March, 22 2021, 12:00am EDT
In New Letter To Pres. Biden, Senate Majority Leader Schumer, & Speaker Pelosi, Massive Coalition of 100 Women Leaders--Including Celebrities & Restaurant Owners--Say Anything Less Than Giving Tipped Workers a Full Minimum Wage Would Codify Gender Pay
Groups say any negotiations to advance minimum wage legislation create pathway to permanently ending the subminimum wage.
WASHINGTON
In a new letter sent this morning to President Joseph Biden, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, and House Speaker Pelosi, a massive coalition of 100 women leaders, including several celebrities and restaurant owners from across the United States are urging the nation's top Democrats to not compromise for anything less than 100% of the full minimum wage for tipped workers, arguing that anything less than a full minimum wage with tips on top results in the restaurant industry having the highest levels of sexual harassment and gender based violence of any industry.
The letter is being delivered just days before Equal Pay Day and also explains how failing to end the subminimum wage for restaurant workers allows the restaurant industry to legally pay women one third of what they pay men - perpetuating gender pay inequities. Together with the letter, national organizations One Fair Wage will also be delivering to Senate Majority Leader and Speaker Pelosi 140,000 petitions from tipped service workers calling for the same thin--100% of the wage for tipped workers.
READ THE LETTER TO PRESIDENT BIDEN, MAJORITY LEADER SCHUMER & SPEAKER PELOSI HERE: https://onefairwage.site/women-gender-justice-leaders-letter-on-tipped-minimum-wage-8
The letters, which recognize that President Biden, Sen. Majority Leader Schumer and Speaker Pelosi will have to negotiate with other Democrats to get the majority support needed to pass Raise the Wage Act, proposes compromises such as adding tax breaks for small businesses and expanding timelines to achieve the full minimum wage for tipped workers - but firmly asserts that anything less than a full minimum wage, even if it takes a longer timeline, is not acceptable. The letters explain:
"In negotiating over the subminimum wage for tipped workers, we could consider additional, time-limited supports for small businesses in the leisure and hospitality industry, supplementing the new Restaurant Revitalization Fund and other small business assistance, given that both workers and employers in the sector have been hard hit by the pandemic, or even a longer timeline to achieve a full minimum wage. But we cannot allow tipped workers to ultimately earn less than 100% of the wage, even if it takes several years to get there. Allowing employers to pay anything less than the full minimum wage to tipped workers exacerbates crisis-level rates of sexual harassment and gender pay inequity."
Specifically, the letter signers argue:
- The subminimum wage for tipped workers is a legacy of slavery that exacerbates gender pay inequity and devalues women's work. Among the millions of tipped workers nationwide for whom the federal subminimum wage is still just $2.13 an hour, more than two-thirds are women, disproportionately women of color. Even before the COVID-19 pandemic and its impacts on the leisure and hospitality industry--including job loss, reduced hours, and lower tips--the poverty rate for women working as restaurant servers, bartenders and in other tipped jobs was nearly 2.5 times the rate for workers overall.
- The subminimum wage for tipped workers is also the key reason that the restaurant industry has the highest rates of sexual harassment of any industry.Because they are dependent on customer tips as a portion of their base wage, tipped workers who earn a subminimum wage often feel forced to tolerate inappropriate customer behavior to avoid jeopardizing their income. During the pandemic, as restaurants have reduced capacity and servers have faced declining tips, this power dynamic has grown even more problematic; in one survey, 41% of workers reported a noticeable change in overall levels of unwanted sexualized comments from customers during the pandemic, and hundreds of women reported that male customers asked them to take off their masks to judge their looks and their tips on that basis.
The letter was signed by 100 women's leaders including Gloria Steinem, Jane Fonda, Alyssa Milano, Amy Schumer, Sophia Bush, Patricia & Rosanna Arquette, Rosario Dawson, Lily Tomlin, dozens of national women's organizations, and organizations from states in which Democratic Senators voted against the Raise the Wage Act, like Maine and Arizona.
VIEW A FULL LIST OF SIGNERS HERE:
https://onefairwage.site/women-gender-justice-leaders-letter-on-tipped-minimum-wage-8
This Wednesday, March 24th, the United States commemorates Equal Pay Day is the symbolic day dedicated to raising awareness of the gender pay gap. In the United States, this date symbolizes how far into the year the average woman must work in order to earn what the average man earns in the previous year regardless of experience or job type.
LATEST NEWS
'Epic Ocean Victory': Biden Permanently Bans Offshore Drilling Across 625 Million Acres
The authority President Joe Biden used could make it difficult for the incoming Trump administration to reverse the sweeping drilling ban.
Jan 06, 2025
Outgoing President Joe Biden on Monday moved to permanently ban offshore oil and gas drilling across more than 625 million acres of U.S. coastal territory, protecting swaths of the East Coast, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, the Pacific, and Alaska's Northern Bering Sea from fossil fuel exploitation just before President-elect Donald Trump is set to retake power.
Biden said in a statement that his decision "reflects what coastal communities, businesses, and beachgoers have known for a long time: that drilling off these coasts could cause irreversible damage to places we hold dear and is unnecessary to meet our nation's energy needs."
Invoking the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill—the largest in U.S. history—Biden said future drilling off the coasts he's seeking to protect "is not worth the risks." Recent polling indicates that a majority of the American public agrees: 64% support action to shield U.S. coastlines from new offshore drilling, according to a 2024 survey conducted by Ipsos on behalf of the advocacy group Oceana.
"As the climate crisis continues to threaten communities across the country and we are transitioning to a clean energy economy," the president said Monday, "now is the time to protect these coasts for our children and grandchildren."
Biden's move comes just two weeks before Trump, a fervent champion of fossil fuel drilling, is set to be sworn in as the nation's 47th president. During his first term in office, Trump moved to expand offshore drilling to nearly all U.S. coastal waters before temporarily banning drilling off the coasts of Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina in 2020.
The far-right Project 2025 agenda crafted by members of Trump's first administration calls for a major increase in offshore fossil fuel drilling.
"Our treasured coastal communities are now safeguarded for future generations."
While Trump and his proposed Cabinet—which is stacked with allies of the oil and gas industry—is expected to aggressively roll back climate protections put in place by the Biden administration, the outgoing president's new executive action could have staying power.
In a fact sheet, the White House said Biden is using his authority under Section 12(a) of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to "protect all U.S. Outer Continental Shelf areas off the East and West coasts, the eastern Gulf of Mexico, and additional portions of the Northern Bering Sea in Alaska from future oil and natural gas leasing." The withdrawals, according to the White House, "have no expiration date, and prohibit all future oil and natural gas leasing in the areas withdrawn."
As The Washington Postobserved, "a federal judge ruled in 2019 that such withdrawals cannot be undone without an act of Congress.
"Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah), the new chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee, suggested that he would seek to overturn the decision using the Congressional Review Act, which allows lawmakers to nullify an executive action within 60 days of enactment with a simple majority vote," the Post added.
A spokesperson for Trump's transition team called Biden's action "disgraceful," adding, "Rest assured, Joe Biden will fail, and we will drill, baby, drill."
Predictably, the fossil fuel lobby also denounced Biden's executive action and implored lawmakers to "use every tool at their disposal to reverse this politically motivated decision."
While Biden has faced criticism from environmentalists throughout his four-year term for approving drilling permits in the face of intensifying climate chaos in the U.S. and around the world, advocates celebrated the president's latest executive action as a critical win.
"This is an epic ocean victory!" said Joseph Gordon, campaign director at Oceana. "Thank you, President Biden, for listening to the voices from coastal communities and contributing to the bipartisan tradition of protecting our coasts."
"Our coastlines are home to millions of Americans and support billions of dollars of economic activity that depend on a clean coast, abundant wildlife, and thriving fisheries," Gordon added. "Our treasured coastal communities are now safeguarded for future generations."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage
'For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption'
Jan 05, 2025
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute - representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world - are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state's damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law - the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River. (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Keep ReadingShow Less
Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos
Jan 04, 2025
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes has resigned from the Washington Post, where she has worked since 2008, due to what she claims was editorial interference.
Telnaes claimed an editor at the paper killed her draft cartoon depicting Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos and other billionaire tech and media chief executives groveling on their knees at the feet of President-elect Donald Trump.
Along with Bezos, Telnaes depicted Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman bringing Trump sacks of cash. Los Angeles Times owner and billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong was shown with a tube of lipstick.
In a post to her Substack, Telnaes wrote:
“I have had editorial feedback and productive conversations – and some differences – about cartoons I have submitted for publication, but in all that time, I’ve never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now.”
"As an editorial cartoonist, my job is to hold powerful people and institutions accountable. For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post. I doubt my decision will cause much of a stir and that it will be dismissed because I’m just a cartoonist. But I will not stop holding truth to power through my cartooning because, as they say, “Democracy dies in darkness.”
Over three hundred thousand people canceled their digital subscriptions after Jeff Bezos decided to squash a Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris in October.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular