November, 16 2021, 04:30pm EDT
COP26 Agreement Fails to Address Climate Emergency, Take Necessary Steps to Protect Amazon and Respect Indigenous Peoples' Rights
Fossil fuel lobby outnumbered Indigenous representation two to one, nations struck deal on international carbon markets despite Indigenous opposition to carbon pricing.
WASHINGTON
Undermining global hopes for meaningful action, the 26th annual Conference of Parties (COP26) climate summit in Glasgow concluded over the weekend without successfully addressing key drivers of the climate crisis, among them the destruction of the Amazon rainforest and the role of fossil fuels. Countries pledged to end deforestation by 2030 and announced $1.7 billion in support to Indigenous forest defenders, without input from Indigenous communities. The commitments are non-binding and fall short of the demands of Indigenous and frontline communities, as well as the urgency and ambition needed to address today's climate crisis.
During the first week of COP, the Amazonia for Life: Protect 80% by 2025 coalition announced new data on the Amazon degradation and deforestation, which has reached 22%, signaling that the rainforest has reached an irreversible tipping point. Undeterred, Amazonian Indigenous peoples continue to mobilize, calling on governments to act immediately to implement measures to achieve 80% protection.
Rather than taking meaningful action, COP26 provided powerful political and corporate actors the opportunity to cement false solutions like "net zero" targets and carbon trading mechanisms. Eschewing growing calls, from activists to the scientific community, for the rapid phasing out of fossil fuels and moratoriums on further forest felling, it allowed governments to push back zero deforestation targets for another decade. Brazil's Bolsonaro administration was even congratulated for empty deforestation commitments amid surging Amazon destruction.
Despite being deeply exclusive toward frontline communities, Indigenous peoples, women, and youth attended in full force, organizing for climate justice and against the fossil fuel industry's corporate greenwash that dominated COP26.
For some Amazonian defenders, traveling to Glasgow was a brief respite from the death threats they face at home. Just days following her return to the Brazilian Amazon, Munduruku leader Alessandra Korap Munduruku's home was burglarized in a clear attempt to intimidate her and undermine her people's struggle against illegal mining and government-backed megaprojects. Kakataibo leader Herlin Odicio has gone back to the Peruvian Amazon, where he will likely face ongoing attempts to silence his advocacy for Indigenous rights at the hands of narco-land grabbers.
"Considering the climate emergency, we traveled to COP26 to amplify the urgency of protecting the Amazon, respect for Indigenous rights, lives, and territories, and demand climate justice. Despite the travel restrictions and inequities due to the COVID-19 pandemic, Indigenous representation was substantial both inside and outside the COP, including the largest delegation of Brazilian Indigenous leaders and youth in the history of climate negotiations calling for 'Land Back' as a climate solution," shared Leila Salazar-Lopez, Executive Director of Amazon Watch.
"While Indigenous solutions were clearly present at the COP, the Glasgow agreement failed to address the climate emergency. While nearly $20 billion was pledged to protect forests by 2030, that's too late for the Amazon, which faces a catastrophic tipping point. We must protect 80% of the rainforest by 2025. This means implementation of the Amazon for Life Declaration, which calls for an immediate moratorium on deforestation and fossil fuel expansion, direct forest finance to Indigenous and forest communities on the front lines of protection, and the exclusion of forest-carbon offsets, " Salazar-Lopez concluded.
Finance "Greenwashes" Away Role in Climate Chaos
In the world of climate finance, much has been made of the Global Financial Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), a group of private sector financiers with assets totaling $130 trillion, signing a commitment at COP26 to achieve net-zero portfolios by 2050.
"This agreement reeks of greenwash: it includes no near-term commitments for any action on fossil fuels or forest protection. In fact, JPMorgan and UBS, both members of the GFANZ, are some of the worst financiers of oil and gas in the Amazon rainforest. It appears that this net-zero pledge is simply another hallow corporate commitment like those that over 700 civil society groups across the world, including Amazon Watch, condemned in the lead-up to COP26," said Pendle Marshall- Hallmark, Climate Finance Campaigner at Amazon Watch.
The COP also marked long-fought climate victories.
Marshall- Hallmark continued, "Due to years of grassroots movement building, COP26 signaled the decline of the coal age, signaling a clear path for the next targets: oil and gas. We're building momentum for an Exit of Amazon Oil & Gas by the world's largest banks through our Amazon Exclusion campaign. In the runup to COP26, Dutch bank ING announced an end to new oil financing in Peru, adding to its earlier commitment to end new oil financing in Ecuador. We're seeing that with pressure, we can move banks to make the rainforest the next Arctic exclusion."
Overall, wealthy nations of the Global North yet again failed to take responsibility for their role in driving the climate crisis, as the U.S. and EU banded together to block "loss and damage" financing that would have provided crucial support for Global South nations that are most affected by climate change. As such, COP26's climate finance outcomes were a continuation of climate colonialism.
Jade Begay, Climate Justice Campaign Director of NDN Collective and Amazon Watch Board Member shares more: "This year, Indigenous Peoples mobilized our efforts to challenge Article 6 in particular because of its severe implications to our land rights. This article promotes carbon market mechanisms that would open up opportunities for land grabs by corporations and governments. We firmly took the position that we would not accept Article 6 unless it includes specific language respecting Indigenous knowledge, proper consultation with Indigenous Peoples throughout the entirety of any decision making processes, and an independent grievance mechanism that holds bad actors accountable."
Amazonian governments double-speak
Ecuador President Guillermo Lasso received widespread praise for announcing the expansion of a maritime protected area for the Galapagos Islands. But he conveniently failed to mention his government's plans to double Amazon oil production over the opposition of Indigenous peoples. The decision runs contrary to the recent IEA report indicating the need to keep fossil fuels in the ground and end new financing of new expansion and exploration, which are incompatible with the Paris agreement and the latest IPCC report, as well as COP26's ambition to limit warming to 1.5C. These projects violate Indigenous rights and are a death sentence for those living in voluntary isolation.
After two weeks in Glasgow, Indigenous Amazonian women defenders from the Kichwa territory of Sarayaku shared, "We Indigenous peoples, resist resource extraction, including fossil fuels, on our lands with our bodies and with our lives. Our contribution to protecting the climate should be recognized and our solutions should be heard. We call upon all governments and the United Nations to recognize our Kawsak Sacha, Living Forest proposal as a solution. Indigenous territories are sources and spaces of life and should be free from all extractive activity to mitigate climate change and ensure human survival. We call on all states, companies, and multilateral organizations to focus on true, not false solutions, and keep fossil fuels in the ground."
Brazilian climate negotiators attempted to use COP26 to burnish the country's tattered environment image, announcing a new commitment to achieve zero deforestation and reduce methane emissions by 30% by 2030. Brazil also vowed to end "illegal" deforestation by 2028, two years earlier than a previous target. However, these pledges mean nothing given how deforestation has soared under Bolsonaro to levels last seen in 2008, as the extreme-right populist aims to open the Amazon to industrial development. The preliminary data from the national space research agency INPE showed about 877 square kilometers of forest were cleared in October, a 5% increase from October 2020. It was the worst October deforestation since the current monitoring system began in 2015.
Sonia Guajajara, Executive Coordinator of APIB (Association of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil), stressed the need for Indigenous voices to be central in climate change discussions for real change to occur during a COP 26 special session: "We are not the ones who are creating the pollution, the ones who are making the problem, but we are the people who are being killed by it: this is environmental genocide. Although Indigenous people form only 5 percent of the global population, they protect 8 percent of the Earth's biodiversity. Yet, they continue to be excluded from decision-making. Governments need to reforest their minds and understand that climate change is already a reality, not a problem for the future. We are here to echo the call of Mother Earth because she is crying, and it is our duty to replicate her call while we still have time. What happens when she stops crying?"
The Peruvian Government maintained its tradition of using the COP to leverage financing. It was one of the countries that signed on to the declaration on forests and land use. Indigenous defenders at the COP reminded international governments that the Peruvian Amazon is facing a humanitarian crisis in which the funds invested to date have not prevented increased violence and deforestation.
Amazon Watch is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 to protect the rainforest and advance the rights of indigenous peoples in the Amazon Basin. We partner with indigenous and environmental organizations in campaigns for human rights, corporate accountability and the preservation of the Amazon's ecological systems.
LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that campaigners linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular