Hamas militants attacked southern Israel, killing over 1,000 people and taking roughly 250 hostages—prompting Israel to carry out a fierce military campaign in the Gaza Strip.
Multiple human rights groups have said Israel is guilt of committing genocide or "acts of genocide."
Over 51,000 people in Gaza have been killed since Israel's campaign began, according to local health officials.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular