December, 08 2021, 10:52am EDT
![Stand.earth](https://assets.rbl.ms/50335756/origin.jpg)
Report Reveals Just 14 U.S. Public Pension, Permanent Funds Invest Massive $82 Billion in Fossil Fuels
New report with decade of data affirms fossil fuel divestment, reinvestment most prudent strategy for pensions in tackling climate change.
WASHINGTON
A first-of-its-kind comprehensive report released today from the Climate Safe Pensions Network and Stand.earth reveals that only 14 US pension and permanent funds finance fossil fuels to the tune of $81.6 billion, bankrolling an outsized proportion of the coal, oil, and gas industry.
The full report can be found here.
Amy Gray, Stand.earth, Senior Climate Finance Strategist, said:
"Public pension funds are the quiet culprits of climate chaos. With 10 years of data, there's hard evidence: divestment is a winning financial strategy. The fastest way for pensions to address climate change is to divest fossil fuel holdings and invest in just and equitable climate solutions."
The real-world impacts and conflicts these investments generate are being exposed right now. Nine of the funds listed in the report invest over $281 million in TC Energy, the company behind the controversial Coastal GasLink pipeline violating Indigenous rights in Wet'suwet'en land, including militarized police raids in British Columbia, Canada. The pension funds also have over $3.24 billion invested in big tar sands miners Canadian Natural Resources, Cenovus, ConocoPhillips, Exxon and Suncor.
Since the launch of the fossil fuel divestment movement, a decade of data shows early adopters of divestment strategies report neutral or positive financial results. From increasing stranded risk to the cost of capital for fossil fuel projects doubling, material risks for fossil fuel corporations are proven long-term and structural.
In the US, the cost of climate disasters doubled in 2020, costing at least $95 billion in immediate recovery. To date, 1500 institutions globally representing $39.88 trillion in assets have committed to some level of divestment.
Pensions makeup 11.8% of commitments, including notable divestment actions from Baltimore, Maryland, New York City and State, and the state of Maine. Most recently San Diego announced its intention to divest its $2.3 billion municipal portfolio from fossil fuels.
FUND | TOTAL FOSSIL FUND FUEL INVESTMENTS (USD) |
Alaska Permanent Fund Corporation (APFC) | $ 4,998,406,400 |
Alaska Retirement Management Board (ARMB) | $ 1,317,804,996 |
California Public Employees' Retirement System (CalPERS) | $ 27,143,227,590 |
California State Teachers' Retirement System (CalSTRS) | $ 15,658,203,000 |
Chicago Teachers' Pension Fund (CTPF) | $ 602,007,802 |
Colorado Public Employees' Retirement Association (PERA) | $ 2,122,338,149 |
Maine Public Employees Retirement System (MainePERS) | $ 989,154,971 |
Massachusetts Pension Reserves Investment Trust (PRIT) | $ 2,598,587,207 |
Minnesota State Board of Investment (MSBI) | $ 6,012,767,267 |
New Jersey Pension Funds (NJ) | $ 4,810,170,560 |
New York State Teachers' Retirement System (NYSTRS) | $6,563,005,119 |
Oregon Public Employees Retirement System (PERS) | $ 1,776,265,000 |
San Mateo County Employees' Retirement Association (SamCERA) | $ 46,177,998 |
Washington State Investment Board (WSIB) | $ 7,092,368,251 |
GRAND TOTAL | $ 81,730,484,311 |
Nick Limbeck, Chicago teacher and divestment organizer, said:
"We have only 6 1/2 years before we hit 1.5 C of warming which will trigger climate feedback loops that will send global warming spiraling out of control, yet our Chicago Teachers Pension Fund still has $600 million invested in fossil fuel companies. As teachers, we are called upon to nurture the next generation. The time is now to divest from fossil fuels. Let us give our students a chance to live and thrive in a world without climate catastrophe.
Maine Youth for Climate Justice, said:
"The primary duty of the Maine Public Employee Retirement System (MainePERS) is to ensure that the pension fund is well-funded and protected from large and unnecessary risk. These fossil fuel companies are exactly the kind of risk that they are mandated to minimize. The bottom line is that fossil fuels are not a safe investment for Maine, not safe for future generations, and not safe for the public employees relying upon this pension fund to support them as they age."
Andrew Bogrand, Divest Oregon Communications Director, said:
"This report reveals just how pension funds are silently bankrolling the climate crisis, which we are already experiencing here in Oregon. Following deadly heatwaves and costly forest fires, more and more Oregonians are urging the Oregon State Treasury to invest in a fossil-free future. Unfortunately, we do not know the extent of our state's investment in the carbon economy. This is why we are urging the Oregon State Treasury to act transparently and disclose all of its fossil fuel holdings. Decarbonizing our retirement starts with following the money!"
Jordan Dale, Divest NY, said:
"It is disturbing and unacceptable that so many pension fund boards and managers, whose mission is to provide for the secure future of their members, insist on supporting fossil fuel companies, which are systematically engaged in destroying that future, not just for the members, but for all of us.
Jane Vosburg, Fossil Free California Board President and CalSTRS beneficiary, said:
"It is unconscionable for any fund, especially teachers' pensions like my CalSTRS pension, to continue investing close to $16 billion in an industry that has caused this existential climate crisis. Costly wildfires throughout the state have already razed communities and schools and relocated and traumatized our students. Since 2014, teachers, like me, students, and local teachers' unions representing 160,000 beneficiaries have been urging CalSTRS board members (two of whom support divestment) to divest."
Deborah McNamara, Campaign Director at 350 Colorado, said:
"Maintaining the status quo of fossil fuel energy production and investments will unquestionably lead to a self-created catastrophe. Therefore the State of Colorado's state pension fund - Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) has an ethical responsibility to take steps to avert this disastrous result. Attempting to profit from investments in companies whose profits depend almost exclusively on the continuation of practices that cause climate breakdown (and adding insult to injury, losing money on those investments) is unacceptable and puts Colorado and PERA on the wrong side of history."
Tina Weishaus, Co-Chair of Divest NJ, said:
"There is only one strategy to protect the long term interests of NJ State Pension members from the existential threat of climate change and that is to divest from the billions of dollars that the Pension has in fossil fuel investments. Delay is folly!"
The Corporate Responsibility Action Group with Mothers Out Front MA, said:
"In Massachusetts we have an immediate opportunity to use the data in this Report to identify the fossil fuel investments in our state pension. Fortunately, we have a legislature working to move money out of risky fossil fuel investments and into fossil free options to protect our pensioners, taxpayers and communities, especially the most vulnerable low income communities. The data in this Report will be critical to the success of their efforts as we and future generations suffer the increasing damage and losses due to the climate crisis."
Doug Woodby, 350Juneau, said:
"This report gives Alaskans the first in-depth analysis of fossil fuel related investments held by the Permanent Fund, accounting for at least 6% of the funds $82 billion at the end of the 2021 fiscal year, as well as the Alaska state pension funds having over $1 billion in fossil fuel related stocks and bonds. These fossil fuel investments are not only contributing to climate chaos, by financing exploration and extraction of carbon-based energy, but they also risk significant monetary loss as the world turns to renewable energy. Divesting from fossil fuels is critically important for preserving the value of these funds for our pensioners, as well as for avoiding the worst of climate change impacts."
Bobbie Mooney, Fossil Free PERA Spokesperson & Colorado PERA member, said:
"PERA owes the same fiduciary duty to members retiring today and members retiring 30 years from now. Everyone's interests should be aligned when it comes to fossil fuel investments. It's time to move our money to safer investments, both for better returns today and a viable future for PERA members of my generation and beyond."
Devon Reynolds, Colorado PERA member, University of Colorado Graduate Student Employe, said:
"PERA should follow the lead of the New York State Comptroller, who announced that his office will decarbonize the pension fund's full portfolio by 2040 with interim targets, completing a systematic review of all fossil fuel investments within four years, including divesting from any companies which don't have a plan to leave fossil fuels behind. This includes transitioning their business away from oil and gas production, servicing or transportation, and alignment with the Paris Climate Agreement. As long as PERA's money remains invested in the fossil fuel industry, that investment supports an industry that has willfully denied its role in climate change, accelerating today's climate crisis in favor of profits. PERA must divest from fossil fuels."
Stand.earth (formerly ForestEthics) is an international nonprofit environmental organization with offices in Canada and the United States that is known for its groundbreaking research and successful corporate and citizens engagement campaigns to create new policies and industry standards in protecting forests, advocating the rights of indigenous peoples, and protecting the climate. Visit us at
LATEST NEWS
US Voter Registrations Surge as Republicans Try to Limit Ballot Access
One group said it has registered over 100,000 new voters since U.S. President Joe Biden dropped out of the 2024 race.
Jul 26, 2024
The group behind a popular get-out-the-vote technology platform said Friday that it's registered more than 100,000 new U.S. voters since President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, a surge that came amid mounting Republican efforts to make it harder to register and vote.
Vote.org said that 84% of voters registered in the new wave are under age 35. Nearly 1 in 5 new registrees is 18 years old. Andrea Hailey, the group's CEO, said that "since 2020, we have led the largest voter registration drive in U.S. history," with more than 7.8 million people registered.
After dropping out, Biden endorsed Vice President Kamala Harris to face former Republican President Donald Trump and Sen. JD Vance (R-Ohio) in the November election. The new presumptive Democratic candidate has already earned endorsements from many Democrats in Congress and groups advocating on issues including climate, labor, and reproductive rights.
Vote.org's success comes as Republicans at the federal level are proposing and passing legislation creating obstacles to the ballot box.
Earlier this month, U.S. House Republicans passed Rep. Chip Roy's (R-Texas)
Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, which would require proof of American citizenship to vote in federal elections. Republicans claim the bill is meant to fix the virtually nonexistent "problem" of noncitizen voter fraud.
However, Rep. Summer Lee (D-Pa.)
slammed the bill as a "xenophobic attack" meant to silence "Black voices, brown voices, LBGTQIA+ voices, [and] young voices."
Lee said the SAVE Act underscores the need to pass her recently introduced Right to Vote Act, "which would establish the first-ever affirmative federal voting rights guarantee, ensuring every citizen may exercise their fundamental right to cast a ballot."
Earlier this year, U.S. Senate Democrats also reintroduced the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, legislation its sponsors say will "update and restore critical safeguards of the original Voting Rights Act."
Meanwhile, Republican-controlled state legislatures and red-state governors are enacting laws imposing tough restrictions on voter registration, with violations punishable by stiff fines that critics say are meant to dissuade people from registration drives and similar efforts.
Again under the guise of preventing fraud, Republican Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis last year signed legislation limiting voter registration drives, with fines of up to $250,000 for violators.
"These draconian laws and rules are like taking a sledgehammer to hit a flea," Cecile Scoon, an attorney and president of the Florida chapter of the League of Women Voters,
toldThe New York Times in an article published Friday.
Three years after Kansas passed a law making "false representation" of an election official a crime, campaigners say it's become extremely difficult to sign up new voters.
"In 2020, even with the pandemic, we had registered nearly 10,000 Kansans to vote. Now, we haven't been able to register anyone," Davis Hammet, president of the youth voter mobilization group Loud Light, told the Times.
In Louisiana, Republican state lawmakers quietly passed legislation making it easier for election officials to toss out absentee ballots with missing details, limiting how people can mail in other voters' ballots, and restricting the ability to assist people with disabilities with their ballots.
"What we've found is that these measures have a disproportionate impact on voters with disabilities, both Black and white," NAACP Legal Defense Fund senior policy counsel Jared Evans
toldNola.com earlier this week.
"It's clear that their goal is to make it harder to vote, harder for specific communities to vote especially," Evans added. "What they don't realize is that these laws hurt white voters, too."
In Nebraska, Republican Secretary of State Bob Evnen last week
ordered county election offices to stop registering voters with past felony convictions who have not received official pardons. The move came after the state's unicameral Legislature passed a bill granting voting eligibility to felons immediately after they have completed their sentences instead of waiting two years.
"We refuse to accept thousands of Nebraskans having their voting rights stripped away," ACLU of Nebraska legal and policy fellow Jane Seu said in a statement. "We are confident in the constitutionality of these laws, and we are exploring every option to ensure that Nebraskans who have done their time can vote."
Keep ReadingShow Less
Critics Warn Manchin-Barrasso Permitting Bill 'Is Taken Straight From Project 2025'
"You thought Project 2025 was just a threat after the election? It's actually happening *right now,*" said one climate campaigner.
Jul 26, 2024
Climate and environmental defenders on this week implored U.S. senators to block a permitting reform bill introduced this week by Sens. Joe Manchin and John Barrasso that campaigners linked to Project 2025, a conservative coalition's agenda for a far-right overhaul of the federal government.
Common Dreamsreported Monday that Manchin (I-W.Va.) and Barrasso (R-Wyo.)—respectively the chair and ranking member of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee—introduced the Energy Permitting Reform Act of 2024.
The Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) noted that although the proposal "includes several positive reforms for the accelerated development of transmission projects," it also advocates "limiting opportunities for communities to challenge projects, loosening oversight for drilling and mining projects, extending drilling permits and fast-tracking [liquified natural gas] permits, and several other provisions friendly to fossil fuel giants."
"This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
These are nearly identical policies to what's proposed in Project 2025's Mandate for Leadership. The plan, which was spearheaded by the Heritage Foundation, calls for "unleashing all of America's energy resources," including by ending federal restrictions on fossil fuel drilling on public lands; limiting investments in renewable energy; and rolling back environmental permitting restrictions for new oil, gas, and coal projects, including power plants.
While Manchin has been trying—and failing—to pass fossil fuel-friendly permitting reform legislation for years, Brett Hartl, director of public affairs at the Center for Biological Diversity, said that his "Frankenstein legislation is taken straight from Project 2025, and it's the biggest giveaway in decades to the fossil fuel industry."
Hartl said the bill "deprives communities of the power to defend themselves and gives that power to Big Oil by making it harder for communities to challenge polluting projects in court," and "prioritizes the profits of coal barons over public health."
"And it mandates oil and gas extraction in our oceans," he continued. "The insignificant crumbs thrown at renewable energy do nothing to address the climate emergency."
"Monday was the hottest day in recorded history," Hartl noted. "It's shocking that as the climate emergency continues to break records around us, the Senate continues to fast-track the fossil fuel expansion that is killing us. This dangerous bill doesn't deserve a floor vote."
Hartl added that "to preserve a livable planet," Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) "must squash this legislation now."
Manchin—who has said this will be his last term in office—has been a steadfast supporter of the fossil fuel industry, partly because his family owns a coal company. The senator says his permitting reform bill "will advance American energy once again to bring down prices, create domestic jobs, and allow us to continue in our role as a global energy leader."
However, Allie Rosenbluth, Oil Change International's U.S. manager, warned Thursday that "this bill is yet another dangerous attempt by Sen. Manchin to line the pockets of his fossil fuel donors, sacrificing communities and our climate along the way."
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else," she continued. "It would unleash more drilling on federal lands and waters, unnecessarily rush the review of proposed oil and gas export projects, and lift the Biden administration's pause on new LNG exports."
"We urge Congress to reject this proposal and commit to action that protects frontline communities from the impacts of fossil fuel development and the climate crisis," Rosenbluth added.
"Don't be fooled: The Energy Permitting Reform Act is another dirty deal to fast-track fossil fuels above all else."
NRDC managing director of government affairs Alexandra Adams said Wednesday that "this bill is a giveaway for the oil and gas industry that will ramp up drilling and environmental destruction at a time when we need to be putting a hard stop to fossil fuels."
"We cannot afford to roll back so many of our bedrock environmental and community legal protections and offer a blank check to the oil and gas industry," she stressed. "We need new solutions for permitting if we are going to meet our clean energy potential and address the climate challenge. But this is not it."
"This bill would altogether be a leap backward on climate, health, and justice if passed into law," Adams added. "The Senate should reject it and look toward alternative solutions already being considered."
Keep ReadingShow Less
'Nothing To Eat': War-Torn Sudan Faces Mass Famine as Military Delays Aid
Both parties in Sudan's civil war are to blame for a looming mass famine, experts say, and the military's blocking of U.N. aid at a border crossing with Chad exacerbates the problem.
Jul 26, 2024
Sudan's military is blocking United Nations aid trucks from entering at a key border crossing, causing severe disruptions in aid in a country that experts fear may be on the brink of one of the worst famines the world has seen in decades, The New York Timesreported Friday.
The border city of Adré in eastern Chad is the main international crossing into the Darfur region of Sudan, but the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF), the state's official military, which is engaged in a civil war with a paramilitary group called the Rapid Support Forces (RSF), has refused to issue permits for U.N. trucks to enter there, as it's an RSF-controlled area.
U.S. and international officials have issued increasingly alarmed calls for steady aid access to help feed the millions of severely malnourished people in Darfur and other areas of Sudan.
Last week, Linda Thomas-Greenfield, the United States ambassador to the U.N., said that the SAF's obstruction of the border was "completely unacceptable."
Both warring parties in Sudan continue to perpetrate brazen atrocities, including starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This piece focuses on the SAF's ongoing obstruction of essential aid. The situation is catastrophic. The policy is criminal. https://t.co/FKhqQh3EI9.
— Tom Dannenbaum (@tomdannenbaum) July 26, 2024
The Sudanese who've made it out of the country and into Adré reported dire and unsafe conditions in their home country.
"We had nothing to eat," Bahja Muhakar, a Sudenese mother of three, told the Times after she crossed into Chad, following a harrowing six-day journey from Al-Fashir, a major city in Darfur. She said the family often had to live off of one shared pancake per day.
Another mother, Dahabaya Ibet, said that her 20-month-old boy had to bear witness to his grandfather being shot and killed in front of his eyes when the family home in Darfur was attacked by gunmen late last year.
Now the mothers and their families are refugees in Adré, where 200,000 Sudanese are living in an overcrowded, under-resourced transit camp.
In addition to those that have made it out of the country, there are 11 million people internally displaced within Sudan, most of whom have become displaced since the civil war began in April 2023.
An unnamed senior American official told the Times that the looming famine in Sudan could be as bad as the 2011 famine in Somalia or even the great Ethiopian famine of the 1980s.
In April, Reutersreported that people in Sudan were eating soil and leaves to survive, and The Washington Postcalled it a nation in "chaos," reporting that World Food Program trucks had been "blocked, hijacked, attacked, looted, and detained."
In late June, a coalition of U.N. agencies, aid groups, and governments warned that 755,000 people in Sudan faced famine in the coming months.
The U.S. last week announced $203 million in additional aid to Sudan—part of a $2.1 billion pledge that world leaders made in April, which some countries have not yet delivered on.
Some officials including Thomas-Greenfield, who has dubbed the situation in Sudan "the worst humanitarian crisis in the world," have called for the U.N. Security Council to allow aid delivery into the country even in the absence of SAF approval; it's believed that Russia would veto such a measure.
Sudan's civil war has seen a great deal of international interference. Amnesty International on Thursday published an investigatory briefing showing that weapons from Russia, China, Serbia, Turkey, Yemen, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) had been identified in the country. And The Guardian on Friday reported that the passports of Emirati citizens had been found among wreckage in Sudan, indicating the UAE may have troops or intelligence officers on the ground, though the UAE denied the accusation.
The International Service for Human Rights on Friday warned that both the SAF and RSF were engaged in wrongful killings and arrests, especially targeted at lawyers, doctors, and activists. The group called for an immediate cease-fire.
The SAF and Sudanese government figures have cast doubt on international experts' claims about famine in the country.
Keep ReadingShow Less
Most Popular