"The first sign that fortunes were shifting came in 2023, when a campaigning Donald Trump, seemingly out of nowhere, promised to hold a contest that would lead to the creation of 10 'freedom cities' on federal lands," they noted. After winning the U.S. presidential contest last November, Trump returned to the Oval Office in January.
As Klein and Taylor detailed:
One might assume that it is contradictory for Trump, elected on a flag-waving "America first" platform, to lend credence to this vision of sovereign territories ruled over by billionaire god-kings. And much has been made of the colorful flame wars between the MAGA mouth-piece Steve Bannon, a proud nationalist and populist, and the Trump-allied billionaires he has attacked as "technofeudalists" who "don't give a flying fuck about the human being"—let alone the nation state. And conflicts inside Trump's awkward, jerry-rigged coalition certainly exist, most recently reaching a boiling point over tariffs. Still, the underlying visions might not be as incompatible as they first appear.
The startup country contingent is clearly foreseeing a future marked by shocks, scarcity, and collapse. Their high-tech private domains are essentially fortressed escape pods, designed for the select few to take advantage of every possible luxury and opportunity for human optimization, giving them and their children an edge in an increasingly barbarous future. To put it bluntly, the most powerful people in the world are preparing for the end of the world, an end they themselves are frenetically accelerating.
That is not so far away from the more mass-market vision of fortressed nations that has gripped the hard right globally, from Italy to Israel, Australia to the United States: In a time of ceaseless peril, openly supremacist movements in these countries are positioning their relatively wealthy states as armed bunkers.
One of Trump's primary campaign promises was "mass deportations," which he has begun delivering on by having plainclothes immigration agents yank foreign students critical of U.S. policy off the streets and sending hundreds of immigrants—many of them seemingly innocent of any crimes—to a mega-prison in El Salvador. The president has pursued this agenda despite expert warnings about the human and economic impacts, and it's not just his anti-migrant effort expected to cause harm on both fronts.
This is an era of climate breakdown, rising risk of nuclear war, skyrocketing inequality, and unregulated artificial intelligence, and "Trump 2.0's economic project is a Frankenstein's monster of the industries driving all of these threats—fossil fuels, weapons, and resource-ravenous cryptocurrency and AI," Klein and Taylor stressed. "Everyone involved in these sectors knows that there is no way to build the artificial mirror world that AI promises to construct without sacrificing this world—these technologies consume too much energy, too many critical minerals, and too much water for the two to coexist in any kind of equilibrium."
While reclaiming the most powerful post in the world, Trump has surrounded himself with billionaires, putting tech leaders willing to give big donations in prominent seats at his inauguration and installing ultrarich individuals—including Elon Musk, the wealthiest person on Earth and the leader of companies including SpaceX—in key positions within his second administration.
"For Musk, Mars has become a secular ark, which he claims is key to the survival of human civilization, perhaps via uploaded consciousnesses to an artificial general intelligence," Klein and Taylor wrote. "Much like religious end-timers who long to escape the corporeal realm, Musk's drive for humanity to become 'multiplanetary' is made possible by his inability to appreciate the multispecies splendor of our only home."
That rejection of protecting Earth and its myriad species is key. As Klein and Taylor argued, "The governing ideology of the far right in our age of escalating disasters has become a monstrous, supremacist survivalism."
"To bet against the future on this scale—to bank on your bunker—is to betray, on the most basic level, our duties to one another, to the children we love, and to every other life form with whom we share a planetary home," the pair wrote. "This is a belief system that is genocidal at its core and treasonous to the wonder and beauty of this world. We are convinced that the more people understand the extent to which the right has succumbed to the Armageddon complex, the more they will be willing to fight back, realizing that absolutely everything is now on the line."
"Our opponents know full well that we are entering an age of emergency, but have responded by embracing lethal yet self-serving delusions," they continued. "Having bought into various apartheid fantasies of bunkered safety, they are choosing to let the Earth burn. Our task is to build a wide and deep movement, as spiritual as it is political, strong enough to stop these unhinged traitors. A movement rooted in a steadfast commitment to one another, across our many differences and divides, and to this miraculous, singular planet."
Klein and Taylor also offered a solution for how to "break this apocalyptic fever." According to them:
First, we help each other face the depth of the depravity that has gripped the hard right in all of our countries. To move forward with focus, we must first understand this simple fact: We are up against an ideology that has given up not only on the premise and promise of liberal democracy but on the livability of our shared world—on its beauty, on its people, on our children, on other species. The forces we are up against have made peace with mass death. They are treasonous to this world and its human and non-human inhabitants.
Second, we counter their apocalyptic narratives with a far better story about how to survive the hard times ahead without leaving anyone behind. A story capable of draining end times fascism of its gothic power and galvanizing a movement ready to put it all on the line for our collective survival. A story not of end times, but of better times; not of separation and supremacy, but of interdependence and belonging; not of escaping, but staying put and staying faithful to the troubled earthly reality in which we are enmeshed and bound.
"To have a hope of combating the end times fascists, with their ever-constricting and asphyxiating concentric circles of 'ordered love,'" the pair asserted, "we will need to build an unruly open-hearted movement of the Earth-loving faithful: faithful to this planet, its people, its creatures, and to the possibility of a livable future for us all."
The essay has been met with high praise from academics, activists, advocacy groups, journalists, and more, many of whom described it as "essential reading" and "terrifying but ultimately hopeful."
Climate campaigner and writer Bill McKibbencalled it "the darkest—and in some ways most light-filled—take on our dire moment."
J. Mijin Cha, an assistant professor of environmental studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz,
said: "This piece by Naomi Klein and Astra Taylor is so sharp in its diagnosis of what we are facing and the way we fight back. We don't fight fascism with fascism-lite."
"What I mean by fascism-lite is the way the Dems have seen migrants, trans people, people of color, and other marginalized people as disposable in this call for 'moderation,'" she added. "You don't get ahead by leaving people behind. We need to have a
positive vision. Not just—we aren't as bad as the other side."
Professor Deborah Lupton, leader of the Vitalities Lab at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia,
wrote on social media, "Read, weep, and then take action."
