September, 23 2021, 02:57pm EDT
Over 300 State and Local Leaders Call on Biden, Congress to Take Bold Action on Nuclear Weapons
Officials across 41 states support back from the brink campaign.
WASHINGTON
Today, the Back from the Brink campaign released a letter signed by over 300 local, county and state officials representing 41 states, calling on President Joe Biden and Congress to reduce and eliminate the threat nuclear weapons pose to their communities and the world. The letter includes representatives from diverse communities across the United States, from Portland, Oregon to Portland, Maine, and Alaska to Florida. The letter remains open for other local leaders to sign.
"Defense budgets and the threat of nuclear war are certainly not topics debated at the County Council," said Dee Durham, a member of the New Castle County Council in Delaware - President Biden's home county - and a signatory of the letter. "However, in a very real way, nothing matters unless we work together to prevent the greatest threat to our very existence. We have a platform to express our voice on matters that impact our constituents, including the use of taxpayer monies not just locally, but globally."
The Back from the Brink campaign calls for five common sense policy changes to make the U.S. and world safer from nuclear weapons by:
- Actively pursuing a verifiable agreement among nuclear-armed states to eliminate their nuclear arsenals;
- Renouncing the option of using nuclear weapons first;
- Ending the sole, unchecked authority of any president to launch a nuclear attack;
- Taking U.S. nuclear weapons off hair-trigger alert; and
- Cancelling the plan to replace the entire U.S. arsenal with enhanced weapons at a cost of more than $1 trillion over the next 30 years.
According to these local leaders, the nuclear arms race robs their communities of needed resources to address pressing problems of human security, such as COVID-19 recovery, racial and economic inequity and housing and food insecurity.
"We need to shift our valuable resources to important endeavors that actually keep people safe like affordable housing, environmental sustainability and equitable job opportunities," said Baltimore City Comptroller Bill Henry. "That is our only path towards peace."
The U.S. spends over $70 billion taxpayer dollars annually to build and maintain nuclear weapons. The country is currently on track to spend $1.7 trillion over the next 30 years - the equivalent of total U.S. student debt - on new, enhanced and unnecessary nuclear weapons.
"Local leaders around the country understand that nuclear weapons are the greatest threat to public health that we face," said Dr. Ira Helfand, co-founder and past president of Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR). "We have to understand that these weapons do not make us safe; they are the greatest threat to our security and we need a fundamental change in US nuclear policy based on that reality."
"The elected officials who signed this letter understand that nuclear weapons are a local issue in the same way that a global pandemic or the climate crisis are local issues," said Denise Duffield, associate director of PSR's Los Angeles chapter. "Unfortunately, there is no vaccine, adaptation or mitigation strategies that can protect us from nuclear war. As this campaign continues to grow, I'm confident that Congress can expect to hear from more local elected officials, more municipalities and states, and more concerned constituents about the urgent need to abolish nuclear weapons."
The letter signers hope to influence the Biden administration's Nuclear Posture Review, the document that sets U.S. nuclear policy. As the administration crafts the document, security experts are warning that the danger of nuclear war is greater than it has ever been, and recent scientific studies have shown that even a limited nuclear war would cause catastrophic worldwide climate disruption and global famine.
"Local leaders from across the country recognize the clear risk nuclear weapons pose to their communities," said David Combs, senior campaign coordinator for the Union of Concerned Scientists' (UCS) Global Security Program. "President Biden has worked to reduce the threat of nuclear war throughout his career. He now has the opportunity to make his vision of a safer world a reality by listening to local and state representatives from across the country and adopting the Back from the Brink policies."
The Back From the Brink platform has been endorsed by 53 municipalities and six state legislative bodies, including Los Angeles, Philadelphia and Washington, D.C., and over 380 health, environmental, faith and peace organizations including UCS, PSR, Sierra Club, Indivisible, Hip Hop Caucus, Friends of the Earth, Veterans for Peace, Presbyterian Church U.S.A, 350.org, and Pax Christi U.S.A.
The Union of Concerned Scientists is the leading science-based nonprofit working for a healthy environment and a safer world. UCS combines independent scientific research and citizen action to develop innovative, practical solutions and to secure responsible changes in government policy, corporate practices, and consumer choices.
LATEST NEWS
Vermont Sued for New Law Requiring Big Oil to Pay for Climate Damage
'For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption'
Jan 05, 2025
The US Chamber of Commerce and the American Petroleum Institute - representing the biggest fossil fuel companies in the world - are suing the State of Vermont over its new law requiring fossil fuel companies to pay a share of the state's damage caused by climate change.
The lawsuit, filed last Monday in the US District Court for the District of Vermont, asks a state court to prevent Vermont from enforcing the law passed last year. Vermont became the first state in the country to enact the law after it suffered over $1 billion in damages from catastrophic summer flooding and other extreme weather.
Vermont’s Attorney General’s Office said as of Friday, Jan. 3, they had not been served with the lawsuit.
The lawsuit argues that the U.S. Constitution precludes the act and that the federal Clean Air Act preempts state law. It also claims that the law violates domestic and foreign commerce clauses by discriminating “against the important interest of other states by targeting large energy companies located outside of Vermont.”
The Chamber and the American Petroleum Institute argue that the federal government is already addressing climate change. Because greenhouse gases come from billions of individual sources, they claim it has been impossible to measure “accurately and fairly” the impact of emissions from a particular entity in a specific location over decades.
“For too long, giant fossil fuel companies have knowingly lit the match of climate disruption without being required to do a thing to put out the fire,” Paul Burns, executive director of the Vermont Public Interest Research Group, said in a statement. “Finally, maybe for the first time anywhere, Vermont is going to hold the companies most responsible for climate-driven floods, fires and heat waves financially accountable for a fair share of the damages they’ve caused.”
The complaint is an essential legal test as more states consider holding fossil fuels liable for expensive global warming-intensified events like floods, fires, and more. Maryland and Massachusetts are among the states expected to pursue similar legislation, modeled after the federal law known as Superfund, in 2025.
New York Gov. Kathy Hochul (D) signed a similar climate bill into law - the Climate Change Superfund Act- on Dec. 26, pointing to the need to fund climate adaptation projects.
Downtown Montpelier, Vermont was under water on Monday, July 10, 2023 caused by the flooding of the Winooski River. (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Heavy Rains Cause Catastrophic Flooding In Southern Vermont (Photo by Scott Eisen/Getty Images)
Flooding is seen in downtown Montpelier, Vermont (Photo: John Tully for The Washington Post via Getty Images)
Keep ReadingShow Less
Renowned Washington Post Cartoonist Quits After Refusal to Publish Critique of Jeff Bezos
Jan 04, 2025
Pulitzer Prize-winning cartoonist Ann Telnaes has resigned from the Washington Post, where she has worked since 2008, due to what she claims was editorial interference.
Telnaes claimed an editor at the paper killed her draft cartoon depicting Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos and other billionaire tech and media chief executives groveling on their knees at the feet of President-elect Donald Trump.
Along with Bezos, Telnaes depicted Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman bringing Trump sacks of cash. Los Angeles Times owner and billionaire Patrick Soon-Shiong was shown with a tube of lipstick.
In a post to her Substack, Telnaes wrote:
“I have had editorial feedback and productive conversations – and some differences – about cartoons I have submitted for publication, but in all that time, I’ve never had a cartoon killed because of who or what I chose to aim my pen at. Until now.”
"As an editorial cartoonist, my job is to hold powerful people and institutions accountable. For the first time, my editor prevented me from doing that critical job. So I have decided to leave the Post. I doubt my decision will cause much of a stir and that it will be dismissed because I’m just a cartoonist. But I will not stop holding truth to power through my cartooning because, as they say, “Democracy dies in darkness.”
Over three hundred thousand people canceled their digital subscriptions after Jeff Bezos decided to squash a Washington Post endorsement of Kamala Harris in October.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Biden Greenlights 'Racist' and 'Sociopathic' $8B Arms Sale to Israel
Multiple human rights organizations and international bodies have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza
Jan 04, 2025
The administration of US President Joe Biden announced on Saturday an arms sale to Israel valued at $8 billion, just ahead of President-elect Donald Trump's return to the White House.
Biden has repeatedly rejected calls to suspend military backing for Israel because of the number of civilians killed during the war in Gaza. Israel has killed more than 45,000 people in Gaza, primarily women and children.
The sale includes medium-range air-to-air missiles, 155mm projectile artillery shells for long-range targeting, Hellfire AGM-114 missiles, 500-pound bombs, and more.
Human rights groups, former State Department officials, and Democratic lawmakers have urged the Biden administration to halt arms sales to Israel, citing violations of US laws, including the Leahy Law, as well as international laws and human rights.
The Leahy Law, named after former Sen. Patrick Leahy, requires the US to withhold military assistance from foreign military or law enforcement units if there is credible evidence of human rights violations.
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the nation’s most significant Muslim civil rights and advocacy organization, today called Biden’s new $8 billion arms deal “racist” and “sociopathic.”
Multiple human rights organizations and international bodies have accused Israel of committing genocide in Gaza. The International Criminal Court (ICC) issued arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for committing war crimes.
The US is, by far, the biggest supplier of weapons to Israel, having helped it build one of the most technologically sophisticated militaries in the world.
CAIR National Executive Director Nihad Awad said on Saturday:
“We strongly condemn the Biden administration for its unbelievable and criminal decision to send another $8 billion worth of American weapons to the government of indicted war criminal Benjamin Netanyahu instead of using American leverage to force an end to the genocide in Gaza.
“Only racists who do not view people of color as equally human, and sociopaths who delight in funding mass slaughter, could send Netanyahu even more bombs while his government openly kidnaps doctors, destroys hospitals, and exterminates the last survivors in northern Gaza.
“If President Biden is actually the person who approved this new $8 billion arms sale, then he is a war criminal who belongs in a cell at The Hague alongside Netanyahu. But if Antony Blinken, Brett McGurk, Jake Sullivan, and other aides are making these unconscionable decisions as shadow presidents, then anyone with a conscience in the administration should speak up now about their abuses of power.”
According to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), the US accounted for 69% of Israel's imports of major conventional arms between 2019 and 2023.
On the other hand, incoming President-elect Donald Trump has also pledged unwavering support for Israel and has never committed to supporting an independent Palestinian state.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular