April, 14 2021, 12:00am EDT

For Immediate Release
Contact:
Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, Western Environmental Law Center, (575) 770-1295, eriksg@westernlaw.org
Taylor McKinnon, Center for Biological Diversity, (801) 300-2414, tmckinnon@biologicaldiversity.org
Virginia Cramer, Sierra Club, (804) 519-8449, virginia.cramer@sierraclub.org
Jeremy Nichols, WildEarth Guardians, (303) 437-7663, jnichols@wildearthguardians.org
Landon Newell, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, (801) 428-3991, landon@suwa.org
WASHINGTON
Hundreds of climate, Native American, religious, business and conservation organizations today called on the Biden administration to do a comprehensive environmental review under the National Environmental Policy Act and other laws to align federal fossil fuel programs with U.S. climate goals to curb global warming.
The letter asks the Interior Department to evaluate a legal finding of climate harm from fossil fuel expansion. It describes how the administration can use existing laws to end new fossil fuel leasing onshore and offshore and manage a just, orderly decline of production consistent with its goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.
The letter also calls for the fair and meaningful involvement of communities vulnerable to climate change, affected by or dependent upon the federal fossil fuel program.
In February the Biden administration issued an executive order pausing oil and gas leasing onshore and offshore pending a climate review of federal fossil fuel programs. In June the Interior Department will issue an interim report describing findings from a March online forum and public comments being solicited through April 15.
In January, 574 conservation, Native American, religious and business groups sent the then president-elect text for a proposed executive order to ban new fossil fuel leasing and permitting on federal public lands and waters.
Today's letter, authored by Western Environmental Law Center, the Center for Biological Diversity, WildEarth Guardians and Sierra Club, was signed by organizations from across the United States, many with members who live on the front lines of fossil fuel pollution and in communities harmed by climate change.
Quotes From Organizations
"The comprehensive review of the federal fossil fuels programs is a long-needed step in the right direction," said Erik Schlenker-Goodrich, executive director of the Taos, N.M.-based Western Environmental Law Center. "Done right and coupled with investments in workers and frontline communities, it can spark a long-needed transition away from fossil fuels and toward a just, equitable and climate-resilient economy where public lands serve as a cornerstone of climate resilience and conservation, not exploitation."
"Runaway pollution from the federal fossil fuel programs has been worsening climate chaos for decades," said Taylor McKinnon, a senior campaigner at the Center for Biological Diversity. "The Biden administration must do a comprehensive review and make frontline communities a part of this process. This will inevitably show the need for a ban on new leasing and a just, orderly decline of oil and gas extraction on public lands and waters."
"The climate crisis requires immediate action. The BLM must put a halt to all new leasing of public lands if there is any chance of avoiding the most severe impacts of a changing climate," said Landon Newell, a staff attorney with the Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance. "For far too long the BLM has wrongly elevated oil and gas leasing and development as the primary use of our nation's public lands, threatening our climate, wildlife, cultural treasures and wild places. This unbalanced approach must stop now."
"The writing on the wall is clear. The long-term health of our communities, economies and our climate requires phasing out fossil fuel leasing on public lands," said Eric Huber, managing attorney for Sierra Club's Environmental Law Program.
"We cannot afford to close our eyes to the dangers of inaction; we need bold action now to halt new leasing and to diversify economies in ways that allow everyone to benefit."
"It's time to put public lands and waters to work for our climate and justice, not for fossil fuels," said Jeremy Nichols, climate and energy program director at WildEarth Guardians. "We're counting on President Biden and Interior Secretary Deb Haaland to boldly reform federal oil and gas management to ensure we keep fossil fuels in the ground and our nation on track for climate progress."
"Together our groups represent millions of people across the country all urging the Biden administration to put the health and safety of our communities and our climate before oil and gas profits," said Nicole Ghio, senior fossil fuels program manager at Friends of the Earth. "The Department of the Interior must meaningfully engage with the public and start managing our lands and waters for the public good instead of selling out future generations to prop up the fossil fuel industry. This starts with permanently halting new leases on public lands and waters."
"As mothers and grandmothers, we want to know that future generations have clean air, clean water and a climate-resilient economy," said Shelley Silbert, executive director of Great Old Broads for Wilderness. "Our best use of public lands is to ensure the safety and health of America's communities and our land, water and wildlife. The fossil fuel industry has for too long put profit above all else. The leasing pause is a valuable way to review impacts and align priorities toward a livable future."
"Winding down federal oil and gas leasing and permitting programs is critical to saving the West," said Natasha Leger, executive director of Citizens for a Healthy Community. "The largest climate hotspot in the U.S. is over the 15 water-producing counties for seven states in the West and Mexico, where we're experiencing extreme drought. We cannot expect to adapt our way out of the climate, ecological and health crises exacerbated by oil and gas extraction."
Background
Fossil fuel production on public lands causes about a quarter of U.S. greenhouse gas pollution. Peer-reviewed science estimates that a nationwide federal fossil fuel leasing ban would reduce carbon emissions by 280 million tons per year, ranking it among the most ambitious federal climate-policy proposals in recent years.
Oil, gas and coal extraction uses mines, well pads, gas lines, roads and other infrastructure that destroys habitat for wildlife, including threatened and endangered species. Oil spills and other harms from offshore drilling have done immense damage to ocean wildlife and coastal communities. Fracking and mining also pollute watersheds and waterways that provide drinking water to millions of people.
Federal fossil fuels that have not been leased to industry contain up to 450 billion tons of potential climate pollution; those already leased to industry contain up to 43 billion tons. Pollution from the world's already producing oil and gas fields, if fully developed, would push global warming well past 1.5 degrees Celsius.
Signing Organizations:
Alabama Interfaith Power & Light, Alliance for Climate Education (ACE), Amigos Bravos, Animal Welfare Institute, Animals Are Sentient Beings, Inc, Animas Valley Institute, Anthropocene Alliance, Atchafalaya Basinkeeper, Athens County's Future Action Network aka Athens County Fracking Action Network, Audubon Society, Aytzim: Ecological Judaism, Azul, Black Warrior Riverkeeper, Breast Cancer Action, Bronx Jewish Earth Alliance, Bucks County Concerned Citizens Against the Pipelines, Bucks Environmental Action, Businesses for a Livable Climate, California League of Conservation Voters, Californians for Western Wilderness, Call to Action CO, CatholicNetwork.US, CELL, Center for Civic Policy, Center for International Environmental Law, Center for Neighborhood Technology (CNT), Central Bergen Circle of GreenFaith, Central Colorado Wilderness Coalition, Chaco Alliance, Church Women United in New York State, Citizens' Environmental Coalition, Citizens for a Healthy Community, Climable, Inc., Climate Action Now Western Mass, Climate Advocates Voces Unidas, Climate Advocates Voces Unidas (CAVU), Climate First: Replacing Oil & Gas (CFROG), Climate Hawks Vote, Climate Hawks Vote, Climate Health Now, Coalition for Outreach, Policy & Education, Colorado Rising, Common Ground Rising, Community for Sustainable Energy, Community Health, Conservation Voters New Mexico, Cooperative Energy Futures, Corporate Ethics International, Corvallis Interfaith Climate Justice Committee / Corvallis Carbon Offset Fund, Defend Our Future, Defenders of Wildlife, Defiende Nuestra Tierra, Dine C.A.R.E., Earth Action, Earth Action, Inc, Earth Action, Inc., Earth Day.org, Earthworks, EcoFlight, Endangered Habitats League, Endangered Habitats League, Endangered Species Coalition, Environmental Protection Information Center, Environmental Protection Information Center, Extinction Rebellion San Francisco Bay Area, First United Methodist Church, Environmental Care Team, Food & Water Watch, Fossil Free California, Foundation Earth, FracTracker Alliance, FreshWater Accountability Project, Friends of the Earth, Gas Free Seneca, GASP, Georgia Conservation Voters, Geos Institute, Golden Egg Permaculture, Grassroots Coalition, Great Egg Harbor Watershed Association, Great Old Broads for Wilderness, GreenFaith, Greenpeace USA, Gullah/Geechee Fishing Association, Gullah/Geechee Sea Island Coalition, HealthLink, Inc, Healthy Gulf, Heartwood, High Country Conservation Advocates, Idle No More Michigan, Indigenous Environmental Network, Inspiration of Sedona, Interfaith Earthkeepers of Eugene/Springfield, International Marine Mammal Project of Earth Island Institute, JewishClimateAction-MA, John Muir Project of Earth Island Institute, Kickapoo Peace Circle, Klamath Forest Alliance, KyotoUSA, Lifelong Medical, Los Padres ForestWatch, Lynn Canal Conservation, Malach Consulting, Massachusetts Forest Watch, MassAmerican Energy LLC, Mid-Missouri Peaceworks, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Milwaukee Riverkeeper, Mining Impact Coalition of Wisconsin, Mission Blue, Montana Environmental Information Center, MountainTrue, Native American Caucus, New Mexico Sportsmen, New Mexico Wild, New Hampshire Audubon, New Mexico Environmental Law Center, No Coal In Richmond, Nobody Leaves Mid-Hudson, North Carolina Council of Churches, North Range Concerned Citizens, Northern Alaska Environmental Center, Northern Arizona Climate Change Alliance, NY4WHALES, Oasis Earth, Ocean Conservation Research, Oceanic Preservation Society, Oil Change International, Oregon Wild, Our Climate Education Fund, Our Revolution Michigan, Patagonia, Pelican Media, People's Party, Physicians for Social Responsibility, Physicians for Social Responsibility Arizona Chapter, Physicians for Social Responsibility Florida Chapter, Physicians for Social Responsibility Pennsylvania Chapter,PNM Shareholders for a Responsible Future, ProgressNow New Mexico, Public Lands Project, Pueblo Action Alliance, Rachel Carson Council, RapidShift Network, Raptors Are The Solution, Reconstructionist Rabbinical Association, Resource Renewal Institute, Rio Arriba Concerned Citizens, Rio Grande Indivisible, NM, River Guardian Foundation, RootsAction.org, Safe Energy Now/North County, San Francisco Bay Physicians for Social Responsibility, Santa Barbara County Action Network, Santa Barbara Standing Rock Coalition, Santa Barbara Urban Creeks Council, Santa Fe Green Chamber of Commerce, Save Our Shores, SAVE THE FROGS!, Seaside Sustainability, Seneca Lake Guardian, A Waterkeeper Alliance Affiliate, Seventh Generation, Sisters of Charity Federation, Sisters of St. Dominic of Blauvelt, New York, Social Eco Education (SEE-LA), Soda Mountain Wilderness Council, Southern Oregon Climate Action Now, Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance, Spottswoode Winery, Inc., Sunflower Alliance, Sungage Financial LLC, Sunrise Corvallis, Syracuse Cultural Workers, System Change Not Climate Change, Tennessee Riverkeeper, The Climate Center, The Enviro Show, The Forest Foundation, Inc., The Samuel Lawrence Foundation, To Nizhoni Ani, Toxics Information Project (TIP), Turner Endangered Species Fund, Turtle Island Restoration Network, Unite North Metro Denver, United for Action (based in NYC), Upper Green River Alliance, Upper Peninsula Environmental Coalition, V & T Ventures, LLC, Vote Climate, Wall of Women, Wasatch Clean Air Coalition, WATCH, Inc, Waterkeeper Alliance, Waterkeepers Chesapeake, WCCUSD, WESPAC Foundation, Inc., Western Colorado Alliance, Western Watersheds Project, Wild Connections, Wilderness Workshop, Women's Earth and Climate Action Network (WECAN), Wyoming Sierra Club, 2degrees Northampton, 350 Colorado, 350 Conejo/San Fernando Valley, 350 Everett, WA, 350 Hawaii, 350 Humboldt, 350 Mass Metro North Node, 350 New Orleans, 350 Seattle, 350 Silicon Valley, 350.org. 350.org New Mexico, 350Corvallis, 350Kishwaukee, 7 Directions of Service
At the Center for Biological Diversity, we believe that the welfare of human beings is deeply linked to nature — to the existence in our world of a vast diversity of wild animals and plants. Because diversity has intrinsic value, and because its loss impoverishes society, we work to secure a future for all species, great and small, hovering on the brink of extinction. We do so through science, law and creative media, with a focus on protecting the lands, waters and climate that species need to survive.
(520) 623-5252LATEST NEWS
Pushing to Eviscerate Head Start and SNAP, Trump Wants to Give Parents Medals for Having More Kids
Republicans, said one feminist writer, "don't care about making the world better, safer, or healthier for American families and children. They just want women to have more babies."
Apr 23, 2025
Political observers have warned that U.S. President Donald Trump has spent his first months in office "flooding the zone"—unleashing a torrent of executive actions and Republican proposals meant to overwhelm his opponents while furthering his right-wing agenda, including pushes to slash healthcare for more than 36 million children, eliminate funding for early childhood education, and weaken environmental justice initiatives.
But new reporting this week revealed that while taking significant actions that are expected to directly harm millions of children—and make the cost of living higher for parents across the country—White House officials have been considering a range of proposals aimed at encouraging people to have more children.
As The New York Times reported Monday, White House aides have met in recent weeks with policy experts and advocates for boosting U.S. birth rates, which have been declining since 2007.
Simone and Malcolm Collins, activists who founded Pronatalist.org, which they describe as "the first pronatalist organization in the world," told the Times that they have sent multiple draft executive orders to the White House, including one that would bestow a "National Medal of Motherhood" on women who have six children or more—a scheme with history in numerous fascist regimes, including those of Italian dictator Benito Mussolini, Nazi leader Adolf Hitler, and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin.
Other proposals aides have discussed would reserve 30% of Fulbright scholarships for people who are married or have children; grant a $5,000 "baby bonus" to families after they have a baby; and fund programs that educate women on their menstrual cycles so they can use "natural family planning" and determine when they are able to conceive.
"Just so we're clear: Instead of teaching kids about birth control and sexual health, the government would fund programs that teach little girls how to get pregnant," wrote Jessica Valenti at the Substack newsletter Abortion, Every Day.
The latter proposal would likely be offered without offering women any information about contraception or other comprehensive sex education, which President Donald Trump vehemently opposed in his first term.
The administration's "pronatalist" push has been steadily building since before Trump won the presidency. During the campaign last year, Vice President JD Vance provoked an uproar when he doubled down on his comments from 2021 when he had said the Democratic Party was run by "childless cat ladies." He said last summer that people without biological children "don't really have a direct stake in" the future and defended his previous remarks that the government should "punish the things that we think are bad"—meaning not having children.
"For years, proposals and debates have separated having children from raising children. But parents aren't dumb. They'll look around and ask whether this is a world where it's good to have children."
Vance's claim that the Democratic Party is "anti-family and anti-child" was based largely on his belief that politicians on the left are too negative about the future—frequently expressing concern about the scientific consensus that continuing to extract fossil fuels, which Trump has promised to ramp up, will cause more frequent and devastating extreme climate events.
Since Trump took office, he has pledged to be a "fertilization president"—touting his support for in vitro fertilization even as federal researchers in reproductive technology were dismissed from their jobs—and his transportation secretary, Sean Duffy, told staffers to prioritize infrastructure projects in areas with high birth and marriage rates.
But the Republican Party, including Trump, has long scoffed at concrete policy proposals meant to make raising children—not just birthing them—more accessible for American families.
The Michigan Republican Party penned a memo in 2023 saying a paid family leave proposal was a "ridiculous idea" akin to "summer break for adults," and a budget proposal by Trump in 2018 claimed to require states to provide paid parental leave, but it was derided as "phony and truly dangerous" by one policy expert.
Senate Republicans last year blocked legislation that would have helped lift 500,000 children out of poverty by expanding eligibility for the child tax credit.
According to a leaked draft for the Health and Human Services Department's budget, Trump is now proposing eliminating federal funding for Head Start, which provides early childhood education and other support services for low-income children and their families, helping nearly 40 million children since it began six decades ago.
Bruce Lesley, president of First Focus on Children, said of the proposed cuts to Head Start last week that it was "shocking to see an administration consider a proposal that will impose such widespread harm on children."
"Rarely has there been such a clear, targeted attack on children," said Lesley. "Parents already have trouble finding available childcare and early learning programs, and even when they do, they struggle to afford them. The average annual cost of center-based childcare for an infant is over $15,000, more than in-state college tuition in many states. And who has the least access and greatest financial challenges to care? The children served by Head Start.
Meanwhile, the federal budget proposal passed by House Republicans earlier this month would help pay for "huge tax giveaways for wealthy households and businesses," said the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities, by cutting health coverage for 72 million people who rely on Medicaid and food assistance for an estimated 13.8 million children who receive Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits.
Responding to the reports of Trump's potential "pronatalist" proposals, Ellen Galinsky, president of the Families and Work Institute, told the Institute for Public Accuracy that the White House "can't just encourage people to have children. You have to think about what happens to those children after they're born."
"The countries that have been more successful in [raising children] have given family allowances, parental leave, and focused on who will teach and take care of children," said Galinsky. "The more children you have, the more likely it is you'll need to work and bring in a salary. Do parents have flexibility at their workplace?"
"For years, proposals and debates have separated having children from raising children," she added. "But parents aren't dumb. They'll look around and ask whether this is a world where it's good to have children."
Republicans' proposed cuts to essential services for families demonstrate that they "don't care about making the world better, safer, or healthier for American families and children," wrote Valenti. "They just want women to have more babies."
"What happens after that?" she added. "They couldn't care less."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Survey Shows Progressive Voters Want 'Fighters,' Not 'Status Quo' Democrats, to Battle Trump
Our Revolution connected the sentiments expressed in the survey to a bid by Democratic National Committee Vice Chair David Hogg to support primaries against safe-seat incumbents.
Apr 23, 2025
Active progressive and Democratic-leaning voters are interested in seeing primary challengers to Democrats who represent the "status quo" and are "failing to meet the moment," according to a survey from the group Our Revolution, which polled more than 4,100 voters meeting that description between April 18-20.
According to survey results published Wednesday, 92% want primary challenges to status quo Democrats who aren't generating enough grassroots energy—and 96% support "transforming the party from within," which Our Revolution defines as electing Democratic challengers who reject corporate political action committee (PAC) money and are "ready to take the fight directly to Trump and his enablers."
Our Revolution, a progressive political organizing group launched as a continuation of Sen. Bernie Sanders' (I-Vt.) 2016 presidential campaign, said in a statement Wednesday that the results reveal a deep frustration with Democratic Party leadership.
Our Revolution also connected the survey results to an effort by David Hogg, Democratic National Committee vice chair and survivor of the 2018 school shooting in Parkland, Florida, to primary "ineffective, asleep-at-the-wheel" Democrats in safely blue seats.
The PAC Hogg co-founded, Leaders We Deserve, has pledged to spend $20 million to support primary challengers in such races.
"Our Revolution polling shows Hogg's sentiment is shared by a large majority of engaged progressive voters," Our Revolution said.
"The voters we organize with are sounding the alarm: they want fighters, not placeholders," added Joseph Geevarghese, executive director of Our Revolution. "If the party establishment continues to sleepwalk through this crisis, they'll be replaced by a new generation of leaders who aren’t afraid to take on the fight of our lives."
In the release, Geevargheese called the survey respondents voters that Our Revolution organizes, though the statement about the survey results doesn't offer more information about the survey sample.
In addition to support for primarying establishment Democrats, 87% of respondents said the Democratic Party has "lost its way."
What's more, 82% want the Democratic Party to stop accepting "Big Money" from billionaires and corporations, 70% said they are not confident Democratic leaders will do what's needed to stop Trump, and 72% support moving away from a "cautious, centrist approach" in confronting Trump and the far right.
In March, Our Revolution conducted a survey of its own members which found that nearly 90% of respondents believe Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) should step aside from his leadership role, and 86% said they would support a primary challenger against Schumer for his Senate seat, should he refuse to step aside.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Under Trump 2.0, Business Is Booming for Corporate Lobbying Firms
"Lobbying firms like Ballard Partners know they can trust the Trump administration to fight on behalf of their corporate clients."
Apr 23, 2025
Disclosures filed this week show that lobbying firms with close ties to U.S. President Donald Trump's White House have seen business surge at the start of 2025, with one group that used to employ Trump's chief of staff and attorney general more than doubling its first-quarter revenue compared to last year.
Ballard Partners, a firm led by a Trump donor, reported $14 million in lobbying revenue in the first three months of this year, up from $6.2 million during the same time in 2024.
Politicoreported earlier this week that Ballard "has disclosed more than 130 new lobbying clients just since Election Day, including JPMorgan Chase, Chevron, Palantir, Netflix, Ripple Labs, and the Business Roundtable."
Attorney General Pam Bondi and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles both previously lobbied for Ballard, as did Trump's deputy director of personnel, Trent Morse.
"Lobbying firms like Ballard Partners know they can trust the Trump administration to fight on behalf of their corporate clients," the anti-corruption group End Citizens United said in response to the new disclosures.
Mother Jonesnoted that Ballard "wasn't the only lobbying firm to see a Trump bump."
"Mercury Public Affairs, where Wiles briefly worked repping a tobacco company, reported earning $5.1 million from lobbying in the first quarter of 2025—nearly half the $11.4 million it earned in all of 2024," the outlet observed. "Miller Strategies, run by super-lobbyist Jeff Miller (the firm's website includes a link to a Wall Street Journalarticle proclaiming Miller 'Trump's K Street rainmaker' for his prominent role in campaign fundraising), reported earning $8.6 million in the first three months of this year. In all of 2024, it only reported $12.6 million."
Despite claiming on the campaign trail that he was "not a big person for lobbyists" and that politicians "have to stop listening" to them, Trump has shown a willingness to do their bidding at the start of his second term in the White House.
Earlier this month, as Common Dreamsreported, Trump signed an executive order aimed at delaying Medicare negotiations for a major category of prescription drugs after pharmaceutical industry lobbyists pushed aggressively for the change.
On Monday, The Leverreported that Trump's Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) "hid data that mapped out the locations of thousands of dangerous chemical facilities, after chemical industry lobbyists demanded that the Trump administration take down the public records."
"After President Donald Trump's victory in November, chemical companies donated generously to his inauguration fund," the outlet observed. "Oil giant ExxonMobil, which is a member of the American Chemistry Council, the industry's main lobbying arm, donated $1 million. The multinational chemical company DuPont donated $250,000."
Trump has placed Lynn Dekleva, a former lobbyist for the American Chemistry Council and DuPont, at the head of an EPA office with "the authority to approve new chemicals for use," The New York Timesreported in February.
During her time with the American Chemistry Council, Dekleva led the group's lobbying campaign to limit EPA regulations on formaldehyde, which the U.S. National Toxicology Program labels as a known carcinogen.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular